Friday, April 08, 2022

America In Crisis: "Gay Cookies"
(Every Accusation Is A Confession From The Party Of Pedophiles)

This is not normal behaviour.

"I do not like gay cookies": Conservatives vow to boycott Oreo over new ad
Right-wing talking heads Greg Kelly and Ben Shapiro vow to boycott "gay cookies" after Oreo releases LGBTQ film
Ashlie D. Stevens, Salon, April 5, 2022

Boycotting Disney and Oreos: The red flags that MAGA is a cult
Cutting followers off from the rest of the world is a standard cult tactic — and a central tenet of Trumpism
Amanda Marcotte, Salon, April 7, 2022

Ari Drennen, Media Matters, April 7, 2022:
While Fox News has devoted segment after segment to covering Disney's opposition to the "Don't Say Gay" law passed in Florida, absurdly claiming that the entertainment giant supports "grooming" children for sex, the network hasn't found time to inform its viewers about a legislative attempt that could actually sexualize children. The network failed to cover a Tennessee bill that originally would have created a new category of heterosexual marriage with no lower age limit.
Meanwhile . . . :

Thursday, April 07, 2022

House Select Committee Investigating January 6 Is Considering Subpoenaing Trump To Testify Under Oath; Also: Possible Secret Service Scandal Re January 6 May Emerge

MSNBC reported on Thursday evening that the House Select Committee investigating the January 6 insurrection and attack on the US Capitol is considering asking Donald Trump to testify under oath before Congress.

As Seth Abramson outlines in his latest Proof article ("The Biggest Lie Trump Just Told The Washington Post Was About January 6. It Now Requires An Investigation."), if the Committee, having elicited testimony from Secret Service Agent Anthony Ornato, is discussing subpoenaing Trump, that is a big fucking deal.

Abramson wrote about the Secret Service and its possible involvement in Trump's attempted coup more than a year ago. On Thursday evening, he tweeted: "Let me tell you what's important about Ornato: his testimony can confirm that Trump knew there was going to be violence at the Capitol—before January 6."

The Washington Post reported on December 30, 2020 that "the Secret Service [under Trump] also took the unprecedented step of allowing [a] former detail leader [Ornato] to temporarily leave his job to become a White House political adviser" during 2020.

Ornato was "hired as White House deputy chief of staff. In that role, he helped coordinate a controversial June photo opportunity in which Trump strode defiantly across Lafayette Square to pose with a Bible after the park was forcibly cleared of peaceful protesters . . . [and] helped coordinate numerous rallies across the country during the pandemic, per Trump's wishes".

The Post further stated that Ornato was "slated to return to the Secret Service [after January 20, 2021]"  a situation which caused the Biden team some concern, as noted by Abramson in his article's conclusion, in which he drops a bomb (my emphasis in bold):
As we learned many months ago, [after taking office] Joe Biden had to engage in a large-scale, unprecedented culling of the Secret Service to weed out certain individuals who otherwise would have been serving very close to the new president. It appears, from major media reports, that this culling went beyond the usual process we see from an incoming president (especially one previously a vice president) with respect to them selecting as bodyguards those individuals with whom they feel most comfortable.

What Biden did was something else. As reports confirmed, some percentage of the culling effort made by the Biden administration had to do with its concern that there had been an unprecedented degree of partisan infiltration of the Secret Service. One imagines that the Biden administration eventually came to be aware of something the Biden transition team couldn't have known back in November or December of 2020: that even Vice President Pence was afraid of the radicalization Trump had brought to the Secret Service, refusing to get into a car driven by a Trump loyalist inside the Service on January 6 for fear that he would be whisked off to Maryland (which he had been told would happen if he did get in the car) but also not returned to D.C. in order to better effectuate Trump's coup plot (which no agent would admit to him on January 6).

The above facts confirm that an investigation of Secret Service complicity in the coup plot that failed on January 6, 2021 must go beyond Anthony Ornato, who at most was the instrument of men far more powerful than he. Congress must find out why Pence was afraid to get into a Secret Service-driven car in the midst of a national emergency that normally would've seen him obeying Secret Service directives without question (a tradition Trump and his co-conspirators, including Ornato, would have counted upon).

So what did Pence know about Trump's Secret Service—and its plans for January 6—that caused him to break with protocol in such an unprecedented way? (We learned in January of this year that the House January 6 Committee now wants to speak to Pence.)

The House January 6 Committee must also find out more from the leaders of the Stop the Steal "movement" about their self-admitted contacts with the Secret Service, all of which—and I mean all of which—fell outside the normal operation of the USSS, if in fact the events of January 6 unfolded as the three men have now publicly said they did.

And of course all of the foregoing makes it more important than ever that Congress demand an interview with Donald Trump under oath.

Trump could very soon be staring down the barrel of having to testify under oath before the House Committee. The Committee has been saying that it will hold public hearings in the next few months. Any questioning of Trump should be televised.

The Committee has conducted over 800 interviews and depositions of witnesses relating to January 6, including more than a dozen former Trump White House staff members.

Also, Trump is being investigated by the Justice Department and the FBI over his stealing 15 boxes of presidential records, which included documents that were classified at the highest level, and keeping them at his home in Florida.

Wednesday, April 06, 2022

Eric Boehlert, Media Critic, Killed In Bicycle Accident

Eric Boehlert, a progressive media critic and founder of the Press Run newsletter, was killed Monday evening after being struck by a train while riding his bicycle in Montclair, New Jersey. He was only 56.

The Daily Beast noted "the circumstances surrounding the accident were unclear". Boehlert's wife said he biked through Montclair every evening and always wore high-vis gear and flashing lights.

Boehlert wrote about music for Billboard and Rolling Stone before covering the media for Salon. He was also a senior fellow at Media Matters for America. He founded Press Run in January 2020, promising an "unfiltered, passionate, and proudly progressive critique of the political press". (I was a proud subscriber.)

Boehlert called out blatant disinformation and bothsides-ism in the mainstream media and was relentless about the steadfast refusal of The New York Times and Washington Post (and many others) to use the word "lies" to describe any of Trump's 30,000+ lies while in office. Once Trump was out of office and access was not an issue, the media gave in and used the word "lies" a few times, here and there, but not so often that you'd notice it.

Boehlert was also the author of two books: Lapdogs: How The Press Rolled Over For Bush and Bloggers on the Bus: How The Internet Changed Politics and the Press.

Two of his last tweets highlighted the double standard when reporting on the two political parties:

Tuesday, April 05, 2022

Trump, To Presidential Historians: "I Didn't Win The [2020] Election"

What I Learned When Trump Tried To Correct the Record
The former president made an unusual effort to influence how historians will view him.
Julian E. Zelizer, The Atlantic, April 4, 2022 (my emphasis)

. . . I am the editor of a scholarly history of Trump's term in the White House, the third book in a series about the most recent presidents. A few days after The New York Times reported on the project, Trump's then-aide Jason Miller contacted me to say that the former president wanted to talk to my co-authors and me . . . For someone who claimed indifference about how people in our world viewed him, Trump was spending an inordinate amount of time—more than any other ex-president that we know of—trying to influence the narratives being written about him. . . . According to Axios, Trump conducted conversations with more than 22 authors, primarily journalists, who were working on books chronicling his presidency. . . .

[O]ur conversation with the former president underscored common criticisms: that he construed the presidency as a forum to prove his dealmaking prowess; that he sought flattery and believed too much of his own spin; that he dismissed substantive criticism as misinformed, politically motivated, ethically compromised, or otherwise cynical. He demonstrated a limited historical worldview: When praising the virtues of press releases over tweets—because the former are more elegant and lengthier—he sounded as if he himself had discovered that old form of presidential communication. He showed little interest in exploring, or even acknowledging, some of the contradictions and tensions in his record.

The former president sat at a wooden desk in his Bedminster Golf Club with an American flag beside him. . . . Many of Trump's anecdotes came back to how he had talked—or intimidated—powerful actors into doing things that no other president would have been able to. . . . [H]e imitated the accent of South Korean President Moon Jae-In. . . .

He seemed to measure American politicians primarily by how they treated him. . . . Trump vented about governors who continually expressed during private meetings how impressed they were with [him] . . . As he has done many times before, Trump proudly mentioned his uncle who was a professor at MIT. . . .

[H]e eventually turned to the Capitol riot of January 6, 2021. According to his memory, the expert opinion was off. The "real story," Trump argued, "has yet to be written." When Congress met to certify the Electoral College results, Trump told us, there had been a "peaceful rally," more than a "million people" who were full of "tremendous love" and believed the election was "rigged" and "robbed" and "stolen." He made a "very modest" and "very peaceful" speech, a "presidential speech." The throng at the Capitol was a "massive" and "tremendous" group of people. The day was marred by a small group of left-wing antifa and Black Lives Matter activists who "infiltrated" them and who were not stopped, because of poor decisions by the U.S. Capitol Police when some "bad things happened."

During our hour together [a video of the conversation is included at the link], Trump didn't have many questions for us. Even in his attempt to correct the record, Trump mostly didn't acknowledge or engage with informed outside criticisms of his presidency. He did, however, admit to having sometimes retweeted people he shouldn't have, and at one point he said, "when I didn't win the election"—phrasing at odds with his false claim that the 2020 vote was stolen. . . .

He seemed to want the approval of historians, without any understanding of how historians gather evidence or render judgments. . . . In practice, professional historians gather their evidence by reviewing essential written and oral documents stored in archives—which is why so many in my profession shuddered upon learning that boxes of material were initially carted off to the former president's home at Mar-a-Lago rather than given directly to experts at the National Archives. . . .

A few days after our meeting, Trump announced that he would stop doing interviews with authors, because they had been a "total waste of time." He added: "These writers are often bad people who write whatever comes to their mind or fits their agenda. It has nothing to do with facts or reality."

Julian E. Zelizer is a history and public-affairs professor at Princeton University. He is the editor of the forthcoming book The Presidency of Donald J. Trump: A First Historical Assessment.

Monday, April 04, 2022

Truth Social Users Are Being Censored . . . When They Quote Trump!


Truth Social, the centerpiece of Donald Trump's revolutionary technology company, stumbled out of the gate in February and face-planted in the marketplace. It hasn't moved since then.

It was reported on Monday that Josh Adams and Billy Boozer, the chiefs of Technology and Product Development, respectively, at Truth Social, have resigned. One source told Reuters, the "brains" of the operation are now gone. "All bets are off."

When Trump announced last year that the app was coming, he promised it would be "a haven for free speech". However, Truth Social's Terms of Service state that you can be banned for making fun of Trump. Long-time Trump ally Roger Stone alleged last week that one of his recent TS posts had been "censored". Users who use Trump's "own words" in their posts are being censored.

In February, Truth Social chief executive Devin Nunes promised that the site would be "fully operational" by the end of March. It's now April 4 and absolutely nothing has changed. The news content is auto-generated, popular hashtags revealed mostly bot-generated posts, many of the app's functions don't work at all, and the site is overrun by crypto-hawking bots. The app's infamous "waiting list" is at least 1.5 million names long and moving slower than Trump walking up a flight of stairs.

Truth Social has been a punch line since Day One and Trump reportedly has been livid at the constant negative and humiliating coverage, demanding: "What the fuck is going on?" MAGA-dolts have complained about signing up, being unable to login, and then hearing nothing for weeks. Downloads of the app have dropped by 95%.

"Nobody seems to know what's going on", a Republican ally of Trump's said. "It should take a few days to fix, not six weeks."

Since it launched on February 21, Trump has posted exactly zero times. (His one and only "truth" was posted several days before the launch.) A source explained to The Daily Beast why Trump has been a no-show: "He wants it to be a hit first." (lol)

Adam Rawnsley and Asawin Suebsaeng, The Daily Beast, April 4, 2022:
The app is now just the 355th most popular app on Apple devices overall. And those who have downloaded it don't seem to be using it that much.

Daily active users—a metric that social media and tech companies use to measure how many engaged users an app has—stood at just 513,000 as of last week. By contrast, daily active users at Twitter—Trump's erstwhile and beloved social media home—were around 217 million . . .
Perhaps this was all merely a grift: a way for Trump to get tens of millions from investors, stick the money in his wallet, and make a semi-perfunctory effort at the app before letting it slowly die.

Our Top Story Tonight . . .

(h/t)

Sunday, April 03, 2022

Trump In Michigan, September 2020: "If I Lose, You'll Never See Me Again"
Trump In Michigan, April 2022: "I Was Right About Everything"

When Donald Trump was in Michigan in September 2020, he said:
If I lose to [Joe Biden] . . . I will never speak to you again. You'll never see me again.
That statement was not among the 30,573 lies counted by the Washington Post.

IT'S NOT A CULT.

* * *

He's Been Telling This Lie For 7 Years (The Award Doesn't Exist)

Self-Described Billionaire Begs Supporters For Cash 20 Times A Day

Friday, April 01, 2022

Transgender Person Excited To Work For Network That Repeatedly Lies,
Denigrates & Calls For Extreme Violence Against Transgender People

In the last three months (my emphasis):
Right-wing media get what they spent years asking for: Texas says accepting trans kids is "child abuse"

Right-wing media blame LGBTQ equality, "pride flags" for Russia's invasion of Ukraine

Defending Florida's "Don't Say Gay" bill, Fox's Tucker Carlson says teachers who talk to kids about gender identity should "get beaten up"

Candace Owens claims USA Today's designation of Adm. Rachel Levine as a "Woman of the Year" points to a government "Marxist" plot to take down "the nuclear family"

Fox leads hate campaign against trans college swimmer Lia Thomas, airing 32 segments about her in just 6 weeks

Fox host calls for "separate but equal" division for trans athletes after Lia Thomas wins NCAA championship

Fox hosts launch dehumanizing anti-trans attacks against Adm. Rachel Levine and UPenn swimmer Lia Thomas

On Fox, Babylon Bee managing editor Joel Berry claims the "trans movement" is a "cultic, religious movement"

Tucker Carlson claims "the trans thing" didn't exist four years ago

Tucker Carlson makes wild accusations of Disney acting like "a sex offender"

Fox is using the "Libs of TikTok" Twitter account like a wire service for anti-LGBTQ attacks

Fox contributor: Disney wants to "sexualize our children"

Fox's Laura Ingraham makes outlandish claim that Disney is "grooming" children

Fox picks up video from CRT alarmist to claim Disney is sexualizing children

Fox has mentioned "Disney" over 350 times this week (53 segments!), alleging the company is grooming, indoctrinating, and sexualizing children
So, how did it go?

Tuesday, March 29, 2022

Immediately After Voting Against Aid To Ukraine,
Pro-Putin Senators Attempt To Take Credit For Ukraine Aid

Thursday, March 24, 2022

A Scandal Of Immense Proportions
Wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Exchanged At Least 29 Texts With Trump's Chief Of Staff After 2020 Election & Pushed For Sidney Kraken Powell To Lead Legal Team
Other Reporting Outs Ginni Thomas As A Chief Architect Of Seditious Attack On US Capitol
Also: Where Is Clarence? Court Refuses To Say Why He Has Been In Hiding For Seven Days

"I wouldn't be in [Washington] if I wasn't on a mission." (Ginni Thomas, 1995)
Bob Woodward and Robert Costa of the Washington Post are reporting that Virginia Thomas, a far-right activist and the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, repeatedly urged White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, in a series of text messages in the weeks after the November 2020 election, to do everything possible to overturn the presidential election, which she described as "the greatest Heist of our History".

Thomas and Meadows exchanged a total of 29 messages. In one of them, from November 24, Meadows invoked God to describe the efforts underway. "This is a fight of good versus evil. Evil always looks like the victor until the King of Kings triumphs. Do not grow weary in well doing. The fight continues. I have staked my career on it."

Ginni Thomas actually pressed for lawyer Sidney "Kraken" Powell to be "the lead and the face" of Trump's legal team. Powell's crackpot theories and batshit claims about the 2020 election were one big reason why Trump's so-called "elite strike force" legal team went 0-62 in court. (The biggest reason was no fraud existed, which they readily admitted in court. Outside of court, they whined about widespread fraud.) Powell's loony tunes also prompted Dominion Voting Systems to bring a defamation lawsuit against her (and others) for $1.3 billion.
 
The 29 text messages were among 2,320 that Meadows provided to the House select committee investigating the seditious attack on the US Capitol. The existence of the 29 messages was confirmed by Meadows's attorney, George Terwilliger III. 

While it is not known if Thomas and Meadows exchanged additional messages in the time period between the election and Biden's inauguration two weeks after the Capitol riot, it seems highly likely, considering the topic of that flurry of conversation remained the top priority for Trump et al.. The January 6 Committee must subpoena Thomas's emails and texts immediately.

In the words of Norman Orenstein:
The wife of a Supreme Court justice is a radical insurrectionist. Her husband has refused to recuse himself from any of the cases in which she has been deeply and actively involved. This is a scandal of immense proportions.
We will see if it gets treated that way.

She also suggested certain members of the press should be shipped to Guantanamo Bay to face "military tribunals for sedition" and other capital (i.e., death penalty) crimes.

Justice Thomas, 73, is a serial sexual harasser and the longest-serving current justice (and who went 10 years without asking a single question from the bench). He has also been absent from the court for seven days. The only publicly released information is that he has "an infection".

The revelation of Thomas's messages with Meadows comes three weeks after lawyers for the committee said in a court filing that the panel has "a good-faith basis for concluding that the President and members of his Campaign engaged in a criminal conspiracy to defraud the United States" and obstruct the counting of electoral votes by Congress. . . .

In her text messages to Meadows, Ginni Thomas spread false theories, commented on cable news segments and advocated with urgency and fervor that the president and his team take action to reverse the outcome of the election. She urged that they take a hard line with Trump staffers and congressional Republicans who had resisted arguments that the election was stolen.

In the messages, Thomas and Meadows each assert a belief that the election was stolen and seem to share a solidarity of purpose and faith, though they occasionally express differences on tactics. . . .

The first of the 29 messages between Ginni Thomas and Meadows was sent on Nov. 5, two days after the election. She sent him a link to a YouTube video labeled "TRUMP STING w CIA Director Steve Pieczenik, The Biggest Election Story in History, QFS-BLOCKCHAIN."

Pieczenik, a former State Department official, is a far-right commentator who has falsely claimed that the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., was a "false-flag" operation to push a gun-control agenda.

The video Thomas shared with Meadows is no longer available on YouTube. But Thomas wrote to Meadows, "I hope this is true; never heard anything like this before, or even a hint of it. Possible???"

"Watermarked ballots in over 12 states have been part of a huge Trump & military white hat sting operation in 12 key battleground states," she wrote.

During that period, supporters of the QAnon extremist ideology embraced a false theory that Trump had watermarked mail-in ballots so he could track potential fraud. "Watch the water" was a refrain in QAnon circles at the time.

In the Nov. 5 message to Meadows, Thomas went on to quote a passage that had circulated on right-wing websites: "Biden crime family & ballot fraud co-conspirators (elected officials, bureaucrats, social media censorship mongers, fake stream media reporters, etc) are being arrested & detained for ballot fraud right now & over coming days, & will be living in barges off GITMO to face military tribunals for sedition." . . .

The next day, Nov. 6, Thomas sent a follow-up to Meadows: "Do not concede. It takes time for the army who is gathering for his back." . . .

On Nov. 10, Thomas drew a reply from Meadows. She wrote, "Mark, I wanted to text you and tell you for days you are in my prayers!!" She continued by urging him to "Help This Great President stand firm" and invoking "the greatest Heist of our History."

Thomas added in the message that Meadows should "Listen to Rush. Mark Steyn, Bongino, Cleta" – appearing to refer to conservative commentators Rush Limbaugh, Mark Steyn and Dan Bongino, as well as lawyer Cleta Mitchell, who was involved in Trump's push to claim victory in Georgia despite Biden's certified win there.

One minute later, Meadows responded: "I will stand firm. We will fight until there is no fight left. Our country is too precious to give up on. Thanks for all you do."

Nine minutes after that, Thomas replied, "Tearing up and praying for you guys!!!!! So proud to know you!!" . . .

Thomas then turned to her frustrations with congressional Republicans and said she wished more of them were rallying behind Trump and being more active with his base voters, who were furious about the election.

She wrote, "House and Senate guys are pathetic too... only 4 GOP House members seen out in street rallies with grassroots... Gohmert, Jordan, Gosar, and Roy." She appeared to be referring to Republican House members Louie Gohmert of Texas, Jim Jordan of Ohio, Paul A. Gosar of Arizona and Chip Roy of Texas. . . .

"Where the heck are all those who benefited by Presidents coattails?!!!" she wrote in her text message to him late on Nov. 10. She then told him to watch a YouTube video about the power of never conceding. . . .

On Nov. 13, she texted Meadows about her outreach to "Jared," potentially a reference to Jared Kushner, the president's son-in-law and senior White House adviser. She wrote, "Just forwarded to yr gmail an email I sent Jared this am. Sidney Powell & improved coordination now will help the cavalry come and Fraud exposed and America saved." . . .

Powell was becoming ubiquitous on television – and winning the president's favor, according to several Trump advisers – as she claimed without evidence that electronic voting systems had stolen the election from Trump by switching millions of ballots in Biden's favor. She claimed, again without evidence, that hundreds of thousands of ballots were appearing out of nowhere and that a global communist conspiracy was afoot involving Venezuela, Cuba, and probably China. . . .

Her views were considered so extreme and unsupported by evidence that David Bossie, a longtime Trump supporter, told others that she was peddling "concocted B.S." After Fox News host Tucker Carlson contacted Powell about her claim that electronic voting machines had switched ballots to Biden, he told his viewers that he found her answers evasive and that she had shown no evidence to support her assertion. He stopped having her on his program.

Ginni Thomas stood by her. "Don't let her and your assets be marginalized instead...help her be the lead and the face," she wrote to Meadows on Nov. 13. . . .

"This war is psychological. PSYOP," the [Nov. 14] text from Thomas states. . . .

On Nov. 19, which would be a crucial day for Powell as she spoke at a news conference at the Republican National Committee, Thomas continued to bolster Powell's standing in a text to Meadows.

"Mark (don't want to wake you)… " Thomas wrote. "Sounds like Sidney and her team are getting inundated with evidence of fraud. Make a plan. Release the Kraken and save us from the left taking America down." . . .

In that same exchange, Thomas also at one point offered Meadows advice on managing the West Wing staff.

"Suggestion: You need to buck up your team on the inside, Mark," Thomas wrote. "The lower level insiders are scared, fearful or sending out signals of hopelessness vs an awareness of the existential threat to America right now. You can buck them up, strengthen their spirits." . . .

Thomas then wrote, "You guys fold, the evil just moves fast down underneath you all. Lots of intensifying threats coming to ACB and others." Justice Amy Coney Barrett, sometimes called "ACB" by her supporters, had joined the Supreme Court in October, shortly before the election. It is unclear to what threats Thomas was referring. . . .

But Thomas's high aspirations for Powell quickly collapsed that afternoon. Instead of capturing the nation's attention at the RNC news conference, where she spoke alongside Giuliani and other Trump advisers, Powell was criticized for spreading a false theory about electronic voting machines as a tool for communists. Some Trump aides were horrified by her and Giuliani's performances and felt they had embarrassed the president by becoming a parody of his post-election fight.

As Giuliani spoke, a dark brown liquid mixed with beads of sweat rolled down his cheek. "Did you watch 'My Cousin Vinny?' " he asked reporters, tying a legal reference to the 1992 comedy.

Thomas wrote to Meadows, "Tears are flowing at what Rudy is doing right now!!!!" . . .

By Nov. 22, Trump gave his blessing for Giuliani and another Trump lawyer, Jenna Ellis, to issue a statement claiming that Powell "is not a member of the Trump Legal Team."

Thomas reached out to Meadows that day with concern. "Trying to understand the Sidney Powell distancing," she wrote.

"She doesn't have anything or at least she won't share it if she does," Meadows texted back.

"Wow!" Thomas replied. . . .

On Nov. 24, Thomas engaged Meadows again by sharing a video from Parler, a conservative social media website, that appeared to refer to conservative commentator Glenn Beck.

"If you all cave to the elites, you have to know that many of your 73 million feel like what Glenn is expressing," Thomas wrote. . . .

Meadows replied three minutes later: "I don't know what you mean by caving to the elites."

Thomas responded: "I can't see Americans swallowing the obvious fraud. Just going with one more thing with no frickin consequences... the whole coup and now this... we just cave to people wanting Biden to be anointed? Many of us can't continue the GOP charade." . . .

The text exchanges with Thomas that Meadows provided to the House select committee pause after Nov. 24, 2020, with an unexplained gap in correspondence. The committee received one additional message sent by Thomas to Meadows, on Jan. 10, four days after the "Stop the Steal" rally Thomas said she attended and the deadly attack on the Capitol. . . .

"We are living through what feels like the end of America," Thomas wrote to Meadows. "Most of us are disgusted with the VP and are in listening mode to see where to fight with our teams. Those who attacked the Capitol are not representative of our great teams of patriots for DJT!!"

"Amazing times," she added. "The end of Liberty."
Seth Abramson (Proof) has been reporting about Ginni Thomas's deep involvement in far-right circles and specifically regarding January 6 for several months. 

On January 30, 2022, near the end of a lengthy and mind-blowing presentation (nearly 14,000 words) of Ginni Thomas's far-right extremism and connections, Abramson wrote:
As a former federal criminal investigator [in the federal criminal justice system in Washington, D.C. and a longtime criminal defense attorney in Massachusetts and New Hampshire], I was trained to consider the relationships between all parties to a given event, the histories of all parties to an event, and the motives that these histories and relationships may disclose. I'm trained to deem past conduct a possible precedent for future conduct; lies as illuminating as truths; and the opportunity for a malfeasor to misbehave as the obvious and necessary precursor to a finding that they did. With all this in mind, and on all of these grounds, there is simply no doubt that Ginni Thomas and Barbara Ledeen are presently the foremost (if not the only) suspects in the matter of who transmitted to key members of Congress the coup plot John Eastman and Peter Navarro had devised with Donald Trump's knowledge.

Incredibly, the other chief suspects in this are all connected to Ginni Thomas and Barbara Ledeen by various means: Ali Alexander, a participant in Ginni Thomas's Groundswell group; Erik Prince, the man who helped train Project Veritas (run by Thomas's partner James O'Keefe) in intelligence-gathering; Michael Ledeen, Barbara Ledeen's politically well-connected husband, who has been involved in scandals in every Republican administration since Nixon's; Michael Flynn, a close friend of the Ledeens, and Michael Ledeen's co-author; Mark Meadows, whose Trumpist career was advanced in aggressive terms by Ginni Thomas, in part (but only part) by the awarding of an laurel Thomas devised to celebrate and advertise her favored political instruments; Cleta Mitchell, another participant in Groundswell, and one who also participated directly in Donald Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election; John Eastman and Peter Navarro themselves, the former of whom was in contact with Ginni Thomas in the weeks and months before the attack on the Capitol and the latter of whom spearheaded a "purge" effort inside the White House that was masterminded by Ginni Thomas and Barbara Ledeen outside of it; Presidential Personnel Office director and former Trump "body man" John McEntee, who assumed a position for which he was entirely unqualified because of a clandestine disinformation campaign against his predecessor Sean Doocey by–you guessed it–Ginni Thomas and Barbara Ledeen; Steve Bannon, whose media operation was hopelessly entwined with Thomas and Groundswell and who was himself a privileged guest of Thomas's secretive group on at least one occasion; and Donald Trump, who met with Thomas on a number of occasions to discuss the very topic at issue here: locating and positioning loyalists in government who would do anything Trump demanded of them. A small number of other tangential figures, like Jeffrey Clark at DOJ, would not have been key liaisons themselves, but were nevertheless somehow located and selected via a murky process run by Trump partisans; Thomas and Ledeen had spent years plucking men like Clark from obscurity for the sake of getting them to do Trump's bidding, and in the search for those who recruited Clark to participate in a coup plot in December 2020, Thomas and Ledeen would likewise be the prime suspects for any federal criminal investigator.

In short, as the House January 6 Committee seeks to connect three spheres of coup plotting–grassroots activists and political insiders, Congress, and the White House–there is no map of the key players within these spheres in January 2021 that does not have both Ginni Thomas and Barbara Ledeen at or near the center of it. The House January 6 Committee would be wise to subpoena these two women immediately in order to find out what they know as soon as possible. . . .

All of the foregoing puts in an entirely new light Ginni Thomas's husband–who, we are assured from those who know them both, she directly lobbies on matters before the Supreme Court–being the only member of the Supreme Court to rule that Donald Trump should be able to keep secret documents related to his contacts with advisers in the run-up to January 6 [Thomas chose not to write a dissent, thus providing no reason for his decision]. That Ginni Thomas appears to have been one of Trump's key advisers in 2019 and 2020, and that during this period she was working hand-in-glove with one of the most notorious election-year "ratfuckers" in the Republican Party, raises the question of whether Clarence Thomas had reason to apprehend (either under his own steam or at his wife's urging) that Ginni Thomas or her closest associates might well be implicated in January 6 plotting if all of Trump's presidential records are disclosed to Congress. Unless we assume that Ginni Thomas hid from her husband the nature of her contacts with Trump and her work on Trump's behalf–which would be impossible, given that Clarence Thomas was present at intimate gatherings with his wife and the former president; it is also not, according to friends of the Thomases, how their marriage has been structured for many decades now–Justice Thomas was aware of his wife's proximity to coup plotters like John Eastman when the issue of Trump's records being released to Congress came before the Court.

Jane Mayer of The New Yorker has also done great in-depth reporting on Ginni Thomas.

On February 22, 2022, the New York Times published a long feature on both Ginni and Clarence Thomas, which Abramson, in an article posted the following day, described as "oddly fram[ed]" and "a series of buried ledes".

In "New Revelations Indicate Ginni Thomas Was a Key Author of Trump's January 6 Coup Plot", Abramson wrote:

It's unclear why the Times did little to highlight these revelations; all are ensconced deep within an article it takes more than an hour and a half to listen to via an audio reading supplied by the newspaper.  . . .

These elements, combined with the January Proof report, confirm that Ginni Thomas was one of the chief architects of the events of January 6, 2021.

While it remains unclear whether the House January 6 Committee will now subpoena Ginni Thomas, it is increasingly evident that the Committee is gathering all available data on potential witnesses—including data published in venues like Proof, which the Committee has previously cited in its formal filings. For this reason, the article below may be of assistance to decision-makers wondering if Ginni Thomas has valuable evidence about the January 6 attack on the Capitol to offer both Congress and the FBI.

The short answer: she does. And indeed the evidence curated in the article that follows warrants the immediate issuance of a subpoena to Ginni Thomas for both testimony and documents. It warrants, further, the interrogation of Thomas by agents of the FBI. . . .

The New York Times focuses a majority of its article on Ginni Thomas on her husband, Clarence Thomas—a common mistake that Proof warned about at the very beginning of its own feature on Ginni Thomas. While the Times does admirably substantiate long-standing claims that the Thomases don't segregate their professional careers in anything like the manner they might like observers to think they do, it remains the case that, whatever the framing employed by the Times, Ginni Thomas's activities are considerably more newsworthy and influential than her husband's, deserving coverage exclusive from any consideration of Justice Thomas’s arch-conservative jurisprudence.

Over more than 10,000 words, Abramson laid out how "the public and private actions of a political activist" could be "more influential" than those of a Supreme Court Justice. He focused on five revelations about Ginni Thomas and January 6:

(1) Ginni Thomas's 2012 formation of Groundswell, and her role in the controversial Council for National Policy, includes shocking details not previously reported upon—all of which have immediate repercussions for the ongoing January 6 investigation.

(2) Ginni Thomas had much more access to Trump in the months before January 6 than we knew—and exploited her access repeatedly and even ruthlessly.

(3) Ginni Thomas (and her husband Clarence) are "close friends" with Trump attorney John Eastman—rather than, as was previously thought, merely acquaintances of his via his past clerkship for Justice Thomas.

(4) Eastman's backchannel communications with Ginni Thomas and the rest of Thomas Clerk World eventually involved an entreaty—one that he would have been sure Ginni Thomas would read—for those reading him (including Ginni Thomas) to "contact him directly."

(5) Ginni Thomas used one of her operations to promote the effort that ultimately came to be known as the "Green Bay Sweep"—the coup plot.

Abramson wrote:

[By 2018] Ginni Thomas had already become such a Trump fanatic that she could seamlessly entwine Trump, her husband, and Trump's second pick to be a new Supreme Court colleague for her husband, Brett Kavanaugh. At an event that was supposed to be kept secret (recording devices were prohibited), she thundered, "Even if [Kavanaugh] gets in [to the Supreme Court]—I believe he'll get in, I'm hoping he gets in—they're not going to leave him alone. They're trying to impeach him [already]! They're coming for my husband! They're coming for President Trump!" The Thomases' cause had become Trump's, and vice versa; the purported suffering of the men Ginni Thomas had put in Trump's path as ideal federal appointments had synchronized itself with the Thomases' own history of (as they saw it) suffering at the hands of their enemies. The Times recounts that it was the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings that first brought the Thomases and Trumps into one another's social orbits—an unsurprising concurrence, given that contentious Court confirmation hearings "define" the Thomases' decades-long history of "rage."

And yet, none of this evidence is needed to make Ginni Thomas a prime suspect in the planning of Trump's coup plot. While there is no evidence excluding Mrs. Thomas from suspicion, there is a mountain of evidence placing her at the scene of the crime. Her January 6 Facebook messages ardently supporting the rally at which Mr. Trump incited an insurrection via enraged partisans who later attacked the U.S. Capitol seem quaint by comparison to the hard evidence of her relevant involvements with Trump, Mitchell, Ledeen, Eastman, Meadows, Bannon, Kremer, Martin, Rich Higgins, and indeed almost every coup plotter at the heart of Donald Trump's insurrection scheme. . . .

So the question remains: what is the House January 6 Committee waiting for? Why is Ginni Thomas sacrosanct in a way no other witness is? . . .

The evidence that Ginni Thomas was at the heart of the planning of the events of January 6 is now overwhelming; the evidence that she kept clear of the pinnacle moment of her life's "mission" is non-existent. Her apparent lifetime of arrogant, "out of bounds" political advocacy has left her open to the ambit of responsible congressional and federal criminal investigations—if only Congress and the FBI will lift the "cone of silence" the Thomases have so carefully constructed.

On Twitter today, Abramson stated:

It appears, from the Post article, that the wife of a SCOTUS Justice—herself a Trump adviser—wrote approvingly to the White House chief of staff of "reporters...being arrested & detained for ballot fraud...& living in barges off GITMO to face military tribunals for sedition.” WTF

Indie journalists keep telling everyone how *profoundly dangerous* these avowed insurrectionists are, but maybe what it takes is one of the insurrectionist leaders getting caught privately speculating about members of the press being sent to Gitmo and tried for capital offenses.

* * *