Monday, January 14, 2008

Sermon for "Baptism of Our Lord" Sunday


I'm ready for the "push back" from those who will find this sermon "soft on sin" and want to know where's the part where we're saved by virtue of our baptism from our fallen nature as members of the wretched human race.

I'm remembering this morning a homily I heard last year on retreat with the Sisters of the Sacred Heart of Jesus in Philadelphia from one of the Roman priests who came to preside in the convent chapel. He talked about his early days in ministry, doing missionary work in Guatemala and the deep friendship he developed with his Protestant roommate.He said they had MUCH in common as they worked among the poor of the city and they had lots of great conversations about theology, mission and ministry.

The one chasm they couldn't bridge, however, was the one between their different views on the nature of humanity. His roommate, the priest recounted, was convinced humans are inherently evil beings who can only accomplish good through our baptism into the Body of Christ. The priest, on the other hand, was convinced that humans are inherently good and that our baptism into the Body of Christ enables us to resist evil and participate with God in making the world a better place.
.
I was struck by how concisely he articulated what is arguably the greatest theological division we face ... and not only in the Episcopal Church/Anglican Communion. So many of the arguments about faith, sexuality, gender and mission come back, again and again, to what it means to be created in the image of God as human beings and what it means to be “saved” as Christians.
.
All that was part of the “back story” in writing this sermon … one I hoped would help the congregation contextualize both theologically and historically the sacrament we were all about to experience together.


========

Be Yourself
January 13, 2008 ~ Epiphany 2A ~ All Saints Church, Pasadena
Click here for the video

The gospel appointed for this “Baptism of Our Lord” Sunday is a Gospel According to Matthew. We’ll get to that in a minute, but I want to start out this morning with a different gospel … a Gospel According to Oscar Wilde: “Be yourself. Everyone else is already taken.”

It is a gospel message I hope the young people being baptized today will take to heart and make their own – and that the parents and sponsors of our baptismal babies will do the same for them. For as we work together as a community of faith – as the Body of Christ – to help these children grow into the full stature of Christ – it is a gospel they will need to hear over and over and over again in order to claim it as their own – in order to believe that they ARE beloved of God, that they ARE anointed by the Holy Spirit in order to make a difference in the world, that they ARE deeply and abundantly loved, treasured and valued because of who they ARE … not because of what they do or believe or will achieve or accomplish.

Our agenda today – as we witness and participate in this baptismal celebration – is to be those “balcony people” the rector talks about – the ones who say, particularly in the bleakest and most anxious of moments, “Go for it. You can do it. You can make it. You’re made from good stuff. Be yourself. Everyone else is already taken!” And when, in a few minutes, we are asked to answer the question, “Will you who witness these vows do all in your power to support these persons in their life in Christ?” our chance to sign on to the balcony brigade is our answer: “We will” – an answer that makes this ritual of baptism a sacramental moment for ALL of us.

Jesus’ baptism was a sacramental moment for all who gathered on the banks of the Jordan that day as well -- and Matthew, the gospel writer, has his own agenda in telling the story the way he does. He wants to show his predominately Jewish audience how the story of Jesus is not just a story, but their story – and so he begins with a genealogy that puts Jesus squarely in the line of Abraham & Sarah and ends with Jesus, like his Hebrew ancestors before him, emerging from the water into the Promised Land on the banks of the Jordan.

In Matthew’s account of the baptismal moment, Jesus is anointed by John and the Holy Spirit as the new bearer of God's hope for the people, the new fulfillment of God's promise -- a promise which at the end of Matthew's Gospel we discover is not just about the people of Israel but "all nations" … a radical notion, indeed!

For in point of fact, Jesus’ coming out of the Jordan was a radical act -- an intensely political act. John first -- and then Jesus -- were setting themselves directly against those in Jerusalem who used their power to oppress God's people. And this “Baptism of Our Lord” we celebrate all these centuries later was a first step toward the showdown that would come between them.

And because this is one of the years when Lent comes about as early as it possibly can, we’ll very soon be hearing again the stories that leads to Jerusalem, to Golgotha and to the Resurrection – stories not of a violent march to the throne but a loving journey to the cross and beyond. But for today, we are at the Jordan River, where our focus is on God’s blessing and the anointing of Jesus as Beloved. That, Matthew says, is our story of promise. That, Jesus says, is our journey, too.

It is a journey that is not about making us feel more comfortable with the status quo of our lives, when so much of that status quo thrives on the backs of the poor. It is about challenging us to cast aside our own oppressive use of power and join Jesus on his journey of speaking truth to power, giving voice to the voiceless, being agents of change.**

I’ve been around this church a VERY long time – and I’ve seen a lot of change. I’ve seen enough to know that change is not only possible but attainable. I was baptized into a church where girls couldn’t grow up to be acolytes … much less deacons, priests or bishops. When, as a young mother, I served at my first Diocesan Convention as a delegate, my credential badge read “Mrs. Anthony Russell” … never mind that MR Anthony Russell’s participation in the mission and ministry of the Episcopal Church was to come on Christmas Eve and Easter Day.

My Aunt Gretchen, who died with a “Save the 1928 Prayer Book” bumper sticker on her car, was part of a Glendale parish that tried to – can you imagine such a thing? – leave the Episcopal Church over changes they couldn't handle: over the ordination of women. I could not in my wildest imagination – and I have a pretty wild imagination – have imagined that this church of my birth and baptism would change so much that in 2008 we would, under the leadership of a woman Presiding Bishop, be challenging the rest of the Anglican Communion to catch up with us as we continue to strive to fully include all the baptized in the Body of Christ.

We’re not quite there yet – but let’s not let the fact that we’re not quite there yet get in the way of celebrating all the changes that have brought us, as a community of faith, closer to the “full stature of Christ” as the Body of Christ in the world.

And I am convinced that a primary reason these changes that we celebrate this morning ARE changes we can celebrate this morning is that the sacrament we are about the celebrate – baptism – became the central organizing event in the theology, worship and work of the Episcopal Church with the adoption in 1976 of what some are still calling “The New Prayer Book” – a new prayer book with some very BIG changes.

For example, I remember when “good Episcopalians” would talk about “having the baby ‘done’” in scheduling the christening. And it was a “christening” … I didn’t hear so much about baptism growing up. I think it might have sounded, well, a little “Baptist.”

No, we “christened” our babies … and once they were “done” we went back home for a nice glass of sherry with the immediate family who had slipped in the side chapel for the sacramental moment that had no direct connection with the mission, ministry or witness of the church gathered on Sunday morning.

The “new prayer book” helped to change our theological focus – and my response to that change is “thanks be to God.” It was the shift to focusing on baptism that spawned the buttons we saw during the struggle for the ordination of women in the 70’s, “Ordain Women or Stop Baptizing Them.” And it is the centrality of our baptism that forms the foundation of our inclusion ministry today – it is the commitment to the ministry of ALL the baptized that sets us apart from some of our Anglican siblings.

I think it is, at least in part, my experience of that change that makes me hopeful we can actually make other changes – both in our church and in our nation – changes that cry out to be made at this time in our life together as Americans and as Episcopalians. It is my experience of that change that makes me both hopeful AND optimistic. Change and experience – they’re all the rage, aren’t they? Or at least they have been in the news of late – from places like … oh, Iowa and … New Hampshire.

Hear what our friend Jim Wallis has to say about that: “Even a candidate who runs on change, really wants it, and goes to Washington to make it, will confront a vast array of powerful forces which will do everything possible to prevent real change.” Which is why, Wallis says, “it will take a new spiritual revival to finally make serious social change really possible. Changing hearts and minds and forging a constituency who will demand nothing less than a new direction. Remember, President Lyndon Johnson didn't become a civil rights leader until Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks made him one. And that's what we need again now.”

That is EXACTLY what we need again now … and that is why what we do here this morning is so important. Not just important for Micah, Luke, William, Alexander, Nolan, Vanessa, Charlie and Nora who are being baptized today but for ALL who dare to take on the brave, audacious challenge of taking up the ministry of Jesus on earth – of BEING the Body of Christ in the world – of daring to, once again, say “I will” to the covenant questions asked at each and every baptismal occasion:

· Will you proclaim by word and example the Good News of God in Christ?
· Will you seek and serve Christ in all persons, loving your neighbor as yourself?
· Will you strive for justice and peace among all people, and respect the dignity of every human being?

These promises – this covenant – is our job description, our strategic plan and our marching orders as Christians all rolled into one. It is what empowers us and sustains us to be part of that “spiritual revival” committed to making serious social change really possible.

I began this morning with a gospel according to Oscar Wilde and so I’ll end with a gospel from this side of the pond … a gospel according to Ed Bacon: Faith in action is called politics. Spirituality without action is fruitless and social action without spirituality is heartless.

Micah, Luke, William, Alexander, Nolan, Vanessa, Charlie and Nora – in a moment we will baptize you into the household of God, invite you to proclaim with us Christ’s resurrection and to share with us in Christ’s eternal priesthood. And we will invite you to join us in being agents of change – of working together to turn the human race into the human family – to join us by putting your faith into action as we go about the work of bringing heaven to earth -- God’s Kingdom come, God’s will be done -- as we strive to proclaim by word AND example the Good News of God in Christ Jesus.

There’s a hurting world out there in dire need of dramatic change. May the experience of this baptismal celebration empower each and every one of us to go out and be the church in the world -- to be agents of change on behalf of the Gospel of our Lord.
.

Oh – and remember: Be yourself. Because everyone else is already taken! Thanks be to God. Alleluia. Amen.
.


====


**Credit to Mike Kinman of EGR (Episcopalians for Global Reconciliation") for this connection between the spiritual and political implications of Matthew's baptismal account.

Saturday, January 12, 2008

A Busy Day in the Diocese of L.A.

Yes, I'm still trying to get my sermon for tomorrow done, but am taking a break between events-of-the-day to celebrate MOST this amazing day which is bursting with grace and blessing and ... well ... God!

I'm missing the diocesan ordination today of nine new priests in the Church of God, but when I wrote about their diaconal ordinations in June I noted that:

I rejoice in the diversity of the candidates and in the joy and energy they bring to their new ministries as deacons in the church of God. I'm also rejoicing at a personal level as: Bonnie Brandon is a long-time friend whose partner is one of the chairs of our Diocesan Reconciliation Team, Lester MacKenzie is the grandson of Bishop Edward MacKenzie (formerly of Capetown SA and now in residence in the Diocese of Los Angeles) and a great friend and ally and David and Karen Maurer and I go back to Cursillo team Praise Band days when we had opportunities to make some very joyful noise together. (And might I note to the diversity squad out there monitoring such things that David and Karen are graduates of TESM ... that would be Trinity Episcopal School for Ministry. Please file that way for the next time this "liberal" diocese of mine gets attacked for excluding and oppressing anyone who doesn't "tow the liberal progressive party line." Thanks!)

Their ordination is in progress as I write at St. John's, Los Angeles -- our new "procathedral" here in L.A. -- and so prayers ascend for ALL the new presbyters as they take on new ministries, new opportunities and new challenges.

Meanwhile, back at the All Saints Ranch I've just finished presiding at the blessing of the union of Vanessa & Millie, witnessed by an intimate gathering of friends and family on the chancel and now we're gearing up to celebrate the life of Robert Salisbury Morton, former Senior Warden with a Requiem Eucharist. And THEN I'll get back to the Baptism of Our Lord ... as we look forward to welcoming into the Household of God eight small people tomorrow morning.

So thank you, God, for most this amazing day -- and for the privilege of doing your work in the world! (And, to be completely honest, in addition to all the other good things happening to day, the 76 degrees and sunny doesn't hurt!) Hope there's as much joy and hope and celebration in your Saturday as there is in mine today!
.

Lord Carey holds forth

Richard Vara offers this feature in the "Belief" section of today's Houston Chronicle:

Carey says Anglican Communion is in crisis
Former archbishop of Canterbury
wants U.S. church to give in to demands


From the article: Ten years ago, Carey presided over the 1998 Lambeth Conference which declared homosexual behavior as not scriptural.

"So what the American church has done by the election and then ordination of Gene Robinson is really actually turn its back on the voice, the moral voice of the Lambeth Conference. That's the problem basically. There is no way out of the problem now."

Still, Carey feels that if the Americans were to come out wholeheartedly for the Windsor Covenant, dialogue and reconciliation would be possible.
"If the Episcopal Church says, 'No, dammit, we are not going to go that way', then there is no dialogue," he said. "They are actually saying they are walking away from the family, they are closing the door. But if they are prepared to say, 'We will fall in behind the convenant,' then we can find a resolution.

"But there is no sign that the American House of Bishops realizes how serious it is," he said.

==============

From my comment on titusonenine earlier today:

No, actually, what there IS is no sign that the American House of Bishops is going to abandon its commitment to decades of discernment of the Holy Spirit that has led us to the place where, like Peter when faced with Cornelius (anybody else preaching that text on Sunday?) recognized that God shows no partiality and our job is to bring people to Jesus, not push them away.

Why do I think that a first century version of Lord Carey’s arguments were used at the Council of Jerusalem when Peter and Paul went head-to-head about the inclusion of the Gentiles? The Holy Spirit won that one and She’ll win this one, too ... in the long haul.

In the short haul, how sad that Carey is part of the problem by insisting that reconciliation short of capitulation is not possible. I’m double checking the Scripture text but ... yes, there it is ... with God ALL things are possible.

And now, back the aforementioned sermon ...

Friday, January 11, 2008

BREAKING NEWS: Schofield Inhibited

Episcopal News Service is reporting:

Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori on January 11 inhibited Diocese of San Joaquin Bishop John-David Schofield.

In the text of the inhibition, Jefferts Schori wrote: "I hereby inhibit the said Bishop Schofield and order that from and after 5:00 p.m. PST, Friday, January 11, 2008, he cease from exercising the gifts of ordination in the ordained ministry of this Church; and pursuant to Canon IV.15, I order him from and after that time to cease all 'episcopal, ministerial, and canonical acts, except as relate to the administration of the temporal affairs of the Diocese of San Joaquin,' until this Inhibition is terminated pursuant to Canon IV.9(2) or superseded by decision of the House of Bishops."

Jefferts Schori acted after the Title IV Review Committee certified that Schofield had abandoned the communion of the Episcopal Church.

Read the rest here ...

========

And may I just say ....

GOOD FOR HER!
.

NEWS FLASH: It IS about sexism!

Today's New York Times has this interesting "post-mortem" of the New Hampshire prmary, which indicates somewhat of a "wake up call" to women on the power of sexism: Women’s Support for Clinton Rises

“I do want Hillary Rodham Clinton to take the White House, but until she lost Iowa, I didn’t realize how much, or how much it had to do with her being a woman,” said Allison Smith-Estelle, 37, director of a program against domestic violence in Red Lodge, Mont.

What bothered them as much as the Iowa results, said several dozen women in states with coming primaries, was the gleeful reaction to her defeat and what seemed like unfair jabs in the final moments before the New Hampshire voting.

Michelle Six, 36, a lawyer and John Edwards supporter in Los Angeles, said she was horrified to hear Mr. Obama tell Mrs. Clinton she was “likable enough” in a Democratic debate on Saturday. Ms. Six said she found the line condescending, and an echo of other unkind remarks by other men about women over the years.
.
========

Need more? Check out this Truthdig commentary, which includes these fun facts to know and tell about the American media:

Television commentator Chris Matthews suggested last month that prominent male politicians who endorsed Clinton are “castratos in the eunuch chorus.” His MSNBC colleague Tucker Carlson declared that there’s something about Clinton that “feels castrating, overbearing and scary.” Why, Carlson said, “when she comes on television, I involuntarily cross my legs.”
.

What are the odds?

Here's a TOTALLY
"truth is stranger than fiction"
report from London:
.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Something ELSE to think about!

Taking a break from reflecting on The Baptism of Our Lord for Sunday's sermon, I checked my email and found the following information, forwarded to me by a parishioner from something called "TakeBackTheCourt.org":

=======

Election results in New Hampshire tell us that the primaries for both parties are far from over. On one very important issue, however, all the major Republican candidates have one thing in common: they will continue, in President Bush's footsteps, to push the Supreme Court dramatically to the right.

Here they are in their own words:

McCain:
"I'm proud that we have Justice Alito and Roberts on the United States Supreme Court." ... [And when asked whether he admires any Supreme Court justice in particular] "Of course, Antonin Scalia."

Huckabee:
"My own personal hero on the court is Scalia."

Romney:
"I think the justices that President Bush has appointed are exactly spot-on. I think Justice Roberts and Justice Alito are exactly the kind of justices America needs."

Giuliani:
"I will nominate strict constructionist judges with respect for the rule of law and a proven fidelity to the Constitution -- judges in the mold of Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito, and Chief Justice Roberts."

This country can ill afford more "judges in the mold of Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito, and Chief Justice Roberts."

The big story of the past week has been about Americans crying out for "change." We cannot change the direction of the country unless we change the direction of the Court.

===========

Amen.