Sunday, January 04, 2015

All about the space

It's cold. The days are short. But when the sun shines in winter, it can turn a well-structured garden into a shifting theatre of light and space.

When there's little else to distract the eye (those pesky pretty flowers), you can more easily absorb the importance of space in a garden.

Sadly, this doesn't hold true for most areas of our garden - I have a tendency to poke too many plants in, and there are large herbaceous/shrub borders which aren't very structured. However, on a trip to Erdigg today, I had the chance to admire good use of space and structure. In the low winter light, highlighted by frost, space provides a range of uses: it gives the eye a chance to rest; draws the eye to a view, and allows shadows to play their own dramatic role within the garden.

The low hedge below uses spaces to create a chequerboard effect, further accentuated by the frost.
 

 The pleached trees look more dramatic with their tortured skeletons exposed.

Ordered spacing of the cones draws the eyes onwards, through the gap in the hedge, to more shaped repetitions.

Spaces between the evergreens allow the low sun to cast shadows which separate each fruit tree by a frosted grassy finger.

More mundanely, spaces between branches and fruiting spurs on this 'Pitmaston Pine Apple' apple tree allow fruit to mature and air to circulate.

Not many of us have this much space, but the visit today has made me think about how I can make better use of space to allow the eye to rest within my own garden. A sunny winter's day is also a great opportunity to see how I can better use shadows as ephemeral art.

Wednesday, December 31, 2014

End of month view - December 2014

This is the first time I've taken part in Patient Gardener's End of Month View meme. I suppose I should have started in the summer, when the lush growth hides a myriad of mistakes, but it's nearly a new year, and so a time to look back with brutal honesty about where the garden is at the moment. The general dreariness of the garden was nicely complemented by the dull weather this afternoon, after several days of picturesque frost and blue skies.

The photo below shows the one bit of colour in the back garden at the moment, and one of the few plants we kept when we moved in -  Choisya (probably 'Sundance'). It's not a subtle shrub, but it just keeps on doing its thing. You can see that I have cleared a lot of dead herbaceous material, which I know is not the done thing nowadays, as the minibeasts need somewhere to overwinter. However, since Thomas came along I just can't keep up with the seasons, so need to get ahead of myself with a bit of autumnal and winter clearing and tidying. If the minibeasts can't make do with the extensive evergreen trees, shrubs and huge amount of ivy cladding the fences in which to make their homes, then I'm not going to lose too much sleep about it at the moment.
 

This shows the new pergola, which went up in July. It's looking bare at the moment, but there is a well-established Clematis 'Black Prince' at the back which will hopefully scramble over much of it in the Spring.


The optimistically named 'Spring border' (below). It contains an Amelanchier 'Robin Hill' which has been in for nearly three years now; the herbaceous plants in there have been in there for just over two years. I tried to put Pachysandra in as ground cover (yes, it's boring, but I thought it would be an indestructible evergreen carpet), but it appears to be slug and snail caviar. It looks better in spring. Honest. Prior to the Amelanchier, there were two large cherry trees that had been regularly 'lollipopped' into round heads by the previous owners. They did hide the houses behind, but were ugly.

The greenhouse is pretty empty, apart from endless empty pots, some over-wintering dahlias and a ravening horde of spiders.

The 'twigloo' is looking a little worse for wear after a few strong winds, but it won't take long to weave and tie back together in early spring.
 
 
Another border which looks best in Spring. The Acer 'Sango Kaku' looks good all year round, but this photo doesn't do justice to its beautiful red stems. The new fence panels are yet to be covered by a climber - I need to do a bit of planting in this area.

The tree ferns are doing well so far, as it has been such a mild winter.

The Stipa tenuissima planted along the bottom of the patio don't look their best after rain, then snow, then frost. Thomas is rather keen on jumping and rolling on top of them, which doesn't help either.
 
A view from one corner across to the greenhouse. We took the island bed out this autumn and put it down to grass seed. It divided the garden up nicely, hiding the far end of the garden from view, but it made the garden less useable for Thomas.

From the other side of the conservatory, looking down to the pergola. Adorned with a distant cat.
 
Perhaps the most ephemeral item in the garden at the moment - the remains of Thomas' first snowman.


So, not very exciting, no 'must see' plants. Just a whole lot of potential, waiting for spring.
Thanks to Helen at Patient Gardener for hosting End of Month View.

Monday, December 29, 2014

Promises

I'm not so good at this blogging thing any more, am I?

Perhaps the golden age of garden blogging has passed, or perhaps it is going on now, and it has passed me by. Perhaps it is still to come. So many questions, all of them a bit reflective and, therefore, somewhat pointless.

So, back to the title of this blog post. Promises. Besides encouraging me to listen to this, I thought I'd get in early with the New Year's Resolutions. I don't normally do them (see New Year posts passim) but had so much fun just reading through some of my past posts that I promise to myself to post at least once a fortnight on this blog in 2015. Hardly in the league of veteran bloggers such as VP and Patient Gardener, but maybe I can get back on track a little and find both my blogging and my gardening vibes again.

A pre-emptive happy new year to you all. Here's to a writerly and floriferous 2015.

Friday, September 05, 2014

What is a garden?

The student's first port of call for a definition, Wikipedia, describes a garden as "... a planned space, usually outdoors, set aside for the display, cultivation, and enjoyment of plants and other forms of nature. The garden can incorporate both natural and man-made materials".

Some argue that gardens can be art, and should be criticised as such. Well, some gardens, anyway. Hopefully not ours. Our garden is to art as a toddler's playdough man with head toppling off is to the beauty of Rodin's 'The Kiss'.

Others subscribe to the view of the garden as an outdoor room, for relaxing and socialising.

However, over this summer, I have discovered that our garden is so much, much  more than any of these views of a garden.

It has been:
- a scooter track
- a pirate ship
- the home of the 'shadow monster'
- a minibeast safari
- a steam train track
- a diesel train track
- an electric train track
- a monorail train track (do you see a recurring theme...?)
- a zoo
- an aquarium
- the sea
- a bus route
- somewhere to feed and identify birds
- a place to dig for buried treasure (potatoes, carrots)
- a place to dig for worms
- a place to build a worm house from mud
- a place to plant a bulb and watch it grow and flower and go over
- a place to mop and hoover (don't ask..)
- a place to help Daddy drill and saw
- a place to pick an apple and eat it, and admire the little worm inside it
- a place to throw yourself into the grasses again and again, until the grasses are flat and it's bed time



So, what is our garden?

An outdoor room? Maybe.
A work of art? Definitely not.

An imaginarium? Most certainly.

That's what our garden is. What's yours?

Wednesday, August 06, 2014

Wordless Wednesday - Framed


Friday, August 01, 2014

Floral Friday - right between the eyes

Never let it be said that my cut flowers are tasteful and subtle.





(Excuse the photo quality - it was 8:15 in the evening, so starting to get a bit dim. Unlike the flowers.)

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Friday, July 25, 2014

The box of delights

For the past few weeks, bulb catalogues have been landing on the doormat. Thoughts of next spring piling up, whilst we endure a sticky heatwave. I flick through the catalogues and my palms get itchy as I mentally heap variety upon variety of tulip, daffodil and crocus into a big box to be sent to me.
But wait.
Slow down.
I’d like to take five minutes to remind myself of muttered truths last year as I opened the box of delights. Or, to be more truthful, boxes of delights.
Firstly, a small reminder that I’ve tried to grow the gorgeous, flouncing tulip ‘Rococo’ three times now. I want it. It’s red and green and yellow and reminds me of something precious in my childhood which I can’t quite remember, but whose colours swirled in my mind. I so want to grow it. Yet it spurns me, sending up feeble, twisted leaves that wither and die before a bud can open. before my memory can be nudged towards recognising the precious thing it so reminds me of.
Secondly, just stick to a simple colour scheme. My plans of different colour schemes in different pots in different parts of the garden failed this year. I had images of ‘Cairo’, ‘Bruine Wimpel’ and ‘Abu Hassan’ making sophisticated statements on the patio. ‘Angelique’ and ‘Spring Green’ were to mix with ‘Groenland’ to give a pretty pink welcome by the front door. But a toddler keen to ‘help’ ensured that pinks mixed with bronzes to achieve… Well, I’m not entirely sure exactly what it did achieve. So, this year, just a range of colours that all blend easily, so that even my enthusiastic helper can cultivate a charismatic, coordinated container.
IMG_5569 One final stern word to myself. Make your order – fling virtual bulbs with wild abandon into the electronic shopping basket. Then stop. Take a cyber pen, and cross out not one quarter, not one half, but three quarters of the order. You’ll still have plenty, but instead of being boxes of regret and despair as you wonder how you’ll ever shoe-horn all those expensive bulbs  into an over-full garden, you’ll be able to enjoy uncovering the jewels within your small, but joyous, box of delights.tulip
Nah, you’re right – it’ll never work…

Tuesday, July 01, 2014

Of Rhubarb and Roses – a very late review

Of Rhubarb and Roses’ – The Telegraph Book of the Garden


Portraying a history of garden fashions through the years, edited by Tim Richardson.

This book came out an absolute age ago now, and I can only apologise for the delay in this review, but perhaps I’ll start a second rush at the bookstalls…

I was going to describe this book as a social history, but then checked myself – this is the Telegraph, after all. The working class get an occasional mention, such as when one old gent was acquitted of bodily harm after a shooting at an allotment. No, if you want to get an idea of what the working classes gardens were/are like, I suggest you read ‘The gardens of the British Working Class’ by Margaret Willes.

No, the Telegraph gardening column is frequently not for those without half an acre or more. Even the first article suggests that a first time buyer will have a garden large enough to accommodate beds for flowers and veg, room for a greenhouse, as well as a reasonable-sized lawn. Our first house did have a garden, within which you could, just about, swing a cat but only a reasonably tolerant one who didn’t mind a few blows around the head as he got struck by the fence panels on each gyration. I was particularly amused by Bunny Guinness’ 2002 article on accommodating children in a garden. I consider that we’re lucky enough to have room for a small willow wigwam as a den. Bunny suggests a range of activities and areas to keep children amused – a 14’ sunken trampoline, paddling ponds (plural, note), and a woodland play area which includes zip wires and hammocks. Oh, and two brief sentences about smaller gardens.

The topic of orchards comes around regularly – long time columnist Fred Whitsey returns repeatedly to the orchard he’s planning in his mind. In 1973, he was talking about medlars, quinces and mulberries. Mark Diacono brings up mulberries again, in 2011. Nothing new under the sun… Joy Larkom introduces us to oriental vegetables and cut-and-come-again salad in 1988, for this to be repeated ad nauseum by others. A lot of the articles on gardening are the standard stuff – there’s only so many ways to talk about pruning, digging and so on.

The range of writers over the years is a delight. Denis Wood and Fred Whitsey lasted quite some time. The earliest contribution included in the compilation appears to be from HH Thomas in 1938, talking about window-boxes – I love the reference to Funkias  - the former (and much more fun) name of Hostas. An article by Bill Deedes reminded me that he had been a politician, and taught me that he was quite handy with a scythe. Many writers have their own theme running through each contribution included in the book – Noel Kingsbury and the development of the new perennial movement, Dan Pearson and native planting, and Roy Strong and his habit of mentioning Highgrove and Prince Charles.  Actually, that is a bit harsh – to my surprise, he only mentions them once, and I really enjoyed his article on embroidery and its relationship to parterres and knot gardens. The obligatory Christopher Lloyd appears only once, I believe. It was interesting to read in one of Kingsbury’s articles that Germany is busy making new public parks that are maintained by the local council. We, on the other hand, close parks, cut down on maintenance and expect volunteers to do the jobs of the experienced park gardeners. What does Roy Lancaster think of that, I wonder? We don’t know, but we are told about his beginnings in an article by Fionnuala McHugh in 1991.

Women writers gradually encroached into the male-dominated environment. Vita Sackville-West made early appearances in the 1960s, and Constance Spry (florist) in 1954. More recently, women contributors have flourished, with regulars such as Sarah Raven (talking about cutting flowers – who’d have thought? And her with a seed shop…), and Beth Chatto, who discusses the importance of getting the plants right for the place. Germaine Greer’s writing was a delight, including her contemplation on snails. The Letters section included a series of correspondence to the RHS in 1967, after a comment by Lord Aberconwy (at the time president of the RHS) about the lack of women on the RHS council being “this little storm in ladies’ teacups”. The first woman was elected to the council in 1968 – Frances Perry.

As well as lords, there is the odd smattering of Dukes particularly in relation to grape exhibiting. In 1993 and again in 2010, articles report on the rivalry between the Dukes of Devonshire and Marlborough and their Muscat grapes. With a good 10 months hard work described by Sarah Raven to get grapes worthy of exhibiting, it’s rather disappointing that the dukes get all the accolades at the shows, and not their hard-working and skilled gardeners. It’s nice to see that the untitled Ms Walshaw beat the dukes on occasion.

Some of the most interesting articles to me are those either interviewing or giving a history of gardeners and designers. Elspeth Thompson writes of  an interview with Rosemary Verey in 1995. Verey describes herself  as a talented amateur. A talented amateur with sufficient money and impeccable connections, it has to be said – the second mention of Prince Charles in the book. I enjoyed Verey imagining she had a “small” garden. Her small garden would still be big enough to have parterres, as well as a separate vegetable plot. Talking of impeccable connections,   the obituary of Peter Coats, “social bachelor”, was a delight- educated at Eton, weekending with aristocracy, and a prolific name-dropper. Possibly my favourite article in the book was Maureen Cleave’s 1994 interview with Sir Geoffrey Jellicoe. I’d heard of Jellicoe, vaguely, and it was fascinating to read of his work as a landscape architect. Here was a man who outlived his 50 year plans that he had worked out for the sites he had designed. I was also delighted to discover that the original guerrilla gardener, Ellen Willmott, was also a shoplifter (allegedly) saved from prosecution by the intervention of the Queen.

Of course, there are articles on gardening and on plants, but many of these don’t stay in the mind so clearly – the cyclical nature of gardening means that we’ve probably read similar before. Growing asparagus pops up almost as frequently as the spears themselves do. Composting is a perennial favourite topic. Perhaps predictably, the use of chemical control of pests and diseases gradually ebbs as the years pass. The popularity of specific plants waxes and wanes. The rise of the new perennial movement is charted. And the bad-tempered gardener, Anne Wareham, carves a niche for herself as a sort of ‘anti-gardener’. I’d imagine that some of her articles make some Telegraph readers get cheerily grumpy about her views. Finally, Arabella Sock may be pleased and amused to hear that Brian Harvey had an article published, on meeting the needs of cats in the garden. Sadly, not *that* Brian Harvey, as the article was published in 1976, probably before the young man had been born, never mind run over his own head with his car or been mooted as the next presenter of Gardeners’ World.

This book was a delight to read, despite some authors occasionally causing my teeth to clench with their assumptions on the reader’s garden size and disposable income. Still, this is the Telegraph. Perhaps it’s a consequence of having a toddler, but the short articles made the book an easy and enjoyable read, and some of the nuggets within have made me want to seek out more. What more could you ask for from an anthology?

Note: I was kindly given this book to review by the publisher. This has not affected my views, which are entirely my own.