Thursday, March 01, 2007

Adult Swim draws more young men than ESPN and MTV? Dude!

Feb 28, 2007, 07:30 PM | by Joshua Rich

Aquateen_l It's now a month past that ill-conceived Aqua Teen Hunger Force (pictured) marketing ploy-slash-terrorism hoax in Boston, and the ratings are in. ATHF's home base, the Cartoon Network's Adult Swim broke all sorts of cable records in February among young and male viewers. Moreover, it extended its streak as the top cable channel among men aged 18-24 to 23 months — yep, more cereal-eating, pot-smoking, dorm-living homebodies watch Adult Swim than tune in to outlets like ESPN or MTV. Dude!

Man. Oh, man. The spin machine would have you believe that this achievement is largely the product of Family Guy and Futurama marathons and of Nielsen Media Research's recent decision to include college students in its count. But is that all there is to it? Isn't it possible that the ATHF stunt sparked interest in a show and network that many people hadn't heard about? (I admit to having been one of them — it's been years since I didn't inhale/was in college/had no life).

To be fair and fully disclose: Turner Broadcasting, which owns the Cartoon Network (and is a part of EW.com parent Time Warner), paid a $2 million fine of sorts, and the channel's honcho resigned. But does all this still leave a bad taste in your mouth? And what do the higher ratings mean for the marketing mavens of the future, who may be looking at the Boston thing with a certain twisted admiration?


RIAA Launches P2PLawsuits.com Riaa_1

As part of its new initiative to convince universities to turn over the names of students suspected of copyright infringement (more on that soon), the RIAA has launched its P2Plawsuits.com website, which, in a deliciously ironic twist, had previously hosted all sorts of ads for dodgy P2P clients.

On the site, students whose universities have agreed to turn over student names to the RIAA and users whose ISPs have agreed to turn over subscriber names to the RIAA can apply for a settlement by entering their case number, and even pay their settlement online, which the RIAA promises will be represent "a substantial discount" from what they would have had to settle for before this campaign launched.

The new process is a response to the RIAA's frustration with our legal system, which requires the organization to use the IP address of a suspected infringer to subpoena ISPs or universities for the name of the suspected infringer, after which settlement talks usually begin. In a conference call that ended minutes ago, however, the organization claimed that it launched the university-oriented part of this campaign as a response to file sharing defendants' pleas for a way to have settled the cases privately, so that their names don't become part of the public record.

The RIAA's latest letter-writing campaign -- with its "courtesy," er, "pre-lawsuit notices" -- is supposed to serve as a nice reminder to universities and ISP officials to turn over the names of those file-sharing students who appear to think their money is better spent on Ramen noodles and beer than music.

The new initiative, launched Wednesday, is remarkably similar to the RIAA's latest ISP program that asks providers to back the organization's piracy investigations by releasing any name tied to an IP address suspected of file sharing. The twist: The RIAA will be now sending letters to both colleges and ISPs officially asking for this info. The goal: Would-be defendants -- including students, universities and ISPs -- get a chance to settle with the RIAA before a costly lawsuit process begins, and the RIAA has a chance to skirt the hassles (like filing subpoenas) of a traditional legal processes.

The RIAA mailed out the first round of these letters, which it calls "pre-lawsuit notices," to 13 schools: Arizona State, Marshall University, North Carolina State, North Dakota State, Northern Illinois University, Ohio University, Syracuse University, U-Mass Amherst, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, University of South Florida, University of Southern California, University of Tennessee at Knoxville and the University of Texas at Austin.

Aside from encouraging the universities to turn over the names of the suspected infringers, the letters ask that copies of the notices be given to the students in question. If students settle their cases over the phone or on P2PLawsuits.com within 20 days of their university's receipt of the letter, the RIAA promises their settlement will be at a "substantial discount." That's compared to the typical settlement offering, which is estimated at around $3,000. (The RIAA won't release an actual settlement average.)

Universities are now contemplating whether they should consult with students before turning over their names. Sally Linder, a spokeswoman for Ohio University, told Wired News that the initial RIAA "courtesy letter" showed up last night, but that it does not contain the IP addresses of the 50 students suspected of infringement. That data will arrive in a later document, possibly because the RIAA wants to test the waters for a potential backlash before disclosing the IP addresses to universities.

Linder said that once the second document with the IP addresses arrives, "(Ohio University) attorneys will be reviewing this new request and determining the most appropriate response under the law and university policy." She said two laws would come into play: "the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act, which protects the privacy of student records, and the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, which the university complies with. We at the university don't condone illegal downloading and sharing, and we have clear policies regarding computing resources."

Note to students: Start saving your beer money -- you might need it for court.


Variety.com

Academy threatens YouTube

Site removes unauthorized Oscar clips

Web surfers will no longer be reliving the magic moments of the 2007 Oscarcast via YouTube. The vid-viewing site complied with a Tuesday request from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences to remove all unauthorized clips of the kudocast.

Several segments of the show, including host Ellen DeGeneres' opening monologue and musical numbers featuring Will Ferrell and Beyonce, had been among YouTube's most-viewed content this week.

Ferrell's musical lament about how comedies never win Oscars, sung with Jack Black and John C. Reilly, had racked up more than 250,000 views on YouTube before it was replaced with the message "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Academy of Motion Pictures Arts & Sciences."

Ric Robertson, exec administrator for the Academy, said the organization had its content pulled "to help manage the value of our telecast and our brand."

The official Oscar.com Website, which is run as a joint venture of the Academy and Disney's ABC.com, features a five-minute clip of highlights from the three hour, 51 minute broadcast. That footage, along with "Thank-You Cam" videos from backstage, are preceded by ads.

But Robertson said that the ads weren't a factor: "Even if Oscar.com didn't have clips, we would have asked YouTube to take remove the excerpts."

None of the show's musical numbers or DeGeneres' monolog were available in their entirety on Oscar.com.

Robertson said there are no plans to post additional video clips on Oscar.com; in fact the current clips will eventually vanish, to "whet people's appetite for next year's show."

The Academy doesn't regularly offer a version of the show on homevideo, and Robertson said that having the clips removed from YouTube was "really not about (protecting that) business opportunity."

One of the only elements of Sunday's show that remains on YouTube is one of the commercials: a cinema-centric Apple spot promoting its forthcoming iPhone.

"Media companies and content owners have not been that aggressive about two things: offering lots of clips on their sites and offering interactivity, like the ability to include a clip in a blog or email it to a friend," said Will Richmond, president of Broadband Directions, a market intelligence firm that focuses on Internet video. "The absence of both of those elements has created this vacuum into which YouTube and others have jumped."

Earlier this month, Viacom asked YouTube to delete more than 100,000 clips of its programming.

On Monday, Google CEO Eric Schmidt told Reuters that YouTube will soon make technology available to media companies that will enable them to prevent the unauthorized uploading of their content. YouTube was purchased by Google last year.


washingtonpost.com
Skeptics Question XM-Sirius Merger Plan

Mel Karmazin, chief executive of Sirius Satellite Radio, appears before a House task force to explain why his company should be allowed to merge with its lone rival, District-based XM. Karmazin would head the merged company.

By Charles Babington
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 1, 2007; D04

The nation's two satellite-radio companies promised yesterday to refrain from raising prices, for a time at least, if they are allowed to merge. But some lawmakers and consumer groups appeared dubious.

Mel Karmazin, chief executive of Sirius Satellite Radio, told the House Judiciary Committee's antitrust task force that consumers would benefit if the government allowed his company to merge with rival XM Satellite Radio Holdings. "We are committed to not raising prices, and we are committed to lowering prices," said Karmazin, who would be chief executive of the new company.

The panel's chairman, Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.), responded: "How do we enforce promises? . . . 'Trust me' isn't going to work here."

Karmazin said Sirius and XM might accept conditions if the Federal Communications Commission and Justice Department were to approve the merger. But he declined to say how long they might agree to cap subscription prices, now set at $12.95 a month by both companies. XM and Sirius have said a merged company would offer various levels of content, presumably at varying prices, but they have declined to provide details.

Owners of free, over-the-air radio stations strongly oppose the merger, and the president of their association sharply challenged Karmazin at the hearing. The government cannot trust XM's and Sirius's promises, "given their long track record of breaking FCC rules," including causing signal interference with local radio stations, said David K. Rehr, president of the National Association of Broadcasters.


The New York Times
Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By


March 1, 2007

NBC May Oust Evening News Executive

NBC’s dominance in television’s evening news race is undergoing its most serious challenge in a decade as “World News” on ABC scored its second ratings victory in the last three weeks. The figures highlight the slow but steady ascent of the veteran ABC newsman Charles Gibson toward the top position among news anchors.

In what is being widely interpreted as fallout from the shifting ratings picture, NBC has made plans to replace the executive producer of the network’s “Nightly News With Brian Williams,” according to several NBC executives.

A successor to the current executive producer, John Reiss, may be announced as early as today, the NBC executives said, emphasizing that a change in the newscast had been in the works for several weeks and was not related to the most recent ratings results. The NBC executives asked not to be identified because the change had not yet been formally announced.

The looming change in the control room at “Nightly News” and the ratings surge by Mr. Gibson are but the latest developments in the most tumultuous two years in the recent history of broadcast news.

Mr. Williams succeeded Tom Brokaw in December 2004. After that, Dan Rather resigned as anchor at CBS in the midst of a reporting scandal, and was soon succeeded by Katie Couric. Peter Jennings died of lung cancer while still the lead anchor at ABC, and one of Mr. Jennings’s designated successors, Bob Woodruff, nearly died in a roadside bomb explosion in Iraq, setting off a sequence of events that ultimately led to Mr. Gibson’s move to the anchor desk at “World News.”

Only six months before Mr. Gibson got the evening news job, he was effectively passed over for it, in favor of two much younger journalists, making his current run at Mr. Williams’s broadcast all the more remarkable.

Even as some young viewers forsake television for the Internet, the three network newscasts continue to attract a collective audience of nearly 25 million viewers most nights. The programs are also among the most lucrative for the networks, with advertisers planning to spend nearly half a billion dollars on them this year.

More than a few viewers, and advertisers, choose their broadcast based on the personal strengths of those anchors. That has left some people at the networks wondering whether Mr. Gibson — who, at 63, is the oldest and most established of the three — may be proving more attractive to more viewers than Mr. Williams and Ms. Couric.

One NBC executive who did speak for the record yesterday, Steve Capus, the president of NBC News, would not confirm that any decision had been made about replacing Mr. Reiss. But he dismissed any conclusions being drawn from the recent ratings, saying that NBC had experienced surges by ABC during previous special ratings periods, known as sweep months. He all but guaranteed that NBC’s anchor, Mr. Williams, would regain supremacy in the ratings in a matter of weeks.

But the results for Mr. Gibson and ABC over the last month or so certainly present at least the potential that a tipping point may be coming in the evening news competition. If ABC’s newscast managed to eclipse NBC on Tuesday and last night by the same margins it has achieved in recent weeks, ABC will probably beat NBC for the entire sweep month of February, in both total viewers and in the chief advertising sales category for news, viewers from the ages of 25 to 54. That would be the first time ABC News had managed that double victory since November 1996.

Mr. Gibson’s progress in closing the gap with Mr. Williams had gone largely unnoticed in the initial torrent of attention that accompanied the arrival of the former host of NBC’s “Today” show, Ms. Couric, as the anchor of “CBS Evening News.”

Mr. Williams had led the news ratings virtually every week since taking over for Mr. Brokaw, the longtime leader, in December 2004.

Mr. Williams’s broadcast remains the most-watched among viewers this television season, drawing about 9.3 million each night, compared with 8.8 million for Mr. Gibson and 7.5 million for Ms. Couric, according to Nielsen Media Research.

But for the four-week period that began Jan. 29 and ended last Friday, Mr. Gibson’s broadcast was seen by an average of 9.69 million viewers a night, about 43,000 more than the 9.65 million who watched Mr. Williams’s newscast. (Ms. Couric’s CBS program trailed at 7.6 million.)

More notable has been the erosion in Mr. Williams’s lead over the last year. Erosion is not uncommon for the network newscasts, which have been steadily losing viewers. Still, Mr. Williams has lost an average of a little more than 570,000 viewers over the last year; Mr. Gibson’s audience has grown by just under 60,000 viewers.

Ms. Couric’s CBS newscast, which remains a distant third, has lost about 120,000 viewers from the program that was led last year at this time by Bob Schieffer. Asked yesterday whether any changes were in the offing for the CBS newscast, Sean McManus, the president of CBS News and Sports, said: “As we’ve said all along, this is a very long process that takes many months, if not years. We’re not losing any patience.”

Through a network spokesman, Mr. Gibson declined a request to be interviewed yesterday. What is perhaps most remarkable about his broadcast’s moving within striking distance of Mr. Williams’s — and perhaps causing NBC to react by shaking up its newscast’s management — is that Mr. Gibson is occupying the anchor chair at ABC at all.

At least twice in the last decade, ABC News marginalized Mr. Gibson’s role to the point that he contemplated leaving the network — only to have ABC call upon him to rescue a program.

The first time was in 1998 when, after 11 years as a co-host with Joan Lunden on “Good Morning America,” he left the program under pressure from network executives as its ratings sagged well below those of “Today” on NBC. At the time, he contemplated assuming a part-time role at ABC News, so that he might accept an offer to take a lead role as host of the “Biography” series on the A&E Network.

But less than a year after Mr. Gibson left “Good Morning America,” David Westin, the president of ABC News, urged him to reassume his post as co-host of the program, this time alongside Diane Sawyer, after the program sagged further under the anchor team of two neophytes, Lisa McRee and Kevin Newman.

In April 2005, after Mr. Jennings took leave of “World News Tonight,” as the program was then known, to be treated for lung cancer, Mr. Gibson was one of several anchors (including Ms. Sawyer and Elizabeth Vargas) who pinch-hit for him until his death in August 2005, and then continued to rotate in and out of Mr. Jennings’s empty chair for four months.

That December, Mr. Westin announced that he had selected Ms. Vargas and Mr. Woodruff, both in their 40s, as a permanent anchor team to succeed Mr. Jennings. In an interview on Dec. 5, the day of the announcement, Mr. Gibson, then 62, acknowledged that he had, effectively, been passed over for the job. At the time, it was widely believed that Mr. Gibson would leave “Good Morning America,” and probably ABC, when his contract was up in June 2007.

And yet, less than a month after the new anchor team began on “World News,” fate again played a hand in Mr. Gibson’s career. In late January, Mr. Woodruff was wounded and began a long recuperation. The plan for the anchor team was scrapped. Mr. Gibson was once again pressed into duty (as was Ms. Sawyer) to work with Ms. Vargas behind the anchor desk.

As for Ms. Vargas, she announced soon afterward that she was pregnant with her second child. Last May, Mr. Westin announced that the job of anchor of “World News” was now Mr. Gibson’s outright, and that he was leaving “Good Morning America.”

In an interview that day, Mr. Gibson said: “I am to some extent a creature of circumstance to horrendous events, Peter’s illness and Bob’s injury, and to a joyous event, but nonetheless one that affected all of us, which is the pregnancy for Elizabeth.”

On Tuesday night, in a stark reminder of that unsettled period, Mr. Gibson welcomed Mr. Woodruff back to the “World News” set, for an unusually long interview that touched on the details of his recovery .

Jon Banner, the executive producer of “World News” for Mr. Gibson (and Mr. Woodruff and Mr. Jennings before him), said: “To stand there with Charlie and Bob just before the broadcast was a miracle.”