Thursday, August 02, 2007

The New York Times
Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By


August 2, 2007

Elle Has a Little Work Done

THE most glamorous thing about the offices of Elle magazine is that they have an excellent view of Condé Nast, eight blocks to the south, where Vogue and GQ and Vanity Fair exist in movie-set-worthy splendor and Town Cars idle in perpetuity. Roberta Myers, the editor of Elle, wears Prada, but she takes the subway to work.

Her corner office on the 44th floor of Paramount Plaza is populated by secondhand leather couches and silver floor lamps, a dark void at the end of a long, drab hallway lined with faded covers of issues past. And yet the threadbare offices of Elle appear less desperately in need of an update than the face of the magazine itself. Like Ms. Myers’s office, Elle is in transition, itself the subject of a makeover not unlike those ducklings-turned-swans featured in the magazine.

To the fashion world, Elle’s visual identity has become predictable to the point of redundancy, losing the spunk of its early years. The imagery of sexy, confident women posing in desert oases against impossibly blue skies seemed to give way to the personal swimsuit fetishes of its longtime creative director, Gilles Bensimon.

Mr. Bensimon, according to those who worked with him, demanded unusual control over every image — the clothes, the hair, the models — appearing in the magazine. For years, he personally photographed most of the fashion features.

“I don’t think that was only perception, as anyone who looked at the magazine could see,” Ms. Myers, 45, said. “Fashion is about image. It’s a story that you have to tell visually, and you cannot do that in only one voice.”

It was not until the end of last year that Mr. Bensimon, 63, began to concede space to outside photographers and stylists, leading to a redesign of the magazine by Joe Zee, its new creative director, who was imported from Condé Nast in January. The new look Mr. Zee has been developing will be fully unveiled in the September issue, which goes out to subscribers next week. Elle is already generating controversy (or buzz, depending on your view) for putting the troubled actress Lindsay Lohan on the cover.

“It is a big change,” said Mr. Bensimon, who in an interview late Monday night brushed aside persistent reports of his resistance to the changes. He will continue to photograph Elle’s covers and some features for its 39 international editions, but his title is now international creative director and his name has moved from the top of the masthead to the bottom.

“For me it is a positive,” Mr. Bensimon said, before turning philosophical. “What can you do if you are always thinking that it was better before? Let’s think about tomorrow.”

Since Mr. Zee, 38, the former fashion director of W and editor of the short-lived Vitals shopping magazine, took over, there have been indications that Elle intends to become a more provocative read.

Ms. Myers and Mr. Zee chose Ms. Lohan for the September cover in the spring. Days after the actress was interviewed and photographed, paparazzi shot her passed out in a car over Memorial Day weekend, and she entered rehab for the second time in six months. The magazine decided to leave her on the cover. She appears in a Venus pose, pulling up the hem of a violet Donna Karan dress. A quotation from her says, “I’m glad I went to rehab — I needed to get away from everyone and I didn’t know how.”

The image — with the actress’s words — was shipped to the printer before Ms. Lohan’s latest arrest last week on charges that included driving under the influence and cocaine possession. It is a turn of events that may render the cover bizarrely ironic.

THAT is not the only controversy Ms. Myers must contend with. In Elle’s transition to a post-Gilles Bensimon era, it has been plagued by reports of budget cuts, canceled trips for editors to the couture shows in Paris and reduced access to car services.

Twenty of its 59 editorial staff members and freelancers on the masthead have departed this year, according to a count by Jennifer Gerson, Ms. Myers’s former assistant, who is now blogging on the Web site Jezebel.com. These include two of the magazine’s most recognizable faces — Isabel Dupré, its style director, and Carlyne Cerf de Dudzeele, the fashion editor-at-large.

A staff member who remains at Elle said the senior employees who departed were loyal to Mr. Bensimon. “They banded themselves together as a way to survive, until the ship went down,” said the person, who requested anonymity because employees are not permitted to speak about personnel matters.

Ms. Myers, for her part, did not deny the number of departures but declined to comment on particular employees. She said the magazine’s parent company, Hachette Filipacchi Media, continued to invest in Elle and that any financial cutbacks resulted from routine reviews of budgets.

Nevertheless, Elle has an image problem in the fashion industry. Although its newsstand sales have shown healthy gains for the last three years, it has settled into third place among its American competitors, trailing in total ad pages for the year behind Vogue and In Style. “Vogue represents the ideal of fashion,” said Italo Zucchelli, the men’s designer for Calvin Klein. “Elle is for real people. It does its job, but I never read it.”

For years before its redesign, Elle had been consistent, popular with readers but relatively ignored by fashion insiders. Carol A. Smith, group publishing director, conceded that the magazine lacked excitement. “Some people felt it had gotten sleepy,” she said. “It wasn’t that at all. People weren’t talking about it.”

On the wall behind Ms. Myers’s desk there is a poster created by Paul Ritter, Mr. Zee’s collaborator since Vitals and now the design director of Elle, with words underlined in what appears to be pink lipstick: “Energy! Sexy! Fun! Smart!” This is the mission statement for Elle, Ms. Myers said, intended to encapsulate both its visual and editorial tone in the redesign, which is most dramatic in the injection into the 592-page issue of arresting work by young photographers like Tom Munro, Matthias Vriens, Doug Inglish and Todd Cole. Lori Goldstein, the stylist, is in talks to work for the magazine.

The September issue includes a new column by Nina Garcia, the fashion director whose manicured claws appear on “Project Runway,” and some intriguing articles, notably Megan Deem’s critical report on Myfreeimplants.com, a Web site that connects women with men who would like to sponsor their breast implants. Yet other articles seem to exist as quid pro quo to advertisers, like a profile of Kate Winslet on the occasion of her endorsement deal with Lancôme, or the requisite 40th anniversary tribute to Ralph Lauren.

Of course, none of this will draw more attention to Elle than Ms. Lohan, who is shown in fashion photographs by Mr. Bensimon, his sole contribution to the issue, and a story by Holly Millea that conveys Ms. Lohan’s rampant narcissism. Ms. Myers insisted the choice was never in doubt. The September 2006 cover of Elle with Ms. Lohan was the best seller of the year, and readers would undoubtedly be more interested in the actress after the scandal. Unfortunately, Ms. Myers chose a subject who refuses to behave according to production schedules.

“Lindsay Lohan is a potential embarrassment for them,” said Steven Cohn, the editor of Media Industry Newsletter. “I would think she is just about worthless as a marketing tool.”

On July 24, the day Ms. Lohan was arrested, Ms. Myers and Mr. Zee were in a photo studio in Chelsea, working on a feature about personal style for the October issue that would include portraits of several stylish individuals, including the actress Sienna Miller and her sister, Savannah, who were posing madly for the photographer, Alexei Hay.

“Move your arms like a sorceress,” Mr. Hay commanded.

No one seemed disturbed by the news about Ms. Lohan or how the issue would be received.

“Read the story, look at the treatment, and then we can talk about it,” Ms. Myers said. “I think it’s a piece of journalism.”

But wasn’t Ms. Myers disappointed?

“We still think the story as written gives insight to her situation right now,” she said.

Mr. Zee said that Ms. Lohan and her peers, in spite of their behavior, have had a meaningful impact on fashion, pointing to trends that originated with the Olsen twins, Paris Hilton and Britney Spears. Elle addresses this paradox with a fashion story that looks as if it was ripped from the pages of Star magazine, with a model dressed in designer clothes to look as if she were caught by paparazzi while taking out the garbage in a Versace bathrobe or awkwardly adjusting a Chanel bikini. (It is similar to a feature by Steven Meisel in the January 2005 issue of Italian Vogue.)

“Yes we have Lindsay on the cover and she looks beautiful and she’s a fashion girl, but I didn’t want people to think we’re also not aware of what people perceive Lindsay to be,” Mr. Zee said.

Mr. Zee grew up in Toronto reading fashion magazines in high school, and as a student at the Fashion Institute of Technology, he redesigned the school newspaper. He can distinctly remember a cover of Elle with the model Ashley Richardson in red. “It was fresh and vibrant,” Mr. Zee said. “It was young and sexy. It was just bold and in your face. That was the part I always remembered.”

Asked about his vision for Elle, the words were repeated in energetic bursts: “I would love to see a girl walking down the street and be dressed like our pages, and for someone to look at her and say: ‘Oh my God. She is so Elle.’ ”

Mr. Bensimon is less emotive about the future of Elle, although he said he planned to continue to be a part of it.

“I think it is not safe to tell them what to do,” he said. “A photographer is better behind the camera, not in front. And I would like to take pictures until the last day of my life, even if it is of my own foot.”

Lawsuit: Rod Stewart's son beat me up

Sean StewartSean Stewart is the son of Rod Stewart and Alana Stewart.

LOS ANGELES, California (AP) -- Rod Stewart's son has been sued by a man who claims Sean Stewart beat him up at a Hollywood nightclub last year.

The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in Los Angeles by Daniel Refoua, accuses Stewart of assault, battery, false imprisonment, negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Refoua's lawyer, Sean Bral, said his client was beaten up January 5, 2006, by a group including Stewart after accidentally bumping into the singer's son at Hollywood's LAX nightclub.

The melee followed an argument between Refoua and Stewart, who had a bodyguard with him, Bral said.

"The next thing you know, he gets punched in the face and he's getting punched by Stewart and his bodyguard and whoever it was who was with him," he said.

Refoua, who is in his 20s, suffered a fractured nose and other injuries, Bral said. The lawsuit seeks unspecified general, special and punitive damages.

"We invite him to come forward if they want a resolution in this, to sit down early to talk as opposed to later," Bral said.

Stewart's lawyer, Peter J. Korn, did not immediately respond to a phone message seeking comment.

Additional lawsuits may be filed against the others accused of attacking Refoua, Bral said.

The lawsuit comes about two months after Stewart, one of the stars of the A&E reality show "Sons of Hollywood," was arrested in a separate attack on a couple outside a Hollywood Hills party.

The couple said they were in a truck in April when Stewart and others confronted them and began punching and throwing bricks at them and the vehicle.

Stewart has pleaded not guilty to felony charges in the case. He remains free on $60,000 bail pending a hearing Monday.

Korn said the incident is "much different" than what has been alleged in the complaint, and suggested the lawsuit was financially motivated.

Sean Stewart is Rod Stewart's son from his marriage to model-actress Alana Stewart. The couple divorced in the early 1980s.

StarTribune.com

Bridge was rated 'structurally deficient' in 2005

The highway bridge that collapsed into the Mississippi River on Wednesday was rated as "structurally deficient" two years ago and possibly in need of replacement.

Photo

Last update: August 02, 2007 – 1:19 AM

The highway bridge that collapsed into the Mississippi River on Wednesday was rated as "structurally deficient" two years ago and possibly in need of replacement.

That rating was contained in the U.S. Department of Transportation's National Bridge Inventory database.

Jeanne Aamodt, a spokeswoman for the Minnesota Department of Transportation, said the department was aware of the 2005 assessment of the bridge. "We've seen it, and we are very familiar with it," she said.

Aamodt said the department plans its bridge repairs using information from the Bridge Inventory database.

Many other bridges nationwide carry the same designation that the I-35W bridge received, Aamodt said.

Aamodt declined to say what the agency was going to do to address the deficiencies found in 2005 and referred further questions to Dan Dorgan, state bridge engineer and director of the bridge office. Dorgan wasn't available for comment.

The deficiency rating is derived from a complex formula that evaluates many factors and condenses them into an overall score. A score of 80 percent or less indicates some rehabilitation may be needed; a 50 percent score or less indicates replacement may be in order.

The I-35W bridge was rated at 50 percent. The rating data was provided to the Star Tribune by the National Institute of Computer Assisted Reporting.

The inventory data also summarize the bridge's status as "structurally deficient." Bridge components are ranked on a scale of 0 to 9, with 0 being "failed" and 9 being "excellent."

In 2005, the bridge's superstructure -- meaning the physical conditions of all structural members -- was rated at 4, records show. The bridge's deck was rated 5, and the substructure, comprised of the piers, abutments, footings and other components, was rated 6.

In 2001, a research report on the bridge had found that it was unlikely to experience any fatigue cracking in the trusses supporting its deck. The paper, prepared by the University of Minnesota's Center for Information Studies, evaluated both the main trusses and the floor truss of the bridge.

The report by the late Robert J. Dexter and others, concluded that the bridge's deck "has not experienced fatigue cracking, but it has many poor fatigue details on the main truss and floor truss system."

The authors said their research helped determine that "fatigue cracking of the deck truss is not likely." They added that the bridge shouldn't have any problems with fatigue cracking "in the forseeable future" and that there was no need to "prematurely replace this bridge because of fatigue cracking, avoiding the high costs associated with such a large project."

However, the report noted "many poor fatigue details" and said certain members of the main truss should be inspected every two years, as was being done at the time. In addition, the report said, certain sections of the floor trusses had high stress areas that should be inspected every six months.

Gov. Tim Pawlenty said Wednesday night that the bridge was inspected in 2005 and 2006, and that no structural deficiencies were identified.

Workers had been engaged since early May on a resurfacing project on the bridge that was to conclude in September. It included the installation of guard rails and lighting.

The span carried the name Bridge 9340 in the books of the state Department of Transportation, although it originally was dubbed the St. Anthony Bridge.

The steel-arch structure, opened in 1967, carried 140,000 cars a day at last count, in 2002, its 1,907 feet spanning eight lanes.

Wednesday, August 01, 2007

The Dog May Be Free!

TMZ has learned that all Mexican charges may have been dropped against famed bounty hunter Duane "Dog" Chapman and two members of his team -- including his son. We're told these photos were taken moments after Dog learned his fate. Hallelujah!

The group had been charged by a Mexican court with deprivation of liberty, after their 2003 capture of convicted serial rapist Andrew Luster in Puerto Vallarta. Chapman had traveled to Mexico to retrieve the Max Factor cosmetics heir, who was wanted in the U.S. on rape charges. Luster is now in jail, serving a 124-year term.

The Chapman crew was jailed for a brief time after the incident as bounty hunting is considered a crime in Mexico. While TMZ could not immediately confirm the ruling (because nosotros hablamos espanol only a little), Dog's attorney told us he "has received a favorable ruling from the people in Puerto Vallarta. The extent of that ruling is unknown as we are still in the process of translating it."

Dog, through his publicist, told TMZ, "Viva La Mexico!"

Dog the Bounty Hunter is on the move…

August 1st, 2007

Filed Under Current Events |

Duane “Dog” Chapman is having an autograph signing today at the Kahala Mall’s Center Court beginning at 7pm to promote his long anticipated new book “You Can Run But You Can’t Hide: The Life and Times of Dog the Bounty Hunter.” Only one autograph per person is allowed to keep the line moving.

art1a.jpg

From there the Chapman family will be on a promotional book tour around the country and will make several TV appearances including Larry King Live on CNN Friday night.

Check the schedule below to see if Dog and his posse are making an appearance in your town.

8/1/07 7:00 PM Lecture & Book Signing Barnes & Noble Honolulu, HI
8/4/07 11:00 AM Book Signing Wal-Mart Santa Clarita, CA
8/7/07 1:00 PM Book Signing Borders Books New York, NY
8/8/07 6:30 PM Lecture & Book Signing Oxonian Society Cornell Club New York, NY
8/10/07 7:00 PM Book Signing Borders Books Ann Arbor, MI
8/13/07 7:30 PM Lecture Lisner Auditorium Washington, D.C.
8/21/07 6:00 PM Book Signing Wal-Mart Festus, MO

If you can’t make it there, here are some upcoming TV/Radio appearances that can supplement your Dog fix.

8/3 6pm TV Interview Larry King Live Show CNN

8/8 11am Radio Interview Elliott in the Morning DC101

8/8 9pm TV Interview Hannity and Colmes Fox News

8/9 7am Radio Interview Jim Kerr Morning Show WAXQ

8/9 10pm TV Interview On the Record Fox News

The New York Times

August 1, 2007
The Media Equation

Murdoch Wanted Dow Jones More

You can bet serious money — billions even — that the article about the sale of The Wall Street Journal and the rest of Dow Jones & Company in today’s Journal will be fully and ferociously reported, with no quarter given to its new owner, Rupert Murdoch.

But given Mr. Murdoch’s history and human nature, how long will that last?

The reputation of The Journal is now in the hands of Mr. Murdoch, who did not end up as the owner of one of the world’s best newspapers because he is a paragon of journalistic principle. In the end, the News Corporation’s capture of Dow Jones can be boiled down to one simple fact: Mr. Murdoch wanted it more.

He wanted it more than other potential bidders, like General Electric, Pearson and Ronald W. Burkle, who never came close to challenging his audacious bid. He wanted it more in the end than many of the Bancrofts did — or at least he offered more than they were able to pass up. He wanted it enough to make a deal for editorial independence that seems to run against his entire history as a owner.

We tend to overanalyze media moguls, in part because of their primacy in the current age. Yes, owning a pivot point in financial news will create some tidy synergies — content for a new Fox business channel to compete with CNBC on cable television, a global foothold for financial data, coverage of all of his competitors in The Journal.

(Note to other media moguls keeping track at home: Mr. Murdoch just bought the scorecard.)

But his purchase is a reminder that the unthinkable is often doable, given the loot and the will. Mr. Murdoch is buying an American newspaper because he’s a sentimentalist, not because he has shown any particular skill at making money with them. His Midas touch in foreign tabloids, television, movies, and more recently, digital properties, turns a little rusty when American publications are involved.

His ownership of The New York Post (twice) is an artistic success, but suggests that his love of American print is just that — irrational, driven by an attraction for the kind of power print conveys, and only made possible through his success on other platforms.

The Bancrofts have a sentimental side as well, but the resolution should not have surprised anyone. If the family members did not want to sell, they would have had to slam the door and get the nail gun out on May 2, the day the offer was made public.

The Bancrofts’ wan demurral set in motion market dynamics that blew the door open. Once a stock that had been mired at $36 goes to $60, a huge new constituency for change buys into the stock, one that will sue like crazy if change is not forthcoming.

So the Bancrofts join the line of other great American family newspaper dynasties — the Ridders, the McCormicks and the Chandlers — that have gotten out of the business in the last few years. The takeaway may not necessarily be that newspapers and family ownership doesn’t mix as much as newspapers and absentee ownership are a bad combination.

After Mr. Murdoch made his bold offer, the Bancrofts suddenly woke up and were cast in the role of parents seeking to adopt a child that they had neglected in the first place. The Hail Mary passes that Christopher Bancroft and others who fought against the sale heaved late in the fourth quarter were no substitute for the lack of basic blocking and tackling back when they were still in the game.

What will The Journal be with Mr. Murdoch at the helm? At heart, he’s a tabloid newsman but critics expecting headlines like “Hedgeless Funds in Stop-Loss Market” may be disappointed.

In the near term, or at least until the shareholders’ annual meeting, Mr. Murdoch will need to make nice with the company he just bought and run his new prize in way that demonstrates that he plans to live up to the editorial independence deal he struck with the Bancroft family.

But he’ll be challenged early by the Journal staff in the form of a hard-hitting story about one of his many business interests. Mr. Murdoch is probably too smart to take the bait.

In the long run, however, it will be outside scrutiny from readers that will be more likely to keep him from interfering in the paper’s news pages, not an editorial independence committee.

Like most of its fans, I will continue to read The Wall Street Journal expecting the best, but keeping an eye out for the worst.