Legal issues arising from the RIAA's lawsuits of intimidation brought against ordinary working people, and other important internet law issues. Provided by Ray Beckerman, P.C.
Friday, October 05, 2012
Motions to sever & dismiss granted in Westchester cases, Malibu Media v Does 1-10
In a group of Westchester cases, including Malibu Media v. Does 1-10, back in August, District Judge Edgardo Ramos severed and dismissed all cases against John Does other than Does numbered 1.
Order granting discovery, severing, and dismissing, Hon. Edgardo Ramos, August 21, 2012
Ray Beckerman, PC
Thursday, October 04, 2012
Plaintiff ordered to show cause why subpoenas should not be quashed in Combat Zone v Does 1-84
In a Massachusetts case, Combat Zone v. Does 1-84, Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal has ordered the plaintiff to show cause why its subpoenas should not be quashed, on the ground that the subpoenas contained a notice which suggested that the recipients -- the owners of the IP access accounts -- had themselves been sued.
October 4, 2012, Order to Show Cause
Ray Beckerman, PC
Wednesday, October 03, 2012
Motion to sever & dismiss granted in Third Degree Films v. Does 1-47
In a Massachusetts case, Third Degree Films v. Does 1-47, the Court has departed from its earlier authority, and granted a motion to sever and dismiss. The Court's 26-page opinion concludes that joinder is permissible, but that the Court should not exercise its discretion in favor of joinder.
October 2, 2012, Memorandum and Order, Hon. William G. Young, US District Judge
Ray Beckerman, PC
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Judge orders plaintiff's counsel to show cause why Does 2-201 should not be severed in MA case
In New Sensations v. Does 1-201, a Massachusetts case, the judge -- in response to an ex parte motion for expedited discovery -- sua sponte ordered the plaintiff's counsel to show cause why the case should not be severed as to Does 2-201.
September 21, 2012, Order to Show Cause, Hon. Richard G. Stearns, US District Judge
Commentary & discussion:
Techdirt
Ray Beckerman, PC
Thursday, September 20, 2012
"Porn suits" -- interesting article by Paul Rapp, Esq.
Interesting article by Paul Rapp, Esq., a Massachusetts attorney:
Porn Suits
This article originally appeared in the 9.20.12 issue of Metroland.
It works
like this: a porn company hires an “investigator” to monitor bit-torrent
activity for a particular movie. The
investigator collects all of the internet addresses that were
downloading from a torrent over
a 2-3 month period, and divvies them up by state and by the internet
companies supplying service to the internet addresses.
The porn company lawyer then starts a lawsuit against all of the
internet addresses in a given state that were on the torrent for a given
movie. The cases are captioned “[Porn Company] v. John
Does 1-120.” The cases all have multiple
John Doe defendants, often over 100.
The porn company then gets the court’s permission to engage in early
“discovery” so it can get the real names associated with the internet
addresses that
were identified by the investigator.
Permission is routinely granted, and the porn company subpoenas the
internet companies (Time Warner, Comcast, etc.) for the names. The
internet companies then contact each of its subscribers, explaining that
the subscriber is going to be named in a lawsuit
for downloading a porn film (and these films have charming titles like
“Anal
Cum-swappers 2” and “OMG I’m Banging My Daughter’s BFF”) in 30 days.
The subscriber’s options are (1) to do
nothing and be named in the lawsuit, (2) go to court to quash the
subpoena, or
(3) contact the porn company’s lawyer, who will demand $3000 to quietly
let you
out of the lawsuit, with your good name intact.......
Complete article
Ray Beckerman, PC
Porn Suits
This article originally appeared in the 9.20.12 issue of Metroland.
In recent months there has been a flood of federal copyright
infringement lawsuits that are having a severe impact on a lot of innocent
people. These lawsuits are a variant on
the P2P suits brought by the major record companies and movie studios several
years ago, a strategy that was a public relations and a financial disaster for
the various companies. These new suits
are fine-tuned and efficient, and they’re brought by little-known companies
that could care less about their public image.
These are porn suits.
Complete article
Ray Beckerman, PC
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Monday, September 17, 2012
Joel Tenenbaum files appeal
In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum, defendant Joel Tenenbaum has filed his appeal. Notice of Appeal, September 17, 2012
Ray Beckerman, PC
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Court severs & dismisses in Media Products v Does 1-26 and 2 related cases
In Media Products v. Does 1-26, Media Products v. Does 1-40, and Patrick Collins v. Does 1-4, three cases pending in Manhattan before Judge Harold Baer, the Court has severed and dismissed as to all defendants other than Doe #1.
September 4, 2012, Opinion & Order, District Judge Harold Baer
Tuesday, September 11, 2012
8th Circuit upholds constitutionality of $9250-per-work statutory damages in Capitol v Thomas
In Capitol Records v. Jammie Thomas-Rasset, the US Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit:
-held that the award of $222,000, or $9250 per song, is not an unconstitutional violation of due process, and
-did not reach the "making available" issue.
Decision of US Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit
Commentary & discussion:
Slashdot
it's my blog dammit
Ray Beckerman, PC
Wednesday, September 05, 2012
Doe #83 moves to dismiss in Massachusetts case, Media Products v Does 1-120
In a Massachusetts case, Media Products v. Does 1-120, Doe number 83 has filed a motion to dismiss.
Defendant Doe 83's memorandum of law in support of motion to dismiss
Ray Beckerman, PC
Defendant Doe 83's memorandum of law in support of motion to dismiss
Ray Beckerman, PC
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)