home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

 

New Special Double Issue on the War Print Edition of CounterPunch Available Exclusively to Subscribers: The US vs. Iraq: the Thirteen Year War; The Sanctions That Killed; Bombing Iraq Every 3 Days Since the Ceasefire of 1991; What Would Gore Have Done?; The Rise of the Neocons; Israel's Proxy War Plan; Why Did It End So Quickly?; The Coming Occupation; Re-educating Iraqis, American-style; Those Reconstruction Contracts; Media Hawks; Christian Crusaders; Democratic Candidates and the War; Smart Bombs Go Haywire; Inside the Mind of Santorum; Gore Vidal on John Kerry; Thomas Pickering: the Bad Seed. Remember, the CounterPunch website is supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. Our worldwide web audience is soaring, with more than 60,000 visitors a day. This is inspiring news, but the work involved also compels us to remind you more urgently than ever to subscribe and/or make a (tax deductible) donation if you can afford it. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840 3683 or write CounterPunch, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Recent Stories

May 16, 2003

Website of the Day
Iraq and Our Energy Future

May 15, 2003

Ayesha Iman and Sindi Medar-Gould
How Not to Help Amina Lawal: The Hidden Dangers of Letter Writing Campaigns

Julie Hilden
Moussaoui and the Camp X-Ray Detainees: Can He Get a Fair Trial?

Tanya Reinhart
Bush's Roadmap: a Ticket to Failure

Laura Carlsen
Here We Go Again: NAFTA Plus or Minus?

Kenneth Rapoza
The New Fakers: State Dept. Undercuts New Yorker's Goldberg

Stew Albert
A Story I Will Tell

Steve Perry
Bush's Little Nukes

Website of the Day
Strip-o-Rama

 

May 14, 2003

Cindy Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter I Can't Hear From

Jason Leopold
The Pentagon and Hallburton: a Secret November Deal for Iraq's Oil

David Lindorff
Fighting the Patriot Act: Now It's Alaska

John Chuckman
Giggling into Chaos

Jack McCarthy
Twin Towers of Journalism: Racism and Double Standards

Wayne Madsen
Assassinating JFK Again

M. Junaid Alam
The Longer View

Paul de Rooij
The New Hydra's Head:
Propagandists and the Selling of the US/Iraq War

James Reiss
What? Me Worry?

Steve Perry
More on Saudi Arabia Bombings

Website of the Day
A Tribute to Ted Joans

 

May 13, 2003

Saul Landau
Clear Channel Fogs the Airwaves

Michael Neumann
Has Islam Failed? Not by Western Standards

Uri Avnery
My Meeting with Arafat

Steve Perry
The Saudi Arabia Bombing

Jacob Levich
Democracy Comes to Iraq: Kick Their Ass and Grab Their Gas

William Lind
The Hippo and the Mongoose: a Question of Military Theory

The Black Commentator
Fraud at the Times: Blaming Blacks for White Folks' Mistakes

Stew Albert
Asylum

Hammond Guthrie
An Illogical Reign

Website of the Day
Sy Hersh: War and Intelligence

 

May 12, 2003

Chris Floyd
Bush, Bin Laden, Bechtel, and Baghdad

Dave Lindorff
America's Dirty Bombs

Sam Hamod and Elaine Cassel
Resisting the Bush Administration's War on Liberty

Uzi Benziman
Sharon and Sons, Inc.

Jason Leopold
The Decline and Fall of Thomas White

Rich Procter
George Jumps the Shark

Federico Moscogiuri
Going to Israel? Sign or Else

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/12

Book of the Day
Fooling Marty Peretz

Website of the Day
T-Shirts to Protest In

 

May 10 / 11, 2003

Alexander Cockburn
Rosenthal Faces the Music in Key Med Marijuana Case

JoAnn Wypijewski
Labor in the Dawn of Empire

Annie C. Higgins
The Last Time I Saw Mus'ab

Ron Jacobs
The Devil in New England

William Mandel
One on One with Sen. Joe McCarthy

Jason Leopold
Halliburton Still Flouts the Law as It Profits from Terror

Patrick Cockburn
The Iraqi Quagmire

Larry Magnuson
William Bennett: Next Viceroy of Iraq?

Sasan Fayazmanesh
The Good Terrorists?

Anthony Gancarski
Chalabi: Drowning in Ba'ath-water?

Steven Sherman
A Letter to My European Friends

Khaled El-Bizri
Mr. Bush Comes to Santa Clara

Bruce Jackson
How Fear Curdles the Soul

Adam Engel
Flag in the Rain

Poets Basement
Reiss, Guthrie, Hamod & Albert

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/10

Website of the Weekend
Killing Again

 

May 9, 2003

Rahul Mahajan
Don't Lift the Sanctions Yet

Wayne Madsen
When Lying Pays Off: Neo-Con Fabricators

Chris Floyd
The Karamazov Question

Don Monkerud
The Great Christian Schism: War or Peace?

Sam Hamod and Elaine Cassel
Drunk on Power: Bush, Power and the Pathology of the Dry Drunk

Hammond Guthrie
Bombastic Promise Keeping

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/09

 

May 8, 2003

Julie Hilden
When It's a Crime to Visit Your Son

Mickey Z.
Partisan Protests?

Mark Zepezauer
Evil is as Evil Does

David Lindorff
The Coming Senior Revolution

Abu Spinoza
The Detention of Dr. Huda Ammash

Ben Tripp
The Other "F" Word

Norman Madarasz
God in the Service of the Security State: a Dispatch from Brazil

Stew Albert
Pushovers

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/08

Website of the Day
Department of Sexual Security

 

May 7, 2003

Alexander Cockburn
Quoting Under the Influence: Breasts, Martinis, Hitchens

David Krieger
Winning the War; Alienating the World

Sen. Robert Byrd
Bush's Troubling Speech

Bruce Jackson
Bill Kunstler's Last Big Speech

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/07

Website of the Day
The Truth About Bush's Military Records

 

May 6, 2003

Paul de Rooij
An Activist in the Trenches: an Interview with Gretta Duisenberg

Anthony Gancarski
Money to Burn: in Defense of Bill Bennett

John Stanton
Bush's War on Jesus

Sam Hamod
W. Bush: the Little Snot, the Little Bully

Robert Fisk
Bush Says the War is Over: Tell It to the Shi'a

Kathleen Christison
A Roadmap to Nowhere

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/06

 

May 5, 2003

Gary Leupp
Phase Two: Syria and Iran

Jorge Mariscal
The Militarization of US Culture

Ishmael Reed
A Family Values Man

Tarif Abboushi
Sharon's Confidence: Bush Won't Come to Shove on Roadmap

Leila Matsui
Regime Change Begins at Home...Literally

Steve Perry
Bush's Wars

Sam Smith
Coalition of the Shilling

 

May 3, 2003

Ron Jacobs
Tears of Rage: Remembering May 1970

Elaine Cassel
William Bennett, a Freudian Perspective

Sam Hamod
Understanding the Shi'a of Lebanon

Scott Fleming
Getting Shot on the Oakland Docks

Mickey Z.
Cuba and Puerto Rico: 100 Years of Terror

William S. Lind
Don't Take Col. John Boyd's Name in Vain

Dr. Bruce Blair
The New Nuclear Terrorism Threat

Joanne Mariner
Cluster Bombs Over Iraq

Anthony Gancarski
Hot Fun in the Summertime

Ilian Pappe
Searching Jenin

William MacDougall
America's Kids Are All Right: Pre-Teen Conservative Commentators

Seth Sandronsky
Incarcerated and Invisible

Rich Procter
Over Our Dead Bodies

Lenni Brenner
How Bob Dylan Found His Voice

Adam Engel
American Bulk

Poets' Basement
Reiss, Guthrie, Albert

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/03

 

May 2, 2003

Caoimhe Butterly
Crowd Control American-style

Neve Gordon
US: No Right to Know About the Disappeared

John Chuckman
Tom Friedman's Life as a Pet Hamster

Bradley Burston
Betting on Abu-Mazen...To Lose

Harvey Wasserman
Bush's Military Defeat

John Troyer
Question Those Writing History

Saul Landau
The Cuba Conundrum

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/02

Website of the Day
Moussaoui's Quiz

 

May 1, 2003

Jeffrey St. Clair
Santorum: That's Latin for Asshole

Iain Boal
A May Day Message to the FCC: "We Are Many; They are Few"

Diana Johnstone
About Cuba

Sam Hamod
Killings at Al Fallujah, City of Mosques

Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
Intelligence Fiasco

Lee Sustar
Greed Air: Airline Workers Agree to Pay Cuts, While Bosses Stuff Their Pockets

Peter Linebaugh
May Day at Kut and Kienthal

Stew Albert
Straight Shooters

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/01

Website of the Day
South Bay Mobilization

 

April 30, 2003

Ashley Smith
Under Uncle Sam's Thumb: a History of Washington's Occupations

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 4/30

Gary Leupp
Shooting Schoolboys: Preliminary Thoughts on the Fallujah Massacre

Robert Jensen
Fighting Alienation in the USA

Wayne Madsen
The Four Horsemen of Propaganda

Ahmad Faruqui
Bush's Strategic Myopia About the Middle East

Gabriel Kolko
Iraq, the US and the End of the European Coalition

Adolfo Perez Esquivel
A Nobel Laureat's Letter to Bush: "You Talk of Freedom; You Detest Freedom"

 

April 29, 2003

Gary Leupp
Disorder and Opportunity: the Results of the Iraq War

Uri Avnery
Don't Envy Abu-Mazen

Anthony Gancarski
Brush with the Law

Mickey Z.
POWs: Then and Now

CounterPunch Wire
How to Spin Israel on the Hill: Internal Lobbying Documents

Robert Fisk
Did the US Murder Journalists?

Chris Floyd
Bush Telegraphs His Punches on Syria

Wayne Madsen
About Those Iraqi Intelligence Documents

Wallace Gagne
Pilgrimage or Demolition Derby?

Eliot Katz
Playing Catch with Cracked Globes

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 4/29

 

 

Hot Stories

Elaine Cassel
Civil Liberties Watch

Michel Guerrin
Embedded Photographer Says: "I Saw Marines Kill Civilians"

Uzma Aslam Khan
The Unbearably Grim Aftermath of War: What America Says Does Not Go

Paul de Rooij
Arrogant Propaganda

Gore Vidal
The Erosion of the American Dream

Francis Boyle
Impeach Bush: A Draft Resolution

Click Here for More Stories.

 

Subscribe Online


Search CounterPunch

 

May 17, 2003

Historical Necessity and Human Freedom

An American Tribute to Christopher Hill

By PETER LINEBAUGH

Since the destruction of the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York on September 11, 2001, the rhetoric of President Bush has drawn heavily on Winston Churchill's rhetoric at the commencement of the Battle of Britain. With the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq the Churchillian note is near deafening. Often it is called, "their finest hour." What is meant? Anticipating the Battle of Britain here is what Churchill said on 18 June 1940 as France fell.

Upon this battle depends the survival of Christian civilization. Upon it depends our own British life, and the long continuity of our institutions and our Empire. ... Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves that, if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say, 'This was their finest hour.'

Christianity and empire are not freely spoken of as goals of the invasion of Iraq, though they are for some. Even if the Iraqi invasion in 2003 was not anybody's finest hour, England being more or less alone in 1940, against the armed might of the National Socialists, most of western Europe having collapsed under their Blitzkrieg, actually did hang at the hinge of fate, a fine moment. Churchill spoke for many besides Christians and imperialists. What made it so fine?

Huge energy of fire and water and air and earth was mobilized by war. Epochal consequences were released in brief moments. A blitz is the lightening stroke, or a tremendous discharge of electrical energy originating in rain clouds striking through the atmosphere to the ground often igniting fires. It has transforming effects. We most notice the destruction of cities and peoples as it is memorialized. In contrast, generation, or the birth of the new, tends to merge with living forms in the epoch to come. Their beginnings however are no less part of the blitz than the endings entailed by destruction. Seeds of the future are born in the terrifying moment. Some seeds are airborne, others survive even in salt water (as Darwin showed), certain seeds need the great heat of the forest fire to open, and germination requires earth for all.

Looking back at May 1940 particularly and broadening our view generally to include all of 1940 (because I don't know the calendar of composition of Christopher Hill's essay) I would like to identify four seeds and their vectors.

One is anti-racism. A few months May 1940 C.L.R. James wrote "What we as Marxists have to see is the tremendous role played by Negroes in the transformation of Western civilization from feudalism to capitalism. It is only from this vantage-ground that we shall be able to appreciate (and prepare for) the still greater role they must of necessity play in the transition from capitalism to socialism." The historical side to this project, despite the expansion of university research at the end of the 20th century, is incomplete. The political aspect of the proposition is the failure of de-colonization against the European and American empires. In May 1940 C.L.R. James reviewed Richard Wright's Native Son: "The great masses of negroes carry in their hearts the heavy heritage of slavery, and their present degradation. Such has been their past, it is their present, and, as far as they can see, it is their future. It is the revolution which will lift these millions from their knees. Nobody can do it for them. Men, personalities, will be freed from the centuries of chains and shame, as Bigger's personality was freed, by violent action against their tyrants. It is on the evening after battle, with smoking rifle and bloody bayonet, that the Negro will be able to look all white men in the face, will be able to respect himself and be respected." This is soldiering against empire and racism; it was a seed germinated by fire.

A second seed is anti-patriarchy. On 27 April 1940 Virginia Woolf gave a lecture at the Women's Institute in Brighton; in May she gave it again to the WEA. Although it was the worst week of her experience, the lecture she offered raised hopes. It was called "The Leaning Tower." In it she spoke as an outsider and a commoner ("are we not commoners, outsiders?"). In the 19th century human life "looked like a landscape cut up into separate fields." After the war, however, there will be "no more classes and shall we stand, without hedges between us, on the common ground?" She quoted her father, the eminent Victorian, "Whenever you see a board up with 'Trespassers will be prosecuted,' trespass at once." She recommended the practice. It is this vision of commoning which she applied in her critique of the Leftist generation of writers who became apostates or emigrants to America. Striding on the Sussex Downs, she contemplated "the subconscious Hitlerism in the hearts of men." The end of class society, the cutting down of hedges, had to become the basis of that compensation of the man's loss of his machine, the loss of his gun, his imprisonment within patriarchy. Against the RAF-Luftwaffe fights in the sky above her, she clasped her hands over her head and flung herself to the ground. Owing to the bombing the River Ouse flooded. Her great project, though derided at the time, is still alive, flowing in the world-wide peace marches against the Iraqi war. This is water.

A third seed which was to bloom quickly and bear fruit rapidly was provided by Aneurin Bevan (himself the cultivator of cabbages on Brimpton Common) who immediately went after Churchill, "Sometimes the Prime Minister's ear is too sensitively attuned to the bugle notes of Blenheim for him to hear the whisperings in the streets." Bevan wrote in January, "social problems thrust themselves upon the minds of the most obtuse and compel an interest, grudging at first, but which often afterwards grows into an eager thirst for new knowledge. War opens minds that were sealed, stimulates dormant intelligences, and recruits into political controversy thousands who otherwise would remain in the political hinterland." He wrote "Britain is still controlled by those who think, consciously or unconsciously, that ordinary men and women are there to be governed and not to govern." Mankind has progressed in arts, crafts, dignity, and learning "just to the extent that ordinary men and women won freedom and pushed their way into the central citadels of power." Speaking in the House of Commons or the BBC, these whispering seeds were airborne.

Christopher Hill's essay The English Revolution 1640 is a fourth seed. It was written for the soldiers going into battle and the civilians who suffered the Blitz. It is brief, it is lucid, and it does not weigh heavily in a soldier's kit. Its address was to a class excluded from academia or the ruling elite. He quoted Oliver Cromwell on his soldiery, they "knew what they fought for and loved what they knew." He explained how revolution was made, and the Communist Party leadership of 1940 did not like what he said. He introduced the idea of the "bourgeois revolution." Getting it published was "a victory for politics as well as theory," wrote Dona Torr. The victory was a lasting one---we see it in the formation of the postwar Communist Party History Group, we see it in the introduction to the first issue of Past & Present (1952) quoting Ibn Khaldoun, the 14th century Islamic scholar, that history includes the "transformations that society undergoes by its very nature," and we see it in "the living line of Marx's analysis of British history" (as Thompson put it). It put the past into the present and into the future.

Christopher Hill's counselor within the Party was Dona Torr of whom he (with John Savile and E.P. Thompson) would write, "She made us feel history on our pulses. History was not words on a page, not the goings-on of kings and prime ministers, not mere events. History was the sweat, blood, tears, and triumphs of the common people, our people." See how they changed Churchill's words which included sweat, blood, and tears among his offerings as prime minister in May 1940, but also toil. Christopher Hill and the historians of the common people, added triumphs instead.

Hill balanced historical necessity with human freedom. Voluntarism and determinism were placed in equilibrium, not of theory nor of politics, but in the actuality of the English civil war. Thus, "Winstanley's communist idea was in one sense backward-looking, since it arose from the village community which capitalism was already disintegrating...," yet Winstanley did not only look to the past; he also had glimpses of a future in which "wheresoever there is a people united by common community of livelihood into oneness it will be the strongest land in the world, for there they will be as one man to defend their inheritance.'" He wrote of both 1640 and 1940. "When the earth becomes a common treasury again, as it must ... then this enmity in all lands will cease." We still have much to learn from the seventeenth century," Hill concluded.

These then were four seeds from the Blitz---fiery anti-racism, fluid anti-patriarchy, airborne broadcasting of social welfare, and these three requiring groundings in the earthly commons of past, present, and future found it in the scholarly husbandry of Christopher Hill. Seeds in 1940, they bloomed in different futures. At an ignominious hour in Anglo-American history, Christopher Hill reminds us of a fine one.


Yesterday's Features

Ayesha Iman and Sindi Medar-Gould
How Not to Help Amina Lawal: The Hidden Dangers of Letter Writing Campaigns

Julie Hilden
Moussaioui and the Camp X-Ray Detainees: Can He Get a Fair Trial?

Tanya Reinhart
Bush's Roadmap: a Ticket to Failure

Laura Carlsen
Here We Go Again: NAFTA Plus or Minus?

Kenneth Rapoza
The New Fakers: State Dept. Undercuts New Yorker's Goldberg

Stew Albert
A Story I Will Tell

Steve Perry
Bush's Little Nukes

Website of the Day
Strip-o-Rama

 

Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /