The Pragmatic Progressive
blog*spot
The Pragmatic Progressive

Todd Kennedy
PragPro@aol.com
Vote John Kerry for President 2004


Tuesday, March 30, 2004  

2. A blank mind is a calm mind.

posted by Todd | 12:14 PM |


Monday, March 29, 2004  

Richard Clarke was outstanding on Meet the Press yesterday, read the transcript here.



MR. RUSSERT: Why do you think the Iraq war has undermined the war on terrorism?

MR. CLARKE: Well, I think it's obvious, but there are three major reasons. Who are we fighting in the war on terrorism? We're fighting Islamic radicals and they are drawing people from the youth of the Islamic world into hating us. Now, after September 11, people in the Islamic world said, "Wait a minute. Maybe we've gone too far here. Maybe this Islamic movement, this radical movement, has to be suppressed," and we had a moment, we had a window of opportunity, where we could change the ideology in the Islamic world. Instead, we've inflamed the ideology. We've played right into the hands of al-Qaeda and others. We've done what Osama bin Laden said we would do.

Ninety percent of the Islamic people in Morocco, Jordan, Turkey, Egypt, allied countries to the United States--90 percent in polls taken last month hate the United States. It's very hard when that's the game where 90 percent of the Arab people hate us. It's very hard for us to win the battle of ideas. We can arrest them. We can kill them. But as Don Rumsfeld said in the memo that leaked from the Pentagon, I'm afraid that they're generating more ideological radicals against us than we are arresting them and killing them. They're producing more faster than we are.

The president of Egypt said, "If you invade Iraq, you will create a hundred bin Ladens." He lives in the Arab world. He knows. It's turned out to be true. It is now much more difficult for us to win the battle of ideas as well as arresting and killing them, and we're going to face a second generation of al-Qaeda. We're going to catch bin Laden. I have no doubt about that. In the next few months, he'll be found dead or alive. But it's two years too late because during those two years, al-Qaeda has morphed into a hydra-headed organization, independent cells like the organization that did the attack in Madrid.

And that's the second reason. The attack in Madrid showed the vulnerabilities of the rails in Spain. We have all sorts of vulnerabilities in our country, chemical plants, railroads. We've done a very good job on passenger aircraft now, but there are all these other vulnerabilities that require enormous amount of money to reduce those vulnerabilities, and we're not doing that.

MR. RUSSERT: And three?

MR. CLARKE: And three is that we actually diverted military resources and intelligence resources from Afghanistan and from the hunt for bin Laden to the war in Iraq.

MR. RUSSERT: But Saddam is gone and that's a good thing?

MR. CLARKE: Saddam is gone is a good thing. If Fidel were gone, it would be a good thing. If Kim Il Sung were gone, it would be a good thing. And let's just make clear, our military performed admirably and they are heroes, but what price are we paying for this war on Iraq?

posted by Todd | 2:24 PM |


Sunday, March 28, 2004  

The Best Bands You’ve Never Heard of, Part 1: Happy Family, Japan

I have few words to describe how hard and wisely Happy Family rock. They rock so f***ing hard, I want to weep uncontrolably when they are rocking their rock. Like all truly great rock bands, they made two albums, and blew the joint. Leaving y'all wanting more. But you can't have it, you can't have anymore of this sweet rock.

This isn't some ELP Prog band, no pretention here, no glitzy capes. This is strictly mind-blowing alternative, instrumental music. If you know someone who likes Punk, Heavy Metal, Alternative, Classical, Jazz, Rock n' Roll, or music, buy these, OK? It would be wise to snatch their two albums, because once they're gone, they're most likely gone. Cuneiform Records has your hook up. The 1990s produced, in my opinion, a few albms that will stick with generations to come, stand the test of time. Happy Family made two of them. They are post-eveything. Dig? They will blow the teeth out yo' mouth.

From All Music

Eponymous Debut :

Happy Family explodes American rock'n'roll and prog in the way only Japanese bands seem to be able to do — the record's tracks are quite simply rocking, taking frantic post-punk guitar noise, new-wavey synth lines, syncopated, jerky song constructions, and incredibly tight changes into extremes most bands could only dream of. The result may have the same insane energy as a Melt-Banana record, but its lack of abraision makes it far more listenable — the band has the amazing ability to veer toward extremes without ever forfeiting the straightforward appeal they're amplifying. This makes Happy Family an incredible, incredible record — it would not be an exaggeration to suggest that this might be one of the finest albums of the decade. Even more amazing is the fact that Happy Family's later work progressed upon this in even more interesting ways. — Nitsuh Abebe


Second and last Album, Tosco:

Toscco is yet another miraculous progression on the frantic rock and prog Happy Family is so adept at constructing — the album backs down from the straightforward energy of records like their self-titled release, and manages to add an epic melodic sense that could even suggest vague comparisons to Godspeed, You Black Emperor. The rock is still there, of course — Toscco returns to the tight, intense riffing of previous records just often enough — but there's a definite rise in the level of sophistication, making for slightly more atmospheric and slanted compositions. The fact that this stands as a large improvement over the already-brilliant albums which preceded Toscco is nothing short of amazing. — Nitsuh Abebe


Three other bands you need to get in front of:

1. Guapo their new album, Five Suns.

2. Azigza

“Azigza is a unique group of musicians who have conjured an inspired musical style which blends sounds of Arabia, Africa, India, Bulgaria and other world music with the hard edge of rock n roll and the elegance of subtle classical colors. From this palette they have evolved a trance of unworldly nature.” – Riffage.com


Oh, sweet lady Hip Hop, I didn't forget you:

3. El Producto - High Water and his label's outstanding new sampler release, Definitve Jux Presents 3

El-P's entry into Thirsty Ear's Matthew Shipp-curated Blue Series is a compelling experiment in genre and sound collision. El-P doesn't rap on this set, nor does he saturate his mix with a truckload of effects. His compositions are skeletal frames on which to hang his mixological architecture of ambitious beats and skeletal samples, creating a tightly controlled dynamic inside which ambitious music is created. His collaborators are pianist Shipp, bassist William Parker, drummer Guillermo E. Brown, and a horn section comprised of Daniel Carter on reeds and flute, Steve Swell on trombone, and trumpet prodigy Roy Campbell. While many titles in the Blue Series catalog seem to be varied in terms of texture and dynamic, High Water is not. This feels like a conscious decision on the part of El-P. The palette is restricted atmospherically; his compositions are almost song-oriented — at least in the beginning. The funky breaks on "Get Your Hand Off My Shoulder, Pig" offer a glance into the depths of his aesthetic: the grooves are midtempo with Shipp delving into his blues and soul book for vamps and a solo, Parker laying underneath and propelling the cadence and the horns floating over the top of those massive beats. Shipp is the first to meander, decentering the melody, pulling it apart phrase by phrase and then turning it inside out. All the while the horns shift harmonics while keeping the timbre and tension in clear view. On "Get Modal," the pop tune "Where Is the Love" becomes the jump-off place for investigation. Parker kicks its phrasing first before Shipp chimes in and confirms it. The skittering beats make the track feel like it is coming off a Tilt-a-Whirl, and a forgotten soul vocal is tossed into the background to rattle around just behind the horns. Meanwhile, Brown's counterpoint polyrhythms accent El-P's foreground sampling — including a looped guitar riff from the ether — and all of it is capped with brief yet tough solo from Campbell.

The crackling strangeness in "Intrigue in the House of India" is indicative of the album's moodiness and rhythmic parlance. Shipp's carnival-inspired Afro-Cuban son riff opens out onto a carousel of sonic layering — Carter's flute solo is the only thing that feels as if it were recorded on Planet Earth and Brown's weaving in and out of the synthetic rhythms keeps everything shimmering, skipping along into a void where entropy and suffocation would be the only choices were it not for Campbell once again cutting through the detritus and creating a melodic center. At about three minutes and 15 seconds into the track, the cut breaks open with big beats, Parker's cutting drone bass, and ambient sonics paring their way into the heart of the rhythmic soundscape. The theme that threads through the album is a complete reconsideration and rewiring of Charles Aznavour's "Yesterday When I Was Young." It is quoted at the beginning as the players get ready, in a faltering, stuttering, tentative attempt to encounter the subtleties at work in the tune's harmonic palette — like the mood of the disc, it too is consciously restricted. When they get to its full articulation on "When the Moon Was Blue" with Harry Keys singing, the beats seem to separate from his voice, which invokes not only the ghost of Aznavour and his theatrical phrasing but also Louis Armstrong's with his underappreciated sense of melancholy. As horns offer droning bell-like lines across the entire top of the tune, El-P's beats pop under the vocal and Shipp and Parker wander the rounded edges of the melody's margin, a step away from complete implosion. Brown jumps through hoops and keeps the entire band — mostly — inside not only the time, but the tight lyrical consideration that makes up the body of the tune. In sum, it's a moody and haunting record with a few highs, a few lows, and lots of shades of blue to make your way through. Recommended. — Thom Jurek


Def Jux, home to RJD2, Cannibal Ox, El-P, Aesop Rock, Mr. Lif, and others. Simply the most innovative and progressive Hip Hop label out there.

Try some Def Jux samples here, some of their artists are hit...some are miss.

As always, Cuneiform Records is also the place to be.



Can't say I didn't warn you.



Gnosis does a great job of offering suggestions for new music. You look up an album that you already love, note the ratings by the reviewers, then check the reviewers that agree with your estimation's other picks. I noticed recently that Gnosis is slowly adding more Progressive types of Hip Hop to their gazillion albums of mostly rock, jazz, avant, experimental and other sophisticated popular offerings. If you want to find ground-breaking, mind expanding music, this is the spot.



What does Gnosis cover?

Under the vast umbrella of music available and unavailable, somewhere lies the Gnosis focus, a mutable area of ambiguous definition. The focus of Gnosis is best understood as an adjunct to its evolutionary conception.

Primarily, Gnosis covers music created for the love of art with no regard to commerce or forced accessibility. However, this does not preclude the inevitably of financial success. Conceptually "music for the sake of art" is defined in different ways by each individual by a personal set of aesthetics. ...


...Progressive, experimental, adventurous, innovative, mind-expanding, psychedelic, cosmic, iconoclastic, groundbreaking, hybrid - these are a number of adjectives that describe the music covered by Gnosis. However, like music that continually changes and ignores boundaries, so does Gnosis, a state of evolution anathema to those who feel the need for definition and the status quo. The directors believe it is in the vested interests of this site to continue to be open-minded, tolerant, and expansive.
To be clear, Gnosis is not a "prog rock" or "symphonic rock" site although it is inclusive of these musical styles. It is a site where the exploration of new music is paramount, and thus the directors feel that restrictions should generally be thrown to the wind.

posted by Todd | 9:23 PM |
 

Spinsanity, a very good and stringently non-partisan political watchdog announces its first book.

We are proud to announce the upcoming release of our first book, All the President's Spin: George W. Bush, the Media and the Truth, which will be published in August by Touchstone/Fireside, an imprint of Simon & Schuster. It will provide the definitive non-partisan account of the Bush administration's unrelenting PR-driven dishonesty about public policy.

We want to make very clear to you, our most faithful readers, that this book does not mean we have become partisans or are going to stop criticizing Democratic spin. In our website posts and other articles, we'll continue to challenge deception from
partisans of all stripes.


Good for Spinsanity, I hope it's widely read and well marketed.

posted by Todd | 8:27 PM |


Thursday, March 25, 2004  

From Harper's

No this isn't a joke.

Stations of the Boss
Posted on Thursday, March 25, 2004. From a 1996 memo written by representatives of Lancaster Management Incorporated to Marty Backus Jr. Backus was employed by the company, which owns several newspapers, as a publisher and editor until June 2001. In March 2002, Backus filed a lawsuit against Lancaster for wrongful dismissal, claiming that company representatives had told him he was "evil in their eyes" for failing to comply with the provisions of the memo. Vickie is Backus's wife, and Adam is their son. Waldron Newspapers is a subsidiary of Lancaster Management. Originally from Harper's Magazine, July 2002.

Consider yourself on probation. The following is a listing of our non-negotiable terms for allowing you to continue in your position at Waldron.

1. Both you and Vickie go to a Christian counselor. These sessions will probably need to be weekly or at least semimonthly. Yes, it costs money. Spend it. Make the commitment. Regardless, be sure you are seeing a Christian counselor. There are all kinds of wacko "counselors" out there.

2. Attend church weekly. Without fail. No excuses.

3. Have dinner as a family at least five times a week. At the very least, you and Vickie should eat dinner together at the table every night. Start each meal with a prayer. Clean up together.

4. You and Vickie must go to bed with each other every night without fail. If she likes to go to sleep early and you like to stay up late, compromise where she stays up a little later with you and you go to bed a little earlier. But go to bed together. Besides saying good night to each other, the last thing you should do each night is say a prayer out loud together. And start each morning the same, with a prayer out loud together.

5. This goes for you and your sons: Turn the TV off and leave it off. Allow yourself limited TV of some sports and some news, but that's it. No prime time. No soaps. No talk shows. No Letterman. And certainly no videos that depict violence or sex. Focus on the family.

6. Read Scripture daily. Proverbs is good. Read a chapter of Proverbs a day to correspond with the day of the month. Romans is good, too. One favorite passage, which we suggest you carry with you at all times, is James 1:12: "Blessed is the man who perseveres under trial, because when he has stood the test, he will receive the crown of life that God has promised to those who love him." Also see Romans 8:28.

7. You must trust each other. You are a team. Vickie has much to do with your success or failure in your personal life together, in the business, and in this effort to resurrect your marriage. But while that is true, you must take charge of this situation. You must lead by example. Be Christlike in all you do.

8. We want a short written report from you faxed to us every Monday morning and on our desk here by 8 a.m. In this report should be your triumphs and tragedies of the past week, the high points and the low points you hit. Business and personal. Tell us about a successful promo you all did. Tell us how the press broke down in Mena. Tell us about a good Scripture passage you found. Tell us about the time you got so mad you had to go for a walk. Tell us about Adam's curveball. Tell us about Adam's curveball breaking the window on the house.

We want you and Vickie to succeed in all personal and business areas of your lives — in that order. You are accountable to us; do not forget this. You must comply completely.

posted by Todd | 11:58 PM |


Wednesday, March 24, 2004  

Richard Clarke, Bush Administration Whistleblowers, and the Art of Ineffective Political Communication in the Face of Policy Criticism

Statement: Richard Clarke’s doing this for the money, he’s a partisan, he’s politically motivated, he want’s a job, his motivations aren’t pure.

Clarke has a job, he's teaching at a small college called Harvard. In any case if he had been a good boy and kept his mouth shut, there were a multitude of private corporations that would have loved to have had him sit on their boards. Trust me, Richard Clarke isn't hurting for money. While under oath he stated that he would refuse any Kerry appointment. Clarke's a life-long Republican, and a thirty-year government official. This was not politically motivated action. Clarke's a niche specialist and a bulldog, those are his motivations. It’s my experience that career policy specialists and usually aren’t as married to their political persuasion as they are to the field they specialize in.

Statement: Clarke’s a liar, he’s incompetent, he wasn’t even in the “loop”,

If Clarke was so incompetent why did Reagan hire him, Bush I and Clinton keep him, and Bush II not fire him? Remember Richard Clarke resigned, he was never fired from the Bush Administration. If he was doing such a bad job for thirty years and wasn't fired, those are indictments on the administrations who didn't relieve him from duty. Why wasn't the terror specialist "kept in the loop"? If Clarke wasn't in the loop, then that simply moves to prove Clarke's points with regard to his criticisms of the Bush Administration.

Statement: Clarke’s been inconsistent in his statements.

Today, when Richard Clarke gave testimony to the 9/11 Commission he indicated that he, as a loyal servant to the President, spun the Administration’s line to make the Administration look good. This is inexcusable, and his apology to the families of the 9/11 victims may have hinted at some feeling of guilt with regard to his previous conduct. Clarke also indicated that he had not been asked by the 9/11 commission in August his opinion on the invasion of Iraq. Today he said that if asked, he would have explained why he thinks the Bush Administration's focus on and later invasion of Iraq severely undermines the US war on terror.

This is the hypothesis or crux of Clarke’s criticism, that the focus and invasion of Iraq is a distraction from the war on terror, and it has made the US less safe because attention to Iraq has taken finite resources and attention away from more pressing terror fighting demands. Clarke is saying that Iraq has little or nothing to do with the war on terror, and it is in this area that the Bush Administration and Clarke himself failed the US. We didn’t get our priorities straight, and Clarke failed to be an effective advocate for proper priority management. Clarke made the mistake of marketing on behalf of the Bush Administration to such ends as to not point out all sides of terror related issues. I think Clarke is attempting to make amends. In doing so, by manking a simple apology Clarke not only did the right thing, he developed a more ineterested audience.

The Bush Administration should follow. Instead of making the mistake of defensive attacks on Clarke, they would gain much more politically and policy-wise by a more calm and wise set of proactive movements going forward from Clarke’s points of argument.


Q. How could Condi Rice not be an expert on international terrorism?

Condi Rice is a Soviet Union specialist, that's her niche, not terrorism. That’s fine, I’m sure she’s up to speed now. What bothers me is that she refuses to testify in front of the 9/11 Committee because it will set a bad precedent in her view? Condi needs to recognize that she’s an employee of the People, as is President Bush, and she should comply with the People’s right to know by testifying in public. What’s the bad precedent? Accountability? Transparency?

Q. What should we take away from this?

The key to Clarke's speaking out is that the Bush Administration wanted to invade Iraq, and was just looking for an excuse. Paul O'Neill seems to agree. I understand to some degree that no one expected 9/11, but still the Bush Administration was told by Berger and others that terror should be their number one priority, instead, "like they had been suspended in amber", they put Cold War issues, Star Wars, and Iraq on the front burner. I'm not surprised that's where Bush's national security team's expertise lies.

Q. Is The Bush Administration’s reaction to these whistleblower incidents helping or hurting their re-election chances?

I think we should be careful to recognize White House talking points when we see them and note the pattern of the immediate engagement in to the politics of personal destruction that the "tone changing" Bush Administration employs whenever it's criticized.

Their spin isn’t even fresh, and is way too defensive to be particularly effective with any portion of the electorate that isn’t wearing partisan blinders or refuses to believe that Bush could ever do any wrong. It may stimulate the Republican base to some extent, but how much more can they be stimulated?

On the flip-side it inflames the Democratic base, and really turns-off moderates and independents. That’s unfortunate for Bush, because if they had any skill or tact, they could soberly refute portions of the whistleblowers’ statements and learn from the rest. It’s perfectly OK to admit that mistakes were made, explain how you will change, and act upon that change. In fact, not doing so, repeatedly, makes things worse for the administration.

This coming election will be won by whom Independents are most endeared to, (or least repulsed by), and Independents crave non-partisanship, clean government, transparency, and pragmatism. The White House doesn’t illustrate that they enjoy any of these qualities when they act defensively, hyper, and/or nasty.

Q. Is there a pattern here?

Look at all the Bush whistle blowers, an unprecedented amount of people who worked for or with this Administration:

General Eric Shinseki
Joe Wilson
Richard Foster
Richard Clarke
Paul O'Neill
John Dilulio
David Kaye

I'm not even counting the officials at the EPA and the OMB who regularly complain about the actions or in-action’s of this most secretive administration since Nixon. I'm not even talking about Republican members of the House who complain about inaccurate budget numbers and projections or Republican Senators like Hagel, McCain, and Lugar who feel the need to speak on behalf of John Kerry when he's attacked for being weak on national defense. This Administration doesn't just have a credibility problem from Democratic partisans on the outside, but also from some Republicans, and internal members of the administration.

They can't all be crazy liars with an axe to grind. You've got to know that the Bush attack team spins the same crap each time someone dares speak out against the Administration. Sometimes they threaten their job, sometimes they endanger their under-cover CIA operative wife.

Democracy requires transparency in order to function for the people. We should applaud those brave enough to speak out, because each of these individuals prime motivation is to either expand the executive branch's transparency or better prosecute the war on terror by pointing out the mistakes.

There is a difference between pointing fingers and holding our representatives accountable. Instead of smearing these individuals with the seemingly same ten talking points regurgitated, how about this administration admits some error and attempts to make amends.

You know an administration has lost touch with good government when it never admits error nor does it ever change its course of action when mistakes in policy option selection are made.

All the Bush Administration ever offers is excuses and attacks on the messenger. It's pathetic and will be instrumental in their downfall. Hubris to end all hubris. The American electorate has become much more sensitive and sophisticated with regard to recognizing things that were foreign quantities in terms of identification even 15 years ago like “spin” and “talking points”. The Bush Administration has failed to evolve with the electorate in this regard. The Democrats have also failed to evolve with the electorate when we talk about effective political communication towards a positive end, and what we are getting which is sloppy, easily seen propaganda. Consumerism and Cable News has made the political consumer hyper sensitive to ingenuous attempts a political manipulation. To some degree they expect and rationalize it, to no good end.

Before I’m a Democrat I’m a democrat, and if this was a Gore Administration we were talking about, and we had this many complaints from internal sources, I would feel exactly the same way. Don’t even mention Clinton, because before there were blogs, I was holding them accountable as well.


posted by Todd | 11:21 PM |
 

New Feature:

What I'm Listening to this Week

1. Rage Against the Machine - rage against the machine

2. Sky Cries Mary - This Timeless Turning

3. Jade Warrior - Elements: The Island Anthology

4. Miles Davis - Panthalassa: the music of Miles Daivis 1969-1974, reconstruction and mix translation by Bill Laswell

5. The Orb - U.F.OFF, The Best of The Orb

6. Univeria Zekt - The Unnamables

7. Tortoise - T.n.T

8. I.E.M. - Arcadia Son

9. Lake Trout - Another One Lost

10. Mogwai - Young Team

11. Cannibal Ox - The Cold Vein

12. and 13. Bela Fleck and the Flecktones - Outbound AND Little Worlds

14. Peter Gabriel - 2

15. California Guitar Trio - an opening act: on tour with King Crimson

16. The Beatles - Let it Be... Naked

17. Aesop Rock - Labor Days

18. The Story of Jamaican Music - vol. 2, Reggae Hit The Town (1968-1974)

19. Ozric Tentacles - The Hidden Step

20. Radiohead - Hail to the Thief

For info on these, allmusic.com

posted by Todd | 5:52 PM |


Tuesday, March 23, 2004  

I'll get to writing some new stuff soon enough. In the meantime, thought I would share this fine piece from the WaPo.

From The Washington Post: 3/22/04

Sen. John F. Kerry's presidential campaign is getting an unexpected boost from an unlikely bunch: former Bush administration officials and congressional Republicans.

In the past week, GOP Sens. John McCain (Ariz.) and Chuck Hagel (Neb.) have broken ranks and defended Kerry against President Bush's assertion that the Massachusetts senator is weak on national defense.

Over the weekend, Richard A. Clarke, Bush's former counterterrorism coordinator, said Bush focused too little attention on al Qaeda before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and too much on Iraq afterward.
Clarke detailed his allegations in a book released yesterday. In it, he echoes criticism of Bush's judgment and fixation on Iraq that were leveled by former Treasury secretary Paul H. O'Neill in his book, which was published in January. Together, McCain, Hagel, Clarke and O'Neill, wittingly or not, are helping Kerry undercut Bush's chief reelection message: that America is safer with this president in charge, GOP and Democratic strategists say.

Republicans are unintentionally assisting Kerry on the domestic front, too. Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and other congressional conservatives are accusing Bush of driving up deficits, a top Kerry campaign message, and misleading the country about the cost of the new Medicare law, another Kerry target. Kerry's campaign is circulating Flake's recent remark that Congress would not have passed the Bush Medicare law if members had been told of its projected cost. The Office of Management and Budget estimated the law would cost about $130 billion more than advertised, but those numbers were kept secret until well after the House passed the legislation by one vote. The flap over the Medicare number threatens to turn the law into a campaign liability for Bush.

Yesterday, Bush's new assault on Kerry's spending for his proposals prompted Democrats to highlight the large number of Republicans and conservative groups that have chided the president for his record-setting spending. Although Kerry's aides privately admit the Democratic candidate cannot fulfill all of his campaign promises and still reduce the deficit by half as promised, they say the Bush campaign relies on questionable assumptions to back up its contention that Kerry will spend $1 trillion more than he will save over the next decade.

More: The Washington Post: 3/22/04

posted by Todd | 10:14 PM |


Monday, March 22, 2004  

Add to your Reading List

The New Pearl Harbor
Disturbing Questions about the
Bush Administration and 9/11
by David Ray Griffin
Foreword by Richard Falk

"It will be painful, and disturbing, to turn the pages of this thoughtful and meticulously researched book. But turn we must. For we owe the truth to those who died, and nothing less." -- Colleen Kelly, sister of Bill Kelly, Jr., who was killed in the North Tower of the World Trade Center on 9/11, and Co-Founder of September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows.

Michael Meacher, MP

"An excellent expose of so many of the deeply troubling questions that must still be answered fully and transparently..."

from the Foreword by Richard Falk, human rights lawyer and professor emeritus, Princeton University

"[A]n extraordinary book... It is rare, indeed, that a book has this potential to become a force of history."


From a skeptical vantage-point, but also taking to heart the classic idea that those who benefit from a crime ought to at least be investigated, Griffin, an eminent philosopher and theologian, brings together an account of the national tragedy that is far more logical than the one we've been asked to believe. Gathering stories from the mainstream press, reports from other countries, the work of other researchers, and the contradictory words of members of the Bush administration themselves, Griffin presents a case that leaves very little doubt that the attacks of 9/11 need to be further investigated.

The disturbing questions emerge from every part of the story, from every angle, until it is impossible not to seriously doubt the official story, and suspect its architects of enormous deception. Long a teacher of ethics and systematic theology, Griffin writes with compelling and passionate logic, urging readers to draw their own conclusions from the evidence outlined. The New Pearl Harbor rings with the conviction that it is possible, even today, to search for the truth; it is a stirring call that we demand a real investigation into what happened on 9/11.

Author: David Ray Griffin has been a professor of philosophy of religion and theology at the Claremont School of Theology in California for over 30 years. He is co-director of the Center for Process Studies there and the author or editor of over 20 books.

Amazon - Editorial Reviews



Book Description

Taking to heart the classic idea that those who benefit from a crime ought to be investigated, here the eminent theologian David Ray Griffin sifts through the evidence about the attacks of 9/11--stories from the mainstream press, reports from abroad, the work of other researchers, and the contradictory words of members of the Bush administration themselves--and finds that, taken together, they cast serious doubt on the official story of that tragic day. He begins with simple questions: Once radio contact was lost with the flights, why weren't jets immediately sent up ("scrambled") from the nearest military airport, something that according to the FAA's own manual is routine procedure? Why did the administration's story about scrambling jets change in the days following the attacks? The disturbing questions don't stop there: they emerge from every part of the story, from every angle, until it is impossible not to suspect the architects of the official story of enormous deception. A teacher of ethics and theology, Griffin writes with compelling logic, urging readers to draw their own conclusions from the evidence. The New Pearl Harbor is a stirring call for a thorough investigation into what happened on 9/11. It rings with the conviction that it is still possible to search for the truth in American political life.


This isn't a crazy time conspiracy jaunt. More so, it's an extention of a philosophical belief system. That the quest for ultimate truth must not be restricted by bias towards preconceived unbelievables and the doctrines of staus quo thinking.

posted by Todd | 11:38 AM |
 

The National Labor Commitee

Side note on the Kernaghan gamble: Yes, becoming more aggressive on labor issues will require the Democratic Party to admit that as of late, mistakes were made, but making amends in public is always a winner.

The Democratic Party needs to get back to its roots as the party of the "little guy". This is a debate we want to have, this is a debate we will win.

posted by Todd | 7:26 AM |
 

Senator Kerry, want to make Ralph Nader's candidacy a total non-factor? Take my advice and make Charles Kernaghan a key advisor on International and National Labor Issues. Kernaghan gets round approval from all political persuasions on the most base level, he's incredibly bright, articulate, and deserves to be a big part of your campaign and administration. The NLC is the happy place where populism, progressivism, ethics and sound policy option selection meet.

The issue of Human Rights as it relates to Labor is also a great place to put the religious on the stand to test their devotion to the base priciples of their faith. When you're talking about children working for six cents an hour on thirteen hour shifts, the word "liberal", goes "poof".

Conservatives, moderates, liberals, all have kids, and once the slide show begins, only maybe Dick Cheney's eyes don't get wet. Jobs, Jobs, Jobs, and Jobs. Quality and Quantity.



Charles Kernaghan

Executive Director, National Labor Committee

Education:
M.A., Psychology, The Graduate Faculty, New School for Social Research, New York, NY
B.A., Psychology, Loyola University, Chicago, IL

The New York Times has referred to Charles Kernaghan as "the labor movement's mouse that roared," while Women's Wear Daily observed that, "Charles Kernaghan and his anti-sweatshop battle have been shaking up the apparel industry like nothing since the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire."

In 1998, Charles Kernaghan was the keynote speaker at 23 universities, 10 high schools and 39 religious, labor and human rights events. He also appeared on 51 radio and 40 television programs and in over 60 newspaper articles.

Charles Kernaghan is the director of the National Labor Committee, an independent, non-profit human rights organization focused on the protection of worker rights--especially those of the young women assembling garments, shoes, toys and other products for export to the U.S. in Central America, the Caribbean, China and other developing countries.

Kernaghan became involved in the struggle to defend international labor rights after participating in a peace march through Central America in December 1985. He became the director of the NLC in 1990. Pre-1985, Kernaghan taught at Duquesne University in Pittsburgh and at SUNY's Harry Van Arsdale Labor College in New York City. He worked as a photographer, furniture mover, carpenter and shop steward (Carpenters Union Local 608), and cab driver.

Under Kernaghan's directorship, the National Labor Committee has played the leading role in bringing the issue of sweatshop abuses and child labor before the American people and placing it squarely on the national agenda.

Kernaghan has led numerous fact-finding missions to Central America and the Caribbean--most recently bringing a delegation of U.S. university students to investigate working conditions in the free trade zones. He and the NLC have hosted U.S. tours of workers from Honduras, El Salvador, Haiti and China; made several videos; written numerous research reports, and run a number of highly successful international solidarity/corporate campaigns, which have gained enormous media attention and helped the NLC to develop one of the best social justice networks in the country. The NLC now works with over 10,000 religious, labor, student, women's, human rights, solidarity and community groups across the country.

Some of what the NLC and Charles Kernaghan have accomplished:

1. Re-writing U.S. Foreign Aid Laws: In the fall of 1992, an NLC exposé documenting the use of hundreds of millions in U.S. tax dollars to finance company flight from the U.S. impacted on the presidential election, and spurred immediate reform of U.S. foreign assistance programs. Posing as investors, the NLC exposed the extensive use of computerized blacklists across Central America. Within six days of the exposé--covered on 60 Minutes and Nightline and released in the NLC report "Paying to Lose Our Jobs"--Congress had passed legislation re-writing U.S. foreign aid law so that U.S. tax dollars could never again be used to build sweatshops offshore, to provide inducements for companies to flee the U.S. or to fund any project in which worker rights are violated.

2. Working for President Aristide's Return: In 1993 the National Labor Committee revealed that over 87 U.S. companies continued to produce goods in Haiti despite the UN/OAS embargo--paying 14 cent-an-hour wages. The Committee documented the Bush Administration's allocation of $26.7 million to oppose President Aristide's attempt to raise the minimum wage in Haiti, and other social reforms. In October 1994, President Aristide invited Charles Kernaghan to accompany him on his return to Haiti.

3. Taking $160 million a year away from the U.S. companies for violating women's and worker rights: In September 1994, after exposing and filming Liz Claiborne, Wal-Mart, Fruit of the Loom and other companies' use of child labor in Honduras, the NLC testified in Senate hearings held by Senator Howard Metzenbaum. The hearings were featured on World News Tonight and CNN. Following a Cabinet-level viewing of the NLC's video Zoned for Slavery at the White House, President Clinton withdrew a pending $160 million a year increase in tariff benefits to U.S. companies sourcing production in Central America and the Caribbean due to the violation of women's and worker rights.

4. Taking on the GAP / Winning Independent Monitoring: In the summer of 1995, the NLC organized a 59-day tour of the U.S. with two teenaged women maquila workers from Central America who sewed GAP clothing under harsh sweatshop conditions, earning just 12 cents for every $20 GAP shirt they made. The tour led to a successful nationwide campaign to press the GAP to guarantee the rights of these young women in El Salvador by opening its contractors' plants to independent monitoring by the Jesuit University in San Salvador, the human rights office of the Catholic Archdiocese and the prestigious NGO, the Center for Labor Studies. A new concept was born: independent monitoring of factory conditions by local respected religious, human, women's and labor rights organizations trusted by the workers. The NLC has now helped set up a second independent monitoring project in Honduras.

5. Making Kathie Lee Cry / Waking Up the Country to the Issue of Child Labor and Sweatshop Abuses: In the spring of 1996, Charles Kernaghan testified in Congress revealing that 13-year-old girls in a Honduras factory were being forced to work 13-hour shifts, under armed guard, for 31 cents an hour sewing pants for Kathie Lee Gifford and Wal-Mart. Kathie Lee responded on her television program, crying and threatening to sue Kernaghan. The case exploded into a major press story, and the issue of child labor and sweatshop abuses was finally on the national agenda as never before.

6. Mickey Mouse Goes to Haiti / Taking on the Walt Disney Company: In 1997, the NLC exposed Disney sweatshops in Haiti, where workers were stripped of their rights and paid just 28 cents an hour--a starvation wage. Haitian women were paid just 6 cents for every $19.99 "101 Dalmatians" children's outfit they sewed for Disney. The NLC campaign generated over 6,000 letters to the Disney company from grammar school children, and ultimately forced Disney to pull out of Burma, include the right to organize in its Code of Conduct, and review working conditions at their contractors' plants around the world.

7. Quarter Million People Sign a Petition to the President and Congress Calling for an End to Child Labor and Sweatshop Abuses: As a venue for public education, to encourage U.S. people to shop with a conscience and to pressure U.S. companies to do the right thing, the NLC launched the first Holiday Season of Conscience in 1997, encouraging consumers to shop with their conscience during the busy holiday season. In fall and winter 1997, 250,000 people signed a petition to the to the President and the U.S. Congress calling for an end to child labor and sweatshop abuses. In the course of the campaign, 2,530 new religious, labor and community organizations joined the NLC network.

8. 30 Million People See NLC/Hard Copy Investigation: In November 1997, posing as investors, the NLC and Hard Copy exposed the 23-cent-an-hour starvation wages, the miserable living conditions and the systematic human and worker rights violations in free trade zones in Nicaragua, where clothing was sewn for J.C. Penney, Kmart and Wal-Mart. Aided by the spotlight of publicity, 2,000 workers at the Chentex factory organized a union and won a contract.

9. U.S. Companies Lowering Standards, Slashing Wages in China: In 1998, the NLC released its ground-breaking research report "Behind the Label Made in China" documenting conditions in Chinese factories where workers toil 60-to-96-hour work weeks, 10-to-15-hour days, six and seven days a week for wages between 12 ½ and 28 cents an hour without benefits, producing clothing for Ralph Lauren, Liz Claiborne, Wal-Mart, Ann Taylor, Espirit and other U.S. companies. The vast majority of the workers are young women who are fired when they reach the age of 25, since they are "used up," may become pregnant, and the companies do not want to pay maternity benefits. The women are housed in crowded dorms, fed a thin rice gruel, kept under surveillance 24 hours a day and can be fired for even discussing factory conditions. Women in China were paid only $3.44 for a seven-day, seventy-hour work week sewing Kathie Lee pocketbooks.

10. Exposing Wal-Mart's "Buy America" Claim as a Fraud / Launching a Campaign for the People's Right to Know--A Call for Public Disclosure: In 1998, travelling to 14 Wal-Mart stores in 12 states using hidden tape recorders and spending 200 hours counting over 105,000 items of clothing, shoes and handbags, Kernaghan and the NLC proved that Wal-Mart's claim to purchase American-made goods was a lie. Of the 86,500 pieces of clothing counted, only 17 percent was made in the U.S., while 83% was made offshore. Of the 16,245 pairs of shoes, only 16 pairs were made in the U.S., and none of the 1,910 handbags we counted were made here.

In fact, Wal-Mart produces its private label clothing in 48 countries around the world, using 700 to 1000 factories in China alone. Wal-Mart and other companies hide their production around the world behind locked metal gates, in un-named factories surrounded by high cinder-block walls topped with barbed wire and patrolled by armed guards.

The People's Right to Know Campaign demands full public disclosure of the names and addresses of the factories that Wal-Mart and other companies use. The American people have the right to know where, in which factories, under what human rights conditions, and at what wages the products we purchase are made. The Right to Know, by dragging these factories out into the light of day, will make it much harder for companies to abuse child labor or operate sweatshops.

11. 1998 Holiday Season of Conscience--Distributing 250,000 Right to Know Brochures / Helping to Organize 58 Demonstrations Across the Country: On December 10, to mark the 50th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the NLC helped organize 42 events across the country, including in New York City where 1,000 people--led by high school students--joined a candle light march down 5th Avenue from Niketown to the Disney Store to the tree at Rockefeller Center.

Charles Kernaghan has authored numerous research reports, including:

 Paying to Lose Our Jobs (1992)
 Free Trade's Hidden Secrets (1993)
 Haiti After the Coup (1993)
 The U.S. in Haiti (1996)
 An Appeal to the Walt Disney Company (1996)
 What Is It Like to Work for Wal-Mart, Kmart or J.C. Penney in Nicaragua? (1997)
 The Neediest & Greediest / Worst Companies List (1997)
 Made in China (1998)
 Liz Claiborne Sweatshop Production in El Salvador (1998)
 Wal-Mart Sweatshops in Honduras (1998)
 Nike Sweatshops in El Salvador (1998)
 U.S. Apparel Imports from Burma Soar Despite Increased Repression and Sanctions (1998)

posted by Todd | 7:21 AM |
Boot Bush! Donate to the DNC today


archives
Resources
<