Saturday, April 10, 2004
Background Thinking
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd4fa/dd4fa983cd44b8682824ca64931d920e96ed0ec5" alt=""
There is a big difference between working an ED shift, and working a day of floor medicine/cards/surgery/ICU/PEDS. On the one hand, I go home at the end of my day, forget about everyone, and start anew the next day. On the other hand, while I'm working in the ED, I am working continuously. Literally. Pick up a chart, see the patient, order some labs/imaging, pick up the next chart, see that patient, order more labs, pick up a third chart, and a fourth chart. By this time, labs from the first patient may be back. Look at 'em, look at the x-rays. Make a decision and a disposition. Some patients will need interventions or procedures, which limits your ability to pick up the next chart, therefore your colleague picks up the next chart. Dinner? If I'm lucky, I can run over to the coffee shop for a snack. Staying hydrated? Forget about it. I've gone through entire 8 & 12 hour shifts without the need to urinate. Not that I can't find time, I just forget. Finding time to eat and drink feels selfish on a busy day.
The point of telling you this is...there is no time for my brain to mull over "background" thoughts and ideas. I'm sure everyone reading this blog has things they like to think about during the day. Projects, bills, friends, vacation planning, weekend planning, grocery list, etc. On floor medicine, you have downtime to let all these things run through your mind, but not while working in the ED. Every single moment is consumed by patient care and medical decision making. It's tiring!
As a result, when I get home, my brain not only needs to decompress from the activity of the ED, but also time to let these background thoughts that were supressed all day bubble to the surface. THe result? Three to four hours of almost manic, stream-of-conscious thinking, reading, internet surfing, project-finishing activity...very little of it medically related.
I'll talk more about background thinking later. In the meantime, check out Electric Sheep, a visual life form created by the background thinking of a global network of computers...concieved and designed by my high school friend, Scott Draves. See Spot Blog to drop in on his daily background thinking.
PS...I was too busy today to think about each patient as a visitor to my blog!
Friday, April 09, 2004
Two Degrees of Blog...Resurrected!
The Helix, an Australian medical studnet, links to This Won't Hurt a Bit, a medical student bringing interesting life experiences to his blog.
Blogborygmi, an med student blogging about science and technology, links to The Personal Genome, with an ironic (and impossible?) subtitie, "Genomics ... as a lifestyle choice," and a cool paisly background too.
Comment below if you're playing so we can see your new discoveries.
Mr. Hassle website hits...
Pain Day
This morning I presented an M&M; and all went well with discussion and didactic presentation untiil the last 2 minutes when the department head asked the (non-rhetorical) question...could this have been prevented? Gulp. He thought yes, but all cases suffer from hindsight bias. How many patients get sent home and never get adequate follow up but never have catastrophic outcomes? Far, far more than the ones that show back up on a gurney, I'm sure. Anyway, that kind of ruined the rest of my day.
Then the radiologist and I had a little "discussion" regarding a testicular ultrasound ordered after hours. Does anyone know if there is a "re-torsion" rate after surgical correction? This teenager presented with what he described as the same symptoms he had when he had a torsion about a year ago. Given that I wanted to prevent another future M&M; conference, I decided to be a patient advocate and call in the ultrasound tech, even though he'd already had the surgery. Seeing as I have no personal experience with testicular pain, I had to believe what my patient was telling me.
During our radiology/emergency medicine monthly conference this morning, we discussed doing more pediatric ultrasounds as opposed to CTs for certain cases of belly pain. A point raised is that in our hospital, CT is available with techs in house 24 hours a day. Whereas the ultrasound techs go home at 4pm, and sometimes it's like pulling teeth to get them to come back in. I even had one radiologist tell me to "make something else up" as a reason for my study. "The tech won't think that's a good reason for an emergency ultrasound." I don't know why the radiologists let the techs dictate when studies are done, but part of our daily challenge is "ordering" tests that we think are clinically necessary, and not "requesting" tests that the radiologist or technicians don't think are necessary.
Monday, April 05, 2004
Miscellaneous
Patients say funny things that I write down sometimes to provide a chuckle when I think I'll need it. Like the lady today who ended up in the ICU because she had to be "incubated" while in MRI. (She meant intubated).
Wish me luck on Step 3 of the USMLE tomorrow and wednesday. I talked to two people recently who *gasp* failed it! One of them called the USMLE to find out why and they said he got ZERO points for the entire second day of the test. If that doesn't sound like a computerized test taking glitch I don't know what does. Now I'm paranoid.
Sunday, April 04, 2004
The Topology of Medical Thinking
Still fascinated with uncovering the "standard of care" for diagnosing PEs, I decided to start with the well known Well's algorithm for evaluating risk, ordering tests and interpreting them. My goal was to create a process map ala the London Tube Map, to make a visually impacting impression on anyone trying to decide which test to order next. The difficulty is, that the order and meaning of the same test can vary depending on the results of previous tests or on the patient's condition.
I made three different diagrams last night before discovering that when trying to view the process as a network topology, it becomes a three dimentional process! No wonder it's so confusing. My goal is to make each lab test a singe node (e.g. D-dimer, VQ scan, CT angiogram, Venous duplex/follow up venous duplex (should they be the same node?).
Ultimately, if I can create noded diagrams for each algorithm, I could overlay them on one another to see where they differ and why. This whole process of trying to diagram scientific thinking somehow reminds me of a different type of mindful diagramming...check out GPS Drawing. And by removing the scientific thought from the process focusing only on layout and balance, the following pasttimes seem eerily related as well: Rock on, Rock on and House Gymnastics.
If anyone can help me figure out why my brain works this way, I would appreciate it.
Addendum: See also the four color graph theory (aka the four color map theory)
Saturday, April 03, 2004
Seeking the Truth...the Naked Emperor
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e592/1e5924123219abc492478115e812ebfc1150a920" alt=""
In this review, he explicity describes no less than EIGHT different algorithms by many different authors in fields such as internal medicine, emergency medicine and radiology. He presents the strengths and weaknesses of the various studies as well as 10 different myths in evaluating patients for PE. I highly recommend that you review his article to stimulate your thinking about the field, and examine his extensive bibliography (partially annotated).
Thursday, April 01, 2004
Whirlwind
But I did "fix" at least one person today. An unfortunate man with an infected knee and a "Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter" for 6 weeks of home antibiotics. He came in because the arm that had the catheter in it was red & swollen. I sent him up to the vascular lab and sure enough, he had a clot in his subclavian artery. I called the coagulation clinic since I was working during the day shift, called the PICC team to put in a new catheter and got all of his followup arranged. He was a little bummed about the whole situation, but I was glad I found out what was wrong with him.
Later in the day, I argued with one of the medicine attendings about the use of the d-dimer test in patients with greater than a low pre-test probability for a pulmonary embolism. Then we argued about the definition of Low pre-test probability. He wanted to to add up points for the Well's criteria. I wanted to use my clinical judgement. Niether has been proven to be a better method, but he insisted I order the d-dimer anway when I already had an intermediate VQ scan. We then proceded to duplex his legs which were negative. So does he have a PE? Well, 30% of people with PEs have negative venous duplex exams. I'm anxious to find out what happened to him.
Wednesday, March 31, 2004
It's My ...
...of the ICU
...of inpatient medicine
...of rotations with overnight calls
...of sitting through 3 hours of trauma/critical care rounds, falling asleep in the dark
...of chasing interns orders
In celebration
my post from last year's last day in the ICU and my last day as an intern...