home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

 

New Print Edition of CounterPunch Available Exclusively to Subscribers: Cockburn on the Roadmap: It's a Big Hoax in a Long Line of Hoaxes; St. Clair on The Rat in the Grain: Daniel Amstutz and the Looting of the Farms of Iraq; All About David Horowitz: the Dazed and Confused Dirigible of the Right; Handicapping the Democrats: Will It be Graham vs. Dean?; Kucinich Wows Madison: But Seems to Have Forgotten the Horrors of Clintontime; Blumenthal v. Hitchens: Inside the Conspiracy; Merle Haggard Stays the Course: Country Legend Defends Dixie Chicks, Bashes Bush. Remember, the CounterPunch website is supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. Our worldwide web audience is soaring, with more than 60,000 visitors a day. This is inspiring news, but the work involved also compels us to remind you more urgently than ever to subscribe and/or make a (tax deductible) donation if you can afford it. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840 3683 or write CounterPunch, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Coming Soon!
From Common Courage Press

Recent Stories

June 9, 2003

Alex Coolman
Male Rape in US Prisons

Elaine Cassel
Ashcroft is Coming!

Steve Perry
How to Beat Bush, part 1

 

June 7 / 8, 2003

Alexander Cockburn
The Terrible Truth

Jeffrey St. Clair
Going Critical: Bush's War on Endangered Species

Joanne Mariner
Ashcrofts Sides with Torturers

Steven Sherman
A Different Theory of Everything

Ron Jacobs
Sports, Politics and the 60s

M. Shahid Alam
Pauperizing the Periphery

Amelia Peltz
If This is the Road, I'd Rather be Lost

Shelton Hull
Another Powell, Another Capitulation

Binoy Kampmark
Nuclear Deterrence and North Korea

Ben Tripp
A Fish Story

Sen. Robert Byrd
Where is the Outrage?

Robin Philpot
Congo Distortions

Julie Hilden
Murder and the Matrix

Laura Flanders
An Interview with Isabel Allende

David Lindorff
The Last Byline

Adam Engel
Talk Dirty Scary Monsters

Poets' Basement
Kearney, Reiss, Guthrie, Albert and Hamod

 

June 6, 2003

Elaine Cassel
Ashcroft the Insatiable

David Krieger
The Big Lie

Ramzy Baroud
Sharon and the Myth of the Peacemakers

Anthony Gancarski
Sharansky: "Crucifixion is a Privilege"

Sam Hamod
His Own Little Country

Sean Carter
Why Indict Martha Stewart and Not Ken Lay?

David Lindorff
Cracks in the Consensus

Stew Albert
Ari's Great Set

Steve Perry
Greens and Moore in 04? No

 

June 5, 2003

Jeffrey St. Clair
Pools of Fire: The Looming Nuclear Nightmare in the Woods of North Carolina

Imraan Siddiqi
Ann Coulter's Foul Mouth

Michael Leon
Clinton, Reno & Waco: Remember What They've Done

Robert Jensen
Texas Pledge Law Undermines Democracy

Ann Harrison
Rosenthal is Free, But the Fight isn't Over

Paul Dean
How You Can Be Deliriously Happy in the Age of Bush

Gary Leupp
When Spooks Speak Out

Website of the Day
Evidence in Black and White?

 

June 4, 2003

Alexander Cockburn
Federal Judge Blinks; Rosenthal Walks

Lisa Walsh Thomas
The Isaiah Crowd: The Threat of Neo-Christianity

Jason Leopold
Manufacturing the Iraq War

John Chuckman
Blackmail as Policy

Mazin Qumsiyeh
Summit: Peace or Pretense?

Issam Nashashibi
Sharon's Sword of Damocles

Steve Perry
Wolfowitz of Arabia: the VF interview transcript

 

June 3, 2003

Chris Floyd
Copycat Killers: Bush, Jakarta and the Slaughter in Aceh

Jason Leopold
Wolfowitz Tells All

Elaine Cassel
We Interrupt Your Normal Show to Bring You an Important Message from Michael Powell: "Go to Hell, Americans!"

Tom Crumpacker
The Politics of US Cuba Policy

William S. Lind
Fourth Generation Warfare in Iraq

Sam Hamod
The Final Brick in the Wall

Uri Avnery
The Altalena Affair

Hammond Guthrie
Stepping into Some Deep DARPA

Steve Perry
The WashTimes' al-Qaeda nuke "exclusive"

June 2, 2003

Arundhati Roy
Day of the Jackals

Norman Madarasz
Behind the Neo-Con Curtain: Plato, Leo Strauss and Allan Bloom

Alain Frachon and Daniel Vernet
The Strategist and the Philosopher: Strauss and Wohlstetter

Anthony Gancarski
Anti-Imperialism, Then & Now

Standard Schaefer
Wasted at the Pentagon

Jason Leopold
Rocky's Advice to the Dems

Guthrie & Albert
HUAC 58 Years Letter

Steve Perry
The Politics of Terror Alerts

 

May 31, 2003

Alexander Cockburn
A Whiner Called Horowitz

Gary Leupp
The Frauds of War

Dave Lindorff
Clinton, Bush, Lies and Impeachment

Tom Stephens
Does It Matter that the Bush Administration Lied?

Sasan Fayazmanesh
Who Is Next?

Joanne Mariner
Trivializing Terrorism

Wayne Madsen
Ayatollah Ashcroft's Busy Week

Larry Magnuson
Is a Television a Radio or a Billboard?

Elaine Cassel
Wake Up, America!

Gila Svirsky
Waiting for the Lament to End

Susan Davis
Kitchen Dreams

Chris Clarke
Barbra Streisand: Environmental Hypocrite

Chris Floyd
Bush Locates Source of World Evil: God

Adam Engel
Gravity's End Zone

Poets' Basement
Reiss, Guthrie, Orloski, Albert

 

May 30, 2003

Ben Tripp
Crouching Tiger, Hidden Agenda

Neve Gordon
The Bad Fence

Todd Steiner
Endangered Ocean

Robert Freeman
Bush's Tax Cuts: a Form of National Insanity

Sean Carter
Utah Gets Fired Up for Executions

Daniel Bacher
How Bush's War Violated International Laws

Tariq Ali
Re-Colonizing Iraq

Steve Perry
Bush Wars Web Log

 

May 29, 2003

CounterPunch Wire
WMD: Who Said What When

Jason Leopold
Despite Thin Intelligence Reports, US Plans Overthrow of Iran Regime

Ron Jacobs
Popular Uprising, Inc.

Michelle Ciaccorra
Bush's Nuclear Policy: Do As I Say, Not As I Do

Yves Engler
The Economics of Health Care in America: Pay More to Die Sooner

Kimberly Blaker
Vouchers for Jesus

Harry Browne
Stakeknife: Britain's Army Spy at the Top of the IRA

Stew Albert
Cops of the World

Steve Perry
Greens 04: In or Out?

 

 

 

Hot Stories

CounterPunch Wire
WMD: Who Said What When

Cindy Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter I Can't Hear From

Elaine Cassel
Civil Liberties Watch

Michel Guerrin
Embedded Photographer Says: "I Saw Marines Kill Civilians"

Uzma Aslam Khan
The Unbearably Grim Aftermath of War: What America Says Does Not Go

Paul de Rooij
Arrogant Propaganda

Gore Vidal
The Erosion of the American Dream

Francis Boyle
Impeach Bush: A Draft Resolution

Click Here for More Stories.

 

Subscribe Online


Search CounterPunch

 

June 9, 2003

Compassionate Conservative

Human Worth in Bush's America

By DR. GERALD LOWER

Michael Kinsley (Tyranny of the Rich, MSNBC, June 06, 2003) has recently legitimized open discussion of class warfare in America, and the historical context for this western millennial trait has been discussed with regard to it's relationships to fundamentalist western religion (Class Warfare Against the Poor, CounterPunch, Jan. 30, 2003). Rather than blame Michael Kinsley for his poor grasp of political correctness, we might also consider addressing the actual issue.

By all right wing gods, we certainly do have an awkward time in America with the notions of human greed and human fairness. The rich are entirely unable to define or recognize greed. The poor, as a result, seldom experience fairness. Rather than having fairness as a bottom line, it has become the reciprocal of greed (greed up, fairness down). As the driving force of capitalism, greed has been increasingly in dominion since World War II, maxing out with the current Bush administration.

Here we are, a nation birthed from the concepts of fairness and equality, and we have recently produced the largest gap between the rich and poor in the history of the human race. The fact that the religious right wing accepts this as the proper norm for the entire world is really all the proof needed that the religious right has never been able to grasp the concepts of fairness and equality. Given our purported American role of nourishing Democracy at home and abroad, this outcome ought really be explained to the American citizens so that they might better appreciate the job their government is doing for them in the name of fairness.

In sorry truth, our American grasp of human fairness and equality is right up there with our grasp of human sexuality, not having a clue what that is about either. We are, as a nation, rather obsessed lately with the adolescent notion that penile size matters in sex (yes, "you have mail"). Never mind Whoopi Goldberg's sage advice to men, that they ought stick their tongues through the hole in a LifeSaver™ and thats "all I wanna see." Viagra™, likewise, will never make much of an impact among the lesbian set. Somehow over the past few millennia, men have simply missed the self-evident fact that the primary sensual apparatus on the female body is situated externally. Somehow over the past few millennia, men have simply missed the simple truth that if you are not making love with the entire woman, body, mind and soul, then you simply ain't all the way in anyway. Beneath this "American" view, my friends, is mythology, ignorance beyond empirical and experiential comprehension. Men have simply not gotten the message, have they?

We are, likewise, rather obsessed lately with the pathetic notion that "greed is good," that greed is central to the nourishment of democracy in America. Never mind Kenneth Lay and American dominion by corrupt middlemen who create or produce nothing themselves. Never mind eating up the poor to eke a little more money out for the rich. Somehow over the past two millennia, the right wing has missed the self-evident fact that the primary causes of unfairness and inequality in the world are greed and self-righteousness. Somehow over the past few millennia, the right wing has missed the self-evident fact that "Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could not have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration" (Lincoln). Beneath this right view, my friends, is mythology, ignorance beyond empirical and experiential comprehension." The right wing have simply not gotten the message, have they?

Consider the various contributors to America, for better or worse. On the one hand, we have had leadership in America which took us in the direction of fairness and equality in the interest of the values of nascent Christianity and Democracy, e.g., Jefferson and Lincoln. On the other hand, we have had "leadership" in America which has taken us in the direction of unfairness and inequality in the name of the values of Republican crony capitalism and "compassionate" conservatism, e.g., Bush and Cheney. Between these extremes, we can consider the concept of relative human worth. That range embraces everything from human genius to human criminality, from knowledgeable creativity to ignorant destruction, from human healers to human hucksters.

The majority of us live in between these extremes, aspiring to be neither saints or sinners, being kindly one day and maybe not so kindly the next, just trying to survive the unfairness of a harshly competitive, mindless socioeconomic system. We mostly just vacillate between acceptance and judgement, indifference and outrage. It is the few at the extremes who provide our saints and our sinners, either by encouraging us to think for ourselves, or by encouraging us to allow others ("them") to think for us, respectively. Speaking directly to this dichotomy in leadership, Jefferson put it this way in a letter to DuPont de Nemours, "We both consider the people as our children, and love them with parental affection. But you love them as infants whom you are afraid to trust without nurses; and I as adults to whom I freely leave to self-government."

With the right wing Republican takeover of American government, capitalism has come to transcend the traditional western dialectic between liberal (empiricist, New Testament) and conservative (transcendentalist, Old Testament) viewpoints, replacing traditional notions of relative human worth with notions of personal net worth. We have become a nation in which everything revolves around money, decidedly in service to mammon (Common knowledge here, people. Deal with it).

Without money, you are no one, you are nothing, you have no "rights." The concept of personal character hasn't been recognized by American financial institutions for decades. Even with an income of $200,000 per annum, you are next to nothing under "influence-for-a-fee" crony capitalism. You simply do not have adequate means to be a viable contributor to the right wing political agenda. You do not have enough chips to gamble at the crony capitalist table.

Employing a purely fiscal approach to relative human worth, Bush's self-enabled tax break for 2003 will be the equivalent of what can be earned by working full time at $20 per hour, a tax savings for Bush more than most Americans can even earn by working. Not bad for a man who is so self-evidently challenged in the intellectual, moral and spiritual realms. Bush is pretty special. Cheney's tax break for 2003 will be the equivalent of what can be earned by working full time at $150 per hour, more than the average physician can make by working. Cheney is enormously special.

And that IS the problem. Cheney is just too special for human belief, but that doesn't matter to the self-righteous who question not how they became so special. They embrace only the notion that they are special, by the grace of their god. Downplaying every notion of meritocracy is essential to this embrace.

There simply is no empirical or logical basis for taking personal fiscal worth as any criterion at all for evaluating relative human worth. Even the first Christian, the abused and ignored savior of right wing religion, died penniless. Even Jefferson accomplished perfection in leaving this life with pretty much what he had when he entered it, abiding by the self-evident notion that "you can't take it with you," and failing to abide by the notion that his offspring were so remarkably blessed that they ought not have to contribute for a livelihood. The only rationale for using money as a measure of human worth comes from the traditional right wing religious notion that personal wealth is an indication of heavenly favoritism which, in turn, provides justification for self-righteousness and belligerence in one's own name and interest. Accordingly, any growing gap between the rich and poor is necessarily seen as god's will, never-mind the will of the people.

This approach to self-justification is the practical equivalent of psychosis insofar as it is a refutation of empirical reality, a refutation of human reason and a denial of human history. As Saint Bernard pointed out, "No more vain than insane." This religious effort to be "right" for the sake of being "right" is characteristic of fanatical and criminal thought, characteristic of fundamentalist religious thought regardless of brand name (William Raspberry, Uncontested Zealotry gives GOP an Edge, Seattle Times, June 3, 2003). This approach is necessarily devoid of reason because it sees "special" people as being worth literally hundreds and thousands times more than a minimum wage worker. This all makes perfectly good sense to the self-righteous religious right wing.

To Jefferson, this was utter nonsense. The members of his American Philosophical Society covered the range from established scientists and physicians to creative craftsmen and naturalist farmers. To Jefferson, it was not whom you knew but what you knew that made you human and worthy of being a citizen in America. Indeed, the evidence would have it that America's intellectual fathers were rather modest men, hoping to convince with logic rather than spin. Jefferson's tombstone does not even mention that he was president.

Is getting an honest, realistic handle on the concepts of fairness and meritocracy just too tough for right wing comprehension? If so, we are going to have to dump them from the political scene, no other option in a world needing a little fairness. But not to worry, as the right wing seems to be doing everything possible to ensure that end on their own. "The people who should worry most about the credibility gap are those who support Bush's foreign policy (E.J. Dionne, Jr., Spinning Away Trust, Washington Post, June 6, 2003)."

Democracy, my friends, is built on trust, trust in human rights and trust in our fellow humans. Human rights transcend a posteriori religious law looking for someone to punish. The most important laws in a democracy are a priori laws designed to prevent people from falling through tears in the social fabric (remember the 60s?). The only absolute law in a true democracy is the law that you must think for yourself and make your own decisions. Everything else follows from that one law in a government of, by and for the people.

Dr. Gerry Lower lives in Keystone, South Dakota. He can be reached at: tisland@enetis.net


Weekend Edition Features

Alexander Cockburn
The Terrible Truth

Jeffrey St. Clair
Going Critical: Bush's War on Endangered Species

Joanne Mariner
Ashcrofts Sides with Torturers

Steven Sherman
A Different Theory of Everything

Ron Jacobs
Sports, Politics and the 60s

M. Shahid Alam
Pauperizing the Periphery

Amelia Peltz
If This is the Road, I'd Rather be Lost

Shelton Hull
Another Powell, Another Capitulation

Binoy Kampmark
Nuclear Deterrence and North Korea

Ben Tripp
A Fish Story

Sen. Robert Byrd
Where is the Outrage?

Robin Philpot
Congo Distortions

Julie Hilden
Murder and the Matrix

Laura Flanders
An Interview with Isabel Allende

David Lindorff
The Last Byline

Adam Engel
Talk Dirty Scary Monsters

Poets' Basement
Kearney, Reiss, Guthrie, Albert and Hamod

 

Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /