:: Bite The Wax Tadpole ::

Culture, language, politics, Europe, the US and whatever strikes my fancy.
:: Where does "Bite The Wax Tadpole" come from? :: bloghome | contact ::
[::..archive..::]
Atom feed
[::..topical blogs..::]
[::..euro blogs..::]
[::..daily reads..::]
[::..slow roll..::]
Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com
Listed on BlogShares

:: Monday, May 17, 2004 ::

What did he know, and when did he know it?


Michael Moore's Farenheit 911 raises an unexpected question.


It comes as no surprise that Michael Moore's latest anti-Bush polemic is a big hit at Cannes. What I did find a little surprising was the fact that it reportedly includes footage of American soldiers abusing Iraqi prisoners:


In the light of the current controversy over pictures of Iraqi prisoners being abused, his latest film is right up to date in showing American soldiers in the field mocking and posing with hooded Iraqi prisoners.


"This is the first footage of abuse and humiliation of these Iraqi detainees," Moore said.



This raises an interesting question: When was this footage taken and when did it come into Michael Moore's possession? It sure sounds like evidence of violations of the Geneva Conventionts being committed, which should have been reported immediately to the appropriate authorities.


Considering how quickly the military moved to investigate and shut down the abuses at Abu Ghraib once they were reported, it seems likely that they would have responded equally quickly to Moore's material -- possibly reducing or even preventing the abuses that have been splattered across the media landscape for the past few weeks.


Did Michael Moore report his evidence to the authorities? Or did he withhold it, knowing that it would boost his film? How many prisoners suffered unnecessarily for Michael Moore's vanity?


Update: I've since seen a report (in print) that the film was finished just 10 days before screening, so it is possible that the material in question was added at the last minute. I'd still like to know if that's the case.


:: Erik | 5/17/2004 06:56:41 PM | | ::
Inside every silver cloud, a dark lining


The reaction to Abu Ghraib inside of Iraq has been muted in comparison to the rest of the Arab world. According to the LA Times, that's bad news for the coalition.


In the LA Times' view, Iraqi response is muted because Iraqis have experienced firsthand the depravity of the American occupiers and expect no better. I'm paraphrasing, of course, but not very loosely.


Of course, the story was written long ago as far as the LAT is concerned -- the "journalist"'s job now is to fit whatever comes along into the narrative. One rather suspects that if more Iraqis were delighted by harsh treatment for Baathist thugs, the LA Times would take the coalition to task for pandering to their base instincts and maybe sowing the seeds for civil war.


Iraq the Model has another take on the issue, as does his friend linked above. But they're just ordinary Iraqis and can't be expected to understand the Iraqi point-of-view as well as those highly trained journalists at the LAT do.


Update: The archive at Iraq the Model appears to be wonky. If the links above don't work, go to the main page and search for the entries on May 6 & May 8 2004.



Update: Here's another report on Iraqi reaction to the scandal and its aftermath, this time from a Marine Colonel in Iraq.


:: Erik | 5/17/2004 10:37:35 AM | | ::
In a heartbeat.


Me too. (via Greg Piper)
:: Erik | 5/17/2004 12:24:45 AM | | ::

:: Thursday, May 13, 2004 ::
If you're looking for evidence that the Vatican is a political rather than a moral entity, you need look no further than this (article in German).

Vatican: Torture Worse Than September 11th


The abuse of Iraqi prisoners by US soldiers is, by Vatican lights, a greater blow to the United States than September 11th. Vatican Foreign Minister Archbishop Giovanni Lajolo told the Italian daily "La Repubblica" that the abuse scandal fuels the hatred of Arabs for the west and, above all, Christianity. (...) The torture scandal makes it even more important that the UN intervenes in Iraq and the US gives authority to Iraqi's as quickly as possible.



It's worth noting that Archbishop Giovanni Lajolo seems entirely preoccupied with political consequences of the two acts and with advancing the Vatican's political agenda (strengthen the UN, weaken the US). Nowhere does he evidence the slightest concern for the immorality of killing more than three thousand innocent people.

:: Erik | 5/13/2004 01:59:27 AM | | ::

:: Monday, May 10, 2004 ::
A Long and Interesting Read.


The Taguba report is available at GlobalSecurity.org.


The report is detailed and hard-hitting and should put paid to any notion that such abuse is typical or that the military is attempting a coverup. It won't, but that's just politics in an election year (and the press running with the narrative they prefer).

:: Erik | 5/10/2004 10:53:30 PM | | ::

:: Sunday, May 09, 2004 ::
Cognitive Whiplash


If rumors of child abuse at Abu Ghraib turn out to be true, I tend to favor this suggestion, not just because it is appropriate (assuming a very high standard of proof is met) but because of what would likely follow.


In the immediate aftermath, the perpetrators of such heinous acts would be justly condemned by pretty much everyone. The European political class (and much of the American left) would, with their typical hyperbolic flair, go much further -- breathlessly placing them on the chart of historical evil-doers somewhere between Hitler and Pol Pot (though still well below President Bush himself).


Once the offenders were sentenced to death, however, the chattering classes would be required by canon to lionize them as heroes (see: Mumia).


One can only hope that such a rapid transition from "evil incarnate" to "poor, innocent saints" produces enough cognitive whiplash to snap a few necks.



:: Erik | 5/9/2004 11:52:54 PM | | ::

:: Thursday, May 06, 2004 ::
Rachel Lucas comes out of hibernation, and the word "Asshat" suddenly starts appearing all over the place once again. Coincidence? We report, you decide.


In any case, welcome back Rachel - we've missed you.

:: Erik | 5/6/2004 05:32:21 PM | | ::

:: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 ::
The word 'Accountability' does not appear in the EU dictionary. MEP attention is apparently focused on the important stuff.

:: Erik | 5/5/2004 12:08:02 PM | | ::
:: Friday, April 30, 2004 ::
Go read the Messopotamian now for an idea of what was and is required in Iraq.


It'll be much harder now, but maybe it isn't too late. Unless of course the coalition really is planning to cut and run in Fallujah.
:: Erik | 4/30/2004 12:57:59 AM | | ::

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?