Mutilations and Muslim law
“A recent fatwa posted on a popular Islamic website in Saudi Arabia,” reports Neil McFarquhar in The New York Times, “explains when a Muslim may mutilate the corpse of an infidel.”
The ruling by Sheik Omar Abdullah Hassan al-Shehabi specifies two circumstances in which the desecration of an infidel – i.e., a non-Muslim – is permitted. One is retaliation – “when the enemy is disfiguring Muslim corpses or when it otherwise serves the Islamic nation.” The other is when mutilation will “terrorize the enemy” or “gladden the heart of a Muslim warrior.”
With conditions like those, it is hard to imagine any situation in which an Islamist militant couldn’t justify the mutilation of a victim’s body.
“That a cleric can post such an argument in an open forum,” comments McFarquhar, “goes a long way toward explaining how the most radical interpretations of religious texts flourish in Saudi Arabia.”
But it isn’t only in Saudi Arabia that they flourish.
Indeed. Read it all; Jacoby’s got it right. Here’s his conclusion:
Our enemies make no secret of their intentions: We will bow to their totalitarian idea of Islam, or we will be killed. And not only killed, but mangled, mutilated, and subjected to the most hideous indignities they can devise.
The terrorists and their followers burn and batter corpses for the same reason the Taliban smashed magnificent statues – for the same reason Hitler wrote “Mein Kampf": to openly proclaim their contempt for the moral principles of the civilized world.
Ultimately it is up to the world’s moderate, modern Muslims to rise up against the barbarians in their midst. Until that day comes, there is nothing the West can do to ameliorate or appease this enemy. We can only destroy it – or be destroyed.
The problem is that the moderate Muslims are in the same position as the west. The barbarians are giving them the same choice.
Sooner would be good. I think Ledeen’s “faster, please” is going to be changed to “yesterday, please” any day now.
Comment by The Bellicose Kat — 15 Jun, 2004 @ 18:28