Pictures Matter: The Ethics of War Images
Congressman James Inhofe (R-OK) this week said he was more "outraged by the
outrage" than the treatment of Iraqi prisoners by American soldiers and contractors.
Of course he was. Like most conservatives and the White House he would prefer
we see nothing from Iraq but smiling Iraqis. Oh, but there aren't any of those
any more are there?
They also never wanted us to see the pictures of flag draped coffins on that
cargo plane returning from Iraq. Basically they don't want us to see anything
that will further diminish support for a war that we were misled into. There
aren't a lot of legs to stand on now if you are a supporter other than shallow
flag waving.
Iraq war supporters say that showing difficult images will lessen support
for the war. Well of course it will, and should. That's because Iraq is a war
of choice, not necessity. If it was a justified war of necessity, even the
worst images would deter only the few who lack the capacity to see the larger
issue. The exception is when unnecessary and unjust actions are taken in an
otherwise just war.
This is what happened in Dresden, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki during World War
II. Dresden, Germany was firebombed in 1945 and over 100,000 were killed. The
bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were entirely unnecessary and cost the lives
of more than 200,000 Japanese. (The propaganda which many still believe that
it would have saved the lives of tens of thousands of americans was just that,
propaganda. Japan was already finished.)
But what if we saw, immediately, or even live, the images from Dresden where
entire families, buildings, and blocks were incinerated, one after the other?
What about the radiation burn victims from Hiroshima? They should have been
in the paper the very next day. First person accounts should have been broadcast
across American radio. If they were, such excesses would be less tolerated
today.
Just like Vietnam reduced, for some, the appetite for war, so should recent
images from Iraq quell the blind patriotism of Bush war supporters, few of
whom seem to think beyond the sloganeering.
It's one thing to see dead enemy soldiers, quite another to see dead civilians,
especially when they are not "collateral damage" but rather intentionally or
carelessly killed. It is our duty to view and reflect upon such pictures, to
consider the impact of our political and military actions.
I make a point of looking at difficult images of wars,
past and present. I look, and I say "This
is what my government is doing. I am responsible for this."
Lupus est homo homini
Posted by Dean Terry at May 16, 2004 08:30 AM| TrackBack