Search
Worth a Look.
June 02, 2004
Supermodels, astronauts, porn stars and journalists: BBC News looks at some of the famous (and infamous) candidates standing in the European Parliament elections
May 27, 2004
After Porto's victory in the European Cup last night, their coach Jose Mourinho has announced he is leaving the club to work in England. He hasn't said which club he's joining yet, though.
May 18, 2004
Russia and the Baltic republics, and now the EU. A fraught relationship, not least because of suspicions of bad faith on both sides. What is to be done? Some thoughts from a key Munich think tank, in German.
If you're finding it a drag to write new posts for your blogs, then Matt's new keyboard may be able to cut the time it takes
Politics in Europe
Unpigeonholeable
Center
- Bonobo Land
- Eamonn Fitzgerald
- Frans Groenendijk
- Mats Lind
- Frank Quist
- Gregorian Ranting
- Castrovalva
- Vermetel
- The Young Fogey
Left
- Crooked Timber
- BertramOnline
- Socialism in an Age of Waiting
- politX - truthful lies
- Norman Geras
- Davos Newbies
- Histologion
- Party of European Socialists
- Martin Wisse
- D-squared Digest
- Virtual Stoa
Right
- Johan Norberg
- Fredrik K.R. Norman
- Iberian Notes
- Fainting in Coyles
- Airstrip One
- Abiola Lapite
- Transport Blog
- Ivan Janssens
National or regional politics
- The Russian Dilettante
- Daily Czech
- All About Latvia
- Dragan Antulov (.hr)
- Baltic Blog
- Björn Staerk (.no)
- Dissident Frogman (.fr)
- ¡No Pasarán!(.fr)
- Ostracised from Österreich (.at)
- Cose Turche (.it)
- Living With Caucasians
- Voicing My Views (.de)
- Slugger O'Toole (.uk/.ie)
- Gavin's Blog.com (.ie)
- The Yorkshire Ranter (.UK)
- Shot by both sides (.uk)
- British Politics (.uk)
- Harry's Place (.uk)
- James Graham (.uk)
- Edge of England's Sword (.uk)
- Beatnik Salad (.uk)
- Anthony Wells (.uk)
- Tom Watson MP (.uk)
- Richard Allan MP (.uk)
- Blogo Slovo
- Changing Trains
- The Argus
- Siberian Light
- Russpundit
- Turkish Torquea
- Aegean Disclosure
- Balkanalysis.com
Life in Europe
- Jez
- Lilli Marleen
- Chris Lightfoot
- Michael Brooke
- Helmintholog
- Desbladet
- Reinder Dijkhuis
- Textism
- Martin Stabe
- Chocolate and Zucchini
- Anna Feruglio Dal Dan
- Gentry Lane
- Pligget
- Charlie Stross
- Netlex
- European History Blog
- elephantrabbits
- Dwarf's Corner
- North Atlantic Skyline
- ShazzerSpeak
- Noumenon
- jogin.com :: Weblog
- Too Much Beauty
- Vanessa's Blog
- De Steen der Eigenwijzen
Tech bloggers
- Loic Le Meur Blog
- Jill Walker
- Marysia Cywinska-Milonas
- PaidContent.org
- misbehaving.net
- Max Romantschuk's Personal Site
- Ben Hammersley
- Torsten Jacobi's Weblog
- In Dust We Trust
- Heiko Hebig
- thinking with my fingers
- Tom Coates
On hiatus
Non-anglophone
Expats
- Stefan Geens
- Vaara
- Silentio
- Giornale Nuovo
- Francis Strand
- Halfway down the Danube
- Open Brackets
- Lost in Transit
- Chris Scheible
- metamorphosism
- Arellanes.com
- Glory of Carniola
- Adam Curry
- Flaschenpost
- Sofia Sideshow
- Papa Scott
- anythingarian barcelona blog
- Ken Saxon in France
- Blethers.com
- Blethers Guestblog
- Culture Shock and the Blonde Librarian
- Hemmungen
- Moron Abroad
- PF's Blog
- PapaScott
- The Puerta del Sol Blog--Reflections on life in Spain and Spanish culture
- Rogis
- Sodazitron se pogovarja
- tracey marshall knows swedish
- Kinuk
- Peace Corps || Ukraine on ::wendylu.com::
- February 30
Not Europe
- Arts & Letters Daily
- Political Theory Daily Review
- Amygdala
- Brad DeLong
- Matt Welch
- MemeFirst
- Amitai Etzioni
- Felix Salmon
- Opinions You Should Have
- Invisible Adjunct
- Cosma Shalizi
- Blogorrhoea
- Randy McDonald's Livejournal
- Angua's First Blog
- Buscaraons
- Vivre à Grossdale
- Nobody Knows Anything
- Locus Solus
- Language Hat
- Southern Exposure
- Marstonalia
- Boulevard St Michel
- Innocents Abroad
- Wäldchen vom Philosophenweg
- Edward Hasbrouck
Living blogzines
- Living on the Planet
- Living in Europe
- Living in China
- Living in India
- Living in Latin America
- Living in Australia
Middle East politics
US politics
- Kevin Drum
- Atrios
- Tacitus
- Michael Froomkin
- Obsidian Wings
- Matthew Yglesias
- Eugene Volokh and friends
- Max Sawicky
- Daniel Drezner
- Josh Marshall
- James Joyner
- TAPPED
- Zizka
- Greenehouse Effect
- Alas, A Blog
- Progressive Gold
- Daily Rant
- Letter from Gotham
- Making Light
- Road to Surfdom
- Patrick Nielsen Hayden
- Respectful of Otters
- Phil Carter
- Laura Rozen
- Mark Schmitt
- The Poor Man
Not weblogs
EU news sources
- EUobserver
- euro-correspondent.com
- EU Business
- European Voice
- Euractiv
- The Sprout
- EUpolitix
- Yahoo!: EU News
- Yahoo!: EMU News
- Google News search for "eu"
- Europa - the EU:s official website
- Europa: EU News
General news sources
- Financial Times
- The Independent
- Dagens Nyheter (in swedish)
- The International Herald Tribune
- The New York Review of Books
- The London Review of Books
Specialized/Regional
Think Tanks
- Centre for the New Europe
- Centre for European Policy Studies
- The European Policy Centre
- Centre for European Reform
- The Federal Trust
- IIPR (UK)
- European Institute of Public Administration
Scholarship
Misc
XML and tracking
- Syndicate this site
- TechnoratiProfile
- Sitemeter:
Powered by
November 11, 2003
If You’re Surprised By This You Shouldn’t Be
Really, much as I would like to see a marked and rapid improvement in the democratic climate in Iraq, forgive me if I can’t help considering most of the discussion about the possibilitiesof this occuring in the near future a bit like a contemporary revamp of ’innocents abroad’. At the end of the day all these endless ’corruption indexes’ that you see published from time to time in the press do actually mean something. Having lived in a society that was relatively less corrupt (the UK) and one that is relatively more (Spain), I do get to note some important differences. One of these relates to the social standing of politicians.
Now many may feel that in the UK, the US, France, Sweden etc, politicians don’t have the highest of reputations. This is undoubtedly true: but if you come to Spain, Italy or Greece, you will find that things get markedly worse. There is an interesting piece on the ChinaBiz website about Guanxi, or informal trust, in China, and the role it plays in the context of an institutional structure that few have confidence in. The more corrupt the society the less important is the official framework for information transit, and the more important are the informal ones. Crooked Timber blogger Henry Farrell has some interesting material which relates to the role of informal trust in the packaging machinery and textile manufacturing industries in Northern Italy, where, as is probably well known, outsourcing into small efficient units has been both speedy and effective. The curious detail is that Italy is the European society that regularly gets the lowest score when it comes to general confidence in the public administration. The interpretation that has normally been put on this is that such micro-social informal networks normally blossom in precisely these circumstances. This I can also confirm from my work with Bulgarians. So when you get down to Iraq, you can imagine: how little credence is given to secular politicians (this may indeed provide some of the explanation for the robustness of the religious networks) and how important the alternative apparatus is. Any realistic strategy would need to start from this reality. When you think about it the German post WWII example which is so often cited in connection with reconstruction may well be badly flawed. It may have been something about the very nature of German civil society that made this type of transition possible. If we do a compare and contrast exercise with Japan, the point should be obvious. I don’t know yet just exactly where this argument is leading me, but the short term conclusion isn’t exactly an optimistic one. Unfortunately the dynamic impetus provided by Guanxi in China, and the presence a thoroughly undemocratic institutional structure, only serve to reinforce the point.
US authorities in Iraq have put on hold hundreds of millions of dollars worth of mobile telephone contracts, while they investigate allegations that the bidding process was hijacked by associates of the new Iraqi governing council.
When the Iraqi Ministry of Communications last month awarded three Middle Eastern consortia two-year licences to build and operate wireless phone networks, the deals were heralded as a breakthrough for regional operators willing to invest in the new Iraq.
But the US-led Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq has been advised to postpone signing the contracts, according to a US administration official speaking on condition of anonymity. CPA lawyers in Iraq made the recommendation to delay signing the contracts for 10 days to allow time to investigate claims of cronyism by the Iraqi authorities in awarding the licences, the official said.
Source: Financial Times
LINK
Two days and no comments, nobody got anything at all to say about this, or is it just too depressing for words?
Posted by: Edward at November 13, 2003 06:12 AMYeah - hold on.
This actually is a good piece and it’s an important point about why nation-building can be easy in one place and hard in another. An independent Quebec, Catalonia or Scotland would still be a place with police, courts, civil codes and anti-corruption laws. Nation building there would be a piece of cake. An independent Kurdistan - for example - probably wouldn’t.
This sort of thinking at once undermines many of the ideas behind national liberation movements and at the same time makes a strong point for European federalism. Why should Scotland want to separate from the UK if there will still be freedom of movement, free trade and a common currency? What point is there to doing it if economic polices are written in Brussels and the final court of appeal is in Strasbourg? Scotland already basically controls its own schools and language policies (and they are really crappy language policies too), and isn’t likely to change its tax structure much even if it is independent. So, why separate and impose the cost of government reorganisation on the people? The same argument applies to Catalonia and Quebec.
On the other hand, why should Kurdistan be independent if it means replacing short-sighted Turkish and Iraqi autocrats with corrupt Kurdish officials? It is justified when (as has been and may still be true in Kurdistan) the level of oppression targeted at the affected population is so great that their own corrupt leadership is still better than what they’ve got. But, national liberation is hard to justify otherwise.
At the same time, if France and Germany both have basically functional governments and social structures, comparable standards of living, and similar notions of law, why should there be any sort of barrier between the two countries?
My second point is that what makes guanxi different from, say, contract law is mostly a matter of cultural anthropology. As Marx said, property is a social relation. So is guanxi. We have built one set of institutions around the set of social relations that our culture recognises. In China, they’ve done the same. Calling one corruption and the other fairness misses some important content. Eliminiating guanxi networks in China probably requires a social revolution as great as 1792, and another century after that to really solify the alternative. It isn’t a short term solution. I’d give Italy another century or two before informal trusts become a thing of the past - after all, it was a fascist state less than 60 years ago. In the meantime, you can still have rising standards of living if you can find competent people who know how to make the system work. Even in places like the US, government at least is still very much based on informal networks that, under other circumstances, would qualify as corrupt. Congress is built on horse-trading, and the last US President to really make a mark as a legislator, Lyndon B. Johnson, was so effective precisely because he knew how to mobilise these networks, and because he had a whole lot of guanxi from his many years in the Senate.
A final point: The orthodox anthropological interpretation of “magic” - as I understand it anyway - is that it represents a kind of formalised guanxi network in the societies where it operates. This puts the traditional Christian taboo against magic in a different light, and also makes “anti-magic” laws like Swaziland’s relatively comprehensible. Instead of being about competing religous faiths, deals with the devil, or even superstition per se, it is about competing power structures.