Saturday, February 28
I am now blogging over at Crescat Sententia . Current most FAQ: This winter will be last my quarter of taking classes at Chicago. I'll go on a leave of abscence for spring quarter and officially graduate on June 12th. I'll probably leave Chicago for DC around the beginning of May. On June 9th, I'll leave for Kazakhstan to teach English for the Peace Corps. I'll be working in a secondary school somewhere there. (But where is that country? Here. ). I'll come back to the US in mid-August 2006 and start law school that fall. "...Soon now we shall go out of the house and go into the convulsion of the world, out of history into history and the awful responsibility of Time."
posted by Amanda |
2/28/2004 04:51:24 PM
Comment </noscript>
Tuesday, April 15
moving alert: Enough with this. Randomly discussing the efficacy of saints has done nothing to solve my problem. Nor has reposting archives, deleting and reforming the template, or searching for problems in the template's code--all the solutions suggested by Blogger's support sites and faqs. My computer problems, as always, remain damningly obscure. Still, I will continue to blog. I'm joining (or is it forming?) a conspiracy. Will and Jonathan Baude have invited me to join a conspiracy over at baude.blogspot.com , despite the fundamental unfit of our last names. So, come visit me there if you like random notes on Nauru (provided with the same promptness as The Onion's Outside Scoop), or the same copyright infringement of books I like (possibly coming next: a poem entitled "Flood" or something from Graham Greene's "The Heart of the Matter" or [non-fiction] "The Wages of Whiteness" or the ever-present, ever-popular, E: none of the above), or random comments on what I dream about and write in my sleep (memories I'll learn to ignore), or whatever else it is I write about or whatever else you read this for (there will continue to be little along the lines of I did X,Y,&Z; today--I must appear somewhat unpredicatable and mysterious). And hopefully this weekend, I'll install my archives at http://home.uchicago.edu/~abutler, although I'm sure this is a matter far more relevant to me than to anyone else. [yes, it does currently say "The page cannot be found."] I will continue to blogsquat here. And if you use me to get to other people, here are my links:Annie , Kathy , Sudeep , Sudeep's hypothetical future cat , Will (and other Baudes) , Alex , Kristy , Ruthie The Advocate , Style Invitational , Miss Manners , Volokh Conspiracy , How Appealing , Actual Malice , Bartleby , KJV , Choking Lot of Quotes , Weather.com: 60637 Baton Rouge High , U Chicago , U Chicago Law How else could it end, but with -- "...Soon now we shall go out of the house and go into the convulsion of the world, out of history into history and the awful responsibility of Time."
posted by Amanda |
4/15/2003 11:23:55 PM
Comment </noscript>
so, how crazy is it being tonight?
posted by Amanda |
4/15/2003 12:51:16 AM
Comment </noscript>
Sunday, April 13
ghetto blog. wonderful. In honor of that I shall be remarkably unprofound. Thanks for the advices. so, what's new to say? I dreamed I met Willa Cather last night. It was as though we were in the habit of getting together to chat every few weeks, but I'd actually run into her a few days before the most recent meeting. She's about 50 years old. Tall and slim like a femine cowboy. Straight red hair only beginning to show grey, cut close to her head, about chin-length. Jeans and a nice western-ish button down shirt with small silver buttons. Her voice is quiet and somewhat low. And I finally tried Spam yesterday evening. Hearing my father give me the "when I was young, I had to walk 5 miles through the snow uphills both ways to get to school" never had much of an effect on me, but he never did remember all parts of that line and snow and hills are a bit scarce in Florida. Over winter break, though, I got treated to the "when I was growing up, we used to eat Spam for dinner." How about some red beans and rice, or lentils and brown rice, for that protein? Anyway, so it went. One fellow has been saying for a while that Hot & Spicy spam--made with real Tabasco--is actually tasty. It's only available in Hawaii, Guam, and parts of California. It's not bad. Rather greasy, with a taste combining bacon, breakfast sausage, and proscuitto. I could see that spam fried rice could be tasty, with enough rice and veggies to distribute it around. I'm not so convinced about the spam version of sushi. [4/12/2003 5:37:45 PM | Amanda Butler] OK... this is frustrating. Blogger won't display any of my sidebar -- my archives or my links -- and it will only display the most recent post. I don't know why it's doing this. Certainly, I didn't conciously program any of that. The closest troubleshooting I could find on the Blogger page suggested switching to "no archive" format. I tried that, and it didn't work. If you have any brilliant suggestions, please email me. If you have any ideas on how to fix this that are likely brighter than mine (remember: I don't know how to program), please email me. William @ 4:35AM | 2003-04-13| I took the time to stop and read a couple of community sites. The best suggestion I have for now is find someone with back issues in their cache so your writing isn't lost. Also, a quick prayer to St. Jude wouldn't hurt. :( annie @ 7:45AM | 2003-04-13 aww. sorry, maybe you could switch to xanga and have a backup blog? Amanda @ 5:45PM | 2003-04-13 oddly enough, the archives are ok (now saved in one giant document on my harddrive). and if I follow someone's link to any archive past the present, it show up properly. it's just this most recent set of posts that's been corrupted.
posted by Amanda |
4/13/2003 11:15:26 AM
Comment </noscript>
Saturday, April 12
OK... this is frustrating. Blogger won't display any of my sidebar -- my archives or my links -- and it will only display the most recent post. I don't know why it's doing this. Certainly, I didn't conciously program any of that. The closest troubleshooting I could find on the Blogger page suggested switching to "no archive" format. I tried that, and it didn't work. If you have any brilliant suggestions, please email me. If you have any ideas on how to fix this that are likely brighter than mine (remember: I don't know how to program), please email me.
posted by Amanda |
4/12/2003 05:37:44 PM
Comment </noscript>
Hmm. I hope this is just Blogger going crazy on me. I have no idea how to fix this.
posted by Amanda |
4/12/2003 05:21:23 PM
Comment </noscript>
I don't know why my sidebar has disappeared. Thoughts? I also don't know why all my posts have disappeared.
posted by Amanda |
4/12/2003 12:43:13 PM
Comment </noscript>
this is from my class on political prints (cartoons) in 17th century England. The meanings of words weren''t very well attached to what they described. Originally, the Puritans created nearly all of the political prints. However, they took seriously the commandment against graven images. To avoid this, they simply called prints 'picture,' 'sculpture,' 'figure,' or 'emblem.' Everyone knew that by using these words, they were all talking about the same artwork that mocked the Spanish ambassador. However, it was not an image, so there was nothing wrong with it. The term image only applied when you chose to use it: for instance, when you wanted to break the artwork in a High Church Anglican sanctuary. This looseness of terms--I don't know what else to call it--showed up in other contexts, too. Around 1640, a fellow named Cook wrote that usury, rape, sodomy, piracy, and idolotry were all the same thing. It wasn't that he didn't distinguish between the acts involved in each, it just that the law treated them all as the same, therefore they must be. The only explanation I can figure for this is that the five were all sins against God and crimes against the laws of the country, and that they were punished the same. Still, I can't see how piracy fits in. Takings without just work?
posted by Amanda |
4/12/2003 12:42:20 PM
Comment </noscript>
Wednesday, April 9
I used to think that the recipes in the New York Times were written on an absurdly high level for people expert at parching foods at precisely six and one-half minutes with ingredients that required trips to grocery stores not found in Hyde Park (especially now that Binny's Beverage Depot has replaced the Wine and Cheese Chalet). Escautoun With Basque Cheese and Wild Mushrooms requests the ingredients I expect from the NYT: duck fat, Esplette pepper, fresh wild mushrooms (trompettes de mort or the lowly hedgehogs), Basque sheep's milk (ok, so it gives some substitutes). The cooking directions aren't bad, though. For complicated and likely to fail, try pate a choux . But today, they presented a recipe more appropriate to the kid's section of USA Today (does it have one?): how to boil an egg . Pardon? [And no, it's not a Minimalist recipe.] Just what audience are you catering to? Expecting that some folks will soon be cooking Seders, the recipe states "But cooking hard-boiled eggs can be almost as bewildering as nailing down their symbolism." No. Nailing down the symbolism in Judaism of a hard-boiled egg beyond me, but these eggs were one of the first things I learned how to cook, even before I could scramble them. Sheesh. How complicated would they make simple food coloring if they reprinted the instructions for Easter? Some of the directions the recipe gives are pretty bad, too. Julia Child does 17 min, an ice bath, 10 sec, another ice bath. Wonderful if you want rocks. And there's something about 4 hours of simmering? Uh-huh, no. Stick the eggs in some water, bring them to a boil. 10 minutes, maybe 12, that's what it takes. Bathe them in ice water, they'll never get cool anytime soon if you don't.
posted by Amanda |
4/9/2003 09:27:28 PM
Comment </noscript>
Does "The game is over. May peace previal," spoken by the Iraqi ambassador to the UN, Mohammed Aldouri, count as surrender?
posted by Amanda |
4/9/2003 05:52:20 PM
Comment </noscript>