Previous banners, movies, nifty graphics and opinion material are here.
June 18, 2004
 Rare Bird • Oiseau Rare
Or at least that's what Michael Moore would look like if he took my advice as to where exactly he should bear his Palme d'Or.

Nonetheless:
« Michael Moore Is A Big Fat Stupid White Man is a new book I've co-written with legendary Moore skeptic David T. Hardy. And while the title is a parody of Moore's own works, the content of the book is a thorough examination of a career spent in hypocrisy, pseudo-intellectualism, deception, and deceit. »
Precisely. And if you were wondering: that's how you get a Golden Palm and a standing ovation in Cannes: by being a big fat lying idiot among your peers.
En tout cas, c'est ce à quoi Michael Moore ressemblerait si il suivait mon avis sur l'endroit exact où porter sa Palme d'Or.

Néanmoins:
« Michael Moore Is A Big Fat Stupid White Man (DF: Michael Moore Est Un Gros et Gras Crétin de Blanc) est un nouveau livre que j'ai co-écrit avec David T. Hardy, notoirement dubitatif de Moore. Alors que le titre est une parodie du propre travail de Moore, le contenu du livre est une investigation minutieuse de toute une carrière accomplie dans l'hypocrisie, le pseudo intellectualisme, la tromperie et la fourberie. »
Précisément. Et si vous vous le demandiez : c'est ainsi que l'on obtient la Palme d'Or et les rappel du publique à Cannes : et étant un gros, gras et malhonnête idiot parmi ses pairs.
 Fired From France by the dissident frogman @ 10:42 PM • (4) • (0)
June 16, 2004
 Day of the Canidae • Journée des Canidés
The Laughing Wolf is showing his teeth and by the look of it, somebody should worry.

Watch out, when they growl, they'll bite.

Come to think of it, the frogman's best friend was a wolf once. Well, not technically a wolf, but very close (and before you ask: no, brown eyes).
As close as one can get while staying within the boundaries of domesticated species I guess.

He passed away.
I miss him.
You probably don't care.

Let's move on.
The Laughing Wolf (Le Loup qui Rit) montre les dents et à en croire les apparences, quelqu'un devrait se faire du souci.

Attention, quand ils grognent, c'est qu'ils vont mordre.

En y pensant, le meilleur ami de l'homme (grenouille) fût un loup jadis. Enfin, pas techniquement un loup, mais très proche (et avant que vous ne demandiez: non, yeux marron).
Aussi proche qu'on puisse l'être tout en restant dans les limites des espèces domestiquées j'imagine.

Il s'est éteint.
Il me manque.
Vous n'en avez probablement rien à faire.

Passons à autre chose.
 Fired From France by the dissident frogman @ 09:01 PM • (3) • (0)
 The Back-scratching Broadcast Company • Canal Copinage
The more I see it, the more it looks like the folks at the BBC are losing their understanding of the English language.

Unless, of course, there is a better explanation for these repeated mistakes:
« An Italian court has given a life sentence to a woman linked to resurgent left-wing guerrillas the Red Brigades.
(...) The guerrillas are notorious for having kidnapped and killed the former Italian Prime Minister, Aldo Moro, in 1978.
(...)
The militants also said they were behind the 2002 murder of another labour ministry official, Marco Biagi. »
It's hard to fathom how the BBC could be so misled. I mean, even by French standards, these guerillas were left wing terrorists.

Let's digress a bit: incidentally, that's probably the reason why the French state sheltered some of them from a much deserved punishment. After all the cradle of modern terrorism is to be found within the walls of French faculties, and there's nothing so touching as to see the return of the prodigal sons.
Wanna strike a serious blow to the nest of terror? Bomb the Sorbonne¹. End of the digression.


To understand where the malfunction comes from, I guess we could see what the "woman linked to resurgent left-wing guerillas", namely Nadia Desdemona Lioce has to tell us.

But first, I'll go for another digression, because I'm in a digressive mood today: somebody please tell me this is a nom de guerre. Somebody please then proceed to tell me this stupid bitch has been reading Shakespeare, without knowing that this cool sounding name comes allegedly from the Greek "Dysdaimon", meaning "the unhappy one" or "the bereaved one". And somebody please do it quickly as I'm not sure I can contain that sarcastic laughter much longer. Thank you very much, this is the end of the second digression.

Nadia Unhappy Guerilla:
« Lioce has described herself as a "political prisoner" and "militant" and says she will appeal against the ruling. »
There you go. Nadia describes herself as a "militant", ergo for the Beeb "militant" she is.

That leaves us the "guerilla" question.

I must say I have an idea as far as this one is concerned. Yes, I do I have an idea, as you probably do too, but I need to find a link between the two, considering of course, that I'm still at the point where I expect the BBC to have at least a vague concern for basic coherence.

Sure, you could call me a naive fool and if you were to do that from behind your computer screen, you would have a reasonable chance to survive for some time (I'll find you eventually), but you would be wrong nevertheless.

Follow the second link under the related stories, from the original article (that's right under "See also"): "Red Brigades admit killing".
At the end of the article, we find this:
« (The Red Brigades) praise the perpetrators of the 11 September attacks against the US, saying that these demonstrate the "need for the forging of alliances between anti-imperialistic forces and revolutionary forces in the regions of Europe, the Mediterranean and the Middle East."  »
Get the link? The Islamofascists 'anti-imperialistic forces' in Iraq are fighting a guerilla war and the Leftists Red Brigades seeks to forge alliances with them, ergo the BBC calls the Red Brigades a 'guerilla group'.

Since we're trying to set things right as far as semantic is concerned, I believe we should really stop calling 'biased journalism' what is simply a great piece of Public Relations by the BBC for the benefit of the Anti-Imperialistic Alliance international terrorism.

And it's not as if we've never heard about that alliance, is it?

1: What? 'course I'm serious!
Plus je lis, et plus je me dis que les gens de la BBC perdent toute compréhension de l'anglais.

A moins, bien entendu, qu'il n'y ait une meilleure explication pour ces erreurs récurrentes:
« Un tribunal italien à prononcé une sentence à vie contre un femme liée à la résurgente guérilla d'extrême gauche, les Brigades Rouges.
(...) Les guérilleros sont connus pour avoir enlevé et tué l'ancien Premier Ministre Aldo Moro en 1978.
(...)
Les militants ont également déclaré qu'ils étaient à l'origine du meurtre d'un autre officiel du ministère du travail, Marco Biagi. »
Difficile de concevoir comment la BBC peut se tromper à ce point. J'entends par là que même selon les standards français, ces guérilleros étaient des terroristes de gauche.

Accordons nous une digression: il est probable que cela soit, accessoirement, la raison pour laquelle l'état français à protégé certains d'entre eux d'un châtiment plus que mérité. Après tout, le berceau du terrorisme moderne se trouve entre les murs des facultés françaises, et il n'est rien de plus touchant que de voir le retour des enfants prodigues.
Vous voulez frapper un coup sévère aux racines du terrorisme? Bombardez la Sorbonne¹. Fin de la digression.


Pour comprendre d'où vient le dysfonctionnement, j'imagine que nous pouvons écouter ce que la "femme liée à la résurgente guérilla d'extrême gauche", nommément Nadia Desdemona Lioce peut avoir à nous dire.

Mais tout d'abord, j'entends m'accorder une autre digression, étant particulièrement dans l'humeur aujourd'hui: que quelqu'un ait la bonté de me dire que c'est là un nom de guerre. Que quelqu'un ait ensuite la bonté de me dire que cette stupide conne a lu Shakespeare, sans savoir que ce chouette nom qui sonne cool vient censément du grec "Dysdaimon", qui signifie "celui qui est mécontent" or "celui qui est dépossédé". Et que quelqu'un ait la bonté de le faire vite parce que je ne suis pas certain de pouvoir contenir ce rire sarcastique très longtemps. Merci beaucoup, fin de la seconde digression.

Nadia Guérilla Pas Contente :
« Lioce se présente comme "prisonnier politique" et "militant" et déclare qu'elle fera appel de la sentence. »
Voilà. Nadia se présente comme un "militant", ainsi pour la BBC "militant" elle est.

Reste la question de la "guérilla".

Je dois dire que j'ai bien une idée sur la question. J'ai vraiment une idée, ainsi que vous même certainement, mais il me faut néanmoins trouver le lien entre les deux, considérant bien entendu, que j'en suis toujours au point où j'attends de la BBC qu'elle ait pour le moins un vague souci de cohérence.

Oui, vous pourriez me traiter de crétin naïf et si vous le faisiez depuis l'abri de votre écran d'ordinateur, vous auriez une raisonnable chance de survie pour quelque temps (je vous trouverai au bout du compte), mais vous n'en auriez pas moins tort.

Suivez le second lien, sous le menu vers les articles en rapport, depuis l'article original (Juste sous "See also"): "Red Brigades admit killing".
En fin d'article, nous trouvons ceci :
« (Les Brigades Rouges) font l'éloge des responsables des attaques du 11 Septembre contre les USA, déclarant qu'elles démontrent la "nécessité de forger des alliances entre les forces anti-impérialistes et les forces révolutionnaires des régions d'Europe, de la Méditerranée et du Moyen Orient."  »
Vous saisissez le lien ? Les Islamofascistes 'forces anti-impérialistes' en Irak mènent des actions de guérilla, les Gauchistes Brigades Rouges cherchent à forger des alliances avec eux, en conséquence la BBC attribue aux Brigade Rouge l'appellation de guérilla.

Etant donné que nous nous efforçons de remettre les points sur les i en terme de sémantique, je crois que nous devrions cesser d'appeler "journalisme biaisé" ce qui est simplement un grand oeuvre de Relations Publiques par la BBC, au bénéfice des Alliances Anti-Impérialiste du terrorisme international.

De plus, ce n'est pas comme si nous n'avions jamais entendu parler de cette alliance, n'est ce pas ?

1: Comment ? 'videmment je suis sérieux!
 Fired From France by the dissident frogman @ 05:22 PM • (2) • (0)
June 15, 2004
 Hunting Wahhabits • Pas de Baraka Pour Al-Zarqa
The AP via Tim Blair tells us that the situation in Iraq is indeed turning into a tragedy.

And I'm rather inclined to believe it, although the message still has to be authenticated:
« Purported Letter: Iraq Holy War in Danger
A leader of militants (DF: 'militants'. Sigh.) in Iraq has purportedly written to Osama bin Laden saying his fighters are being squeezed by U.S.-led coalition troops, according to a statement posted Monday on Islamic Web sites. (...)
"The space of movement is starting to get smaller," it said. "The grip is starting to be tightened on the holy warriors' necks and, with the spread of soldiers and police, the future is becoming frightening." »
(By the way, make sure you don't miss Tim Blair's short yet hilarious comment)
Frightening? Oh come on you pussy Ass-Zarqawi! What with these:
« "On a tape claiming responsibility for the atrocities in Madrid, a man is heard to say, 'We choose death, while you choose life.'... »
And these:
« Chief Palestinian Authority cleric Mufti Sheikh Ikrimeh Sabri stated, "We tell them, in as much as you love life, the Muslim loves death and martyrdom. »
So now that the Crusaders are bringing you free of charge and by the hundreds what you're supposedly worshipping, you're going to complain?

What's the trouble, Holy Warriors Militants of Allah-la-la? Could it be that once put to task and despite the great deal of posturing, threats and insults at the supposedly soft and weak West, you eventually reveal yourself as a bunch of pissy bitches?

Love death? Then stop crying and die.

Allahu Akbar, motherfucker.
L'AP via Tim Blair nous informe que la situation en Irak tourne effectivement à la tragédie.

Et j'ai plutôt tendance à le croire, même si le message doit encore être authentifié :
« Courrier supposé : La Guerre Sainte d'Irak en danger
L'un des leaders des militants (DF: 'militants'. Soupirs.) en Irak a censément écrit à Osama bin Laden déclarant que ses combattants étaient écrasés par les troupes de la coalition menée par les USA, selon une déclaration postée lundi sur des sites web islamiques (...)
"La marge de manoeuvre commence à se réduire," a-t-il dit. "L'emprise commence à se resserrer sur le cou des guerriers saints et, avec le déploiement des soldats et de la police, le futur devient effrayant." »
(A propos, assurez vous de ne pas manquer le commentaire court mais hilarant de Tim Blair)
Effrayant ? Oh allons donc Al-Zarqawi, espèce de gonzesse! Qu'est ce que tu fais de ça:
« "Sur une bande revendiquant les atrocités de Madrid, on entends un homme dire, 'Nous choisissons la mort, alors que vous choisissez la vie.'... »
Et ça :
« Principal clerc de l'Autorité Palestinienne, Mufti Sheikh Ikrimeh Sabri a affirmé, "Nous leurs disons, autant que vous aimez la vie, le musulman aime la mort et le martyr. »
Alors maintenant que les Croisés vous apportent gratuitement et par centaines ce que vous adorez ostensiblement, vous allez commencer à vous plaindre ?

Quel est le problème, Guerriers Militants Saints d'Allah-la-la? Se pourrait-il qu'en dépit de vos grands mouvements de manche, vos menaces et vos insultes à l'encontre d'un Occident censément mou et faible, vous vous révéliez n'être finalement qu'une bande de chiennes pisseuses quand on vous prends au mot ?

T'aimes la mort ? Alors cesse de chialer et meurt.

Allahu Akbar, enculé de ta mère.
 Fired From France by the dissident frogman @ 05:02 PM • (4) • (1)
 Paulot Nuke The Jews • Paulot Atomise Les Feujs
Paul-Marie Couteaux, the Sinister Sovereignist MEP who declared in 2001 at the European Parliament:
« I have no hesitation in saying that we must consider giving the Arab side a force large enough, including a nuclear force large enough, to persuade Israel that it cannot simply do whatever it wants »
And who apparently has no more hesitation today than he had 3 years ago, considering that this transcript of his intervention at the European Parliament is still available on his website as we speak among other excretions of this sorry anti-Semite but also pro-Castro...
« Finally, President Castro still is, (...) the incarnation of the XXth century rebel, of the defender of the liberties of the people »
... justifier of anti-American and more broadly anti-Western terrorism (via a discourse accurately interchangeable with that of the anti-globalization neo-Bolsheviks and of Al-Qaeda's beard Head of the Propaganda):
« "We're led to call "terrorism", as all Empires do actually, what could very well be called resistance." (...) "Granted, I'm far from approving actions targeting the innocents (although, as far as I know, nobody is totally innocent in a democracy. But let's not digress...). Of course I reprove without appeal the attacks of 9/11 (...)
However Ladies and Gentlemen, and this is fundamental: we are not a tribunal. We do not have to tell Good and Evil. (...) In reality, what we call "terrorists" are legions around the world; they multiply and radicalize as the Empire (DF: i.e. the USA of course) unrolls its domination and makes it even more violent against people which values, patrimony and secrets it ignores and who he diabolizes even though they can't measure to it, militarily of course." (...) "There will never be peace between the rich people when they are too rich and too arrogant, and poor people when they are too poor and too humiliated" »
... Yes, this right-wing Socialist, Ladies and Gentlemen, was reelected by the Parisians last Sunday.

And we're led to wonder: what is exactly the operational status of the Kidon teams these days?
Paul-Marie Couteaux, le Sinistre MPE Souverainiste qui a déclaré en 2001 au Parlement Européen :
« Il faut que nous envisagions - je n'hésite pas à le dire - à doter la partie arabe d'une force suffisante, y compris d'une force nucléaire suffisante, pour qu'Israël ne se croit pas tout permis. »
Et qui n'a apparemment pas plus d'hésitations aujourd'hui qu'il n'en avait il y a 3 ans, considérant que cette transcription de son intervention au Parlement Européen est toujours disponible sur son site web à cette date, parmi d'autres excrétions de ce pathétique antisémite, mais aussi pro-Castro...
« Enfin, le Président Castro reste, (...) l'incarnation du rebelle du XXe siècle, du défenseur de la liberté des peuples »
... avocat du terrorisme anti-Américain et plus largement anti-Occidental (via un discours précisément interchangeable avec celui des neo-Bolcheviques antimondialisation et du Département de la Propagande d'Al-Qaeda) :
« "nous sommes conduits, comme le font tous les Empires d'ailleurs, à nommer "terrorisme" ce qui pourrait aussi bien s'appeler de la résistance." (...) "Certes, je suis loin d'approuver les actes qui visent des innocents (encore que, dans une démocratie, que je sache, personne ne soit tout à fait innocent. Mais passons...). Il va de soi que je condamne sans appel les attentats du 11 septembre (...)
Il n'en reste pas moins, Mesdames et Messieurs, et ceci est fondamental, que nous ne sommes pas un tribunal. Nous n'avons pas à dire le bien et le mal. (...) En réalité, ce que nous appelons "les terroristes" sont légions de par le monde; ils se multiplient et se radicalisent à mesure même que l'Empire (DF: les USA bien entendu) étend sa domination et la rend plus violente contre les peuples dont il ignore les valeurs, les héritages et les secrets, et qu'il diabolise, alors même qu'ils ne sont évidemment pas à sa taille, militairement s'entend." (...) "Il n'y aura jamais de paix entre des peuples riches, quand ils sont trop riches et trop arrogants, et des peuples pauvres, quand ils sont trop pauvres et trop humiliés." »
... Oui, ce socialiste de droite, Mesdames et Messieurs, a été réélu par les parisiens dimanche dernier.

Et nous sommes conduits à nous demander : quelle est exactement le statut opérationnel des équipes Kidon ces jours ci ?
 Fired From France by the dissident frogman @ 01:15 PM • (4) • (1)
 My Moron of the Week • Mon Con de la Semaine
That is to say, unless a better moron rise up from the grave before the week is over, of course.

In the meantime, the accolade goes to a Belgian (and it's not even a French joke), Jean Beaufays who is in charge of the political science department at Liege University.
Interviewed by Woof Woof 1, (one on five main French TV channels. Not really owned by the State anymore, but still barking on orders, woof woof) on the, well, "significant" result of the Blok Party at the Zeropean Parliament elections:
« tf1.fr: Woof woof analyze woof vote for woof Vlaams Blok ? Woof woof rejection grrrrrr woof politics woof traditional parties woof woof or genuine woof vote of adherence to ideals woof grrrrr?
Jean Beaufays: One has to talk straight: it is indeed a vote of adherence to a racist and anti-democratic ideal (...) »
See, that's the really weary thing with democracy:
First you let the people vote, and next thing you know, they start electing people you disagree with anti-democrats democratically.

That's in fact one of the reasons why I have little respect for democracy as such. It's simply meaningless and rather powerless by itself, and without a whole structure of prerequisites: Rule of Law, separation of powers (and by that I mean beyond the administrative or political frame: civil society is not just for the dogs, woof) and a solid set of essential liberties and rights (property, speech, assembly and religion for a start).

Freedom comes before democracy.
Without freedom, all you can hope is a sham of democracy: see the "elections" in Mugabe's Zimbabwe or Saddam's Iraq for instance.

Or see Europe, for a more ludicrous example.

Consequently, that's also the reason why I have no consideration for the too many democracidolaters, particularly when they crash on the limits of their God simply because they expect everything from Him, or because they're just using Him as a pretext to enforce their own (usually authoritarian) conception of society.

Yes, that also means Belgians in charge of political science departments who bawl "down with the anti-democrats" when democracy is working a bit too well.

Woof woof. Grrrrrrrrrr.
C'est à dire, à moins qu'un autre con de qualité supérieure ne se lève d'entre les morts avant la fin de la semaine, bien entendu.

Dans l'intervalle, les lauriers vont à un Belge (Et ce n'est même pas une blague française), Jean Beaufays, responsable du département de sciences politiques à l'Université de Liège.
Interviewé par Ouaf Ouaf 1, (L'une des cinq principales chaînes de TV françaises. Plus vraiment propriété de l'Etat, mais aboyant toujours sur ses ordres, ouaf ouaf.) concernant le résultat, disons, "significatif" du parti Blok aux élections au Parlement Zéropéen:
« tf1.fr : Ouaf ouaf analyser ouaf vote ouaf ouaf Vlaams Blok ? Ouaf ouaf rejet grrrrrrr ouaf politique ouaf partis traditionnels ouaf ouaf ou ouaf vote d'adhésion à des idées ouaf grrrrr ?
Jean Beaufays : Il faut abandonner la langue de bois, il s'agit bel et bien d'un vote d'adhésion à un idéal raciste et anti-démocratique (...) »
Tu vois, c'est vraiment ça le truc saoulant avec la démocratie :
D'abord tu laisse le peuple voter, et tu t'es à peine retourné qu'ils commencent à élire des types avec qui t'es pas d'accord anti-démocrates démocratiquement.

C'est en fait l'une des raisons pour lesquelles je n'ai guère de respect pour la démocratie en soi. Elle est tout simplement insignifiante et impuissante par elle même, et sans le soutien de toute une structure préalable essentielle : Règle de la Loi, séparation des pouvoirs (et j'entends par là au-delà du cadre administratif et politique: la société civile, c'est pas que pour les chiens, ouaf) et un solide ensemble de libertés et de droits essentiels (propriété, discours, assemblée et religion pour commencer).

La liberté vient avant la démocratie.
Sans liberté, tout ce que vous pouvez obtenir est un simulacre de démocratie : voir les "élections" au Zimbabwe de Mugabe ou de l'Irak de Saddam par exemple.

Ou voyez l'Europe pour un exemple plus risible.

En conséquence, c'est aussi la raison pour laquelle je n'ai aucune considération pour les trop nombreux démocratidolâtres, particulièrement lorsqu'ils se crashent sur les limites de leur Dieu, simplement parce qu'ils attendent tout de lui, ou qu'il leur sert de prétexte pour imposer leur propre conception (généralement autoritaire) de la société.

Oui, ça inclue aussi les Belges responsables de départements de sciences politiques qui braillent "haro sur l'anti-democrate" quand la démocratie marche un peu trop bien.

Ouaf ouaf. Grrrrrrrrrr.
 Fired From France by the dissident frogman @ 11:23 AM • (4) • (0)
June 08, 2004
 Proud (ex-)French Citizen • Fier (ex-)Citoyen Français
As a general rule, I don't post contributions from other people in the dacha. It's not just that I'm being a convinced individualist enjoying his private property, but also that the whole point of blogs is precisely to be such an easy and cheap way to publish content on the the wide web of the world that just about everybody, his dog and their sister (not in that particular order though) can now have a large exposure, and incidentally be a living and vibrant FYYSBY¹ to the leftist infected mainstream media. I therefore strongly encourage each of you to get a blog running, even if only to write everyday "FYYSBY at ABC", "FYYSBY at CNN", "FYYSBY at CBS" or "FYYSBY at the BBC".

Let's see how they will take a bit of their own medicine, now that those half-cocked rebels became the Establishment. Hah.

Having said that and unlike your local Socialists, I have no use for "general rules" that fail the test of reality, which is one of the reasons why I'd like to give you to read a post by... Okay, let's call him "A."

The other reason being that, to put it bluntly, A. is in some way the kind of man I hope to be one day. And once you'll read his very own tagline at the end of the post, you'll understand what I mean by that.

I left his text unedited and if I also considered to translate it to French at some point, I finally decided to abstain, considering that this US citizen is indeed addressing exclusively his fellow Americans.

One last thing: I'm sure A. will appreciate your comments after this post - and I hope he'll feel free to answer them - but in case you'd want to email him, please send your correspondance my way, and I'll forward it. He will then decide if he gets back to you directly or not.

Here you go. Ladies and Gentlemen, Mr. A.

¹: "Fuck You, You Slimy Bastard You". What else were you expecting anyway?


« C'est le Débarquement! » (« It's the Landing ! »). Cries of joy, freedom is in the air. My dad, a native Parisian was eleven years old and right on Champs-Elysées Avenue to cheer on US soldiers. Like today in Iraq, American soldiers were synonymous to freedom, great big smiles, and free chewing gum. The latter remains vivid in my dad's memory, the sweet minty taste of American freedom along with this indescribable hope and joy in the heart. 

Sixty years later, the French chose to distance themselves from their liberator, with some reluctance to fly the US flags over the Champs-Elysées. Arecent survey reveals that 50% of the French public feels that France has no moral debt to the United States.This opinion is shared by 63% of the newer generation (population 18 to 24), and by even 32% of those 65 and older. The study also found that 82% of the French felt that France was sufficiently grateful to the US and that as little as 3% admire the US.

The chief reason America came to liberate France was motivated by selfish economic and strategic interests. That is the thesis believed by at least 41% of the surveyed population (adopted by 63% of the younger generation). This thesis, advanced via a subtle unanswered set of questioning passed off as academic inquiry, was inserted into my malleable young mind in French government school (Lycée, classes de seconde et terminale).

Don't be deceived by our media or by John Kerry's interpretation of the French sentiment towards America. President Bush is not responsible for this French ungratefulness or for its mistrust of America.

(continued in next column)
(continuing)
Our President is only a lightning rod for long-deeply rooted feelings of envy, jalousie and resentment for America's "hyperpower". An inferiority complex and a love for ultra egalitarianism - a belief that no nation should be stronger than any other - aren't new feelings. They came to light with Charles de Gaulle public addresses, who kept hard feelings for being snubbed and humiliated by Roosevelt. Already in his August 25th, 1944's address, General de Gaulle had transformed the French defeat into a French victory, thus depriving US soldiers of their due credit, young Americans who had put their life on the line for strangers who were deprived of freedom.

We must also factor-in a growing presence of radical Islamic groups in France who hate America for supporting Israel ( Two days ago, another Jew got stabbed by a suburban kid who was yelling 'Allah Akbar'). Maybe as a need to cater to Muslims in France, a French official proposed to give the Arab world nuclear weapons so that they could attack Israel if necessary.

Self-loathing Americans are partly responsible as well.  J. Robert Lilly, professor of sociology and criminology at Northern Kentucky U comes to mind. His work prompted French film writer Moreau to capitalize on his allegations and shoot "The Hidden Face of GIs", soldiers who allegedly raped thousands in Europe. Professor Robert Lilly was inspired to examine rape by GIs from stories by his father and uncle, both World War II veterans (reminiscent of Kerry's own allegations in Vietnam). In his book, he contends that GIs raped over 17,000 women; 1,040 in Germany, 3,620 in France, and 2,420 in England.

Like many, I believe J. Robert Lilly's work is motivated not by the pursuit of truth and justice but rather by a personal contempt toward his own country and more particularly toward this segment of America that continues to hold to its traditional way of life and values. In his suicidal quest, the gravity of the charges is his primary weapon in his attempt to spread a negative perception of America around the world. The veracity of those allegations doesn't matter and it would even be preferable that those accusations remain unresolved. The objective being to implant in the world's psyche a disgusting and lingering possibility of GIs wrongdoing, an ethereal negative impression as convincing as truth itself. 

Obviously history is being rewritten and truth becomes elusive as more than 1,000 World War II veterans die every day with it.

Diplomats' sporadic efforts of reconciliation between France and America won't make a dint against the more recent wave of anti-American propaganda routinely spewed on State-sponsored French TV. A recently aired French documentary viewed by 7 million raised the notion of "contradictory aspects" in their American Liberator (such as ethnic cleansing, lynching, bombings, etc.,(?)) without touching on the newly found freedom from the Nazis. This piece of disinformation and false association simply exposes the personal agenda of its producer, Patrick Rotman. He stated in an interview that hopefully his documentary would serve as a stepping stone in "our reflection on what is being done in Iraq".

We are definitely witnessing shifting alliances. On the one hand, the telling presence of Chancellor Shröder's at the D-Day ceremonies, and on the other, an obvious French departure from the once tutelary power of the United States. Today, 82% of French feel that Germany is France's strongest ally while only 55% feel that the US is a trustworthy ally.

I wish France and America would stay united. But their respective vision of the world has become irreconcilable on too many essential points; France has abandoned its fundamental principles. That's an unfortunate reality.

A.
Ex-French Citizen, Proud and Unapologetic US Citizen By Choice and By Law

 Fired From France by the dissident frogman @ 11:36 PM • (24) • (0)
June 06, 2004
 Substance of Greatness • La Substance de la Grandeur
To me, the great misery of our time is that there is not enough men and women like him: not an ordinary politician, but a statesman (as defined by J.H. Hallowell), and one of the greatest in history.

I could go over and over on his achievements, as a governor and as a president, at home and abroad, I could go on the forces that were driving him, on his genuine attachment to freedom and small government, but rather than the drivel of a French who remembers that the Soviet tanks never reached the West coast of France thank to this man, I would suggest that you go and read him in his own hand.

Because that's what I'll be doing anyway.

« Nothing can cover his high fame but Heaven; No pyramids set off his memories, But the eternal substance of his greatness, -- To which I leave him. »
Godspeed Mr. President.
 Fired From France by the dissident frogman @ 01:09 AM • (11) • (4)


And Also • Mais aussi
The Present • Le Présent
Have you been to the Dissident Frogman's Propaganda Bureau?
Avez-vous visité le Bureau de la Propagande du Dissident Frogman ?
The Past • Le Passé
The Future • Le Futur
Register to be notified of new major postings (only) via email:
Inscrivez-vous pour être averti des (seuls) articles majeurs par email :







This mailing list is managed by the Dissident Frogman alone. Addresses are not disclosed to anybody else, whatever the reason and won't be used for any other purpose.

What's more, I'm afraid I really can't help you, should you need to change the proportions of various parts of your anatomy or transfer millions of unused US dollars from politically unstable African countries to your bank account.

Sorry about that.


Cette liste de mailing est gérée par le seul Dissident Frogman. Les adresses ne sont pas communiquées à des tiers, quelles qu'en soient les raisons et ne sont pas utilisées dans d'autres buts.

Je crains fort de ne pas pouvoir vous aider à modifier les proportions de diverses parties de votre anatomie ou transférer des millions de dollars US inutilisés de pays africains politiquement instables vers votre compte en banque.

Désolé, vraiment.
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License