|
|
|
|
|
|
July
14, 2004
Faux
Populism
By
Victor Davis Hanson
Private Papers
It is
going to be hard to convince the American people that two
East Coast, liberal lawyers, one Senator married to a billionaire,
the other worth $75 million, are men of the people. No wonder
they and their supporters have introduced some very strange
arguments.
The first
is that John Edwards really has not embraced the privileged
life of a multimillionaire who got rich suing obstetricians
because he was born poor. But there are two problems with
this. First, being the son of a postal employee and a mill
worker doesn't necessarily make one impoverished in America.
Some of my best friends are postal hourly-wage employees—including
my wife and daughter.
|
July
10, 2004
Allies,
Friends, Neutrals, or Enemies?
By
Victor Davis Hanson
Private Papers
For all the mayhem in the Sunni Triangle, and for all our mishaps
at trying to reconstruct a pathological society reeling from 30
years of mass murder, we are beginning now to see the emergence
of new civilized beginning in Iraq. Sadly our allies are mostly
neutral, if not hostile to this radically new world, mostly out
of spite, narrow self-interest, and deductive anger and envy of
the United States. In the process, they have done the near impossible:
lost the good will of the American people, a development that
will have radical repercussions in the years ahead.
|
|
July
10, 2004
The
Ayatollah of Anti-Americanism
By
Bruce Thornton
Private Papers
The Anti-Chomsky Reader, ed.
by Peter Collier and David Horowitz (Encounter Books)
Of all the pseudo-religions corrupting our thinking--Freudianism,
Marxism, Darwinism, to name a few--anti-Americanism is the
most bizarre and dangerous. The facts of American life and
American history simply do not support the widespread view
that the United States, in the lunatic words of playwright
Harold Pinter, is a "fully-fledged, award-winning,
gold-plated monster" that "knows only one language--bombs
and death." Such hatred usually is spawned by a diseased
religious sensibility, an irrational passion for a narrative
that bestows meaning on the world and one's exalted place
in it as a champion of the revealed truth and righteousness.
Yet the cult of anti-Americanism is worse than any dysfunctional
religion, for it masquerades as reasoned analysis based
on historical fact.
|
July
9, 2004
Civilization
vs. Trivia
By
Victor Davis Hanson
National Review Online
Last week, the carnivore Saddam Hussein faced the world in the
docket. There was none of the usual Middle East barbarity. The
mass murderer was not hooded and then beheaded on tape, in the
manner of al Qaeda. Civilization has come to Iraq.
Nor was the destroyer of Iraqi dissidents hitched — Saudi-style
— to a Humvee and dragged to pieces through the streets
of Baghdad. The pillager of Kuwait did not lose a limb on the
precepts of a sharia-inspired fatwa. A young Saddam-like Baathist
assassin did not break in and shoot the desecrator of the Mesopotamian
marshlands in the back of the head. And a West Bank-like mob did
not lynch the torturer of dissidents in the public square. Even
al Jazeera, an enthusiast of the usual barbarity, was
wondering what the heck was going on in its own neck of the medieval
woods.
|
|
July
6, 2004
Another
9/11?
The awful response we dare not speak about
By
Victor Davis Hanson
National Review Online
Almost
daily we are assured that another attack on the homeland,
commensurate with 9/11, is inevitable. What a scary
mood of fatalism we are in! Where will it happen?
The Olympics? The party conventions this summer? A
week before the election? Chicago? L.A.?
Our experts weighed in over the 4th of July weekend
and seemed to disagree only over the method of the
mass murder to come. Will it be chemical, biological,
radiological, or involve hijacked planes, car bombs,
or waves of suicide terrorists?
|
|
|
|
July 11, 2004
Response to Readership
(Updated daily)
What nationality were the Trojans and language
did they speak?
Hanson: From archaeological and philological evidence,
Trojans were probably some sort of early Semitic people and their
language akin to Hittite; but as a creative device “they”
of course speak Greek in the Iliad to communicate in those wonderful
dialogues and recriminations before the opposing warriors square
off >>>
|
Recent Works by Victor Davis Hanson
Review of Rural Greece under the Democracy, by Nicholas F. Jones, in Times Literary Supplement, June 25, 2004
"The ancient Greeks: Were they like us at all?" in The New Criterion, Vol. 22, No. 9, May 2004
"The Power to Do Good" : a review of Niall Ferguson's "Colossus" in the New York Post, April 25, 2004
Review of John Gaddis's Surprise, Security, and the American Experience
Introduction to the Modern Library's Plutarch's The Life of Alexander the Great
More works by Bruce Thornton
|
|
|
|
July 11, 2004
Response to Readership
Victor will post a response to readers' questions daily. If you have questions that Victor can answer, email them to author@victorhanson.com. |
|
Current
Affairs and Classics What nationality
were the Trojans and language did they speak?
Hanson: From archaeological and philological evidence, Trojans
were probably some sort of early Semitic people and their language
akin to Hittite; but as a creative device “they” of
course speak Greek in the Iliad to communicate in those wonderful
dialogues and recriminations before the opposing warriors square
off. There is a large bibliography both on the “real”
language of Troy and on Homer’s use of Greek to portray speaking
Trojans.
What are your impressions of Mr. Knox and his collected
work “The Oldest Dead White European Males”?
Hanson: Bernard Knox is one of the great classicists of our times.
Most of our current ideas about Sophocles and his characters—especially
the Ajax, Antigone, and Philoctetes—in some ways derive from
his criticism. He is one of those now mostly lost who did almost
everything—military experience, ran the Hellenic Center in
Washington, professor, poet, translator, critic—and is emblematic
of the age of serious classics before the wave of postmodernism
washed all that away. There is now not one serious critic of the
classics in any major university who could write and interpret as
he did.
|
|
|
Reprinting permission click here
|
|
|