I’ve had a few chemical experiences that gave me specialized training in sleeping in the next day. And sometimes I want to bring down the government because they don’t, they don’t speak for us. So I can’t get a visa either.

I faced this very problem recently; nice to see someone else is troubled by it. The correct answer, it seems, is “No”. At least it didn’t cause consular officials to say “No specialised skills, eh…. well, you are applying for a specialist worker visa!” as I had feared.

The including (and limited to? / but not limited to?) is very confusing. Neither can be right. I bet they don’t take kindly either to academics saying yes, or to Sudanese militiamen saying “No, well, the neutron bomb isn’t a nuclear device as such, since the neutrons that stream out of it, wreaking havoc among the infidels while leaving infrastructure happily intact, while normally nuclear particles, aren’t actually in a nucleus at the time, but are produced by the weak interaction at high energies, don’t you know.”

Hi Brian,
Can you explain why thinking that you think that x doesn’t entail that you think that x?
Thanks!