home / subscribe / donate / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback / events

 

New Edition of CounterPunch

Before Kill and Run, Was There Rape and Run? Documents Show the FBI Gave Janklow a Pass by Stephen Hendricks; The Faces of Janus: Why the New York Times Has Always Been a Rotten Paper by Alexander Cockburn; Steal a Tree, Go To Jail; Steal a Forest, Stay in the Lincoln Bedroom: the Politics of Timber Theft by Jeffrey St. Clair; A Southern Africa Sojourn by Lawrence Reichard; The Kiev Con: Exposing David Duke's Illusory Doctorate; CounterPunch Online is read by 70,000 visitors each day, but we are funded solely by the subscribers to the print edition of CounterPunch. Please support this website by buying a subscription to our newsletter, which contains fresh material you won't find anywhere else, or by making a donation for the online edition. Remember contributions are tax-deductible. Click here to make a (tax deductible) donation. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840 3683 or write CounterPunch, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Cockburn and St. Clair Tour California!

Now Available from
CounterPunch for Only $11.50 (S/H Included)

Today's Stories

February 4, 2004

Brian McKinlay
Bush's Australian Deputy: Howard's Last Round Up?

February 3, 2004

Alan Maass
The Dems' New Mantra: What They Really Mean by "Electability"

Nick Halfinger
How the Other Half Lives: Embedded in Iraq

Rahul Mahajan
Our True Intelligence Failure

Neve Gordon
The Only Democracy in the Middle East?

Laura Carlsen
Mexico: Two Anniversaries; Two Futures

Jordan Green
Democratic Patronage in Northern New Mexico

Terry Lodge
An Open Letter to Michael Powell from the Boobs & Body Parts Fairness Campaign

Hammond Guthrie
Investigating the Meaningless

Website of the Day
Waging Peace

 

February 2, 2004

Gary Leupp
The Buddhist Nun in Tom Ridge's Jail

Justin E.H. Smith
The Manners of Their Deaths: Capital Punishment in a Smoke-Free Environment

Tom Wright
The Prosecution of Captain Yee

Winslow Wheeler
Inside the Bush Defense Budget

Lee Ballinger
Janet Jackson's Naked Truth

Leonard Pitts, Jr
For Blacks, the Game of Justice is Rigged

Jeffrey St. Clair
The Hollow Candidate:
The Trouble with Howard Dean

Website of the Day
Resistance: In the Eye of the American Hegemon


Jan. 31 / Feb 1, 2004

Paul de Rooij
For Whom the Death Tolls: Deliberate Undercounting of Coalition Fatalities

Bernard Chazelle
Bush's Desolate Imperium

Jack Heyman
Bushfires on the Docks

Christopher Reed
Broken Ballots

Michael Donnelly
An Urgent Plea to Progressives: Don't Give in to Fear

Rob Eshelman
The Subtle War

Lee Sustar
Palestine and the Anti-War Movement

George Bisharat
Right of Return

Ray McGovern
Nothing to Preempt

Brian Cloughley
Enron's Beady-Eyed Sharks

Conn Hallinan
Nepal, Bush & Real WMDs

Kurt Nimmo
The Murderous Lies of the Neo-Cons

Phillip Cryan
Media at the Monterrey Summit

Christopher Brauchli
A Speech for Those Who Don't Read

John Holt
War in the Great White North

Mickey Z.
Clueless in America: When Mikey Met Wesley

Mark Scaramella
The High Cost of Throwing Away the Key

Tariq Ali
Farewell, Munif

Ben Tripp
Waiter! The Reality Check, Please

Poets' Basement
LaMorticella, Guthrie, Thomas and Albert


January 30, 2004

Saul Landau
Cuba High on Neo-Con Hit List

Michael Donnelly
Bush's Second Front: The War in the Woods

Elaine Cassel
Worse Than Jacko: Child Abuse at Gitmo

David Vest
More Halliburton News, Brought to You by Halliburton

Mike Whitney
The Kay Report: Still Defending Aggression

David Miller
The Hutton Whitewash

Sam Husseini
How Many People Must Die Because of This "Mistake", Senator Kerry?


January 29, 2004

Patricia Nelson Limerick
John Ehrlichman, Environmentalist

Ron Jacobs
Homeland Security and "Legalized" Immigration

Rahul Mahajan
New Hampshire v. Iraq

Greg Weiher
Bush Calls for Preemptive Strike on Moon and Mars

Norman Solomon
The State of the Media Union

Cockburn / St. Clair
Does NH Mean Anything?

 

January 28, 2004

Kathy Kelly
Bearing Witness Against Teachers of Torture and Assassination

 

 

January 27, 2004

Steve Philion
Ritter Was Right: My Exchange with CNN's Aaron Brown

Daniel Ellsberg
Leak Against This War: Expose the Lies from the Inside

C.G. Estabrook
Can George Ever Really be Elected President?

Josh Frank
Hot Coals in Vermont: Dean's Smoke Screens

Greg Moses
Racism 101 All Over Again

Gilad Atzmon
Blood, Soil and Art

Mike Ferner
"We're All Lied To": an Interview with Bruce Cockburn in Baghdad

Hammond Guthrie
General Disorders of the Day

 

January 26, 2004

Sean Donahue
The Toxic Career of Rand Beers: Kerry's Drug War Zealot

Gary Leupp
David Kay's Admission

January 24/5, 2004

Patrick Cockburn
Iraq's Shia: "Our Day Has Come"

Laura Flanders
State of the Conservative Union

Simon Helweg-Larsen
Enter Berger: Signs of Hope in Guatemala

Dave Lindorff
Ground Control to Maj. George

Susan Davis
The Birdwatcher Menace

Alexander Cockburn
The Fog of Cop Out: McNamara 10, Morris 0

 

January 23, 2004

Yonathan Shapira
An Israeli Pilot Speaks Out

Standard Schaefer
Italian Philosopher Giorgio Agamben Protests US Travel Policy

Josh Frank
In Defense of Polluters: Howard Dean's Vermont

William A. Cook
Rule by the Corrupt and the Capricious

 

January 22, 2004

Sam Smith
Howards End?

Patricia Koyce Wanniski
Lost in Space

Alexander Lukin
Putin and the Clans

Katherine van Wormer
Dry Drunk Confirmed: O'Neill's Revelations and Bush's Mind

Forrest Hylton
The Prisoner, the President and the Mafia

 

January 19, 2004

Justin E. H. Smith
Inside America's Prisons: From Corrections to Retribution

Richard W. Behan
The GOP, Inc.

Ray McGovern
Bush's State of the Union: Humility or More Hyperbole?

Werther
SOTUS: the Stalin Moment of America's Nomenklatura

Phillip Cryan
Media Collusion in Colombia's War

Lee Sustar
A New Strategy to Reverse Labor's Decline?

Arthur Versluis
Great Lakes as Commodity: Privatizing Water

Uri Avnery
Anti-Semitism: a Practical Manual

Steve Perry
Fresh Crack from Hawkeye State

 

January 17 / 18, 2004

Fadi Kiblawi and Will Youmans
The Use and Abuse of MLK Jr by Israel's Apologists

Joshua Muldavin
and Joseph Nevins

Blaming the Symptoms

Jeffrey St. Clair
Bad Days at Indian Point: Inside America's Most Dangerous Nuclear Plant

Brian Cloughley
Iron Hammers in Iraq

Saul Landau
Fog of War: Vietnam and Iraq

M. Shahid Alam
Lerner, Said and the Palestinians

Richard Manning
Food Poisoning as Background Noise

Marjorie Cohn
The Guantanamo Concentration Camp

Mike Whitney
Scalia and Opus Dei: Radicals on the Court

Sadik Kassim
Meet Our New Saddam: Islam Karimov

Carol Norris
Arnold and Bush's Numbers Don't Add Up

Joe Quandt
Suicide Bombers: The Clash of Absurdities

David Krieger
Imagining MLK Jr at 75

Bruce Jackson
Making War, Making Movies

Ron Jacobs
Revolution in the Air: a review

Richard Edmondson
Rupert Murdoch and My Sister

Richard Forno
Apologizing for Preemption: Evil, Perle and Frum

Poets' Basement
Holt, Mickey Z, Albert & Guthrie

 

January 16, 2004

Kathy Kelly
A Visit to Umm Qasr Prison

William S. Lind
More Thoughts on 4th Generation Warfare

Gillian Russom
So. Cal Grocery Strikers Speak Out: "We Need Action!"

Ari Shavit
Survival of the Fittest? An Interview with Benny Morris

Adi Ophir
Genocide Hides Behind Expulsion: a Response to Benny Morris

Dave Lindorff
The General's Henchman: Michael Moore Smears Kucinich

Steve Perry
Iowa Death Trip 2

 

January 15, 2004

Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
Memo to the President: Your State of the Union Address

John Chuckman
Dry Hole in the Oval Office: President from Podunk Drilling, Inc

Chris Floyd
Mind Over Matter

Gil-Scott Heron
Whitey on the Moon

Gary Leupp
The Silk Road: Random Thoughts on the Bam Earthquake and Satan

 

 

January 14, 2004

Greg Moses
Happy Birthday, Dr. King: To Write Off the South is to Surrender to Bigots

Kurt Nimmo
Bush and the Supremes: Amputating the Bill of Rights

Dave Lindorff
Preview of Iowa? Pennsylvania Straw Poll Spells Trouble for Traditional Dems (and Dean)

Jason Leopold
O'Neill Claims Backed by Rumsfeld / Wolfowitz War Letters to Clinton

Alexander Cockburn
Bush, Oil and Iraq: Some Truth at Last

 

 

January 13, 2004

William S. Lind
How 2004 Looks from Potsdam

M. Junaid Alam
Do Iraqis Have a Right to Resist?

Mickey Z
Snipers: No Nuts in Iraq

Adolfo Gilly
Chonchocoro: The Prisoner and the Presidents

Steve Perry
You Love God, Right?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Hot Stories

Alexander Cockburn
Behold, the Head of a Neo-Con!

Subcomandante Marcos
The Death Train of the WTO

Norman Finkelstein
Hitchens as Model Apostate

Steve Niva
Israel's Assassination Policy: the Trigger for Suicide Bombings?

Dardagan, Slobodo and Williams
CounterPunch Exclusive:
20,000 Wounded Iraqi Civilians

Steve J.B.
Prison Bitch

Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber
True Lies: the Use of Propaganda in the Iraq War

Wendell Berry
Small Destructions Add Up

CounterPunch Wire
WMD: Who Said What When

Cindy Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter I Can't Hear From

Gore Vidal
The Erosion of the American Dream

Francis Boyle
Impeach Bush: A Draft Resolution

Click Here for More Stories.

 

 

Subscribe Online


Search CounterPunch

 

February 4, 2004

Palestine and the Media

The Imagery of Arabs

By JUDITH BROWN

After years of military occupation, Palestinians have many demands on their limited resources. Managing the media gets a low priority when faced with humanitarian demands from a population that needs amongst other things health care, education and replacement housing. Yet managing the media is an important way of getting your message across to a Western public that sympathises when Israelis are killed by Palestinian suicide bombers, while Palestinians are portrayed as a barbaric people who hate Israel and do not want peace.

In a conflict there are always two opposing viewpoints. The Palestinians want to present their side but are poorly resourced compared with Israel's efficient and effective media machine.

There are undoubtedly structural problems that make it easier for journalists to see the Israeli view--each Western journalist registers with the Israeli authorities, they have a handler and carry a beeper provided by Israel which keeps them up to date with news stories. They live and work in Jerusalem, where they are subject to the same fears of suicide bombs that helps them identify with Israelis. By comparison, currently only the Israeli award-winning journalist Amira Hass lives in the Palestinian territories. Access to the areas where Palestinians live is difficult. At times when there is an important news story, journalists are more likely to be denied access. Media offices are in Jerusalem, but Palestinian journalists no longer have press cards and most cannot travel into the city, which limits the chances of them working for foreign media agencies.

Visiting foreign journalists frequently stay in the American Colony Hotel in East Jerusalem. They have physical problems in accessing stories in the occupied territories and linguistic problems in Arabic translation. When writing stories, journalists use a Palestinian programme producer whose job is to find out where the journalist needs to go, who they should interview, how they can get there and who should translate for them. Programme producers work on a self-employed basis and get known by word of mouth--if they have done their job well in the past, the story gets round and more journalists contact them in the future. One producer told me how lazy most Western journalists are. They take the details from her and write the story in their hotel room or office, while paying her as if they have attended the story. She felt they could not understand the Palestinian position when they hadn't experienced it. She said: "Some of them have not even experienced a checkpoint--sitting there for three hours, hungry or thirsty, wanting to go to the toilet, the crying children, the heat or cold. Not all, but most. They cut and paste from AFP and Reuters."

What counts as news is also a problem. Desperate to tell the Palestinian story and also with a financial need to work, the Palestinian producer I interviewed explained she has a vested interest in contacting foreign journalists whenever there is a news item. Over Christmas 2003 there were 18 deaths in Nablus and a mother whose babies died due to delays at a checkpoint. No journalist was interested. They all gave excuses--it was a holiday, that sort of thing was not news any more. She said that once Palestinian deaths were just numbers to journalists, but now they are not even that. Even when Western journalists do get to stories, she said they often sanitise it. She challenged some German journalists when they missed out important parts of a story. They replied that they wanted to stay in Israel and get permission to come back the next time and that limited what they could do. She was passionate--"Either you are a journalist or you are not, there is no half-way journalism. There is a price for being a journalist, for being prepared to find out the truth. You have to pay for it. You are either a journalist or a collaborator. I can't say it is all who work like this, but it is the majority who take this attitude." Despite all of their handicaps, I met courageous Palestinians working in the media who persisted in trying to get their stories out despite the odds. There was no doubt they were efficient and resourceful. But within the Palestinian Authority itself, there is room for considerable improvement.

Despite the PA headquarters being housed in a half-demolished building in Ramallah, Arafat and his spokespersons are still in high demand from journalists throughout the world. They manage the media circus with no press/media department, no media budget and not even one expert in media management skills. There are also internal tensions. Recently Palestinians close to the PA told me that if a Palestinian receives favourable reports from the West concerning the way they present themselves, they are seen as a threat to those by the top. Instead of encouraging good communicators, their activities are often curtailed.

There is no monitoring of the coverage of media outlets by the PA and no sanctions if media outlets misrepresent them. A US station recently did a "hatchet job" on Arafat, but it is believed that he did not even know about it. A Palestinian spokesman told me there should be monitoring and restricted access to stories to channels that routinely misinterpret information.

Every Palestinian spokesman within the PA works as an individual. Several times I was told that after an important meeting, a number of senior Palestinians leave the room to talk to waiting journalists without planning what they are going to say. In consequence, often they give slightly different stories; there is nothing that detracts from the value of a story more than different versions. The impression gained is that the story is manufactured or the Palestinians are in total disarray. There is no system of deciding how to present their story to gain maximum impact or decide what words most clearly express their position. This makes a big difference to the way that a sophisticated Western audience views the Palestinian cause.

In an attempt to overcome this, a Palestine Media Center was set up in Ramallah with the idea that it would be a coordinating body that would be proactive in providing services for foreign journalists. It did not make a significant difference, and in consequence it now has a smaller budget and its activities have been seriously curtailed. Senior Palestinians give different stories concerning the reason why it was not effective, including lack of sufficient funding, or lack of experienced media managers who really knew what needed to be done. Whatever the reason, apart from their website it offers little else to visiting journalists now.

There have been some serious mistakes in presentation of the Palestinian story, but none greater than the failure to address the foreign press after the Camp David talks. Palestinians gave different reasons--one person said it was because there were difficulties of opinion within the Palestinian team, which meant they did nothing because they could not agree what to do. Another said it was because Arafat felt that if he did not rock the boat, the Israelis would come back and complete the peace deal. Whatever the reason, the Palestinians were unfairly blamed for the failure by Bill Clinton and Ehud Barak and did not answer back, which made the world think they must be guilty. One Palestinian negotiator independently decided to write an account in the New York Times, and Arafat responded by ordering his arrest. The story stayed hidden for a year and after that it was too late--no-one was interested in a stale story and the world had moved on.

Sometimes Palestinians get their stories heard despite all the odds. At the recent Aqaba summit, Israel turned up with a coach filled with 25 press officers and a coordinator with whom journalists could book their place at different press conferences in a variety of languages. The Palestinian press delegation consisted of two people who had made their own way there, neither of whom was a fluent Arabic speaker--whilst Israel even offered an Arabic speaking spokesman. Yet the two Palestinian spokesmen did reasonably well simply because their case was sound. With a coach-load of presenters they could undoubtedly have done much better.

The Palestinians have handicaps of coping with difficult stories such as suicide bombers. Some senior Palestinian spokesmen say the reason why Israel deliberately killed unarmed observers in cold blood at the beginning of the second intifada was to induce fear into people who might otherwise have protested peacefully, and to elicit an armed response that Palestinian militant groups obligingly provided. But Palestinians do not have skill in turning difficult stories around. Journalists who have Israeli sympathies can and do use skill--for example, Hanan Ashrawi was asked in all seriousness why Palestinian mothers allow their children to go out and get killed. This is a skilful way of blaming the victim that worked as it created an image of uncaring Palestinian families who are not 'like us'. A Palestinian media student pointed out the way that Israel uses imagination in the way that it presents its case. For example, he said that when CNN showed a story sympathetic to Palestinians, Israeli television showed it the next day as an example of CNN bias against them--the student commented: "This is creative, efficient."

More Palestinians are developing media skills with active media departments in Al Quds and Birzeit universities, which is a great improvement as only a decade ago Palestinians as a whole lacked these skills. The draw is well-paid jobs in the ever-growing satellite channels that are springing up all over the Arab world. Within Palestine itself, there are many independent television and radio channels as well as the PA's channel. But one media worker said Palestinians only want to say they broadcast and don't care about the quality. The PA studio is over-staffed and under-skilled, and equipment is often old and out of date. This is important as with good technical quality, the stories could be sold to overseas companies. As it is, when voice and picture don't match up the stories are likely to stay local. No debate is allowed on difficult issues, corruption might be mentioned as a word but no names or details get through, giving the impression of a controlled television that has to worship the leader. This then leads outsiders to the unfair conclusion that Palestinian television is merely propaganda and it reduces credibility when genuine Palestinian suffering is shown. No thought is given to the way stories are presented. If a Palestinian mother is bereaved, they show pictures of her when she is wailing in distress. By comparison, Israeli television interviews show grieving mothers the day after when they are calm, when they can explain about their loss and how it affects them and other members of their family. It is this approach that makes Israelis come over as more civilised and less barbaric and more like the West.

In the Palestinian Delegation in London, there is yet more serious under-funding with no budget and not even one press officer. It relies on organisations such as Arab Media Watch and the Council for the Advancement of Arab-British Understanding to monitor the media for it. These organisations do monitor but they have small budgets and cannot take the place of a well-organised, well-funded press office. The officers know some journalists who ring them for information, but there is no time or budget to get to know journalists informally so they can develop good working relationships. By comparison, some Arab embassies in London are now developing fully equipped and staffed press offices, and if there is an inaccurate story they can immediately take action, such as inviting the journalist out to discuss it over lunch, or even arrange a visit so facts on the ground can be checked by the journalist. The Palestinian Ambassador is held in great respect, but he is only one person and cannot be proactive when he interacts with the media. The Palestinian Delegation merely responds and usually the press only contact it over negative stories, such as condemning suicide bombs where Israelis have died. The press do not contact it for confirmation of stories in which Palestinians are victims and Palestinians have no glamorous office, nor any carrot or stick they can use to influence journalists to show Palestinians as a long-suffering nation with people who deserve justice.

For the future, there is a growing awareness, an impatience among younger Palestinians who use Israeli media management as a model that Palestinians should copy. Time and again I heard Palestinians in all positions defend what Israel does in media management, saying every nation should put thought into presenting their own case in the best possible way. For example, one media student told me he wants to do a PhD looking at how Israel manages television news. Journalists and younger people associated with the PA knew exactly what was going wrong, although they felt frustrated that they could not at this moment put things right. This raw energy, this unleashing of new media ideas, will one day energise the Palestinian cause and give it new impetus. Let us hope that their day is not too far ahead of us, as winning the media war is the only way that Palestinians can defeat the odds that are currently heavily stacked against them. They have the best possible case, they are developing skills, and they are hungry for the opportunity to show the world what they think.

Judith Brown, a member of Arab Media Watch's executive committee who recently visited Palestine as part of her PhD in "Imagery of Arabs in the British Media". This essay originally appeared on Arab Media Watch.

 

Weekend Edition Features for February 1, 2004

Paul de Rooij
For Whom the Death Tolls: Deliberate Undercounting of Coalition Fatalities

Bernard Chazelle
Bush's Desolate Imperium

Jack Heyman
Bushfires on the Docks

Christopher Reed
Broken Ballots

Michael Donnelly
An Urgent Plea to Progressives: Don't Give in to Fear

Rob Eshelman
The Subtle War

Lee Sustar
Palestine and the Anti-War Movement

George Bisharat
Right of Return

Ray McGovern
Nothing to Preempt

Brian Cloughley
Enron's Beady-Eyed Sharks

Conn Hallinan
Nepal, Bush & Real WMDs

Kurt Nimmo
The Murderous Lies of the Neo-Cons

Phillip Cryan
Media at the Monterrey Summit

Christopher Brauchli
A Speech for Those Who Don't Read

John Holt
War in the Great White North

Mickey Z.
Clueless in America: When Mikey Met Wesley

Mark Scaramella
The High Cost of Throwing Away the Key

Tariq Ali
Farewell, Munif

Ben Tripp
Waiter! The Reality Check, Please

Poets' Basement
LaMorticella, Guthrie, Thomas and Albert


Keep CounterPunch Alive:

Make a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /