Decompression
 for the Democrat!™

Home
Shop Our Store!
Search
Resources
Bushisms
Press

What Our Customers are Saying!

Hate Mail

Order Status

Ordering Info
Terms & Conds.

Company
Contact Us!
FAQ
Wholesale Info

Flash Intro!

Your One-Stop-Shop for the Finest in Outrageous
and Irreverent Political Gifts and Clothing!

Inside you'll find:

•  Fun & Forward Political T-shirts !
•  Outrageous Bumper Stickers !
•  Campaign Buttons !
•  Wonderful information and links for Democratic  conventions and organizations within your state!
•  Fun and Informative Books and Publications!

Our new No C.A.R.B. t-Shirt !

More new arrivals!

...this is just a small sample! Many, many more
in our Political Store!

We are completely appalled!

07/07/2004 - A Texas couple was charged with trespassing on the Fourth of July for wearing anti-Bush t-shirts at a speech by the President in West Virginia. Although the couple, Nicole and Jeffrey Rank, had tickets to the event, security insisted they leave or stand in a designated protest zone. When they refused, police detained them.

From the stage Bush said. "We're thankful that this nation they created 228 years ago remains free and independent and the best hope for all mankind."

Source - Democracy Now

Not Funny...

"F___ Saddam. We're taking him out." Those were the words of President George W. Bush, who had poked his head into the office of National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice. It was March 2002, and Rice was meeting with three U.S. Senators, discussing how to deal with Iraq through the United Nations, or perhaps in a coalition with America's Middle East allies. Bush wasn't interested. He waved his hand dismissively, recalls a participant, and neatly summed up his Iraq policy in that short phrase. The Senators laughed uncomfortably; Rice flashed a knowing smile. The President left the room.

A year later, Bush's outburst has been translated into action, as cruise missiles and smart bombs slam into Baghdad.
Posted Sunday, March 23, 2003; 2:31 p.m. EST (Time Magazine)

Do as I say....not as I do!

Taken from www.georgewbush.com on May 14, 2004:

In his 2003 State of the Union Address, President Bush told the nation, "We will not deny, we will not ignore, we will not pass along our problems to other Congresses, other presidents, and other generations." He has followed through on this commitment by delivering a bold vision that meets America's challenges at home and abroad.

Contrary to that rhetoric, Shrub's fiscal policies have erased the largest budget surplus in U.S. History and produced the largest budget deficit in the shortest time in U.S. History. In doing so, Shrub has, in fact, passed along economic and budget problems to our children, grandchildren, and probably our great-grandchildren as well.

The Prime Time Interview
with Diane Sawer and Bush
WMDs vs. WMD Programs: Does It Matter?

Does it matter whether or not Saddam’s Iraqi regime possessed weapons of mass destruction at the time American forces invaded Iraq? Apparently not, according to President George W. Bush’s recent remarks on ABC News’ Primetime program.

On December 16, Primetime’s Diane Sawyer pressed the president about earlier administration statements that Saddam Hussein definitely had WMDs as opposed to just weapons programs. During that segment of the interview the following interesting exchange took place.

President Bush: "Well, you can keep asking the question, and my answer’s gonna be the same. Saddam was a danger and the world is better off ’cause we got rid of him."

Diane Sawyer: "But stated as a hard fact, that there were weapons of mass destruction as opposed to the possibility that he could move to acquire those weapons still —"

President Bush: "So what’s the difference?"

Diane Sawyer: "Well —"

President Bush: "The possibility that he could acquire weapons. If he were to acquire weapons, he would be the danger. That’s what I’m trying to explain to you."

Of course, the administration had not just claimed that Saddam had WMDs but that the country was practically bulging with such weapons. The Iraqi threat was supposed to be both serious and imminent. On April 10, in a message to the Iraqi people, President Bush even went so far as to say that the Iraqi regime’s "aggression and weapons of mass destruction make it a unique threat to the world." (Emphasis added.) And privately, the Bush administration had much more to say about the Iraqi threat.
Courtest of The New American - Vol. 20, No. 1 - January 12, 2004

BBC Blasts US Media War Coverage!
We knew it all along (you did too)....and now the BBC has gone on record to say how right-wing, one-sided the coverage of the war was Iraq was! Personally these Two Unemployed Democrats were appalled and embarrassed while we watched this so-called "coverage". LONDON (Reuters) - U.S. broadcasters' coverage of the Iraq (news - web sites) war was so unquestioningly patriotic and so lacking in impartiality that it threatened the credibility of America's electronic media, the head of the BBC said.

From a peace rally held in downtown Munich.

SeeYaGeorge.com - News Archives

Why We do this
It's simple! We are dedicated Democrats with a goal....change the current administration and make a difference! Want to know more about our mission? Click here!

We Promise to give back!
Part of our profits will go to help Americans. We will donate a portion of all profits to help cancer research and AMfar The American Foundation for AIDS Research. See our T & C page for more information.

Top

Free counters provided by Andale.