Spreadin' the Love from Mumbai to Modi'in


Soon Israelis will be able to enjoy the tacky goodness of Bollywood from their own living rooms.

The cable channel, HOT Bombay, will "be launched in November for two months on an experimental basis," exclusively devoted to the Indian musicals.

[1 comment]



Mmm... Doughnuts...


This morning, Krispy Kreme opened their first store in Washington, D.C. to packs of hungry stateless consumers.
A cheer went up through the line of more than 150 people when a Krispy Kreme truck pulled up around 5:45 a.m., Tuesday.

First in line was Rami Genauer. He won a dozen free doughnuts each week for a year. Genauer said if there's one word to describe his wait, it's "irony."

Genauer is an orthodox Jew who won't eat the doughnuts because they're not kosher. He plans to give them to the homeless.
Now that's some yummy tzedakah.

[4 comments]



No Smicha Required


From Bang it Out, it's The Chassidic Rebbe Name Generator.
You are very wise, humble and pious, Ariela... from this day forward you will now be known as the holy Reb Gedalyahu Yekutiel Krevat of Chelm, also known as the 'Baatlaner Rebbe'... now let your chassidish adventures begin, your talmidim are waiting!
The fictional city of Chelm is, of course, one of the great places in Eastern European Jewish folklore, and I am proud to represent, if you will.

The story of the Rabbi of Chelm:
One day the Rabbi was called to the neighboring town of Lublin for a Rabbinical Conference. Each of the rabbis tried to show how brilliant their powers were. The Rabbi of Lublin asked a riddle. "Who is my father's son but he is not my brother?" The other rabbis thought, but couldn't come up with the answer. "Me," replied the Rabbi triumphantly. The Rabbi of Chelm was very impressed with the riddle and couldn't wait to get home to tell it to his congregation.

That Friday night after his speech the people asked him to share some of the wisdom he had picked up at the conference. "OK," said the Rabbi, shaking back and forth and stroking his long grey beard, "Listen carefully, I am going to ask you a riddle. Who is this? He's my father's son but he's not my brother." The people of Chelm thought and thought, each one trying for an answer, but finally they all turned to the Rabbi. "We give up," they acknowledged.

"Simple," replied the wise sage, "He is the Rabbi of Lublin."
(Story courtesy of WZO Hagshama)

[Update] It appears there is really a city in Poland called Chelm. Huh. And here's more information on the historical Jewish community there.

[2 comments]



Allah Hu Clockbar!



The mosque clock: Never be late for the call to prayer again!

[6 comments]



ADL takes on Ali G


With reference to our earlier discussion of Borat's song In My Country There is a Problem on HBO's Da Ali G Show... The ADL has taken up this issue in a letter to comedian Sacha Baron Cohen.
While we understand this scene was an attempt to show how easily a group of ordinary people can be encouraged to join in an anti-Semitic chorus, we are concerned that the irony may have been lost on some of your audience – or worse, that some of your viewers may have simply accepted Borat's statements about Jews at face value.
I'm still conflicted about this, and I'm not sure an organizational response in this form was appropriate. In fact, I sense that the ADL would see a better payday if it used the clip as an educational, eye-opening tool rather than confronting Cohen, whose message is clearly in line with their own.

Full letter here.

[14 comments]



'Every Mother's Son': Stories of Sons Killed by Police


A new documentary called Every Mother's Son airs Tuesday night on PBS. The film recounts the stories of three mothers whose sons (Amadou Diallo, Anthony Baez and Gidone 'Gary' Busch) were killed by police officers.

[8 comments]



Our Girls Aren't Good Enough?


JDate outsources:
Her name is Hila. She is 22 years old and lives in Tel Aviv. She is very attractive, single, looking for a Jewish husband from a good family, and most important - she is a mouse-click away. This is how the banner persuades you, the Jewish bachelor, to enter the Jewish dating site JDate and find the love of your life.

But Hila in the banner is no other than pornographic model Kari Gold, 18 years old, who lives in Hungary. She is, indeed, very attractive, has a boyfriend and is not looking for a Jewish husband at all. Gold says she is not looking for spiritual qualities in men.
Full Story.

[17 comments]



Paris JCC Burnt Down


Full article.

It's too easy to feel safe and comfortable in the US sometimes. While nobody was hurt, thank God, this is a frightening reminder of some people's desire to destroy our ability to join together as a community.

Frankly, I don't think Sharon was so off base when he recommended to French Jews that they bolt -- clearly they are not being protected adequately (have you seen an American JCC recently without serious security?).

[11 comments]



We're On A Mission from G-d


Santa Cruz's alternative weekly Good Times has a cover feature this week on SC's local chabadniks. Read it before it's gone cuz apparently they don't believe in archiving stories...

[17 comments]



Remember


27000 Palestinians and 6500 Israelis were injured since September 2000. Below are statistics of casualties of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Fatalities in the al-Aqsa Intifada,: 29 Sept. 2000 - 12 July 2004 (from www.btselem.org)

In the occupied territories:

2,683 Palestinians were killed by Israeli security forces in the Occupied Territories, of whom 533 were minors under the age of 18. Ages of the minors killed: One hundred and one minors were age 17, one hundred and eight were age 16, seventy five were age 15, seventy three were age 14, forty seven were age 13, twenty seven age 12, eighteen were age 11, twenty one were age 10, eleven were age 9, ten were age 8, eight were age 7, seven were age 6, three were age 5, six were age 4, five were age 3, six were two years old, four were one year old babies, one was an 11 month old baby girl, one was a 6 month old baby girl and one was a four month old baby girl.

At least 149 of the Palestinians killed were extrajudicially executed by Israel... In the course of these assasinations 100 additional Palestinians were killed, 90 of them minors.

32 Palestinians were killed by Israeli civilians, including Three minors: One was age 17, One was age 14 and One was a Two month- old baby girl. Ten foreign Citizens were killed by Israeli security forces gunfire.

207 Israeli civilians were killed by Palestinians, 34 of them were minors under the age of 18: Six were aged 17, five were age 16, seven were age 14, two were age 13, two was age 11, two was age 9, one was age 7, three were age 5, one was two years old, one was a 10 month-old baby girl, one was a 7 month-old baby girl, one was an 8 month-old baby girl, one was a 5 month-old baby boy and one was a one day old baby boy.

Seven foreign citizens were killed by Palestinians. 201 members of the Israeli security forces were killed by Palestinians. 89 Palestinians were killed by Palestinian civilians on suspicion of collaborating with Israel. 18 of them were killed while held in the custody of the Palestinian security forces. 29 Palestinian were killed by members of the Palestinian security forces. 9 of them were killed while held in the custody of the Palestinian security forces.

Three Palestinians were killed by gunfire by Palestinians who opened fire at Israeli civilians. Two members of the Palestinian security forces were killed by Palestinians who attempted to kill IDF soldiers. One Palestinian civilian was killed by gunfire when IDF soldiers forced him to serve as their human shield.

Within Israel:

49 Palestinians, residents of the Occupied Territories, were killed by Israeli security forces gunfire. One of those killed was a minor aged 14.

408 Israeli civilians were killed by Palestinians, residents of the Occupied Territories. 75 of them were minors under the age of 18. Of them: Twelve were age 17, thirteen were age 16, fourteen were age 15, six were age 14, four were age 13, three were age 12, two were age 11, one was age 10, two were age 9, two were age 8, two were age 7, one was age 5, three were age 4, three were age 3, one was a two years old baby, one was an eighteen month old baby, one was a 14 month old baby, one was a one year old baby, one was an eleven month old baby, one was a nine month old baby, and one was a seven month old baby.

3 Israeli civilians were killed by foreign citizens. 33 foreign citizens were killed by Palestinians. Two of them were minors: One of them - 16 years old and the other - Five months old. 83 members of the Israeli security forces were killed by Palestinians, residents of the Occupied Territories.

Tehe' Nishmatam Tzrura Bitzror Hachayim.

[28 comments]



Sharon Betrays Israel's Founders


Henry Siegman - a senior fellow on the Middle East at the Council on Foreign Relations and a former head of the American Jewish Congress and of the Synagogue Council of America, argues in the International Herald Tribune that Sharon has betrayed Israel's founders, and even drops the Apartheid bomb. Hot stuff! Personally I don't know if Sharon is betraying Israel's founders, or being completely faithful to their innermost desires. I guess it depends - to which founders does he refer? Hertzl, Chaim Wiezmann, David Ben Gurion, or Jabotinsky?

Full story.

[23 comments]



Suicide Bomb Free Flying


In an effort to boost tourism, El Al Israel Airlines offers "Suicide Bomb-Free Flying" or your money back — no questions asked.

[11 comments]



Bitchin' Hebrew Fonts


Sick of the same old Hebrew fonts which make everything you design look like a page of tefillah or something punched off a Hebrew typewriter? Peep Ha-Fontia Shel Ben — the illest collection of free Hebrew fonts this side of the Jordan.

[8 comments]



Matisyahu on Jimmy Kimmel Live


Matisyahu, the Hasidic Reggae Superstar, will be on Jimmy Kimmel Live on ABC, next Tuesday, August 25, at 12:05 AM EST. Tune in for the national TV premier of the illest Jewish musician to grip the mic. His new CD will be dropping sometime in October.

[9 comments]



Vanunu Risks Jail To Speak in First U.S. Interview


Mordechai Vanunu speaks to Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! about restrictions on his freedom of speech and movement.
"Mordechai Vanunu worked as a nuclear technician at Dimona, Israel's secret nuclear installation from 1976 to 1985. He worked there at a time when Israel was insisting it would not be the first to introduce nuclear weapons to the Middle East. What Vanunu discovered is that Israel had secretly developed an extensive nuclear program, hiding its existence from the Israeli people and parliament, and the world.

Vanunu leaked information and photos of Israel's nuclear weapons program to the Sunday Times in London. He was subsequently kidnapped by Israeli spy agency Mossad in Italy and then jailed. He would go on to spend 18 years behind bars including 11 in solitary confinement."
You can listen to the interview at Democracy Now!

[23 comments]



Taking Responsibility


According to Ha'aretz, the IDF is investigating 600 suspected cases of abuse of Palestinians since September 2000.

I have always been immensely frustrated by claims that Israeli soldiers abuse Palestinians indescriminately. While I have no doubt that it occurs, the IDF has and will hold soldiers accountable for any crimes they commit. These are the actions of a morally responsible nation.

Having said that, the number 600-- including 88 shooting deaths and 217 other violent offenses-- is simply appalling. I hope that the IDF takes the next step and makes the institutional reforms necessary to curb abuse.

[17 comments]



No Sense Behind Google's AdSense


I apologize for the length of this post, but I thought y'all might enjoy reading it. As you may have noticed, beneath the blogads in the sidebar, I've started running Google Ads. And while I'm glad to have found a way to bring in a 'lil extra dough to keep the site going, getting up and running with AdSense has been a bit of a forehead smacking experience.

It started when I applied for an Adsense account and was subsequently rejected:
Hello Daniel,

Thank you for your interest in Google AdSense. After reviewing your application, our program specialists have found that the website currently associated with your account does not comply with our policies. Therefore, we're unable to accept you into Google AdSense at this time.

We did not approve your application for the reasons listed below. If you are able to resolve these issues, please feel free to reply to this email for reconsideration when you have made the changes.

Issues:

Sensitive content: Google believes strongly in freedom of expression and offers broad access to content across the web without censoring search results. At the same time, we reserve the right to exercise discretion when reviewing sites for AdSense. We've found that your website contains content that we don't allow at this time. AdSense policy doesn't currently accept sites that advocate against any individual, group, or organization. Please review our policies for a complete list of site content not allowed on web pages.

[...]

If you would like to submit another website for consideration, simply reply to this email and provide us with the URL. If this new website complies with our program policies, we will help you start delivering AdWords ads in minutes.

Please contact us at adsense-support@google.com if you have any questions.

Regards,

The Google Team
Now, I'm positively perplexed. I know we're a bit snarky and our politics are far from mainstream, but 'sensitive'? What on earth about Jewschool is 'sensitive,' I wondered. And so I replied:
I am extremely curious as to what "sensitive content" on my website does not comply with your organization's policies. Could you please specify?
That's a very straight-forward question, is it not? Here was the reply:
Hello Daniel,

Thank you for your email.

Our program specialists review all websites for a variety of criteria. These include, but are not limited to, site content, clear navigation, and the site's potential value to the AdSense program and the user experience.

Upon reviewing your site, we found that many of the ads that would appear on your site would not be relevant to your site's content, as a whole. As the ads would not provide a valuable experience for your site's users or our advertisers, we feel that your site isn't a good fit for the AdSense program at this time.

Please feel free to reply to this email with any further questions. If you manage or own another site on which you'd like to display Google ads, you may reply to this email and include the URL in the message. We will then reconsider your application. If the new site complies with our program policies and is a fit for the AdSense program, we'll approve your application and allow you to run ads on that specific site.

Thank you for your understanding.

Sincerely,

Carrie
The Google Team
Now, is it just me, or did Carrie not answer my question at all? I felt like I was dealing with a PR agent specializing in spin. So in turn, I responded:
"Upon reviewing your site, we found that many of the ads that would appear on your site would not be relevant to your site's content, as a whole."

I find this to be a wholly fallacious statement. You seem to have no trouble at all placing relative ads on http://protocols.blogspot.com/ and http://www.theyadablog.com/ to which my site is considered a contemporary (and in fact, both sites regularly quote mine, not to mention the fact that I've lectured on panels alongside the editors of both of those sites and am a contributor to the latter), nor do you have trouble placing advertisements on any number of other Jewishly-themed websites apart from mine. Your statement that the ads are not relevant does not intimate the label of "sensitive content" which was your preliminary dismissal. I did not ask whether or not the site's material was "incompatible" with AdSense, but rather why the material is considered "sensitive."

I would still like an answer to this question that is not scripted, but rather, based on the assesment of the staff who deemed it so. Thus I shall reiterate my question, which was not answered: "I am extremely curious as to what 'sensitive content' on my website does not comply with your organization's policies. Could you please specify?"
I soon thereafter received an e-mail reading:
Congratulations!

Your Google AdSense application has been approved. You can now activate your account and start delivering Google ads and AdSense for search on your site in minutes.
This was soon followed by another e-mail from Carrie:
Hello Daniel,

Thank you for your email. We appreciate your explanation on this matter.

Our AdSense representatives review all AdSense applications according to our Terms and Conditions and our program policies. I apologize if the prior disapproval of your application was made in error.

I have now reviewed and confirmed that your website meets all of our policies. Your application has been approved.
"Well, alright," I said to myself. "Good shit." So I created my little ad block and tossed the Javascript into my Blogger template, republished my site, and found this gaping hole in the sidebar where the ads were supposed to display. I had a similar experience when I first started using blogads, so I e-mailed Google to be sure if everything was alright and if it just took a few hours or a couple days for the ads to start displaying.
So I added the Javascript and I'm just getting this big blank space...Does it take a while for the ads to start displaying?
Google's response was wholly unexpected:
Hello Daniel,

Thank you for your email. Please note that we currently do not run paid Google ads on web pages that are determined to contain potentially sensitive or non-family safe content by our automatic contextual advertising system. Because our system automatically classifies web pages based on the type of content, the ads appearing on the page you mentioned are public service ads, for which you do not receive earnings.

I have reviewed your site and found that many of the ads that would appear on your site would not be relevant to your site's content. Therefore, the ads would not provide a valuable experience for your site's users or our advertisers.

Thank you for your understanding. Please feel free to reply to this email if you have additional technical questions or concerns. For general program or account questions, please email adsense-support@google.com.

Sincerely,

Ray
The Google Team
This, of course, was perplexing because, by the time I received this e-mail, the Google ads were displaying on my site, and they were not PSAs, but rather ads for "Terrorism Experts" and Christian Zionist organizations pleading with Jews to make aliyah. At this point, I'm getting annoyed:
You guys are really starting to wear my patience thin.

First I get rejected because my content is "sensitive." Then I write you to ask what's sensitive about it and you respond, not by answering my question, but by saying the ads would be irrelevant to my site. Then when I point out that you are running ads on two other sites which parallel mine (and which in fact, regularly quote mine) and demand, again, to know what's wrong with my content, I get an e-mail back apologizing and welcoming me to AdSense. Now, you're e-mailing me to tell me that I may as well yank the Javascript from my template because my content is purportedly sensitive and not "family-safe", and thus the ads are irrelevant to my site.

Would you care to give me a straight answer regarding what is sensitive about the content on my site; what it is that you deem objectionable?
The answer I got, I was completely unprepared for:
Hello Dan,

Thank you for your reply. Please note that our automatic contextual advertising system may find any content related to the 'Holocaust' to be sensitive. Please know that Google believes strongly in freedom of expression and offers broad access to content across the web without censoring search results. However, as previously mentioned, our system automatically classifies web pages based on their content to prevent the possibility of a negative user experience. At this time, we cannot manually alter the targeting of the ads displayed on your site.

Please keep in mind that your AdSense account remains active and you are free to serve ads to any pages that do not contain potentially sensitive content.

We appreciate your understanding. Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

Ray
The Google Team
I love how he put Holocaust in single quotes like, "the so-called 'Holocaust'," but I'm sure that wasn't his intention. See, I was kind of thinking that they didn't like our critical stance on Israel and they were going to say something about that. But to essentially say that they won't run ads on our site because of the word Holocaust, despite that it was raised in the context of condemning Holocaust denial? Who's feelings are we trying to protect? Antisemites? Also, how can I get flack for the word Holocaust when one of the ads Google was displaying on our site was for a book about the American eugenics movement called Hitler Is Winning?
Wait, I'm sorry. Let me get this straight. The term "Holocaust," when used in a discussion about the wrongfulness of Holocaust denial, is "sensitive," but the ad for the book "Hitler is Winning" which is now being displayed in my Adsense bar isn't? Are you kidding me?
To which Google replied:
Hello Dan,

Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. I have forwarded your finding to our AdWords team for further investigation.

All AdWords ads are held to the AdWords Editorial Guidelines and Terms and Conditions. If this ad is found to be in violation of any of these policies, we will remove it immediately.

We understand that you are disappointed with our current policies. We apologize for the inconvenience. However, we have certain policies in place that we believe will help ensure the effectiveness of Google ads for our publishers as well as our advertisers.

As we grow, we may find that we are able to expand our program to more more pages with a wider variety of web content.

Thank you for your feedback, and please know that we are working hard to make the AdSense program available to as many pages as we can.

Sincerely,

Ray
The Google Team
I'm still perplexed as to why Ray is suggesting that Jewschool doesn't meet Google's criteria, considering the fact that I've been displaying ads for "Republican singles" and birthright israel trips for the last two days. Further, I had no interest in having that guy's ad yanked for his book, because, frankly, I want people to learn about the history of the American eugenics movement. I wasn't trying to "bring that to his attention", I was trying to point out the fallacy in their logic and get a straight answer to my question: What is it about Jewschool's content that is too 'sensitive.' But no such luck when talking to Google's robot support staff who apparently can not respond to a direct question, particularly without the use of a computer. At this point I have my doubts that Ray is even a human being himself. He might just be AI software scanning e-mails and shooting back responses, because clearly the guy hasn't the ability to deviate from a script long enough to address me like a human being, let alone actually respond to my question.

But to hell with it. The ads are running and I seem to be making money, so... What Robot Ray don't know don't hurt him, I guess. The logic behind AdSense, on the other hand, well... that shall forever remain a mystery to me.

[11 comments]



separate but not-so-equal


Yesterday, the Robinson's Arch area of the Kotel (Western Wall) was "officially" inaugurated by the Israeli government, with very different reactions from the two groups it is primarily intended to serve--Women at the Wall and the Conservative/Masorti movement. The space is off to the side of the main Kotel area, far enough off the beaten path that one doesn't have to go through a metal detector to get there. Since the "real" Kotel area has a mechitza dividing men's and women's prayer space, the Masortim have been unofficially using the Arch space for mixed, egalitarian services for about five years, and welcome more official recognition of their right to be there.

Women at the Wall, on the other hand, fought the Israeli Government for about 14 years for the right to pray as a group, read from the Torah and wear tallitot on the women's side of the Kotel. (All of these activities are permitted by Jewish law.) During that time, things often got violent, as angry haredim screamed obscenities and threw eggs, chairs, and worse at the women as they attempted to pray; several months ago a friend of mine was actually punched in the face. Last year the High Court denied WotW's petition and ruled that they must read Torah and/or don tallitot and tefillin at an "alternate location."

The raw deal was reported by the Jerusalem Post:

"The government of Israel spent millions of shekels to put us in a second-class section of the wall," said the head of the Women of the Wall, Anat Hoffman.... [She] noted that every time the group wants to organize a prayer event at the site, it needs to apply for permission to do so from the company that built it, and must ensure it does not need to pay the normal admission fee to enter the compound.
I myself made it to WotW services today; the group davvened Shacharit and Hallel towards the back of the women's section of the Kotel without tallitot and tefillin [per the ruling], but due to a logistical snafu there was no Sefer Torah available this month (though someone noted that there are, in fact, 200 Sifrei Torah available on the men's side for "anyone", ie any man, who wants to use them.) The move to Robninson's Arch is likely to take place at the next gathering, Rosh Hodesh Cheshvan.

The full story in the Jerusalem Post is here.

[23 comments]



Shaving Face





[6 comments]