A great nation
 deserves the truth

AMERICAblog.org
by John Aravosis

Blogging live from the GOP Convention: 8/30 to 9/2

Send me your tips/comments:
AMERICAblog [AT] starpower [DOT] net 

Join my Gay Politics email list: 
click here


 

Monday, August 30, 2004

by John in DC - 9:51 PM

this is an audio post - click to play

  |  Permanent Link |  


UPDATED: VA Congressman Schrock Pulls Out of Race

by Rob in Baltimore - 7:56 PM

Here's an interesting one guys - this is Pat Robertson's Congressman, and he's dropping out of his reelection race. Why? According to AP:
""In recent weeks, allegations have surfaced that have called into question my ability to represent the citizens of Virginia's Second Congressional District," Shrock said in a press release."

What were those allegations? That the Congressman, who had a 92% approval rating from The Christian Coalition, a co-sponsor of the Federal Marriage Amendment, was reportedly cruising for men on phone sex lines. According to BlogActive:
"Congressman Ed Schrock has made a habit of rendezvousing with gay men via the MegaMates/ MegaPhone Line, an interactive telephone service on which men place ads and respond to those ads to meet each other."

UPDATE: And in case you want to hear the evidence for yourself, again from BlogActive:
Audio link - be aware that this is an ad soliciting gay sex.

Lest you think that this is this guy is just a regular congressman, here's the reality (again from the AP story):
"In January 2001, Schrock was elected president of the Republican House freshman class and landed a seat on the House Armed Services Committee, a plum for any member of Congress from eastern Virginia."

This is a huge success for bloggers, and the outing campaign in general. For those who criticized John when he started talking about this, think about it this way. This was a LEADER in the House, a LEADER in the fight to discriminate against gays and lesbians, and complete hypocrite. Without blogging, and the outing campaign, this guy would still be sitting in office.

  |  Permanent Link |  


In case you doubted McGreevey...

by Rob in Baltimore - 7:40 PM

His accuser has fled to Israel and has now decided, according to AP:
NEW YORK - A former aide who claims New Jersey Gov. James E. McGreevey sexually harassed him said Monday he will not sue the governor.

The governor's resignation announcement was sufficient admission of his wrongdoing, Golan Cipel said in a statement written in Hebrew and released Monday by an Israeli public relations agency. Cipel is in seclusion with his family in Israel.

So much for him having been harassed and needing justice.

  |  Permanent Link |  



by John in DC - 6:20 PM

this is an audio post - click to play

  |  Permanent Link |  


My favorite mistakes...

by David - 5:42 PM

A couple weeks back I wrote a post about an idea for a commercial that featured preznit's last press conference -- April -- where he couldn't come up with a coherent answer on any mistakes he'd made since Sept. 11.

Turns out DNC already did it. My bad.

Again, going right at the heart of strong, decisive leadership. The guy can't even handle a press conference where he gets to choose who asks questions.

I think DNC might want to dust this one off, maybe tweak a bit, add the latest "mistakes" and run it again. You know, a million more in poverty, a million more uninsured, and...

my... pet... goat.

  |  Permanent Link |  


Moderate Republicans Fighting Back

by Rob in Baltimore - 4:30 PM

The LA Times pieces were interesting, showing some real divisions within the Republican Party. As I was flipping through the NY Times Convention section today, I came across a full page ad by these guys, Mainstream2004.

"As Republican former Governors, Senators and public officials,
we urge our party to renew its allegiance to the proven, common sense values which unite America.

Instead of partisan ideology - which increasingly has led moderates to leave the party - what's needed is a speedy return to the pragmatic, problem-solving mainstream."

They have a petition online that they indicate will be delivered to the Chairman during the convention. They talk about the current administration "weakening environmental law", the need to "end record defects", "rebuild alliances". On social issues, two interesting things:
"- put the health of millions first, and clear the way for embryonic stem cell research;

- appoint mainstream federal judges, and respect the Constitution;"

And this is coming from REPUBLICANS. Given that this ad was signed by a number of former Republican Governors and Senators, this is not shaping up to be what I would call a "unified" convention. I give them a lot of credit for standing up for what the Republican party used to be all about. For those who want to have one more go to try and change the party from within, might be a good group to join up with. Sign their petition - give the repubs a little indigestion during their convention. :)

  |  Permanent Link |  


Bush admits he had plans to invade Iraq pre 9/11, kind of

by John in DC - 4:11 PM

President Bush admitted, almost, on Friday that he was thinking of invading Iraq even before 9/11. Not that this is news, but it's something that we all keep forgetting, and it's important to keep on him about this. What WAS the point of this war?

From USA Today:
I believe the decision to go to war was the right decision, particularly after September the 11th.
So, even without Sept 11, it would have been valid to go to war. But before Sept. 11, there wasn't a war on terror, so what would the justification have been? Look, I don't like Saddam, I don't think the Iraqis were flying kites before we invaded, but it's BS for the president to start coming up with alternative pre-9/11 reasons to invade, now that the WMD discussion has gone out the window (not to mention, what DID happen to Sarin gas shells they "discovered" a few months ago?)

  |  Permanent Link |  


Three Words

by David - 4:05 PM

Strong, decisive leadership. That will be the theme of the convention and what the R's hope everyone understands about their candidate. There will be flags, soldiers, firemen, flags, police, sailors, and flags. Above all, we'll hear about strong, decisive leadership.

Three simple words that create an effective message.

I have three words in response.

My.

Pet.

Goat.

  |  Permanent Link |  


Bush admits defeat in war on terror

by Chris in Paris - 3:03 PM

This guy just gets worse by the day. Now he's giving up on American security in the War on Terror.
When asked "Can we win?" the war on terror, Bush said, "I don't think you can win it."
Why does Bush not believe in America? It's time to rebuild our alliances around the world and win this war. Just because Bush is giving in doesn't mean everyone else should.

  |  Permanent Link |  



by John in DC - 2:41 PM

this is an audio post - click to play

  |  Permanent Link |  


Catania does Air America at RNC...

by David - 1:07 PM

Gay, Republican DC City Councillor David Catania will make an appearance on the Al Franken show on Air America Radio in the next hour or two. Should be interesting...

  |  Permanent Link |  


BIG ASS article on gay-baiting, and gay staffers, in Florida Senate campaign

by John in DC - 11:30 AM

AMAZING article in the Miami Herald about how Republican Senate candidate Mel Martinez in Florida is using gay-baiting TO THE MAX in his campaign. This, even though Martinez has two openly-gay staff in senior positions.

What a pig. And what very sad morons these staffers are.
As Christian conservatives rally around Mel Martinez, their favorite candidate in the U.S. Senate race, a key reason for their support is his strict stance on one of their hot-button issues: homosexuality.

The Martinez campaign has made the fight against what it calls ''the radical homosexual lobby'' central to its campaign. It's the subject of an attack ad -- removed Saturday under political pressure -- and a stinging mailer that criticizes rival Bill McCollum, a fellow conservative, for ''pandering to gays'' because he supported so-called hate crimes legislation in Congress.

Yet the Martinez campaign and the candidate's religious allies find themselves having to carefully parse their positions for one reason: Both Martinez and McCollum -- Republican politicians with impeccable conservative credentials -- have highly placed campaign staffers who are gay.
I don't know why a local gay group doesn't launch protests calling on these gay staffers to quit.

  |  Permanent Link |  


BIG ASS NYT article about Mary Cheney

by John in DC - 11:13 AM

Allow me one small gloat. You'd likely have NEVER seen the New York Times writing about Mary had we not launched DearMary.com (and had many of you not donated to the DearMary.com ad campaign) and made it "okay" to talk about her being a lesbian.

This part of the article made me go YEAH (again, wouldn't have happened had we not alerted the country to the fact that Mary is gay):
Mr. [Alan] Simpson recalled a tense confrontation on the campaign trail when one of Mr. Bush's Christian conservative backers advised Mr. Cheney to "pray for her" and "to urge her away from her aberration."

"Dick just starred at him," Mr. Simpson recalled. "If you said that to Dick or Lynne Cheney, you will get a look that would sizzle your underwear, I tell you."
And this part of the article made me want to spit on Mary Matalin. What kind of homophobic crap is this? She knows better.
"When people are open, which Mary is, they are not trying to make a statement,'' Ms. Matalin said. "There are other reasons to be politically active besides your sexual orientation. That is not her raison d'être."
And that, my friends, is why Mary is a big fat traitor. Hell, I'm beginning to think her dad is more pro-gay than she.

  |  Permanent Link |  


HETERO Cheney daughter speaking at convention, NOT Mary

by John in DC - 10:37 AM

From the Chicago Trib:
Speaking of the gay equality movement... What about Mary? Mary Cheney, that is. She's the gay daughter of vice president Dick and his wife, Lynne.

Lynne Cheney and one of her two daughters are on the roster of top Republican wives and offspring listed as speakers at Monday's "W Stands for Women Forum." But notably absent from that list is Mary Cheney.

Meanwhile -- how retro -- all the married women are listed as "Mrs.": Mrs. Barbara Bush, Mrs. Liz Cheney Perry (the Cheney's other daughter); Mrs. Doro Bush Koch (President Bush the First's only daughter; sister of the current president). Also listed, the president's twin 22-year-old twin daughters, Barbara and Jenna, who everyone wants to meet, or at least eyeball this convention week.
Yep, ALL the straight Bush-Cheney women are talking, but not Mary. Gosh I hope she's proud of what she's doing.

  |  Permanent Link |  


Gay Republicans fighting back at the convention

by John in DC - 10:28 AM

Two interesting articles about how gay Republicans are fighting back at the convention, and Pataki, among others, has been egging them on. Interestingly, Giuliani was NOT mentioned as someone giving them support.

LA Times 1

LA Times 2

  |  Permanent Link |  


Tucker Carlson blasts Bush for hiding on 9/11

by Chris in Paris - 10:21 AM

From Daily Kos, a piece about Tucker Carlson and his blunt remarks about Bush running and hiding most of the day on 9/11.

I could not agree with it any more and have been saying this since 9/11. As much as I may have disliked and still dislike Guiliani (Bush = Churchill? Get a grip pal) he was the only voice of America on 9/11. Operation Flight Suit boy was a coward, no bones about it, as he hid away in a bunker in the middle of the US. It's time to take the gloves off on this issue because this is the cornerstone of his campaign. On 9/11 Bush dicked around for those famous seven minutes and then he wet his pants and hid leaving the country and the world wondering what was happening. If Rudy thinks that is what Churchill or even Reagan would have done, call the men in white jackets because there is no way in hell either (or Clinton or Bush I) would have hid out sucking his thumb. What an embarassment it was.

Bush ran to Nebraska and cowered in fear. This issue needs to be pounded home every day until the election. Bush hid. He showed his colors and they were yellow.

Here's what Carlson said:
... The attacks initially made me sorry I voted for him. For most of that day, as my wife and children stayed inside our house listening to the roar of fighter jets overhead, and black smoke from the Pentagon hovered above our neighborhood, Bush failed to return to Washington. My family sat unprotected a few miles from the scene of a terrorist attack; Bush hid in a bunker on some faraway military base.

It infuriated me, as did the subsequent excuses from White House spokesman. There was a risk in coming back, they said. There was a risk in coming back, they said. Of course there was. That's the point: Leaders must take risks, sometimes physical ones. Bush should have elbowed his Secret Service detail out of the way and returned in a display of fearlessness to his nation's capital. I found it distressingly revealing that he didn't.
As Kos notes:
But as Carlson says, the incident was revealing. Just as Kerry's heroism half a world away is revealing. There's a reason the Swift Boat Liars are going after the story so hard. Kerry turned his boat into the danger he faced.

  |  Permanent Link |  


Two little Hitlers

by John in DC - 10:18 AM

I'm pretty sure these are the two guys who Sheri Dow, the woman doing the GOP convention invocation, thinks are an evil akin to Hitler. (Thanks to reader James for finding this link.)

  |  Permanent Link |  


"Shadowy struggle within Bush administration"

by Chris in Paris - 5:56 AM

Forget about the shadowy whatevers that Bush is talking about because the seriously shadowy business is going on right under his nose. Let's remember that this guy is promoting himself as a strong leader in times of trouble yet he's taken us into a war in Iraq that is a complete mess with no end in sight and he has rogue teams and moles operating in the Pentagon under his watch. The new Washington Monthly article "Iran-Contra II?" sheds new light on a few facts that have been previously dismissed by Rummy and others. Who's buying the "chance encounter" nonsense story? These people have zero credibility left.
...the FBI is looking with renewed interest at an unauthorized back-channel between Iranian dissidents and advisers in Feith's office, which more-senior
administration officials first tried in vain to shut down and then later attempted to cover up.

The administration's reluctance to disclose these details seems clear: the DoD-Ghorbanifar meetings suggest the possibility that a rogue faction at the Pentagon was trying to work outside normal US foreign policy channels to advance a "regime change" agenda not approved by the president's foreign policy principals or even the president himself.

The Agency believes Ghorbanifar is a serial "fabricator" and forbids its officers from having anything to do with him. Moreover, why were mid-level Pentagon officials organizing meetings with a foreign intelligence agency behind the back of the CIA -- a clear breach of US government protocol?

Newsday broke the original story about the secret Ghorbanifar channel. Faced with the disclosure, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld acknowledged the December, 2001 meeting but dismissed it as routine and unimportant. Later that day, another senior Defense official acknowledged the second meeting, in Paris, June, 2003, but insisted that it was the result of a "chance encounter" between Ghorbanifar and a Pentagon official.

  |  Permanent Link |  

Sunday, August 29, 2004
GOP Convention invocation to be given by woman who compares gays to Hitler - SO not kidding

by John in DC - 10:37 PM

As Atrios wrote about this, apparently Jerry Falwell didn't hate gays quite enough to get the opening invocation spot at the GOP Convention. Instead they chose Sheri Dow, a woman WHO COMPARED GAYS TO HITLER. I am SO not making this up, or even vaguely twisting her words. This is so despicable, so vile, that it's difficult to even express the approriate level of outrage.

Ms. Dow made her wonderful comparison of gays to Hitler in a speech she gave about her horror at having viewed a magazine in which two gay men were married in the presence of their twin "daughters" (the added quotation marks are HERS). She rails for a bit about how these girls will likely be scarred for life by their horrible dads, then says this about the threat gay families pose to the "traditional" family (read the entire article via the link to get the full horrifying context):
Lining Up With Hitler or Against Him

This escalating situation reminds me of a statement of a World War II journalist by the name of Dorothy Thompson who wrote for the Saturday Evening Post in Europe during the pre-World War II years when Hitler was building up his armies and starting to take ground. In an address she delivered in Toronto in 1941 she said this: ?Before this epic is over, every living human being will have chosen. Every living human being will have lined up with Hitler or against him. Every living human being either will have opposed this onslaught or supported it, for if he tries to make no choice that in itself will be a choice. If he takes no side, he is on Hitler?s side. If he does not act, that is an act­for Hitler.?

May I take the liberty of reading this statement again and changing just a few words, applying it to what I fear we face today? ?Before this era is over, every living human being will have chosen. Every living human being will have lined up in support of the family or against it. Every living human being will have either opposed the onslaught against the family or supported it, for if he tries to make no choice that in itself will be a choice. If we do not act in behalf of the family, that is itself an act of opposition to the family.?

At first it may seem a bit extreme to imply a comparison between the atrocities of Hitler and what is happening in terms of contemporary threats against the family­ but maybe not....
Ironically, Ms. Dow may have a point. The GOP is increasingly embracing the kind of social policy that Hitler loved. Perhaps some enterprising journalist at the convention will ask Mr. Cheney how he feels about the opening invocation being given by a woman who compared his daughter to Hitler. Not to mention, why is Ms. Dow even willing to appear at a convention where Hitler's dad is the VP?

  |  Permanent Link |  


I'm off to NYC - I'll check in later tonight - this means a BIG ASS open thread :-)

by John in DC - 4:16 PM

Toodles.

  |  Permanent Link |  


Laura Bush defends Swift Boat ads, say they're "fair"

by John in DC - 3:24 PM

Laura Bush now tells Time Magazine that she thinks the Swift Boat attacks on Kerry are fair. Her husband, meanwhile, says that John Kerry is a bigger hero than he, and that the ads should come off the air. Gov. Pataki, meanwhile, was on ABC's This Week this morning saying it's time to move on past Vietnam, then the throws in, but it isn't horrible that John Kerry lied about being in Cambodia on Christmas Even 36 years ago?

Bush has moved beyond using the Swift Boat liars, and now is using people even closer to his campain to continue the attack on Kerry while publicly pretending he's so over it.

Time to ask the president why his wife just attacked John Kerry on the very issue he said we need to stop discussing. Why does George Bush say John Kerry is a hero and the next day Laura Bush attacks Kerry's Vietnam record? It's time for the media to start asking the White House if they are going to stop using Vietnam as a political issue?

  |  Permanent Link |  



by John in DC - 2:02 PM

this is an audio post - click to play

  |  Permanent Link |  


More polls from NBC/WSJ

by John in DC - 11:25 AM

Where the country is headed
Right direction 36%
Wrong track 50%

Bush's handling of the economy
Approve 43%
Disapprove 52%

Was removing Saddam Hussein worth the $ cost and US casualties?
Yes 43%
No 49%

Bush's handling of war on terror
Approve 53%
Disapprove 42%

When it comes to issues such as the economy, education and health care do you think President Bush has provided a clear set of goals?
Has 29%
Has not 63%

Bush is easygoing and likeable?
Yes 55%
No 27%

If election held today
Bush 47%
Kerry 45%
Nader 3%

  |  Permanent Link |  


Falwell stands by his "gays caused 9/11" comments; gets VIP pass to GOP Convention

by John in DC - 11:10 AM

So Falwell stands by his incredibly offensive comments blaming gays and other liberals for September 11, he's getting a VIP pass to the GOP Convention, and he appears to talk a lot with the president. Why does this man continue to be embraced by the Bush White House?

SF Chronicle:
Falwell, the founder of the Moral Majority and a veteran in conservative evangelical politics, will be at the convention.

"I'm in New York right now," he said in a phone interview with The Chronicle on Thursday afternoon. "I have V.I.P. credentials, and I will be there.'' ....

Falwell said God was especially upset with pagans, abortionists, feminists, homosexuals, the American Civil Liberties Union and the People for the American Way, a liberal watchdog group.

In his interview Thursday, Falwell said he still stands by that statement, but wishes he had added "the sleeping church" to the list of responsible parties....

[Falwell] insists that he remains close to President Bush.

"We've talked many times,'' Falwell said. "I've had many photo ops with the president.''

"Listen,'' he added, "I've been doing this for 50 years, and I don't know of any president who is more beloved by conservative evangelicals than President Bush.''

  |  Permanent Link |  


'This administration believes the less known the better"

by Chris in Paris - 11:06 AM

Sounds like some crazy lefty, right? Too bad it is a quote from Representative Christopher Shays, Republican of Connecticut and chairman of the Government Reform Committee's national security panel.
The problem is growing, said J. William Leonard, director of the Archives' Information Security Oversight Office, which monitors federal practices. Officials classified documents 8 percent more often in 2003 than in 2002.

''This administration believes the less known the better," said Shays, noting that he was speaking of a GOP administration. ''I believe the more known the better."

But in 2003, President Bush ordered officials to use the more restrictive level.

Steven Aftergood, director of a Federation of American Scientists project on secrecy, said some classification clearly aimed to conceal illegality or avoid embarrassment, even though that is forbidden.

Aftergood cited the ''secret" stamp on Army Major General Antonio Taguba's report of ''numerous incidents of sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses" inflicted on Iraqi inmates at Abu Ghraib prison.

  |  Permanent Link |  


How did Bush blow such a massive lead?

by Chris in Paris - 8:55 AM

Interesting analysis in the Washington Post today about Bush and his misjudgements. In 2000 he promised to be "a uniter not a divider" and on 9/11 he had the American public and even many parts of the world in his hands. It sickens me to think of what could have been around the world, considering how much support there was out there. If Bush had truly run an inclusive government as he promised, this election campagin would not even be close.
As Bush heads to the Republican National Convention in New York this week, the man who stood astride the political world at that news conference in 2002 is a distinctly more life-size figure. With the election just 65 days away, there is a puzzle: How did a leader who was so formidable become so vulnerable?

In small ways, the answer is an accumulation of miscalculations and missed opportunities that have marred the president's political operation this year... In a large way, however, Bush's predicament is less a reversal of his 2002 success than a natural progression of it -- the consequence of two confrontations he sought that autumn.

...his decision to confront Democrats directly and immerse himself in partisan electioneering ensured that he would face reelection with little of the rally-behind-the-leader sentiment that flowed to him after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Among the two biggest blunders:
  • The enactment of a prescription drug benefit under Medicare in December
  • The missed opportunity of the State of the Union address in January.

  |  Permanent Link |  


Is Bush interfering (and flip-flopping) with Iraq military policy because of the convention?

by Chris in Paris - 8:20 AM

Despite past criticism of politicians who did not let the military fight the war, Bush appears to be tweaking military policy in Iraq against the will of the military in the field. (That criticism has always been a funny argument to me since we live in a democracy and not a military dictatorship.) I'm not even debating the issue of whether or not it was right or wrong to pull back from Najaf and the fighting, but he is certainly flip-flopping on this issue so he doesn't have to deal with the black eye of 1,000 US dead during his convention.

What many feared about pulling back was the Sadr militants would simply pick up the battle elsewhere and it looks as though it did not take them very long to do so. All of this from a man who doesn't read newspapers or follow the polls. Uh-huh.

  |  Permanent Link |  


Bush team duped by Axis of Evil as well as friendly nation. This is making America safer?

by Chris in Paris - 7:47 AM

One can only imagine if this was all happening under Clinton or any other Democrat. This story has it all: moles for an allied nation, double agents who are invited to sit with the First Lady at a State of The Union address and secret meetings with Axis of Evil member. Why do I feel like I'm walking by a brutal crime scene and the police are saying "nothing to see here, keep moving?" If this was NCAA sports I believe the term would be "lack of institutional control" and everyone involved would be sent packing. Fortunately this is more serious so we should expect to see jail time and a change of political parties in November.

A few new interesting bits about Larry Franklin, the low-level desk jockey who absolutely had nothing to do with anything besides buying paperclips and sometimes new letterhead and who certainly had nothing to do with policy:

Questions have also repeatedly been raised about work done by members of Mr. Feith's staff that skirted the normal bureaucracy. For example, Mr. Franklin participated in secret meetings with Manucher Ghorbanifar, an Iranian who had acted as an arms deal middleman in the Iran-contra affair during the Reagan administration.

The secret meetings were first held in Rome in December 2001 and were brokered by Mr. Ledeen. He said he arranged the meetings to put the Bush administration in closer contact with Iranian dissidents who could provide information in the war on terrorism.

Current and former defense officials said on Saturday that Mr. Franklin worked for the Defense Intelligence Agency until about three years ago, when he moved to the Pentagon's policy office, headed by Mr. Feith, to work on Iran and other Middle East issues.

Making America safer? Why does Bush hate America so much?

  |  Permanent Link |  


FBI espionage probe goes beyond Israeli allegations

by John in DC - 1:02 AM

Rob and I SO called it. This espionage scandal is bigger than DOD is claiming. Mid-level official, my ass. Atrios found a new Knight-Ridder story that confirms our concerns. If the media is tenacious enough not to, yet again, fall for the Pentagon's lies, I truly believe this is going to turn into a very big scandal.

  |  Permanent Link |  

Saturday, August 28, 2004
Sex toy fans prefer George W. Bush in bed (not kidding)

by John in DC - 9:35 PM

From NCBuy Weird News:
George W. Bush may be a conservative, but he has liberal sex appeal with the ladies.

Case in point: He's the presidential candidate that women most want to bed, according to a survey by an online sex toy company.

Forty-five percent of the 1000 proud sex toy fans who answered the MyPleasure.com poll chose Bush, compared to 33 percent who prefer John Kerry as their fantasy bedroom buddy.

As for vice-presidential candidates, John Edwards gets the motor revving for 18 percent of the women polled, while Dick Cheney brings up the rear with only 3.5 percent.

You may find it unusual that sex toy users pick a conservative as their ultimate presidential sex partner, and you're not alone.

MyPleasure.com founder/sexologist Sandor Gardos admits surprise at the survey results, adding: "We assumed the sex toy buying audience might lean to the left politically. Clearly, we were wrong. It just goes to show you, whether you are Republican or Democrat, everyone loves sex."

  |  Permanent Link |  


Salon.com details alleged atrocities in Vietnam.

by John in DC - 8:27 PM

One point that's been nagging me throughout the entire Swift Boat affair is that I thought the Vietnam war was pretty well discredited. I thought it was historical fact that our soldiers did some pretty nasty things over there. So then, how were the Swift Boat Veterans successfully using Kerry's criticism of the war against him when most Americans are critical of the war?

Even more importantly, the newest Swift Boat commercial includes a quote from John Kerry's 1971 testimony in which he summarized the atrocities Vietnam vets had told him they'd done in Vietnam. Are the Swift Boat boys claiming that Kerry lied in his summation, that the Vets never claimed to have committed these atrocities? Not at all. They can't call Kerry a liar because his summation was correct.

Salon.com has just published the details of the crimes alleged by the men who spoke to Kerry (excerpts below). It's clear that Kerry's testimony in 1971 was not just accurate, but damn heroic considering the extent of the crimes being alleged. Criticizing John Kerry for speaking out about these alleged crimes is akin to criticizing Abu Ghraib investigators for trying to find out what really happened at that prison.

Oh yeah, I forgot. The Republicans DID criticize folks for trying to get to the bottom of Abu Ghraib, where people were raped and abused not unlike the way they were in Vietnam.

Why is the media not reporting on the REAL ATROCITIES that were alleged to have occurred in Vietnam, and why aren't they demanding the Swift Boat boys either fess up that Kerry told the truth, or shut up?

I've strung together some excerpts from the Salon.com article:
Kerry's April 1971 testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee: "They had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads ... randomly shot at civilians ... cut off limbs, blown up bodies ... razed villages in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan ... crimes committed on a day-to-day basis ... ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam."

Take a close look at what Kerry said to the Senate committee. He was summarizing testimony given publicly at the so-called Winter Soldier Investigation of Jan. 31-Feb. 2, 1971, presented by Vietnam Veterans Against the War, in Detroit. One hundred five Vietnam veterans testified there. Seventy-one of them said they were eyewitnesses to war crimes of the sort Kerry later mentioned. Thirteen said that they themselves had committed war crimes.

These veterans testified to rape; to torture and the killing of prisoners; to the torching of Vietnamese homes and whole villages. In sickening detail they filled in the blanks -- as the Pentagon was itself unwilling to do -- to put to work this sentence from a U.S. Army field manual: "Every violation of the law of war is a war crime."

The cutting off of heads -- on Operation Stone -- there was a Lt. Colonel there and two people had their heads cut off and put on stakes and stuck in the middle of the field.

Before we went out on the operation we were told not to waste our heat tablets on food but to save them for the villages because we were going to destroy all the villages and we didn't give the people any time to get out of the villages. We just went in and burned them and if people were in the villages yelling and screaming, we didn't help them. We just burned the houses as we went.

People cut off ears and when they'd come back in off of an operation you'd make deals before you'd go out and like for every ear you cut off someone would buy you two beers, so people cut off ears. The torturing of prisoners was done with beatings and I saw one case where there were two prisoners. One prisoner was staked out on the ground and he was cut open while he was alive and part of his insides were cut out and they told the other prisoner if he didn't tell them what they wanted to know they would kill him. And I don't know what he said because he spoke in Vietnamese but then they killed him after that anyway."

I looked out across the field and I spotted a Vietnamese woman peasant running away from the ship. I fired a burst of about six or seven rounds into her back before we fired, before we hit the ground. When I was being questioned as to what happened about two weeks later by a captain in my company, I told him what we did and what I did. We both had a good laugh about it. That was pretty much company policy. Also in Hue, during the Tet offensive in '68, I observed American fighters and bombers (Phantoms) dropping bombs and napalm into very crowded streets full of civilians. I don't know how many people were wiped out in that place.

"...kids 4 years old, ranging up to 16 years old, came around the fence to sell GIs cigarettes, or candy, or beg for food, they were CSed. And what I mean is they were gassed. This didn't happen just once, it happened constantly,

We encountered a large amount of civilian population. The civilian population was brought out to one end of the village, and the women, who were guarded by a squad and a squad leader at that time, were separated. I might say the young women were separated from their children and the older women and the older men, the elderly men. They were told at gunpoint that if they did not submit to the sexual desires of any GI who was there guarding them, they would be shot for running away.

Two men were leading a young girl, approximately 19 years old, very pretty, out of a hootch. She had no clothes on so I assumed she had been raped, which was pretty SOP, and she was thrown onto the pile of the 19 women and children, and five men, around the circle, opened up on full automatic with their M-16s.

Regarding throwing people out of helicopters, I only saw one incident to this ... There were five Vietnamese people. I do not know if they were civilians, Viet Cong or Viet Cong suspects. Three of them were wounded, had bandages on their bodies and their legs and their arms looked in bad shape. The other two were older men, somewhere around 50 years old. The lieutenant from the armored personnel carrier and the captain from the chopper helped place these people in the helicopter. He got in the helicopter and took off. He got a couple of hundred feet up and three bodies came out.

The Toledo Blade won a Pulitzer Prize for its October 2003 series about killings committed by an elite U.S. Army "Tiger Force" unit in the course of a seven-month period in 1967. "Elderly farmers were shot as they toiled in the fields. Prisoners were tortured and executed -- their ears and scalps severed for souvenirs. One soldier kicked out the teeth of executed civilians for their gold fillings," the Blade reported. "Investigators concluded that 18 soldiers committed war crimes ranging from murder and assault to dereliction of duty. But no one was charged."

  |  Permanent Link |  


John McLaughlin blasts GOP platform: "It's not compassionate conservatism"

by John in DC - 8:02 PM

McLaughlin Group, Saturday, August 28, 2004
Eleanor Clift: The [GOP Convention prime time] stage will be full of moderates who could never win a Republican primary, who do not represent the basic values expressed in the Republican platform.

John McLaughlin: You're correct.

Clift: It's a total fraud.

McLaughlin: Well it's also an abolitionist document. Ban gay marriage, ban civil unions benefits, ban abortion. It's a series of bans. It's not compassionate conservatism.

  |  Permanent Link |  


Michael Moore proposes an ad campaign for Bush

by John in DC - 7:09 PM

ANNOUNCER: "Mr. Kerry's biggest supporter, Sen. Max Cleland, claims to have lost two legs and an arm in Vietnam. But he still has one arm! How did that happen? One word: Cowardice. When duty called, he was unwilling to give his last limb. Is that the type of selfishness you want hanging out in the White House? We think not. Vote for the man who would be willing to give America his right frontal lobe. Vote Bush." - MichaelMoore.com

  |  Permanent Link |  


Bush says Bible is his favorite book

by John in DC - 7:00 PM

Once upon a time, years ago, I'd have found that a very sweet answer. Today it scares the hell out of me.

  |  Permanent Link |  


An Olympic Embarrassment

by David - 3:31 PM

Here come the republicans. My official prediction: Bush will get a considerably bigger bounce from his convention than what's been discussed so far. His campaign people are really, really smart. But I hope Americans will take a look at how the world has treated America at the olympics and at least consider how far our international stature has dropped.

Cancelling Secretary Powell's visit to the olympic games wasn't a mistake -- ever considering such an idea was. Colin Powell is a combat veteran -- he's not scared of a few protesters. But the State Department realized just how vehement opposition to the visit to the closing ceremony would be, and they wisely backed out.

This white house has tried to use the olympic games as a branding opportunity. But the olympic games are not supposed to be political. Despite the request of the US Olympic Committee to stop, preznit's campaign continues to exploit the olympics in a commercial.

But of course, this latest act of arrogance is just the tip of the iceberg. This administration has damaged our standing so much in the world that we can't even send a cabinet minister to an athletic event without embarassing our country -- and, most importantly to this administration, hurting the incumbent in those precious opinion polls of his.

Right now, I think the rest of the world still thinks worse of the American president than the American people. At the olympics, American athletes and spectators (save a few) were widely welcomed, while American politicians were not. If preznit wins this election, the rest of the world will take it -- and take US -- personally.

  |  Permanent Link |  


Create your favorite Religious Right fortune cookie

by John in DC - 2:20 PM

You may recall from a post I made below that the religious right is going to be passing out fortune cookies at the GOP Convention, and the cookies will contain suggestions for messages that Bush should be using to win the election. These are the four "fortunes" you'll find inside their cookies:
Real Men Marry Women:
Support a Constitutional Amendment to Protect Marriage

Save the Constitution!
Impeach an Activist Judge

Cures for Diseases - Know the Score
Embryonic Stem Cell 0
Adult Stem Cell 45

#1 Reason to Ban Human Cloning:
Hillary Clinton
Justin, one of our avid readers, who clearly has too much time on his hands, has taken it upon himself to start coming up with OTHER fortunes that ALMOST MADE THE CUT, but JUST missed getting used by the religious right. His suggestions were so funny that I thought "why not open this up to everyone."

So here goes. Please submit your favorite religious right fortune cookie message for those ideas that didn't get out of the planning stage. I'll post the best ones in a separate post later. Here are Justin's two examples so far:
"Queers are the Antichrist. Lucky Numbers 2, 7, 12, 15, 19, 22."

"Reason #2 to Ban Human Cloning: No One Wants an Army of Ann Coulters."

  |  Permanent Link |  


"Heterosexual Pride" parade is a big bust (well, you know what I mean)

by John in DC - 2:12 PM

Just got a report from Pam Spaulding who decided to visit the Straight Pride parade in Chapel Hill, NC with her partner Kate, and Pam reports that it was a big bust. The attendance was so pitiful that Pam and Kate didn't even use the signs they brought with them. Perhaps we need to teach the hets a thing or two about recruitment. :-)

Here's Pam or Kate with my fav sign:

  |  Permanent Link |  


Open Thread: On a scale of 1 to 10 - 1 being "no big deal," 10 being "very big deal" - how big a scandal is this Israeli spy story?

by John in DC - 1:38 PM

Is this a story, as DOD claims, about a simple middle-level DOD official who had no influence on policy, or is this a major scandal involving more people who had a major impact on US policy with regards to the war in Iraq and beyond?

  |  Permanent Link |  


"I got a young man named George W. Bush into the National Guard"

by Chris in Paris - 4:56 AM

"I got a young man named George W. Bush into the National Guard when I was lieutenant governor of Texas, and I'm not necessarily proud of that, but I did it." - AP
What a good thing it is that Bush wanted to make the Vietnam era such a big issue. Go figure, George received preferential treatment to jump ahead of others already in line. (I wonder how those pushed to the back of the line fared.) It's not like people didn't warn him that if he pushed it too far it would come back to his own record during Vietnam. Let's face it, he brought this issue on himself by his own arrogance. This story is nice timing, just before the convention. We now have moles in the administration, a team that outs CIA agents, a shaky economy, more poor and uninsured, and a man who only knows priviledge. And this is the record that they want to push?
Barnes, who was House speaker when Bush entered the Guard, later became lieutenant governor.

He said he became ashamed after walking through the Vietnam Memorial and looking at the names of people who died.
Click here for the video link. Ouch!

  |  Permanent Link |  


Wash Post: Subject of investigation is reportedly Larry Franklin

by John in DC - 1:22 AM

Wash Post:
The FBI is investigating a mid-level Pentagon official who specializes in Iranian affairs for allegedly passing classified information to Israel, and arrests in the case could come as early as next week, officials at the Pentagon and other government agencies said last night.

The name of the person under investigation was not officially released, but two sources identified him as Larry Franklin. He was described as a desk officer in the Pentagon's Near East and South Asia Bureau, one of six regional policy sections. Franklin worked at the Defense Intelligence Agency before moving to the Pentagon's policy branch three years ago and is nearing retirement, the officials said. Franklin could not be located for comment last night.

  |  Permanent Link |  

    


Why AMERICAblog?
Because at some point you tire of the lies.

What issues do you cover?
US politics overall with a particular focus on the Bush Administration, the radical right, and gay civil rights.

Who are you?
John Aravosis is a Washington DC-based writer and political consultant, specializing in using the Internet for political advocacy. He is the creator of StopDrLaura.com, Matthew Shepard Online Resources, and DearMary.com, among other activist Web sites. 

John has a joint JD and MSFS from Georgetown, where he studied under former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright. He is an avid writer, and in addition to writing THE LIST, he has worked as a stringer for the Economist magazine, and for years was the US Politics Guide at About.com. 

John's policy experience includes stints in the US Senate, the World Bank, and the Children's Defense Fund. John is also an occasional TV pundit, having appeared on The O'Reilly Factor, Hardball with Chris Matthews, ABCNews World News Tonight, CNN, and more. John speaks five languages and has visited or worked in 28 countries.

This page is powered by Blogger.
Copyright 2004 - John Aravosis