Red State Red State

About Red State
Mission
Founders
Posting Rules
Help/FAQ
Contact
RSS
Your Account
Please Sign In:
Username
Password
New User? Want to participate? Read our FAQ and get started bysigning up now.
Search Red State
Latest Comments
· Whoa, both party chairs. (Doverspa)
· John Kerry 1971 (RBMN)
· $2 for the troll (Doverspa)
· Thank you for stopping by, sir! <nt> (jadedmara)
· Weakness of the Kerry campaign (Preston)
· You hang Kerry along with Bush on that note (Seth A)
· On adherence (von)
· I believe that many of us (Maximos)
· I'm inclined to agree (Maximos)
· Moby Moby Moby! (Augustine)
Red State at the RNC -- Latest Dispatches
Red State interview: Zainab al Suwaij Sep 2nd, 2004: 16:22:07
Red State Guest Blogger: Ed Gillespie. (No, we're not kidding.) Sep 2nd, 2004: 16:08:30
Pre-speech open thread Sep 2nd, 2004: 14:10:32
RedState Interviews Michael Steele Sep 2nd, 2004: 14:09:41
But Mooo-ooom...Zell's being mean. Sep 2nd, 2004: 11:49:10
Poll Update: Bounce in Progress? Sep 2nd, 2004: 11:31:42
JC Watts talks shop (and Zell) Sep 2nd, 2004: 10:47:06
Misfire. Sep 2nd, 2004: 09:48:35
Only we who disregard the mystery shall be unhappy. Sep 1st, 2004: 22:05:49
Would you like the Spicy, Hot, or Atomic Zell Miller? Sep 1st, 2004: 21:15:31
Read all RNC Dispatches...

Section: Miscellania

Tacitus on C-Span RIGHT NOW
Talking about RedState. Tune in, folks.

Update [2004-8-28 6:1:52 by krempasky]: "We realize that the news value of the convention is that of a middle school play"

Update [2004-8-28 6:25:7 by tacitus]:

Video archive will be posted here.

Print This Story
(8 comments) Comments >> Posted On: Aug 28th, 2004: 05:59:08, Not Rated

Frequently Asked Questions
For a first-time visitor, even those that may be familiar with blogs in general - the format of RedState might seem a little foreign.

It is.

While most blogs are fairly limited when it comes to fostering discussion, RedState provides a much greater opportunity for you, the reader, to not only participate in the discussion, but help create the site itself.

Collaborative Republicanism for the Masses - and we mean it.

Every registered user at RedState gets their own little piece of cyber-real estate, called a diary. Every time you post an article or story, it appears in your diary. Even better, Scoop (the software powering this site) will create your own domain for you. For example, if your username is "William", then the system will create http://william.redstate.org for you.

In addition, as you write posts (diary entries), the editors of RedState can choose to promote that entry to the front page of the site.

Why register?

Only registered users can post comments and diaries or vote in polls. Even if you're not a regular web-surfer, upon registration, you can opt to receive a "site digest" via email from RedState. A brief run down of recent articles on the site.

You want my address?

Your information will never be shared outside of RedState. In fact, your address isn't required at all - but we encourage you to share it. From time to time RedState will inform its users of events, get togethers, or other opportunities in your area. You can always opt-out at any time.

How do I post a comment?

Only registered users can post comments. Once you've registered, find the story, diary, or even comment you'd like to reply to and then click "post comment" or "read story and discuss" to participate.

How do I post a diary?

Once you register with the site, you'll see a list of options on the left-hand column under "your account." Click "New Diary Entry" to start posting. Remember, posting rules are in effect for diaries, and we highly encourage you to take your time on diary entries - and USE THE PREVIEW FUNCTION before you save your diary. You will not have the ability to edit your diary once saved.

What's the difference between a diary and a story?Currently, only editors can post stories directly to the official "sections" of RedState - articles categorized by subject, as well as the front page. New users can still, of course, post diaries to their personal sub section for the community to see.

Any more questions? Feel free to email info (at) redstate (dot) org

Print This Story
Comments >> Posted On: Aug 26th, 2004: 19:52:45, Not Rated

Admin note: technical difficulty
Our apologies for the recent RedState brownout. We've experienced some technical difficulty (namely, a hard drive that wet the bed) but we should be all set now. If you see anything out of the ordinary in the next day or so, feel free to email us and let us know. Thanks for your patience. Print This Story
Comments >> Posted On: Aug 16th, 2004: 05:47:15, Not Rated

How Sporting

I enjoyed watching the opening ceremonies of the Athens Olympics, and I look forward to two weeks of (mostly) amateur sports at their finest. I also hope that the ceremonies won't be imbued with too much politics, but I suppose that having some politics in the Games is inevitable.

Having said that, let's dip our toes into the political aspect of the Games, and note a massive inconsistency from the opening ceremonies:

There was huge applause for Afghanistan on its return to Olympic competition after an eight-year absence and with its first female athletes.

The entrance of the more than 500-member U.S. team - led by basketball guard Dawn Staley - drew cheers. But some people also stood and put their thumbs down in an apparent show of displeasure for the war in Iraq. Moments later, the Iraqis entered to a roaring ovation.

So there you have it. Cheers for two countries liberated by the United States, and some jeers for the country which did--and continues to do--the liberating.

Fascinating, isn't it?

Print This Story
(7 comments) Comments >> Posted On: Aug 13th, 2004: 21:43:12, Not Rated

New Advertisers at RedState
In addition to RedState-kind-of Congressman John Kline, we've been very happy to see other good groups signing on to advertisere for two reasons:

1) they help pay the bandwidth. you folks just think it's all fun and games, till someone gets stuck with the bill. ;) 2) they each represent things we'd probably recommend without an ad.

VociferousSam has been writing columns and blogging about the Biblical worldview for quite some time.

We should all click to thank Tony Blair. I have to admit that while I would hardly agree with an ounce of his domestic policy, I can't help but admire the stand he's taken against terrorism in the world - and at no small personal political price. Let's call him the Anti-Clinton.

Last but not least, it's all about the sense of humor over at Casual Conservative. Irreverent? You betcha. Would posting some of their stuff skirt the edge of our own posting rules? Maybe. But they rightly smack around the French *and* Al Sharpton, thereby finding the quickest way to my heart, at least.

Enjoy, click thru, thank them for supporting RedState.

Print This Story
(6 comments) Comments >> Posted On: Aug 3rd, 2004: 18:30:11, Not Rated

My talk with Wired Magazine
Yesterday afternoon, I had the pleasure of speaking with a reporter from Wired Magazine about RedState. For a little over an hour, we chatted about weblogs, politics, liberals and conservatives. She was quite pleasant - and had originally called in response to all the recent articles on liberals and their vibrant (agressive and popular) blogs and web communities.

All of this activity is happening on the left, she wondered, so what are conservatives doing?

Which brings us to RedState. While we're not even two weeks old, a couple of numbers are telling:

  • Stories: 318
  • Comments: 2707
  • Users: 829
In addition, just consider that in these 10 days, we've had 73,000 visitors and 200,000 pageviews. It's humbling to think of so many people coming to read and participate in RedState - but it shouldn't be, since I don't have anything to do with it.

Already RedState has established itself as an online community marked by intellectual and open discourse. We don't walk in lockstep, nor do we hide the disagreements within our party nor movement. We demand civility, but out of the more than 800 users, we've banned but a handful.

But what's next? When the reporter asked me how much we had raised for these candidates, I was embarassed to say 1) I don't know, exactly and 2) what I did know - wasn't impressive. So if we've got this great community, and we can sharpen our arguments and be so darn - well, right...then that's enough, no?

No. It's not. We have to do, not just talk. We have to move, not just debate. Young conservatives often hear pep talks from other movement types and are told that, "ideas have consequences." Well, to an extent, that's hogwash. To paraphrase an old boss of mine, "Ideas have consequences only when they cause action."

True. So don't stop the debates nor the discourse here at RedState - it's far too valuable. But remember: RedState isn't just another pretty face (at least we hope it's not!), nor just another blog. Our hope is to translate our skills, our ideas, our time into actual change - most prevalent at the ballot box.

So in the coming weeks, look forward to seeing a lot more information about political contests. Polls, updates, opportunities to help good candidates. The only way conservatives and the party will take RedState seriously is this: actually produce something.

Donations, votes, volunteers - without them, we're all just academics. Good ones, without a doubt, but still...

I'm grateful to be a part of this experiment - and excited about its future. We've got a lot of muscle to flex, and it's about time we did so.

And that said, I'm in for another $100.02 for Tom Coburn. He needs it, and we need to give it. Will you join me? We're at just about $500 so far, let's make it $1,000 by Tuesday. Let's give Wired something to really write about

Print This Story
(13 comments) Comments >> Posted On: Jul 24th, 2004: 17:54:00, Not Rated

Admin note: yes, another feature
In our never-ending (or so it seems so late at night) quest to make RedState more user-friendly, we've added a "printer-friendly" function to the site. Just to the right of every post title, you'll see a little printer icon. Click on it and check it out. No comments, no clutter - just the article.

Of course, since we give you the chance to get rid of all our ads, your penance is to come back, buy Hewitt's book, and donate to Coburn and Demint. Got any other features you'd like to see here at RedState? (other than "an absence of posts by Krempasky") Is there anything you particulary like or particularly dislike? Please post away, we'll put them on our wishlist and see what we can do.

Print This Story
(3 comments) Comments >> Posted On: Jul 22nd, 2004: 22:03:03, Not Rated

Admin note
Subdomains are now active. Every user -- including you -- now has his or her own page at username.redstate.org. It gets better: topics have their own subdomains too, at topicname.redstate.org. Want to see what Red State has said about Democrats? Head to democrats.redstate.org. Want to see user feddie's oeuvre? Hop over to feddie.redstate.org. (Usernames or topic headers with a space are handled in the URLs by placing an underscore where the space is -- hence moe_lane.redstate.org.) We'll be expanding this functionality in coming months to allow hotlisting and greater customization of individual pages, so stay tuned. Print This Story
(8 comments) Comments >> Posted On: Jul 21st, 2004: 10:55:27, Not Rated

A Brief Chronology of Significant Terrorist Incidents
An overview of signifcant terrorist incidents from 1961-2003 (found on Fark of all places). This certainly makes for interesting Saturday morning reading and I present it here mainly for discussion. It would take a while to analyze the data contained therein, but I'd be interested if anyone wants to take a crack at it. Does reading through the list make you draw any conclusions about the global war on terrorism? Print This Story
(6 comments) Comments >> Posted On: Jul 17th, 2004: 04:18:26, Not Rated

Redstate. Not so Red.
It's been quite a week here at RedState, many thanks to all that have made it such a successful launch.

First, thought you might find it interesting to see just how many of us live in Red and Blue states.

Second, a request: under user preferences in "your account" - would you add at least your zip code if not your address?

Print This Story
(55 comments) Comments >> Posted On: Jul 16th, 2004: 22:47:40, Not Rated

Admin note: banned user to kick around
From time to time, we'll post for public flogging those that deserve banning. Here's one. Print This Story
Comments >> Posted On: Jul 15th, 2004: 14:07:39, Not Rated

Admin note: registration issues
Welcome Instapundit readers! On that note, with the spike in traffic, a word of caution. We've been experiencing intermittent problems with the registration function of RedState. If you sign up and do not receive a confirmation email within 15-20 minutes, please email info@redstate.org. We're trying to resolve the issue. Welcome, we're glad to have you.

Update [2004-7-14 14:24:56 by krempasky]:Please forgive our growing pains - some email confirmations got stuck in cyberpurgatory, we know not why. Regardless, they should be in your inboxes now (all 431 of you waiting!). Please check your Spam folders first, and if you don't have them, go ahead and drop us a line.

Print This Story
(4 comments) Comments >> Posted On: Jul 14th, 2004: 14:24:56, Not Rated

Admin note
FYI, there is an clarifying addition to the posting rules. Several folks today have come in with rhetorical guns blazing about "wingnuts," etc., gotten swiftly banned, and then griped in e-mail about getting canned for ideological reasons. Not so: we ban for behavior, not belief. Please keep in mind that this is an explicitly conservative and Republican community, and we will act swiftly to preserve that identity. If you are not conservative or Republican, you're welcome here so long as you respect this intent. And yes, the posting rules apply to us, too.

Posting rules are re-posted in full in the extended text box here.

Print This Story
(31 comments, 364 words in story) Read Story & Discuss Posted On: Jul 12th, 2004: 18:19:47, Not Rated

The Claremont Achievement
Every thinking Conservative should be reading the Claremont Institute's fine journal, The Claremont Review of Books. No publication in America gives more wise and assiduous attention to all that body of theory and history and tradition, which is the distinctively American contribution to political philosophy. No publication takes the ideal of the Republic more seriously.

Far removed from Washington (and New York), The Claremont Review seems to cultivate and preserve a certain intellectual distance, even aloofness, from that modern-day Versailles. This alone is a valuable thing.

For those interested in a unsparing analysis of the war, Professor Angelo Codevilla's occasional "Victory Watch" columns will be a tonic.

Those taken with the heavy lifting of political philosophy will benefit from the fireworks between the fissiparous schools of Straussians.

I myself have been impressed by a series of essays of reinterpretation of momentous events in American political history, for example Mr. David Forte's study of Marbury v. Madison.

But no subject which embraces ideas and arguments about the Good Society, and how it is best achieved by fallen men, is left unexamined. I for one already draw heavily on this journal for my thinking and writing, and I recommend that others do as well.

Print This Story
(2 comments) Comments >> Posted On: Jul 11th, 2004: 19:02:44, Not Rated

Belated Intro
After that little stemwinder (and not before!), I should introduce myself. Hat tip to Moe, for reminding me by implication.

Some generalities:

Print This Story
(416 words in story) Read Story & Discuss Posted On: Jul 11th, 2004: 10:27:04, Not Rated

Welcome to Redstate
Welcome to RedState.org, a Republican community weblog.

In little more than two years, we have seen blogs blossom into a public square for the open exchange of ideas and opinions. Blogs are already a revolutionizing force, changing the way opinion-makers interact with new ideas ... defining candidates and campaigns in a critical election year ... and planting the seeds of democracy around the world.

RedState.org is focused on politics, and seeks the construction of a Republican majority in the United States. We hope to unite serious, innovative, and accomplished voices from government, politics, activism, civil society, and journalism to participate in this work.

In the past year, the dangerous perception has arisen that blogs are predominantly a venue for community and activism on the Left. Catchphrases such as "the liberal talk radio" are bandied about to describe the relevance of the medium that helped elevate Howard Dean to his early heights and continues to fund and support congressional candidates. Accurate or not, this emerging perception must be challenged and defeated. That is what Redstate.org is here to do.

Since its inception, the Republican Party has always embraced wide range of ideological beliefs. This diversity of thought sometimes inspires conflict -- but it has also led to great achievement. Through all debates, despite all regional or political concerns, the central philosophy of every true strain of Republicanism remains faithful to the foundational principles of the party: individual freedom and the value of every human life. These principles have guided the party from its origin as a political force to smash slavery, to the long fight against communism, to the ongoing battle for the sanctity of the unborn, to the present war against the forces of Islamism.

Our objective is not to centralize or to direct, but to provide a rallying point for the Right, a public square where Republicans can interact, debate, and share information on a wide variety of political issues independent of the official party structure. Redstate.org will be a gathering place of responsible voices, stimulating debate, and constructive action, fully mobilizing conservative intellectual and organizational resources to create a strong and vibrant presence in the blog medium. Through Redstate, the political blogging of the Right can gain the critical mass it needs for the battle ahead.

The Left has proven that blogs can thrive on the fringe, in a petri dish of pessimism and protest. We intend to make blogs a voice for mainstream America, and articulate the deeply held ideals of a free and virtuous nation. We aim to provide an arena for serious thought and a force for influence in Republican politics and policy - and we intend to lead.

Welcome to Redstate.

Print This Story
Comments >> Posted On: Jul 10th, 2004: 12:20:32, Not Rated

The founders
The founders of Redstate are:

Ben Domenech.

Originally from Mississippi, Ben began his career as a political journalist covering Capitol Hill, writing for numerous publications and working as a Contributing Editor to National Review Online. He abandoned the journalism career track for a taxpayer-funded life following the 9/11 attacks, and was sworn in as the youngest political appointee in the Bush Administration. Ben currently works as the chief speechwriter for a U.S. Senator. He lives in Virginia with his wife, Caroline.
Mike Krempasky.
Mike Krempasky is from Pennsylvania, and would almost accept a Kerry presidency in return for a couple Steelers Super Bowl victories.

He's worked in grassroots politics in a number of roles, from leading a national pro-life organization and training conservative activists all across the country, to raising money for Republican candidates and conservative causes.

He doesn't like the French.

Tacitus.
Tacitus was born in Texas and has been trying to get back ever since. He has been a dot-commer, a speechwriter, a consultant, and a US Army officer. He lives in western Maryland with his wife.
Print This Story
Comments >> Posted On: Jul 10th, 2004: 12:11:18, Not Rated

Redstate.org posting rules
The posting rules for redstate.org are as follows:
  • No profanity.
  • No personal attacks.
  • No harassment or demonization of a particular individual.
  • No disruptive behavior or off-topic remarks for their own sake.
  • Banning for ideological reasons will take place only in the cases of fundamentally anti-American ideologies. Nazis, Islamists, Communists and racists are unwelcome at redstate.org. Any other person of basic good sense and goodwill, regardless of party, is welcome to participate and hopefully come around to the ideals of Republicanism.

    The proprietors of this site are the sole and final judges and enforcers of this policy.

    Update [2004-7-12 18:12:59 by tacitus]:

    A little clarification is in order. Pursuant to the mission statement, this site is explicitly meant to serve as a conservative and Republican community. Postings, comments, etc., contrary to this purpose fall under the rubric of "disruptive behavior" and will result in banning. You may or may not get a warning -- it depends on how harried the moderators are. If you are coming from a non-conservative, non-Republican context, you are still welcome here, but you must respect the site's stated purpose.

    The posting rules benefit everyone. By promoting civility even in disagreement, they help the site avoid the pitfalls of notorious dens of iniquity like Democratic Underground and every unmoderated Usenet thread that has ever existed.

    Update [2004-8-5 13:24:19 by tacitus]:

    There is confusion over the term "Islamist," and we owe it to readers to clarify. First and foremost, we do not mean to bar Muslims per se. Rather, we mean the folks adhering to the violent and oppressive manifestations of the ideology described by that most neutral of sources, Wikipedia.

    Print This Story
    Comments >> Posted On: Jul 10th, 2004: 11:42:35, Not Rated


    RedState Endorsements
    Don't forget to add $.02 to your donation as a RedState reader!





    Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
    Member Diaries
    The First Debate Revealed! (Lapham-style)
    by SDAI Tech1 - September 2

    Overheard at the RNC
    by krempasky - September 2

    Kerry citing unearned awards?
    by Reg - September 2

    Fox News Beats the Big 3 Networks
    by Doverspa - September 2

    "Blowhard&qu;
    ot; not "Hardball&qu;
    ot;

    by Grenrew - September 2

    More Zell
    by My2Cents - September 2

    Cutting campaign ads in your head
    by LibertarianJim - September 2
    1 comment


    A Georgian's look at Zell's speech
    by dpayton - September 2

    My Report from the RNC
    by Crank - September 2

    The myth of the Zell "meltdown&qu;
    ot;

    by feddie - September 1


    More Diaries... · Guidelines for Diaries
    Blog Roll

    Vote

    · Register to vote

    · Absentee ballot

    Founders

    · Ben Domenech

    · Mike Krempasky

    · Tacitus

    Contributors

    · Michele Catalano

    · Paul Cella

    · John Cole

    · Owen Courreges

    · Thomas Crown

    · Gerry Daly

    · Adam Doverspike

    · Ed Driscoll

    · Erick-Woods Erickson

    · Charles Fenwick

    · Bill Hobbs

    · Sebastian Holsclaw

    · Kevin Holtsberry

    · Jannelsen

    · Christopher Johnson

    · Moe Lane

    · Walt Latham

    · Machiavel

    · Jay Reding

    · Matt Rosenberg

    · Max Rosenthal

    · Dan Spencer

    · Matthew Stinson

    · Robert Tagorda

    · Pejman Yousefzadeh

    Allies

    · Stephen Bainbridge

    · Blogs for Bush

    · Joe Carter

    · Daniel Drezner

    · Dan Flynn

    · Stephen Green

    · Jeff Goldstein

    · John Hawkins

    · Hugh Hewitt

    · James Joyner

    · Joe Katzman

    · Ben Kepple

    · James Lileks

    · Eric Lindholm

    · Michelle Malkin

    · Lee Anne Millinger

    · OxBlog

    · PoliPundit

    · Powerline

    · William Sulik

    · DC Thornton

    · Torerolaw

    · Eric Trimmer

    · Eve Tushnet

    Fellow Travelers

    · Glenn Reynolds

    · Samizdata

    Media

    · Commentary

    · First Things

    · National Review

    · Opinion Journal

    · Weekly Standard

    Campaigns

    · George W. Bush

    · Tom Coburn

    · Jim DeMint

    Meta

    · Technorati

    · Daypop

    Design & Hosting

    · Designed by Cory King

    · Hosted by XLAN

    And yeah, we're going:

    create account | faq | search