The Blogging of the President
Click to hear Chris Lydon's latest audio interview

Sign up
for our Mailing List 
Contact us at: matt@bopnews.com
Books That Will Tell You Why Everything is Crazy Right Now
Where we are...


Pre-Review of
Attack Poodles


Review of
American Dynasty
(Thumbs up)



Review of
What's the Matter
With Kansas
(Thumbs sideways)


How we got here...


Review of
Before the Storm
(Thumbs up)



The Prize:
The Epic Quest for
Oil, Money & Power
(Thumbs up)


Where we're going...


Review of
The Revolution Will Not
Be Televised
(Thumbs up)




Review of
Free Culture(Thumbs up)


Jay Rosen's PressThink
Site Meter
Powered by Movable Type
Hosted by skyBuilders.com  
Sep 1 , 1:03 AM
WSJ: Inflation Data not good for the incumbent
by Barry Ritholtz

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE
Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):

 

Yet another good analysis by the WSJ: The CPI, or consumer price index, shows inflation to be relatively benign. Despite this good data, most middle income families are feeling a cost squeeze.

Why the disconnect? Some of its due to the outmoded way we measure inflation. Look at what's is causing a squeeze for the typical family:

Health care costs are way up. Food has gotten pricier. The costs of sending your kid to a decent college is through the roof. Property taxes have risen -- and in some areas, quite aggressively. State and City taxes have generally increased. And of course, energy costs are dramatically higher than they were this time last year.

The Journal observes:

"Favorable inflation numbers should be giving President Bush a boost in his re-election campaign. But while official figures show inflation remaining in check, consumers are being pinched by higher prices and that could affect votes in November. At the Sam's Club warehouse store here, Jim Long now buys food in bulk and complains he can no longer afford steak.

Recently, everyday expenses seem to belie government statistics. The Labor Department's July inflation report found prices rose 3% over the previous 12 months, down a bit from 3.3% in June and still low by historical standards.

Because food and energy prices can be volatile, economists often look at a gauge that excludes those categories to measure underlying inflation trends. The index, which includes prices for goods such as housing, furniture and cars, has increased at an annual rate of 1.8% in the past year.

This is a perfect example of where classical economics fails: The data is volatile and sloppy, so the focus shifts to more reliable, but far less informative, inflation analysis: CPI ex-food and energy.

Now if only someone can figure out how I can go about my day without: eating, using heat or electricity, or fuel to commute to work. Hey, we whipped inflation! and all we had to do was ignore the ugly data (a/k/a cooking the books).

Here's another excerpt:

The Federal Reserve in July pronounced "underlying inflation" to be "relatively low" and said that some of the recent rise in prices "seems to reflect transitory factors."

For consumers who have been paying about $2 a gallon for gasoline, $5 or more a pound for steak and $3 for a gallon of milk, inflation seems to be a lot higher than the government numbers indicate.

Inflation08252004201315 The consumer-price index, instituted during World War I to adjust wages for the cost of living, is a survey of prices of more than 80,000 goods and services. Categories in the index are weighted for their relative importance to households. Housing, for instance, represents 42% of the index. Changes in the method of computing the CPI have shaved almost half a percentage point a year from the inflation rate since 1995, according to Patrick Jackman, a Labor Department economist. Among other things, the government added an adjustment for quality improvements to the prices of various products.

"The problem is, the everyday citizen still doesn't feel like there's a recovery. They judge it by the price of a quart of milk, a loaf of bread or a gallon of gasoline," says Robert Denton, a professor of political communication at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Va.

Lower-income voters say they are worried about increased commodity prices, although consumers overall think inflation will remain at an annual rate of about 3% over the next 12 months, according to the University of Michigan consumer survey. Consumers also believe housing prices are too high, and there is widespread concern among older Americans about rising out-of-pocket health-care costs, says Richard Curtin, director of the university's consumer surveys.

But prices are only part of what is driving consumer unease. Some feel a pinch because their wages have risen less than prices. In July, average weekly earnings of production and nonsupervisory workers in the U.S., adjusted for inflation, were down 0.7% from a year earlier.

That is little comfort to consumers who seem to pay more attention to higher prices for food and gasoline. Prices of meat and poultry are 9.2% higher than a year ago, dairy products are up 14%, and gasoline has jumped 26%, according to the Labor Department.

Inflation creeping higher while real wages fail to keep up? Hardly a beneficial economic backdrop for an incumbent.


Source:
Inflation Data May Not Aid Bush
Although Rate of Price Increases Steadies, Consumers Feel Sting of Higher Food, Gas Costs
Michael Schroeder
The Wall Street Journal, August 26, 2004; Page A4
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109347145118001226,00.html


Permalink
by Barry Ritholtz
Sep 1 , 1:03 AM  Comments (9) , Trackback (0)

Comments

None of those things you mentioned are factored into the inflation measurements? What ARE they measuring when they determine that?

Posted by: thehim at September 1, 2004 02:09 AM

I'd say the price of gasoline and the price of health insurance are starting to really alarm many Americans.

My mother, for instance, complains bitterly about the rising cost of almost everything, and then sees on CNN that we have no inflation.

She thinks the government is lying.


Posted by: Don in Colorado at September 1, 2004 03:27 AM

The government is lying.

Posted by: Elaine Supkis at September 1, 2004 06:58 AM

Good article.

The CPI has been cooked for a long time, hedonic measurements are bullshit when it comes to the actual effect of inflation on people.

Posted by: Ian Welsh at September 1, 2004 09:37 AM

The government is spinning: lying.

Posted by: Jeremiah Jewett at September 1, 2004 09:52 AM

Almost naturally, people tend to overweight items based on frequency of purchase, not proportion of cost. Having said that, when eliminating my relatively large (in its contribution to my cost structure) but stable rent, the rest (food, healthcare, transportation, ...) must have gone up more than 5% (based on my own observation & speculation). Combined with rent I also see around 3%. People (presumably larger families) who spend relatively more on non-rent, non-tech items will see higher inflation.

Posted by: cm at September 1, 2004 12:16 PM

If there is no inflation why is the Fed raising interest rates? Oh yeah, it's because the feds can't raise taxes. Gotta stick it to the little guy one way or the other.

I still buy I-bonds and TIPS.

Posted by: tim at September 1, 2004 01:14 PM

Yeah, gov't is cooking the books big time. Except now its noticable to about everyone who has to manage their budget.

Of course the those cheerful empty heads on TV news will tell you otherwise.

Posted by: Rodger at September 1, 2004 06:13 PM

Is anything still "indexed to inflation" these days -- like labour contracts, pensions and the like? They used to be, so people keep an eagle eye on the indexes. But I don't know if they still are.
At one point, in the late 70s, I reported on a weekly "food basket" for CBC Radio -- we had a list of items like frozen peas, 10 lbs potatoes, etc, which I priced each week at various stores in my city, so then I could compare whether the price was up or down and CBC could report on which city had the best prices. We were supposed to be very secretive about what was on the list and which stores we went to, so the grocery chains wouldn't know which items to put on sale at which locations. So I wonder if the American government does its own surveys this way, and how careful they are with their survey components.

Posted by: CathiefromCanada at September 1, 2004 08:55 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?







Archives by Author
Recent Comments What's the scoop on BOPnews?

WSJ: Inflation Data not good for the incumbent (9)
CathiefromCanada wrote: Is anything still "indexed to inflation" these day...[more]

It's Nelson Rockefeller's Party (2)
Robert E wrote: Fascinating take on the current Republican party, ...[more]

NOW HEAR THIS:

The Blogging of the President: 2004, a live radio special
(47)
buy xanax online wrote: Xanais used to treat patients with anxiety or pani...[more]

Kucinich: (5)
CamHooka wrote: Live webcam & phone sex with Chantal, the French b...[more]

Gender (10)
Astarte wrote: No offense Ian, but this all sounds like 'Women ar...[more]

Chris Lydon Sphere

Transformation Blogs

Communities

The New AP

Investigators

Authorities

Muses

Poli-Snark

Lydon Interviews...