August 30, 2004

"Noballs" With Chris Matthews

Chris Matthews is one of the reasons I don't even watch network news channels anymore.
I'd much rather just read text than have my blood pressure spike to the point of sweating hemoglobin.
"Hardball" is so fucking ridiculous that the spoof they do of it on SNL is actually less biased and more informative.
This mini-rant came up after I was reading Ann Coulter's take on Matthews via her blog.
It's par for the course with that sack of shit who doesn't deserve a public access TV slot let alone his own show:

Matthews employs a logical calculus known as "begging the question," which goes something like this:

1. John Kerry claims to be a great war hero.

2. Maybe so, but legitimate questions have been raised about his combat record.

3. How can you say that about a great war hero like John Kerry?

When John O'Neill, author of "Unfit for Command," went on "Hardball," Matthews accused O'Neill of being a Republican operative and demanded that O'Neill detail for "Hardball's" six remaining viewers his voting history for the past 20 years in mind-numbing detail. (Completely destroying his case against Kerry, in 1988, O'Neill voted for George Herbert Walker Bush!) Apparently voting for a Republican presidential candidate 15 years ago is a credibility-destroyer, whereas being a former member of the White House staff under Jimmy Carter, as Chris Matthews is, enhances one's credibility.

Normally an interview on a newly released book consists of the author being asked questions about his book and the author answering the questions. With O'Neill, Matthews interviewed himself.

Also, erstwhile war protester John Hurley was interviewed along with O'Neill about "Unfit for Command." The fact that Hurley (1) didn't write the book, and (2) is a paid Kerry campaign worker raises no credibility issues. A colleague of Kerry's in Vietnam Veterans Against the War, Hurley's contribution to the interview about a book he didn't write consisted of his piping in periodically with insightful comments about O'Neill, such as "his book and his organization is built on lies and distortions."

O'Neill's contribution to a discussion about his own book consisted mostly of meaningless sentence fragments:

O'Neill: I don't believe that ... (MATTHEWS INTERRUPTION)

O'Neill: Well, I'm not here to ... (MATTHEWS INTERRUPTION)

O'Neill: I think he is millions of steps behind, because he went over ... (MATTHEWS INTERRUPTION)

O'Neill: His first Purple ... (MATTHEWS INTERRUPTION)

O'Neill: Well, the first ... (MATTHEWS INTERRUPTION)

O'Neill: You're right. I'm saying ... (MATTHEWS INTERRUPTION)

O'Neill: Well, wait just a second. What you've done is ... (MATTHEWS INTERRUPTION)

O'Neill: First of all ... (MATTHEWS INTERRUPTION)

Finally, O'Neill proposed that he be allowed to answer questions and Matthews erupted with an indignant speech notable mostly for being slightly longer than anything O'Neill ever got to say:

Matthews: "One of the oldest tricks on this show is for somebody to come on the show after talking for 20 minutes and say they haven't had the chance to talk. I'll be glad to clock you, John, on how many minutes you spoke on the show. So don't try that old trick. It is a particularly conservative trick, OK? So let's move on here."

Let's review the transcript!

Total words by book author John O'Neill: approximately 1,150. (Complete sentences devoid of Matthews interruptions: about 2.)

Total words by paid Kerry flack Hurley: approximately 950.

Total words by Matthews, excluding host prattle ("Welcome back to 'Hardball'!"): approximately 2,290.

I mourn the demise of what was once considered the art of debate.
Liberal arsewipes have taken what used to be a legitimate clash of ideas into a screaming match.
I, for one, wouldn't be surprised if Kerry doesn't stick his fingers in his ears and starts yelling "LALALALALALALALALA" when he debates Bush. For a fact he'll be interrupting every seven seconds like Gorebot did.
Add that to the sleazy ambush tactics they use (like Matthews did on Michelle Malkin) and I tremble with the urge to strangle every one of these pompus assholes with their own mike cords.
We need fewer journalists and more reporters.

Posted by Graumagus at August 30, 2004 11:47 AM | TrackBack
Comments

I'd like to debate with Matthews. I read his book and he seems more concerned with the charisma of a candidate than what they stand for. For me it is easy, I vote for the guy/gal that has the most similar political views as myself. I don't care if they are as boring as a door or are not the world's best speaker. Getting off track...anyhow, I would dare Matthews to interrupt me. Edit the hell out of it all you want, but I wouldn't back down just because he opens his pie hole.

Posted by: Nick Badway at August 30, 2004 05:34 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?