|
Wednesday, November 24th, 2004
|
3:18 pm
|
Wow, this is a very interesting story about a Dutch filmmaker killed by an Islamic fundamentalist. I'd say that the Dutch have put themselves into a bad position by allowing such free immigration. I'd be very concerned about the resulting increase of Islam if I were there. http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/11/24/vangogh/index.html
On the morning of Nov. 2 in a busy street in east Amsterdam, a 26-year-old Dutch Moroccan named Mohammed Bouyeri pulled out a gun and shot controversial filmmaker Theo van Gogh, who was riding a bike to his office. Van Gogh hit the ground and stumbled across the street to a nearby building. He didn't make it. As the Moroccan strode toward him, van Gogh shouted, "We can still talk about it! Don't do it! Don't do it." But the Moroccan didn't stop. He shot him again, slit van Gogh's throat and stuck a letter to his chest with a knife. He was slaughtered like an animal, witnesses said. "Cut like a tire," said one. Van Gogh, the Dutch master's great-grand-nephew, was 47 years old.
After shooting van Gogh, Bouyeri fled to a nearby park, where he was arrested after a gunfight with the police. One police officer was wounded and Bouyeri himself was shot in the leg and taken to a police hospital.
The letter pinned to van Gogh's chest contained accusations aimed not at him but at Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a Somali refugee and liberal parliamentarian, who for years has been fighting for women's rights in the Netherlands' widespread Islamic community. Earlier this year, Hirsi Ali and van Gogh had made "Submission," a short fiction film that was shown on Dutch public television. In the film, a Muslim woman is forced into an arranged marriage, abused by her husband, raped by her uncle and then brutally punished for adultery. Her body, visible through transparent garments, shows painted verses from the Koran. The film, van Gogh said in a TV interview, was "intended to provoke discussion on the position of enslaved Muslim women. It's directed at the fanatics, the fundamentalists." ( Read more... )
|
(11 comments |comment on this)
|
| Tuesday, November 23rd, 2004
|
1:30 pm
|
November 19, 2004
Third of Americans Say Evidence Has Supported Darwin's Evolution Theory Almost half of Americans believe God created humans 10,000 years ago
by Frank Newport
Only about a third of Americans believe that Charles Darwin's theory of evolution is a scientific theory that has been well supported by the evidence, while just as many say that it is just one of many theories and has not been supported by the evidence. The rest say they don't know enough to say. Forty-five percent of Americans also believe that God created human beings pretty much in their present form about 10,000 years ago. A third of Americans are biblical literalists who believe that the Bible is the actual word of God and is to be taken literally, word for word.
http://www.cpod.ubc.ca/polls/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewItem&itemID;=5108
|
(18 comments |comment on this)
|
| Wednesday, November 17th, 2004
|
3:49 pm
|
More reasons to leave: http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2004/11/15/europe/print.html
Much of American "productivity," Rifkin suggests, is accounted for by economic activity that might be better described as wasteful: military spending; the endlessly expanding police and prison bureaucracies; the spiraling cost of healthcare; suburban sprawl; the fast-food industry and its inevitable corollary, the weight-loss craze. Meaningful comparisons of living standards, he says, consistently favor the Europeans. In France, for instance, the work week is 35 hours and most employees take 10 to 12 weeks off every year, factors that clearly depress GDP. Yet it takes a John Locke heart of stone to say that France is worse off as a nation for all that time people spend in the countryside downing du vin rouge et du Camembert with friends and family [...] European children are consistently better educated; the United States would rank ninth in the EU in reading, ninth in scientific literacy, and 13th in math. Twenty-two percent of American children grow up in poverty, which means that our country ranks 22nd out of the 23 industrialized nations, ahead of only Mexico and behind all 15 of the pre-2004 EU countries. What's more horrifying: the statistic itself or the fact that no American politician to the right of Dennis Kucinich would ever address it?
Perhaps more surprisingly, European business has not been strangled by the EU welfare state; in fact, quite the opposite is true. Europe has surpassed the United States in several high-tech and financial sectors, including wireless technology, grid computing and the insurance industry. The EU has a higher proportion of small businesses than the U.S., and their success rate is higher. American capitalists have begun to pay attention to all this. In Reid's book, Ford Motor Co. chairman Bill Ford explains that the company's Volvo subsidiary is more profitable than its U.S. manufacturing operation, even though wages and benefits are significantly higher in Sweden. Government-subsidized healthcare, child care, pensions and other social supports, Ford says, more than make up for the difference.
The new EU constitution, currently being considered by the member states, is an unwieldy, jargon-laden document that runs to 265 pages in English (and even more in Spanish and French). It should also serve as an inspiration to progressives around the world. It bars capital punishment in all 25 nations and defines such things as universal healthcare, child care, paid annual leave, parental leave, housing for the poor, and equal treatment for gays and lesbians as fundamental human rights. Most of these are still hotly contested questions in the United States; as Rifkin says, this document all by itself makes the European Union the world leader in the human rights debate. It is the first governing document that aspires to universality, "with rights and responsibilities that encompass the totality of human existence on Earth."
|
(8 comments |comment on this)
|
| Saturday, November 13th, 2004
|
5:43 pm
|
People kept saying "Dean is a far-left radical" and such when his record apprared to me to be fairly moerate. I've recently realized why Dean probably would have actually been unelectable and why he couldn't have escaped the far-left label: Dean is indeed on the left on the issue of secularism. It's not so much Dean's moderate views on most issues that wouldn't have played--it's his secularism that would have killed him.
The country is not a secular place, and it won't be for the foreseeable future.
|
(7 comments |comment on this)
|
|
5:37 pm
|
I've been practicing my religious rhetoric lately so I can be assured of fitting into Jesusland.
|
(1 comment |comment on this)
|
|
5:20 pm
|
| Saturday, November 6th, 2004
|
2:58 pm
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/17BUSH.html
In the summer of 2002, after I had written an article in Esquire that the White House didn't like about Bush's former communications director, Karen Hughes, I had a meeting with a senior adviser to Bush. He expressed the White House's displeasure, and then he told me something that at the time I didn't fully comprehend -- but which I now believe gets to the very heart of the Bush presidency.
The aide said that guys like me were ''in what we call the reality-based community,'' which he defined as people who ''believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.'' I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. ''That's not the way the world really works anymore,'' he continued. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.''
|
(1 comment |comment on this)
|
| Friday, November 5th, 2004
|
8:44 pm
|
A look at America's future: http://objective.jesussave.us/creationsciencefair.html
1st Place: "Life Doesn't Come From Non-Life" Patricia Lewis (grade 8) did an experiment to see if life can evolve from non-life. Patricia placed all the non-living ingredients of life - carbon (a charcoal briquet), purified water, and assorted minerals (a multi-vitamin) - into a sealed glass jar. The jar was left undisturbed, being exposed only to sunlight, for three weeks. (Patricia also prayed to God not to do anything miraculous during the course of the experiment, so as not to disqualify the findings.) No life evolved. This shows that life cannot come from non-life through natural processes.
2nd Place: "Women Were Designed For Homemaking" Jonathan Goode (grade 7) applied findings from many fields of science to support his conclusion that God designed women for homemaking: physics shows that women have a lower center of gravity than men, making them more suited to carrying groceries and laundry baskets; biology shows that women were designed to carry un-born babies in their wombs and to feed born babies milk, making them the natural choice for child rearing; social sciences show that the wages for women workers are lower than for normal workers, meaning that they are unable to work as well and thus earn equal pay; and exegetics shows that God created Eve as a companion for Adam, not as a co-worker.
Honorable Mention: "Mousetrap Reduced To Pile Of Functionless Parts" - Kevin Parker (grade 7) "Dinosaur & Man Walked Together" - Donny Findlay (grade 6) "Rocks Can't Evolve, Where Did They Come From Mr. Darwin?" - Anna Reed (grade 6)
(ok, so the site is fake...it's still pretty damn well made.)
|
(5 comments |comment on this)
|
|
3:31 pm
|
Fox News isn't causing Americans to be conservative--the conservativism of Americans allowed Fox News to fourish.
|
(3 comments |comment on this)
|
|
2:24 am
|
Phew, I'm so glad we stopped the Gay Agenda on Tuesday. You know what's on the Gay Agenda? Well I have the inside scoop from a confidential source:
1. Gay marriage 2. Sodomy 3. All children will be converted to the homosexual lifestyle 4. Compulsory anal sex imposed upon all males 5. Sodomy 6. An aborted fetus in every pot 7. Ritual sacrifices to Satan
Now that the US will be adopting biblical law, here are a few of God's lesser known commands:
God spake unto Jesus, "Woman lying with woman is abomination. Woman lying with woman and man shall cleanse all of sin." --Matthew 15:8
He who kills Arabs shall be blessed. --Psalms 2:4
Mary spat out Jesus' seed, and for her sin she was stoned. --John 18:6
|
(17 comments |comment on this)
|
| Thursday, November 4th, 2004
|
3:13 pm
|
The American people have shown that enough of them want a radical fundamentalist government to make one possible. There's a new question those of us opposed to this need to ask: What can cause the American people to change?
I figure there are a few possibilities:
1. Large-scale war on American soil 2. Economic collapse on the scale of the Great Depression 3. Dramatic demographic shifts
Barring any of those, I think we're stuck in a fundamentalist country with a shrinking left.
|
(18 comments |comment on this)
|
|
1:57 pm
|
ON THE COMING AMERICAN RELIGIOUS CIVIL WAR (ARCW)
War is hell. Little understood aphorism.
THIS MAY BE YOUR FIRST NOTICE OF THE COMING AMERICAN RELIGIOUS CIVIL WAR (ARCW). If so, you should date and preserve this warning. Then your distant descendants (maybe the "Daughters of the ARCW") can have something to be smug about--in the unlikely event that they, and this notice, survive the fires, and anybody can still read. ( Read more... )
|
(8 comments |comment on this)
|
|
1:52 pm
|
|
1:47 pm
|
We (in the US) live in a country which is neither secular nor rational. The American people aren't going to change any time soon. People who are secular and rational will be a minority in this country for the foreseeable future. I don't want to live in a country controlled for the foreseeable future by religious nuts bent on irrational government and the reduction of freedom. It's time to leave. America had a good run, but we're seeing it in decline now.
|
(9 comments |comment on this)
|
| Wednesday, November 3rd, 2004
|
5:32 pm
|
Damn you Lincoln! Why oh why couldn't he have just let the south go? What the fuck did he need the south for, anyway? What good has it done us but keep a bunch of whackos in the country? Can we retroactively accept the secession of the south now?
|
(13 comments |comment on this)
|
|
4:21 pm
|
from http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/3/16148/8234
Religious conservatives have won on an agenda of bringing Christian dogma to a courtroom near you. Weather it be abortion, FCC regulations, marriage equality, or your choice of religion, the right is intent on choosing for you how you will live. Our liberal leaders have shot back with a resounding silence. Their fear of being labeled immoral has stymied them.
It is time we, as liberals, stop hiding behind Supreme Court decisions older than we are, abandoning homosexuals, and battling for the Bible belt at all costs. We would do better arguing for those want the freedom to listening to Howard Stern, have an abortion, choose a lover of the same sex, buy pornography, pierce and tattoo whatever we want, or pray to Buddha. Why should we be forced to cease and desist when we hurt no one else? Howard Stern is already off the air. The possibility of overturning Roe is no longer remote; it is now likely. Not long ago this would be dismissed as hysteria, but with John Ashcroft in control of the Justice department and Bush claiming leadership of the nation, this administration will work to limit our moral freedom. ( Read more... )
|
(2 comments |comment on this)
|
|
4:09 pm
|
Which Democratic candidate wasn't afraid to talk about core Democratic values in the primaries? That's right, it was Howard Dean. I'm not sure he would have won, but at least he had vision. At least he would have fought and inspired some people.
|
(6 comments |comment on this)
|
|
3:59 pm
|
"I think it's time to face the possibility that the majority of Americans are actually ready to turn their backs on science, rationality, and secularism."
I don't think that American Taliban is an exaggertion. I think that's the way we're headed.
Andrew Sullivan says this: http://www.andrewsullivan.com/
A MANDATE FOR CULTURE WAR: That's Bill Bennett's conclusion. He won't be the only one. What we're seeing, I think, is a huge fundamentalist Christian revival in this country, a religious movement that is now explicitly political as well. It is unsurprising, of course, given the uncertainty of today's world, the devastating attacks on our country, and the emergence of so many more liberal cultures in urban America. And it is completely legitimate in this country for such views to be represented in public policy, however much I disagree with them. But the intensity of the passion, and the inherently totalist nature of religiously motivated politics means deep social conflict if we are not careful. Our safety valve must be federalism. We have to live and let live. As blue states become more secular, and red states become less so, the only alternative to a national religious war is to allow different states to pursue different options. That goes for things like decriminalization of marijuana, abortion rights, stem cell research and marriage rights. Forcing California and Mississippi into one model is a recipe for disaster. Federalism is now more important than ever. I just hope that Republican federalists understand this. I fear they don't. - 1:07:45 PM Apparently 23% of openly gay voters voted for Bush, by the way.
|
(1 comment |comment on this)
|
|
12:57 pm
|
from a diary on kos: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/11/3/92359/8844
This is not about Republicans or Democrats. This is not about the war. This is not about the economy. This is not even about counting the votes.
This is the final step in the 20-year creeping coup by the theocrats, the Dominionists.
In the House and the Senate, the theocrats made dramatic advances, far beyond the number of seats that switched parties. On the GOP side, they have replaced moderates with zealots, and have significantly strengthened the support for the main theocrat bills that will be reintroduced in the new Congress.
You can hear it in the media's codewords: this election did NOT turn on Iraq or the economy or security, it turned on "moral values", the politically correct code-word for theocratic values, i.e., placing one's religion above the laws of man. Exit polls show that "moral values" were the most common #1 concern among voters, and that among those who marked "moral values" as their primary concern, 80% voted for Bush. Every state that had a same-sex marriage ban up for decision voted the theocrat way.
When analysis of local races around the nation becomes available, it will become clear that theocrats have advanced everywhere, gaining control of even more school boards, gaining even more representation in city councils, winning even more seats in state legislatures.
Make no mistake, this election was the keystone of the theocrat coup. All that is left now is carrying out the agenda and changing the laws of this nation irrevocably to gut the Bill of Rights and establish a Dominionist government in America. ( Read more... )
|
(1 comment |comment on this)
|
|
12:32 pm
|
http://www.salon.com/opinion/blumenthal/2004/11/03/second_bush_term/index.html
The evangelical churches became instruments of political organization. Ideology was enforced as theology, turning nonconformity into sin, and the faithful, following voter guides with biblical literalism, were shepherded to the polls as though to the rapture. White Protestants, especially in the South, especially married men, gave their souls and votes for flag and cross.
The campaign was one long camp meeting, a revival. Abortion and stem cell research became a lever for prying loose white Catholics. (Rove's designated Catholic leader, his own political pontiff, had to resign in disgrace after being exposed for sexual harassment, but this was little reported and had no effect.) To help in Florida, a referendum was put on the ballot to deny young women the right to abortion without parental approval, and it galvanized evangelicals and conservative Catholics alike.
While Kerry ran on the mainstream American traditions of international cooperation and domestic investment, and transparency and rationality as essential to democratic government, Bush campaigned directly against these very ideas. At his rallies, Bush was introduced as standing for "the right God." During the closing weeks of the campaign, Bush and Cheney ridiculed internationalism, falsifying Kerry's statement about a "global test." They disdained Kerry's internationalism as effeminate, unpatriotic, a character flaw and elitist. "You can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig," Vice President Cheney derided in every speech. They grafted imperial unilateralism onto provincial isolationism. Fear of the rest of the world was to be mastered with contempt for it. ... The new majority is more theocratic than Republican, as Republican was previously understood; the defeat of the old moderate Republican Party is far more decisive than the loss by the Democrats. And there are no checks and balances. The terminal illness of Chief Justice William Rehnquist signals new appointments to the Supreme Court that will alter law for more than a generation. Conservative promises to dismantle constitutional law established since the New Deal will be acted upon. Roe vs. Wade will be overturned and abortion outlawed.
Now, without constraints, Bush can pursue the dreams he campaigned for -- the use of U.S. military might to bring God's gift of freedom to the world, with no more "global tests," and at home the enactment of the imperatives of "the right God." The international system of collective security forged in World War II and tempered in the Cold War is a thing of the past. The Democratic Party, despite its best efforts, has failed to rein in the radicalism sweeping the country. The world is in a state of emergency but also irrelevant. The New World, with all its power and might, stepping forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old? Goodbye to all that.
|
(1 comment |comment on this)
|
|
12:22 pm
|
"As an EU-citizen, and from the secular north to boot, my main reaction to the election is sadness, or a kind of low-level horror, bemusment perhaps, at Bush's 3,5 million lead in the popular vote.
To me this means that the US is on the road of seceeding from the Western family. Seceeding from the common ideological thread with roots in 1789 and refined and strengthened through the League of Nations and the United Nations.
During the cold war America was a leading light in the ideas of defining what freedom is. Personal freedoms, the state having no say in how you run your life. The freedom of thought (oh, the McCarthy aberration was noted - but official rhetoric even then clung to the basic tenets of free thought and expression).
America's relentless pushing of the idea of freedom - liberty, made the corporativistic elements of the left reframe and re-think ideas about social equality in terms of "positive freedoms" ("you have to have the means to live to be free to make choices").
This election seems to show that the US has crossed over - perhaps matured? - from a country founded on ideas and ideals to a "normal nation-state". Albeit with a almost new-speakish political liturgy. Social cohesion, us-vs-them, my-country-right-or-wrong seem to be the important things to the electorate in the US today. The very pillars, the revolutionary philosophies of the United States are no longer what defines the country. The separation of state and church, the personal freedom to not have the state interfere in your life.
It is as if the moderate, rational and reality-based Western culture has just lost one of its founding mothers.
Another grieving family of ideas is the "international community", the idea that states can work together, respecting each other, for a better world."
|
(3 comments |comment on this)
|
|
12:15 pm
|
Rationality is in decline in the US as well as in much of the world. Our experiment with secular liberalism was fun while it lasted. I might have to go somewhere else where it's still hanging on.
|
(4 comments |comment on this)
|
|
11:39 am
|
Exit polls didn't match the results. Exit polls prior to 2000 had a high degree of accuracy. Either exit polls now suck or something fishy was going on.
current mood: morose
|
(1 comment |comment on this)
|
|
2:27 am
|
"The dismal results in Ohio and Florida, illuminated by exit polling, tell us that culture issues are what killed us. More and more of this country is becoming culturally conservative and willing to vote against their economic interests for a candidate aligned with their cultural values."
How can Democrats compete without losing the core values that make them Democrats?
I just feel like the country is slipping away from all of the rational people in this country, and this election is a continuation of what's been happening ever since 1994 or earlier. 2002 and 2004 have been killers, and this time the election wasn't even stolen (probably).
Did gay marriage lose this one for us? Obviously too much of the country is not quite ready to confront this issue. If people had just waited until a more favorable political climate (4-8 years, perhaps), this would all have worked out better. I knew gay marriage should never have been made an issue (and warned about it too)...perhaps it was unavoidable though.
|
(6 comments |comment on this)
|
| Tuesday, November 2nd, 2004
|
11:36 pm
|
I'm calling Ohio for Bush. Kerry is behind by 150,000 votes without indication in the current results that he has enough of his strongholds left to be counted there, as far as I can tell. See here
It's over unless something miraculous happens.
|
(6 comments |comment on this)
|
|
11:17 pm
|
It's all about Ohio right now, and it's not looking so good. I'm starting to get very disappointed, and this is really reminding me of 2002 where every close race seemed to go to the Rethugs.
current mood: fuckfuckfuck
|
(1 comment |comment on this)
|
|
2:23 pm
|
Republicans vote early in the morning, Democrats vote later. Don't read too much into the length of the lines early in the day.
|
(6 comments |comment on this)
|
| Monday, November 1st, 2004
|
2:04 pm
|
| Wednesday, October 27th, 2004
|
6:46 pm
|
People are overreacting about this Secret Service visiting someone due to what she wrote on her LJ incident. (see here and here and here) This is standard Secret Service procedure, and they've been investigating people who are potential threats to the president for a long time--I think they do over 2000 similar investigations every year, and the post in question does seem like one which would typically catch their eye.
|
(3 comments |comment on this)
|
| Tuesday, October 26th, 2004
|
2:22 pm
|
I should go to this on Friday night, since I'm in the area and I leave Saturday morning. When I was in Tokyo the event was a lot of fun (I'm sure it'll be very different here in SF though):
Tokyo's world famous gothic event debuts in SF as an after hours Halloween weekend extravaganza featuring 6 bands, DJ Dancing, a Gothic Waltz and Bazaar, a Fashion show, and a Costume Contest with a $100 top prize.
http://www.tokyodarkcastle.com
When: Friday, October 29th, 9:00 p.m. - 3:00 a.m.
Where: The Pound SF, 100 Cargo Way, San Francisco on Pier 96
Admission: $10 with special Yaoi-Con coupon
Note: Ages 18+ only with ID
|
(3 comments |comment on this)
|
|
|
|
|