home / subscribe / donate / tower / books / archives / search / links / feedback / events
![]() |
Get the Answer Only in CounterPunch's Print Edition US's top radical economist, Prof.Robert Pollin, gives CounterPunch newsletter subscribers exclusive briefing on the global casino and the dollar's future. Is neoliberalism still calling the shots? Is US now under Chinese rule? Move over, Kansas! Maybe Tom Frank got it wrong. Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz asks, What's the matter with Oklahoma? How did one state go from pro-worker to proto-fascist in a generation? It'll take a mutiny: Alexander Cockburn on how Cindy Sheehan and a radical movement can end the war. Get the answers you're looking for in the latest subscriber-only edition of CounterPunch ... CounterPunch Online is read by millions of viewers each month! But remember, we are funded solely by the subscribers to the print edition of CounterPunch. Please support this website by buying a subscription to our newsletter, which contains fresh material you won't find anywhere else, or by making a donation for the online edition. Remember contributions are tax-deductible. Click here to make a donation. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now! or write CounterPunch, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558 |
September 20, 2005 Paul
Craig Roberts September 19, 2005 Gary
Leupp Rev.
William E. Alberts Tom
Gorman Leigh
Saavedra Mike
Whitney Ingmar
Lee Katrina
Yeaw Kathleen
and Bill Christison
September 17 / 18, 2005 Alexander
Cockburn Ralph
Nader Diane
Christian Ned
Sublette William
Cook Barbara
Ehrenreich Nikolas
Kozloff Dave
Lindorff Heather
Gray C.A.N. James
Petras Bill
Pahneles Jeff
Chapman Dave
Zirin Ron
Jacobs Fred
Gardner Peter
Harley Matthew
Koehler Ben
Tripp Poets'
Basement Website
of the Weekend
September 16, 2005 Ishmael
Reed J.L.
Chestnut, Jr. James
Petras Louis
Proyect Christopher
Brauchli Naomi
Archer Edward
Gibbon Francis
Boyle Paul
Craig Roberts
September 15, 2005 Jeffrey
St. Clair Brian
J. Foley Justin
E.H. Smith Dave
Lindorff Kevin
Zeese Jason
Leopold Todd
May Niranjan
Ramakrishnan Pat
Williams William
S. Lind Saul
Landau
September 14, 2005 Gary
Leupp Evelyn
Pringle Jordan
Flaherty Jeff
Chapman Ramzy
Baroud Manuel
Garcia, Jr. Mickey
Z. Sam
Husseini Ralph
Nader
September 13, 2005 Uri
Avnery Werther JG Marlene
Martin Joshua
Frank Ron
Jacobs Dave
Lindorff Ben
Tripp Dave
Zirin Billy
Sothern Website
of the Day
September 12, 2005 Bill
Glahn Jason
Leopold Bill
Simpich Mike
Whitney Justin
Felux Rep.
Cynthia McKinney Carol
Norris Robert
Jensen Gideon
Levy Paul
Craig Roberts Website
of the Day
September 9 / 11, 2005 William
A. Cook Saul
Landau Lance
Selfa Col.
Dan Smith Elaine
Cassel Ron
Jacobs Elisa
Salasin Christopher
Brauchli Evelyn
Pringle Tom
Crumpacker Dave
Lindorff Robert
Jensen Gary
Bass Dr.
Susan Block Steven
Sherman Col.
Douglas A. Macgregor Barghouti
/ Grima Jeff
Berg Fred
Gardner Charles
Sullivan Dan
Vojir Website
of the Weekend
John
Chuckman Dan
La Botz Carol
Norris David
Krieger Irma
Thomas Roger
Morris September 7, 2005 Roxanne
Dunbar-Ortiz Werther Chris
Floyd Jason
Leopold Michael
Donnelly Niranjan
Ramakrishnan Linda
Milazzo / John Stern Gary
Leupp Pierre
Tristam Kevin
Zeese Charmaine
Neville
September 6, 2005 Keeanga-Yamahtta
Taylor Dan
La Botz Larry
Bradshaw / Lorrie Beth Slonsky Chuck
D. Debbie
Dupre / Bill Quigley Omar
Wariach Mike
Whitney Carol
Norris Norman
Solomon Michael
Neumann
Paul
Craig Roberts David
Vest John
Blair Fidel
Castro Mike
Whitney Alan
Farago Doug
Giebel Mark
Chmiel Carol
Wolman, MD Norman
Solomon Eli
Stephens Peter
Linebaugh
September 3 / 4, 2005 Alexander
Cockburn Paul
Craig Roberts Gary
Leupp Dave
Lindorff Dan
La Botz Jonathan
M. Feldman Landau
/ Hassen Tim
Wise Mitchel
Cohen Dave
Zirin Mike
Ferner Rep.
Cynthia McKinney Jason
Leopold Justin
Felux Monica
Benderman Ben
Tripp Jordan
Flaherty Bill
Pahnelas Seth
Sandronsky Mark
Donham Fred
Gardner Joshua
Frank Jackie
Corr Poets'
Basement
September 2, 2005 Evan
Jones David
Stocker Dave
Lindorff Norman
Solomon Mike
Whitney Eli
Stephens Ron
Jacobs Christopher
Brauchli Harvey
Wasserman CounterPunch
Wire Glen
Ford
September 1, 2005 Dr.
Greg Henderson, MD Paul
Craig Roberts Mike
Whitney Lee
Sustar Dave
Lindorff Lynn
Gonzalez Chris
Floyd
Cockburn
/ St. Clair John Walsh Bernstein /
Mishel Alan Farago Norman
Solomon Bryan
Newbury Jason
Leopold Website
of the Day
August 30, 2005 Gary
Leupp Joshua
Frank Evelyn
Pringle Urariano
Mota Ron
Jacobs CP
News Service Roger
Morris
August 29, 2005 Seth
Sandronsky Norman
Solomon Charles
Sullivan Paul
Craig Roberts Website
of the Day
Alexander
Cockburn Ricardo
Alarcon Diane
Christian M.
Shahid Alam Laith
al-Saud Diane
Farsetta Saul
Landau Tom
Barry Nicholas
Rowe George
E. Bisharat Dave
Lindorff Fred
Gardner John
Francis Lee Evan
Jones Ali
Khan Poets'
Basement August 26, 2005 Lee
Sustar Ramzy
Baroud Christopher
Brauchli Peter
Harley John
Snider Kathleen
Christison
August 25, 2005 Paul
Craig Roberts Cockburn
/ St. Clair J.L.
Chestnut, Jr. Chhandasi
Pandya Richard
Ward Norman
Solomon Joshua
Frank Seth
Sandronsky Lucinda
Marshall VIPS Ralph
Nader
August 24, 2005 Stan
Goff Rachard
Itani Elisa
Salasin Ron
Jacobs John
Chuckman Leibowitz
/ Heller Douglas
Valentine Thomas
Nagy Alexander
Cockburn Website
of the Day
August 23, 2005 Rev.
Graylan Scott Hagler Karen
Kilroy Stew
Albert Joshua
Frank Dave
Zirin Julia
Olmstead CounterPunch
Wire Jason
Leopold Diane
Christian
August 22, 2005 Sonia
Nettnin Mike
Whitney Kevin
Zeese Norman
Solomon Christopher
Brauchli Jeff
Bale Greg
Moses
August 20 / 21, 2005 Alexander
Cockburn Saul
Landau Kevin
Zeese Greg
Moses Ray
McGovern Fred
Gardner Martin
Smith Benjamin
Granby Frankie
Lake Joshua
Frank Ron
Jacobs Tom
Crumpacker Mike
Ferner James
Petras Col.
Dan Smith Dr.
Teresa Whitehurst Ben
Tripp Poets'
Basement
August 19, 2005 Alexander
Cockburn Neve
Gordon Gary
Leupp William
S. Lind Vijay
Prashad Dave
Lindorff Pat
Williams John
Pilger Elaine
Cassel
August 18, 2005 Alexander
Cockburn Greg
Moses Ramzy
Baroud Joshua
Frank Monica
Benderman Paul
Craig Roberts
August 17, 2005 Alexander
Cockburn Robert
Jensen Carl
G. Estabrook Mike
Whitney Niranjan
Ramakrishnan Norman
Solomon Dave
Zirin Jennifer
Loewenstein CounterPunch
August 16, 2005 Greg
Moses Thomas
Larson Diana
Barahona Dave
Lindorff Rep.
Cynthia McKinney Elisa
Salasin David
Krieger Alexander
Cockburn Website
of the Day
August 15, 2005 Greg
Moses Paul
Craig Roberts Mike
Whitney Robert
Jensen CounterPunch
Wire Norman
Solomon Kathleen
Christison
August 13 / 14, 2005 Cockburn
/ St. Clair William
Blum Gary
Leupp Jack
Z. Bratich Brian
Cloughley Ron
Jacobs John
Farley Dave
Lindorff Tim
Wise J.L.
Chestnut, Jr. John
Gershman Felice
Pace Fred
Gardner David
Krieger Roxanne
Dunbar-Ortiz Ben
Tripp Poets'
Basement
August 12, 2005 Christopher
Brauchli Greg
Moses Ramzy
Baroud Norman
Solomon Chris
Genovali Chris
Floyd Tariq
Ali
August 11, 2005 Saul
Landau Dave
Lindorff Ralph
Nader Talli
Nauman Gary
Leupp Sharon
Smith Paul
Craig Roberts
August 10, 2005 Tim
Wise Ron
Jacobs Joshua
Frank Cynthia
McKinney Rick
Wilhelm Stan
Goff
August 9, 2005 Mike
Ferner Monica
Benderman Mike
Marqusee Rep.
Cynthia McKinney Paul
Craig Roberts
August 6-8, 2005 Alexander
Cockburn Jason
Leopold Ray
McGovern David
Krieger Sharon
K. Weiner / Robert Jensen Fred
Gardner
August 5, 2005 Bill
Christison Paul
Craig Roberts Alexander
Cockburn
August 4, 2005 Tom
Barry Lila
Rajiva Greg
Moses Alexander
Cockburn August 3, 2005
August 3, 2005 Alexander
Cockburn Paul
Craig Roberts William
A. Cook Dave
Zirin Dave
Lindorff José
Pertierra
August 2, 2005 Ramzi
Kysia William
A. Cook Paul
Craig Roberts Mike
Whitney Ron
Jacobs Norman
Madarsz Tim
Wise
August 1, 2005 Virginia
Rodino Diana
Barahona Joshua
Frank Mike
Whitney Norm
Dixon Norman
Solomon James
Petras
July 30 / 31, 2005 Alexander
Cockburn JoAnn
Wypijewski Sheldon
Rampton Jack
Z. Bratich Greg
Moses Jordan
Green Patrick
Cockburn Brian
Cloughley Justin
Taylor Saul
Landau John
Walsh Joshua
Frank Ron
Jacobs Fred
Gardner John
Chuckman Liaquat
Ali Khan Remi
Kanazi Naveen
Jaganathan Richard
Heinberg Max
Watts Ben
Tripp Poets'
Basement
July 29, 2005 Cockburn
/ St. Clair P.
Sainath Niranjan
Ramakrishnan Dave
Lindorff J.L.
Chestnut, Jr. Pat
Williams Norman
Solomon Sen.
Russ Feingold
July 28, 2005 Paul
Craig Roberts William
S. Lind Gilad
Atzmon Joshua
Frank Lila
Rajiva Amina
Mire Website
of the Day
July 27, 2005 Roger
Morris Gary
Leupp Paul
Craig Roberts Jackie
Corr Mike
Whitney Dave
Zirin Christopher
Bradley Norman
Solomon Website
of the Day
Subscribe Online
|
September 20, 2005 Is Pakistan Selling Out?General Musharraf and the Recognition of IsraelBy M. SHAHID ALAM It appears that General Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan's military dictator since October 1999, is on a mission to legitimize Israel: and he is going about it with the zeal of a new convert. On September 1, 2005, Pakistan's foreign minister met his Israeli counterpart in Istanbul. This was followed by a meeting between General Musharraf and members of the American Jewish Congress in New York. Earlier, the General praised war-criminal Ariel Sharon as "a great soldier and courageous leader" for pulling out illegal and often murderous Jewish settlers from the Gaza.[1] Moreover, after the two "courageous leaders" shook hands in New York, the Pakistani General told reporters, "And that's very good." [2] Very good? The question is, for whom? The General wants Pakistanis to believe that recognizing Israel will be good for their country. His minions in the government and media argue that this is a pragmatic, even daring, measure that finally breaks free from the 'archaic sentimentalism' about the Ummah a 'vague concept' according to one columnist. Is this true? Or is the Pakistani dictator surrendering the national interest in order to perpetuate his own grip on power? This question deserves our sober consideration. The claim that General Musharraf is acting in Pakistan's national interest strains credulity. The General has found regime salvation in what the US calls its 'war against global terrorism.' Instantly, on the night of September 11, he had seen the opportunity in America's putative war against terrorism and seized it with both hands. Musharraf's compact with his American mentors was transparent. The US would support the General, and he would join America's 'war against global terrorism.' This compact has been hugely
profitable for the General. And he has never missed an opportunity
to peddle its ethereal advantages for Pakistan even as he continues
to surrender his nation's core values and interests. His method
is simple. He has redefined Pakistan's 'national interest' to
coincide with that of the United States. As he put it in June
The General's gains are clear; but what has Pakistan lost? Pakistan surrendered its territorial sovereignty to the US, handing over Pakistan's airspace and land bases to be used in a war against a friendly neighbor, Afghanistan. As a result, Pakistan lost the 'strategic depth' it had created in Afghanistan though, not with the best means by handing over Afghanistan to its strategic adversaries, the Northern Alliance and India. On its eastern border, Pakistan stopped supporting the resistance in Kashmiri. In 2003, after the American invasion of Iraq, the General tried desperately to send Pakistani troops to police the US occupation of that country, but, thankfully, that move was defeated by Pakistanis. On the domestic front, the General has been supporting the US 'war against terrorism' by promoting a new-fangled ideology of 'enlightened moderation,' no doubt a product of neoconservative think tanks in the US. This is an attempt to shift Pakistan away from its core values of Islamic governance, law, morality and justice. The primary targets of this campaign are the madaris (the Islamic schools) and the Ulama, the historical safeguards against Western imperialism and state tyranny in Islamic countries. Now the US wants to destroy them under the pretext that they are 'breeding grounds of terrorism.' The move to recognize Israel is merely the latest in the series of capitulations Pakistan has witnessed since September 11, 2001. It is an Israeli demand advanced through the agency of the US government. The General is being asked to give proof positive of his partnership in the 'war against global terrorism' by reversing Pakistan's strategic opposition to the unnatural creation of Israel. Pakistan's founding father had described Israel as the "illegitimate child of Western imperialism." Under Israeli-US pressure, the General is determined to turn Pakistan into an instrument for promoting Israeli ambitions in the Islamic world. Much of Pakistan's media is now swamped with writers staking putatively 'nationalist' positions on the question of recognizing Israel. Suddenly, these writers are beginning to discover endless and vital advantages that will begin to flow to Pakistan once it normalizes relations with Israel. It only remains for these deluded Pakistanis now to celebrate the ancient ties going back to Abraham that have always bound the two fraternal nations. If the Zionists themselves were making Pakistan's case for recognition, they could not have sounded more specious. If the narrow nationalism that is being peddled in Pakistan to justify recognizing Israel were genuine if Pakistani nationalism ever had a spine it would remain suspect. It would be suspect because it fails to recognize the deep connections that bind the security and the welfare of Islamic countries. When Islamic governments ignore these connections, and stand individually on their sickly nationalisms, they encourage and facilitate the imperialist attempts of the United States and Israel among others to subjugate these countries, to pick them off one by one. In this connection one may recall the disastrous experience of the Arabs with their 'nationalism.' At the outbreak of the WWI, the Ottomans allied themselves with the Germans in order to neutralize longstanding British and French imperial designs against their state. When the Turkish entry in the war threatened their position in the Arab world, the British sought to incite an Arab rebellion against the Ottomans. The Arab chieftain of Hijaz Sharif Hussein of Makka was picked for this service with promises of an Arab kingdom. These early Arab 'nationalists' even agreed to hand over Palestine to the Zionists. What did these gullible Arab nationalists receive in return for their betrayal of the Islamic Ottomans who had staunchly refused to cooperate with the Zionists? A vivisection of the eastern segment of the Arab world into paltry Arab fiefdoms, mostly controlled by the British, French and, later, the Americans. In addition, they helped to create Israel, which would engage in ethnic cleansing and endless wars against the Arabs into the indefinite future. Let the Pakistanis also consider momentarily the implications of an Iran driven by nationalism alone to normalize relations with Israel. What if the two then joined hands with India to try to balkanize Pakistan? Drafting blinkered 'nationalist' arguments or with appropriate inducements from Israel and India the Iranians too could begin to see plenty of advantages in an alliance with Israel against Pakistan. Yet, the present rulers of Iran, a country whose claims to nationalism are more firmly grounded than Pakistan's, have remained steadfast in their support of the Palestinian cause. They understand that in the long run Iranian security depends on the success of Palestinian resistance to Israeli expansionism. What are the much-trumpeted 'national' interests that Musharraf hopes to advance by recognizing Israel? One common argument starts by noting, with apparent alarm, the growing economic and military ties between India and Israel. Pakistan, it is argued, can neutralize these Indian gains by normalizing relations with Israel. The wishful thinking in this argument is quickly exposed. With its light-weight economy currently, 12 percent of India's, and shrinking Pakistan cannot even dream of matching the attractiveness of Indian markets for Israeli exporters. India's trade with Israel including trade in military hardware will continue to grow rapidly even with Pakistani recognition of Israel. If anything should alarm Pakistan, it is not India's growing trade relations with Israel. After all, Israel is a mere one-third of one percent of the world economy. If India is our most serious adversary, economically and militarily, Pakistanis should rather worry about the rate at which they have been falling behind India in economic size, living standards, education, science, technology, and democratic institutions. Could the General make a start by eliminating the last deficit in democratic institutions? A second argument maintains that Pakistan can begin to mobilize Israel's powerful lobbies in the US, in particular AIPAC, for its own interests. All it has to do is normalize relations with Israel. The naiveté of this argument borders on stupidity. Yes, Israel hankers for legitimacy which only Islamic states can give it. It is the key that will unlock the doors to Israeli penetration of the economies of Islamic countries; this will allow Israel to undermine the Islamic resistance to Zionism from within these countries. Surely, Israel will dangle the moon before gullible Pakistani generals and diplomats. But recognition is like virginity. Once Pakistan loses it, Israel will move to its next Islamic victim. It is worth recounting here what one Pakistani newspaper Daily Times claims is Pakistan's chief leverage over Israel. It writes that "Pakistan will remain strategically more important [to Israel] as a Muslim state than India as a buyer of [Israeli] arms. India has offered itself as a partner in war; Israel actually needs a partner for peace in the Middle East." It is hard to fathom why Israel would turn to Pakistan a country in South Asia if it needs a partner for peace in the Middle East. Equally stunning, this newspaper has wholly bought into the Israeli canard that they had no partners for peace even after the Oslo accords. Israel's expansionist agenda depends on ethnic cleansings and wars. It has never lacked for Arab states eager to capitulate once it defeated the Arab armies in 1948. Peace has never served Israel's expansionist logic. The General has repeatedly argued that there is no moral case now for denying legitimacy to Israel. If the Palestinians can recognize Israel, he demands, why should Pakistanis insist on being "more Palestinian than the Palestinians?" On moral consideration, this argument has no validity. Does a crime become legitimate if its victim left undefended by society 'accepts' his victimization? The Palestinian recognition of Israel amounts to nothing more than this. Abandoned by the world community including the Muslims some Palestinian factions chose the path of negotiation with their tormentors. In negotiations too, the Palestinians continue to reap a bitter harvest. Yet, instead of offering substantive support to the Palestinians, Pakistan's military rulers seek to legitimize Israeli crimes on the plea that the victims have done the same. This cannot be deemed moral: instead, it is moral cowardice in the extreme. The deluded Pakistanis who urge recognition must be told and told repeatedly that Israel has only one strategic interest in Pakistan. Israelis look upon Pakistan as a target for attack and dismemberment, and this for two reasons. As the second largest Islamic country by far the largest in West Asia it could someday challenge Israeli ambitions in West and Central Asia. More urgently, Israel views Pakistan as a potential nuclear threat. In either case, Pakistan interests Israel primarily as a target a target for its F-16s, missiles and nuclear arsenal. This proposition holds regardless of how cravenly Pakistan seeks to befriend Israel. Israel will not tolerate a united and nuclear-armed Pakistan. Let Pakistanis ignore this incontestable fact only at their peril. In closing, I would like to state for the record what I believe are the conditions which Israel must satisfy before the Islamic world or indeed, the world can willingly grant it legitimacy. Israel must dismantle its apartheid structure and remove all the barriers to the return and rehabilitation of the Palestinians it has pushed out of their homes since 1948. Once these conditions have been fully met, Israel under whatever name will cease to be an imperialist project. It will lose its expansionist logic. It can then become a native of the Middle East, and live at peace with its Muslim neighbors. References: [1] http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/619981.html [2] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4247406.stm M. Shahid Alam teaches economics at a university in Boston. Some of his previous essays are available in a book, Is There An Islamic Problem (IBT Books, 2004). He may be reached at alqalam02760@yahoo.com. © M. Shahid Alam
ALEXANDER COCKBURN, JEFFREY ST CLAIR, BECKY GRANT AND THE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF JOURNALISTIC CLARITY, COUNTERPUNCH We published an article entitled "A Saudiless Arabia" by Wayne Madsen dated October 22, 2002 (the "Article"), on the website of the Institute for the Advancement of Journalistic Clarity, CounterPunch, www.counterpunch.org (the "Website"). Although it was not our intention, counsel for Mohammed Hussein Al Amoudi has advised us the Article suggests, or could be read as suggesting, that Mr Al Amoudi has funded, supported, or is in some way associated with, the terrorist activities of Osama bin Laden and the Al Qaeda terrorist network. We do not have any evidence connecting Mr Al Amoudi with terrorism. As a result of an exchange of communications with Mr Al Amoudi's lawyers, we have removed the Article from the Website. We are pleased to clarify the position. August 17, 2005
|
from CounterPunch Books! The Case Against Israel By Michael Neumann ![]() Grand Theft Pentagon: Tales of Greed and Profiteering in the War on Terror by Jeffrey St. Clair ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |