The White House is reportedly concerned that liberals may increasingly, and publicly, push for the US to withdraw from Afghanistan. The problem is that the White House doesn't have that good of a relationship with liberals because it has never seemed to want such a relationship in the past.
The White House makes no bones about wooing conservative Democrats and Republicans on issues ranging from the stimulus package to health care, but when it comes to wooing liberals, we're more likely to hear a senior administration official utter a slur, such as calling Democrats concerned about where health care reform is heading "the left of the left." And even during the campaign, rather than truly work with the blogs and liberal groups, Obama chose to create his own blogosphere on mybarackobama.com, and his own liberal group, Obama for America. It is simply not clear whether the White House, or the President himself, actually "likes" liberals, or considers them a legitimate part of the Democratic party.
The problem is now coming home to roost on Afghan policy, but it's really not limited to that. On health care reform, it's liberals who first called into question the President's fortitude in handling tough issues, and that doubt has now seeped into the public at large. And we've seen how "liberal" gays are able to repeatedly steal the news cycle when the candidate and now the White House forsakes that particular Democratic constituency.
Joe and I have argued for a while that "liberals" are not just a legitimate part of the Democratic party, but quite a powerful constituency as well. We've long believed that candidate, and now president, Obama made a tactical mistake in shunning the Democratic party's base, simply because the base is not just large, it's powerful, and has the ability to help on issues, but also to fight back mightily, publicly, and painfully when scorned. Obama's mistake was ignoring and antagonizing the left, rather than befriending it, when times were good. That decision now seems to be coming home to roost on an increasingly diverse number of issues.
Read More......