Friday, November 30, 2007

He's back




The 8 foot inflatable Grinch has a new friend this year. I picked him up in Normandy last winter. He's this tackly little fellow who was hanging on practically every house in northern France. Had to have him. I'm waiting for someone to call the cops thinking Santa is threatening to jump.

Read More......

The National Review thinks the GOP is screwed for a long long time


Nice analysis of the cover story of the very-conservative National Review, which basically thinks the Republicans are toast next election and beyond. If you ever needed a story to help perk up your mood, this one will do just that. Enjoy. Read More......

Bush intends to slash counterterrorism funding for police, firefighters and rescue departments across the country by more than half


Well, I mean, he did catch Osama bin Laden, so there's really no more threat. Oh. Never mind. But at least Iraq is free. Sort of. Oh that's right, we spent all our money and all of our military resources on a war we didn't need and now don't have anything left for the war we do need to fight. This would be shocking if it weren't typical. Get ready for Bush and the GOP presidential candidates to blast the Dems sometime soon as being soft on terror. Read More......

Hostage drama in Rochester, NH is over


The suspect surrendered. The hostages are safe. Read More......

Looks like Rudy lied when he blamed NYPD for the very unusual billing practices


A break from the hostage situation in NH to get an update on Rudy's growing scandal.

This thing just keeps getting worse for Rudy as ABC's The Blotter gets more information that contradicts the former Mayor. This has become a textbook campaign scandal. Now, we're dealing with the lies and the cover-up of the original scandal about Rudy using taxpayer dollars to finance his extra-marital affair with Judith Nathan. Yesterday, Rudy tried to blame NYPD. NYPD's chief says otherwise. Lies and cover-up:
Giuliani said Thursday the unusual billing practice was not intended to hide anything but instead to speed payment of American Express credit card bills.

But the current New York Police Commissioner Ray Kelly said today he knew of no problems with the delay of payments before Giuliani was mayor, when Kelly served under Mayor David Dinkins, or since.

"I don't recall anybody, any statements about delay," Kelly told reporters.

He said all bills for the police details for Dinkins and now for Mayor Mike Bloomberg are handled directly "through the police department."
Back to you, Rudy. What's your lie to explains this?

Oh, wait. Rudy's not talking to the media today. Now we're seeing the pre-9/11 Rudy. That's the Rudy New Yorkers hated. Read More......

Hostage situation at Hillary campaign office in NH


4:51 pm NBC tentatively identifies the suspect as "Leland Eisenberg." Son-in-law claims he was "drinking and that he was someone who wanted to be hospitalized."

4:48 pm "That was the most pointless press conference of all time" was the message I got from a reader. And, he's right.

4:35 pm Just heard from a very reliable source that all of Clinton's offices in Iowa have been shut down.

3:44 pm MSNBC: From AP, There were four hostages, but three have been released. One hostage is still being held. Also, the suspect is "known to local authorities from a past incident and that he may have a history of emotional problems."

3:19 pm ABC NEWS: Suspect is an older male with a history of mental illness who told his son today "watch the news."

2:58pm You can watch live coverage of the story on the local TV news in NH via this link.

2:52pm UPDATE from Channel 9 in NH:
Officials with the campaign confirmed that there were two workers taken hostage in the office on 28 North Main St., and NBC News reported that the man demanded to speak to Clinton.

Clinton, who is not in New Hampshire, canceled a National Democratic Committee meeting in Virginia....

Witnesses described the man as in his 40s with salt-and-pepper hair. There are several police officers in the area with guns drawn....

"There are sharp shooters on the roof, and police are negotiating with someone in the building," said another witness, who did not want to be identified. "The police are notifying all the business owners on the street to evacuate. There are fire trucks behind the Hillary Clinton office."

Presidential candidate Barack Obama also has an office in Rochester, and it has been evacuated. Staff members in John Edwards' office, which is a few buildings away, were also evacuated.
CNN reports that Hillary just canceled her speech she was going to give momentarily at the DNC winter meeting here in Virginia.

Channel 5 Boston has much more. The national cable TV networks have totally dropped the ball on this story - it took them a good half hour AFTER ABC broke the story on their Web site:
The incident happened at about 1 p.m. Friday at 28 North Main St. in Rochester. The man had what appeared to be a bomb strapped to himself inside the Democrat's office, according to Bill Shaheen, a top state campaign official.

A witness said that she spoke to a woman shortly after she was released from the office by the hostage-taker.

"A young woman with a 6-month or 8-month-old infant came rushing into the store just in tears, and she said, 'You need to call 911. A man has just walked into the Clinton office, opened his coat and showed us a bomb strapped to his chest with duct tape," witness Lettie Tzizik said.

There are several police officers positioned across the street from the office, crouched down behind cruisers with guns drawn, according to a reported at the scene.

"There are sharp shooters on the roof, and police are negotiating with someone in the building," said another witness, who did not want to be identified. "The police are notifying all the business owners on the street to evacuate. There are fire trucks behind the Hillary Clinton office.

"I walked out and I immediately started running, and I saw that the road was blocked off. They told me run and keep going," said Cassandra Hamilton, who works in an office adjacent to the building.

Nearby businesses have been evacuated, and the St. Elizabeth Seaton School has been locked down.
Reuters:
An armed man took people hostage at a New Hampshire campaign office for Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Clinton on Friday, New Hampshire's WMUR TV reported.

Clinton, who was scheduled to campaign in Virginia on Friday, was not present at the office in Rochester, New Hampshire, according to TV reports.

The number of hostages was unclear, WMUR said. A separate report on MSNBC said a man claiming to have a bomb strapped to him walked into the campaign office.
Read More......

Clinton/Powell and Obama/Bloomberg?


The rumors are swirling that Hillary might consider asking Colin Powell to be her VP and that Obama may be considering NY Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Weird but interesting notions for each candidate. Pohell isn't exactly loved by Democrats, and he really screwed President Clinton, his commander in chief, to the tune of insubordination in the early 90s. Odd that there might be a rapprochement with the Clintons now. I'm not sure Hillary can or should trust Powell. And it's an interesting question, though not a very PC one, as to whether America will take kindly to the first woman president and first black vice president being on the same ticket (and even if they wouldn't, is that a reason not to do the ticket?) As for Obama, also a bit odd, talk of him considering a Republican, albeit a very moderate kind of Democrat one, isn't going to thrill party regulars. Read More......

More on Giuliani's secret use of taxpayer money to facilitate his adultery


Not that there's anything wrong with that. Well, actually, there is. First, Giuliani is running as a Republican, and the Republican party is the party of family values. Adultery isn't a family value. Second, Giuliani didn't just use taxpayer money to pay for his security while visiting his mistress - and I would agree, he was the mayor of NYC, he needed security even during his off hours - but he then tried to jigger the books to hide the money he was spending on his security for the adultery. That's creepy. And it's of questionable legality as well - you just can't charge the NYC agency dealing with "lofts" for your security to visit your mistress. And Giuliani is now telling the media that he charged obscure agencies for his security detail while visiting his mistress because it was easier to bill it this way. Hmmm. Then did Giuliani use this innovative accounting method, charging the wrong agency for his security, for any other extra-curricular activities beyond his adultery? And just as important, why did Giuliani keep charging the security detail's expenses to different agencies each time, as though he were trying to hide it by spreading it around?

Giuliani is falling into the classic political scandal trap. You get caught, then you lie, then you get caught in your lie, making the story even bigger.

Ah yes, a president who lies and then breaks the law because of his adultery. Plus ca change... Read More......

Weekly election update, by podcast


I've decided, for now at least, to do a weekly election update on the podcast. Joe really is one of the smartest people I know when it comes to elections - he has a scary knowledge of polls and districts and facts about why a caucus isn't a primary, and more. So, each week, we're going to do a round up of where the elections stand and why. This week, Joe and I invited longtime Internet reporter Jacki Schechner (formerly of CNN) to join us. I think it turned into a really interesting discussion, and hope you agree (I also left the file in stereo mode this time, which I think adds a nice touch). You can listen to the broadcast via this link (just click and it should play the audio file on your computer), you can subscribe to our podcasts via iTunes here, or you can subscribe to our podcast RSS feed here. This show is about 26 minutes long, so perfect for the treadmill :-) Read More......

Tough guy Republicans are really afraid of questions from real Americans


The right wingers are in a frenzy over the CNN YouTube debate. In their world view, it's somehow diabolical that real Americans, some of whom were Democrats, submitted questions to the candidates. The GOPers have gotten used to watching Bush live in his his bubble where he's only greeted by adoring fans. Apparently, right wingers only want their candidates to be insulated from anything except immigration bashing and supporting Bush's war in Iraq -- and top GOP operative Grover Norquist who managed to get a question.

Seriously, how are any of these wimps going to stand up to Al Qaeda if they can't even take a tough question from a Democrat? Read More......

Friday Morning Open Thread


Rudy, Rudy, Rudy. The GOP front-runner is in BIG trouble. He's got a major scandal on his hands -- having taxpayers finance his affair probably won't go over so well with the GOP voters. Just imagine how insane the right wingers would be if a Democrat pulled a stunt like that and also tried to cover it up.

So, let's get cranking. Read More......

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Republican operative's wife attacks MoveOn.org. Oh, she's also CNN's new anchor Campbell Brown


Jonathan Klein, the President of CNN, has got himself yet another biased reporter.

The wife of Dan Senor, who served as a spokesperson for Bush in Iraq, is now working for CNN. Normally, who a reporter's spouse is wouldn't and shouldn't matter. And, it wouldn't if Campbell Brown didn't show an obvious bias. Last night, in her first week on the job, she attacked MoveOn:
During the November 28 CNN special Campaign Killers: Why Do Negative Ads Work?, CNN anchor Campbell Brown said: "General David Petraeus made his reputation taking on insurgents in Iraq. But when he came to Capitol Hill in September, he was confronted by American insurgents, a liberal anti-war group called MoveOn.org."
Seriously, comparing MoveOn to insurgents is beyond the pale. That is such an obviously loaded term. Campbell Brown showed a clear bias, plain and simple.

Actually, Campbell, if you want to know what real insurgents are, ask your husband and his colleagues who let the insurgency grow in Iraq under their watch. He even still has his White House web page touting that gig. Read More......

Australians set Iraq withdrawal date


See. Setting a withdrawal timetable really isn't all that difficult. A country just needs a new leader:
About 550 Australian combat troops in Iraq should be withdrawn by about the middle of next year, Prime Minister-elect Kevin Rudd said on Friday, setting a broad timetable for the soldiers to return home.

Australia has about 1,500 troops in and around Iraq, but Rudd won power at the Australia's national election on November 24 with a promise to bring frontline forces home.
Read More......

Dems Denounce Bush and GOP for Stalling Troop Funds


From Speaker Pelosi:
“Earlier this month, Congress approved nearly a half trillion dollars for the Department of Defense. Just two weeks ago, House Democrats passed $50 billion in additional funding for our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. We have provided every penny that is currently necessary to fund Defense Department operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and around the world. It is President Bush and his Republican allies in the Senate who are preventing extra funds from reaching our troops.
Read More......

Rudy: Claims a "hit job" on him, but doesn't deny using taxpayer money for his affair


This is becoming a very big scandal for Rudy Giuliani at the worst possible time. ABC's Jake Tapper just did a devastating piece showing Rudy claiming a "hit job." Yet, Rudy didn't deny what happened -- he just tried to rationlize it and change the subject:
Late this afternoon Giuliani told ABC News this story was a "hit job."

"This was really done to try to focus on my personal life," Giuliani said.

He said the NYPD always reimbursed city agencies for his security details' expenses.

"They were handled openly, honestly, it was the practice that was going on since my first term and the idea was to get the bills paid quickly," Giuliani said.

Comptroller Thompson said this about the Mayor's explanation: "That's not the way that we operate these days and it would not be the preferred way of doing business," Thompson said. "In the end, it's a very convoluted way of getting things done."

"If anyone hoped that no one would notice, they were being foolish," Thompson told ABC News.
Um, Rudy, this is about your public life intersecting with your "personal life." You were having an extramarital affair. And, you were using taxpayer dollars to facilitate that affair. And, you tried to hide it. So, Rudy, that makes it an issue.

Welcome to the big leagues, Rudy. And, stop your whining. You've been busted. Read More......

Open thread


Let's try these again. Read More......

MItt and Rudy fighting over who is being meanest


These Republicans are so thin-skinned. Rudy and Mitt are escalating their intra-GOP spat. Have at it, boys:
"I thought that that was Mayor Giuliani showing his nasty side," said Romney communications director Matt Rhoades. "And it was a personal attack of a personal nature, and the audience booed him."

Giuliani aide Bill Paxon, a former Republican congressman, said it was Romney who initiated the attack on Giuliani.

"Others have tried to misrepresent his record. And I think they learned that he doesn't take it when he's attacked. He's going to come back, he's going to tell the truth, he's going to lay it out," Paxon said.
Read More......

The Hate Crimes bill is now in jeopardy


Surprise surprise surprise. What surprises me is that it took this long for the Democrats to get cold feet.

As you may recall, the hate crimes bill (adding sexual orientation, gender identity, disability and gender to the already-existing federal hate crimes law) was added on to a defense bill in the Senate (Bush threatened a veto, thus the reason it was added on to a must-pass bill that Bush would be uncomfortable vetoing), it passed the House as a free-standing bill. Well, it appears that House Republicans are now balking at adding the hate crimes legislation on to the same defense bill in the House, which would pretty much guarantee it would make its way to the president's desk, then he'd have to veto a defense bill, which would be quite interesting. The House Republicans are up in arms about attaching a gay thing to a defense bill (surprise), and the Democrats, the conservative ones at least, are siding with the House Republicans (again, big surprise there). So let me ask the following question: At what point did we not think that the Republicans were going to squawk because this was added on to a defense bill? I mean, I'm all for adding it to must-pass legislation like the defense bill in order to try to short-circuit Bush's veto - in fact, it's a very smart strategy. But it was also painfully obvious months ago that the GOP would complain that we were "polluting" a defense bill. So why is everything heading south now, as if the GOP complaint, and conservative Dem defection, is suddenly some kind of surprise we weren't prepared for?

This is looking very much like the ENDA debacle where, suddenly, everyone was surprised that adding "gender identity" (e.g., transsexuals, cross dressers) was somehow a controversial notion. Like no one thought it might be controversial before the brouhaha?

And a final PS. The bill is already passed in the House as a free-standing bill, and it's already been passed as part of the defense bill in the Senate. That means that the real issue here is whether the Dems have the courage to keep the hate crimes provisions in the House-Senate conference report (i.e., after they reconcile the House and Senate versions of the defense bill). The Dems run the House and Senate, so if it drops from the conference report, it means that senior Dems agreed to drop it. Just remember that. Read More......

40% of guys in my age group are obese in America?


My God. I had no idea it was that bad. 40%? And the article in today's Washington Post makes it sound like a good thing - the numbers are trending downwards. Al Qaeda schmaeda, our biggest threat is ourselves. Read More......

Troubled UK bank under investigation for charity claims


Northern Rock, previously one of the leading mortgage providers in the UK, took a higher international profile recently after being the first big bank to be caught in the credit crunch. This triggered a run on the bank and massive government intervention to keep the bank in business. Besides being caught up in those banking problems, The Guardian is now reporting that the bank promoted a charity fund, though the charity in question was unaware of the relationship.
And at the heart of Granite's operations is a rather peculiar fact: on paper, at least, it had been set up to benefit charities, and in particular a small organisation for children with Down's Syndrome, and their families, which was being run from a semi-detached house on the outskirts of Newcastle.

Even more peculiar, perhaps, is the fact that nobody at Northern Rock bothered to tell the children's charity that it was a beneficiary, and the charity never received a penny from Granite.

For seven years, Down's Syndrome North East (DSNE) raised small sums of money as best it could. There was £125 from a man who cycled across the United States, children at a primary school in Middlesbrough chipped in £100, and the North East Ladies' Luncheon raised £750. And the whole time, the volunteers who kept the charity running were unaware that it was supposed to be the beneficiary of a trust which had raised £71bn on the international financial markets and which enjoyed a turnover of £1.8bn last year.

After the Guardian asked Northern Rock for an explanation, the bank apologised to DSNE for what it described as an "oversight" and promised the charity that it would receive a donation in the future. The bank then told the Guardian that the charity might receive a payment - but only if its trust was wound up.
The "charity trust" set up by the bank raised £71 billion (double that and add some for dollars) though it remains to be seen if any charities were aware of this. Read More......

Worst article of the campaign cycle


This piece on Obama is just mind-bogglingly awful. Essentially, this is the summary: "There are a bunch of vicious rumors online about Obama. Obama denies them, but some random people interviewed assume they're true. Because these random people think the smears might be true, we'll tell you all about the smears, but without saying that they're all false and malicious. Plus, if they are true, it might torpedo his candidacy!"

Seriously. It's like, "Random emails say Obama is a Muslim. He says he's not. But if he is, he's screwed!" It's absurd.

On a related note, for an excellent explanation of how these types of smear emails get started and stay influential, see Chris Hayes's recent Nation article. Read More......

Bush picks new Director of National Economic Council


Wait a minute here. He actually has an economic adviser working for him? Read More......

Thursday Morning Open Thread


That GOP YouTube debate was brutal. Not one of them should ever be President. But, it was so fun watching them all beat up on each other. Watch Huckabee become the next target of their attacks.

Get it going. Read More......

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

American Family Association still selling video promoting HIV+ "ex-gay" who since was accused of having gay unsafe-sex orgies


Note to our friends in the media: The religious right groups lie. Do not quote them unless they prove what they're telling you, because they lie. The American Family Association, one of the largest, and most extreme, religious right groups is selling a video promoting the notion that you can "cure" gays. The guy on the cover of the video? Michael Johnston, an HIV+ man who claimed he was "cured" of being gay, but then was accused by numerous witnesses of having unsafe sex with other men at gay orgies. (The religious right groups subsequently admitted that Johnston had fallen.) You'd think having unsafe gay orgy sex while HIV+ would be a deal-breaker for serving as a spokesman of the "I was cured of my homosexuality" movement. But not with this crowd. The American Family Association is still hocking Johnston's face right there on the cover of their video.

At least it's good to know that Larry Craig will have a place to go after he leaves the Senate. I mean, what's a little gay bathroom sex compared to this? Read More......

GOP Debate Open Thread


It's the YouTube Debate. This should be painful. John and I will be watching and liveblogging -- as much as we can stand anyway.

Oh no. The start is pitiful. Governor Charlie Crist looks quite fit and tanned after that introduction from another very nice fellow. How come Crist gets to give a sales pitch?

Well, it's 8:06 p.m. and still not a question.

Okay, finally at 8:09 p.m. a video and it's lame. The endless GOP candidate guitar song. What's the question? There wasn't one.

Of course, of course, the first question was about immigration. The GOPers love the immigrant bashing. Rudy is trying hard to be one of them. Mitt and Rudy are already going at it. This could be fun. Rudy slams Mitt's "sanctuary mansion."

8:20 P.M. Wow. Fred Thompson is really bad. This guy was considered a good actor? He's horrible. And, typical GOP crowd getting into the booing and heckling.

8:29 P.M. Geez, still talking about immigration?

8:33 P.M. McCain is right about one thing: GOPers are profligate spenders. Maybe when McCain is in the Senate, he can stop federal spending. Oh wait. He is in the Senate.

8:35 P.M. If John McCain were elected to the federal government he'd stop all the wasteful spending that he's been in charge of for decades. Oh yeah, and McCain thinks paying for children's health insurance is an example of "wasteful spending." Nice.

8:41 P.M. Nice back and forth between McCain and Ron Paul. Ron Paul wins.

8:43 P.M. Wait. The tax question is from Grover Norquist, a prominent D.C.-based GOP operative. That totally undermines the whole concept of the YouTube debate. As if Grover doesn't have enough access to the candidates. That's pathetic, CNN and YouTube. Pathetic.

8:44 P.M. Duncan Hunter said he'd vote for tax increases during the time of war. Um, Duncan, we ARE at war. He is a buffoon.

8:48 P.M. In a non-YouTube question, Rudy just blamed the police for trying to hide the tax-payer money spent for his extra-marital affair. That's low even for Rudy.

Finally, a commercial break. I've never been so happy for a t.v. ad. -- So close to a break and then, Anderson Cooper says no break because of Fred Thompson's stupid video.

This is truly painful.

They're back.

9:01 P.M. Rudy's getting tough questions about his very strong pro-gun control record. And, it was a very strong record despite what he's saying now.

9:14 P.M. What would Jesus do about the death penalty? Now that was a good question. None of the Republicans will actually give an answer to that question.

9:17 P.M. Do they believe every word of the Bible? Rudy doesn't. Although he did read it during the big crises in his life. Would that include those two divorces? Mitt seemed a little nervous, but he believes the Bible is the word of god. He doesn't disagree with the Bible. He squirmed. Huckabee (who offered to help Rudy with the answer) sure knows how to answer the question. But, he's been in the biz.

YEAH...another break after Mitt's stupid video. He gets "the big stuff done." Huh?

Ugh. Lost some of the post. Here's a recap since the last break:

The interaction between Mitt and McCain over torture was pretty good. Mitt was so out of his league. But, why did McCain compare the U.S. to Pol Pot and Communist China.

And, as for that question from the Muslim woman, as if any of the GOPers care what Muslims around the world think about us. And, note how they all turned it into a warmongering question.

Another break. This thing is brutal to watch. Brutal. Can you really imagine any of these guys being President? That's truly frightening.

Only 15 minutes left and CNN better end it on time.

9:50 P.M. The "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" question. Duncan Hunter agrees with Colin Powell. And Romney won't really answer the question. And, the questioner, a retired general, gets to really lay it out to the candidates. The audience doesn't like it. They're trying to shout down the general. Nothing like a good gay bashing from the gays.

9:57 P.M. Mars? Are they kidding? Okay, I'll admit it. Huckabee is scary. He gives good answers...even when he's being a typically insane GOPer. Meanwhile, Tancredo just looks insane cause he is.

Always the stupid question at the end. Rudy gets asked about the Yankees and Red Sox. He should have gotten the same question as Hillary at the last debate: Pearls or Diamonds? You know, for when he does drag.

Okay, it's finally over. I'd say this was Mike Huckabee's night. He gave great answers, held his own against the big dogs. Romney looked pathetic and often uncertain. He's clearly not good when he's not scripted. McCain had some moments, but overall just doesn't have it. Rudy was just too much of a smarty pants. This was a raucous gathering and they're all getting ugly with each other. Have at it. Read More......

Don't forget the AMERICAblog shop for your Christmas (and holiday) needs



I've just added two new calendars for 2008 - one is "Paris by Day" and the other is "Paris by Night." Both contain my photos of Paris, most of which (if not all) were taken over the past year. They're $19.99 each.

And we also have our ever-popular Treason's Greetings cards in Christmas red and Hannukah blue.

There's much more than that. You can check out the home page of the shop here, and have a ball. Of course, a portion of the proceeds goes to AMERICAblog. Read More......

For Rudy, "Security" was an excuse to have taxpayers pay for his affair


Rudy keeps promoting himself as the "security" candidate. Funny thing that "security" was the code word to cover up Rudy's taxpayer financed affair when he was Mayor. What a slimeball.

Ben Smith at The Politico has the goods -- and they are good:
As New York mayor, Rudy Giuliani billed obscure city agencies for tens of thousands of dollars in security expenses amassed during the time when he was beginning an extramarital relationship with future wife Judith Nathan in the Hamptons, according to previously undisclosed government records.

The documents, obtained by Politico under New York’s Freedom of Information Law, show that the mayoral costs had nothing to do with the functions of the little-known city offices that defrayed his tabs, including agencies responsible for regulating loft apartments, aiding the disabled and providing lawyers for indigent defendants.

At the time, the mayor’s office refused to explain the accounting to city auditors, citing “security.”

The Hamptons visits resulted in hotel, gas and other costs for Giuliani’s New York Police Department security detail.

Giuliani’s relationship with Nathan is old news now, and Giuliani regularly asks voters on the campaign trail to forgive his "mistakes."
Most Americans have a different definition of "security" than Rudy. Read More......

Going green delivers the greenbacks


Interesting news from this particular fund manager and there are certainly other similar success stories. GOP anti-environment knuckle-draggers can keep fighting this or join the future. Even Arnold gets it, though Inhofe and so many others in the GOP would rather the US keep propping up the old fashioned companies who insist on polluting and fighting the future. Supporting new businesses that will be employing Americans in the coming years is where the market is going.
Matt Patsky finds taking a fund green has been good not only for the environment but his investors as well.

The manager of Winslow Management's Winslow Green Growth Fund is up 11.2 percent year to date, and 22.5 percent over the last five years.
Read More......

BREAKING: State Department official Iraq update is really compilation of plagiarized major media articles


Kind of pathetic when the official report from the US State Department on what's "really" happening in Iraq is actually just a bunch of plagiarized paragraphs from the major media in the US. To wit, the following analysis an anonymous friend just sent me. I just checked it out and he's right. State outright plagiarized much of the major media in making its "report." And what's really funny, they even stole a number of paragraphs from a New York Times article when, as I recall, the NYT is the newspaper that George Bush refuses to read because it supposedly has such a "liberal bias." Here's my friend's report:
This is last week’s “Iraq Weekly Status Report” from the State Department.

It’s described thusly: “This comprehensive status report on Iraq provides weekly updates in the eight key areas identified as pillars of U.S. Government policy.”

Scroll through and it looks kind of impressive, lots of information -- good job keeping on top of the game State Department! But scroll to the bottom and it lists the sources for the information. Now it woulda been nice if they included some footnotes in the body of the document to indicate they were including outside information, but as it turns out the entire thing is basically plagiarized word for word from those news articles, with the slightest of adjustments so as to maybe give the impression it’s in their own words. Drop this code below in a post to see what I mean, pretty pathetic that the US State Department would send this out as their official “Status Report” on the preeminent foreign policy clusterfuck of our generation, and plays right into Dowd’s point about Condi being lost in the funhouse and learning everything from the news.

1. Washington Post, 11/15/07:
Senior military commanders here now portray the intransigence of Iraq's Shiite-dominated government as the key threat facing the U.S. effort in Iraq, rather than al-Qaeda terrorists, Sunni insurgents or Iranian-backed militias. In more than a dozen interviews, U.S. military officials expressed growing concern over the Iraqi government's failure to capitalize on sharp declines in attacks against U.S. troops and Iraqi civilians. A window of opportunity has opened for the government to reach out to its former foes, said Army Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno, the commander of day-to-day U.S. military operations in Iraq, but "it's unclear how long that window is going to be open."
State Dept Iraq Weekly Status Report, 11/21/07 (page 9):
Senior military commanders now portray the intransigence of Iraq's Shiite-dominated government as the key threat facing the U.S. effort in Iraq, rather than al-Qaida terrorists, Sunni insurgents or Iranian-backed militias. Several U.S. military officials have expressed growing concern over the Iraqi government's failure to capitalize on sharp declines in attacks against U.S. troops and Iraqi civilians. A window of opportunity has opened for the government to reach out to its former foes, said Army Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno, the commander of day-to-day U.S. military operations in Iraq, but "it's unclear how long that window is going to be open."
2. AP, 11/14/07:
The Iraqi government seized the west Baghdad headquarters of a powerful Sunni Muslim group today, cordoning off the building and accusing the group of supporting al-Qaida, officials said. The Association of Muslim Scholars, a hardline Sunni clerics group with links to insurgents, has its headquarters in the Um al-Qura mosque in the capital's Sunni-dominated Ghazaliyhah neighborhood.
State Dept Iraq Weekly Status Report, 11/21/07 (page 3,9):
The Iraqi government seized the west Baghdad headquarters of a powerful Muslim group November 14, cordoning off the building and accusing the supporting al-Qaida, officials said. The Association of Muslim Scholars, Sunni clerics group with links to insurgents, has its headquarters in the mosque in the capital's Sunni-dominated Ghazaliyhah neighborhood.
3. UPI, 11/19/07:
The United Nations announced it will help the Iraqi government with the increasing number of refugees returning to their homes. In a statement, Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Iraq Staffan de Mistura said the assistance is a result of a request by the Iraqi Ministry of Displacement and Migration. As there are indications that both refugees and (internally displaced people) are starting to return back to their homes, we stand behind the Iraqi government in ensuring that this initial positive return is properly assisted and implemented," Mistura said. Aid and relief agencies estimate 2 million people fled the country since the March 2003 U.S.-led invasion and subsequent sectarian fighting, while another 2.3 million left their homes for other parts of Iraq. The assistance will include technical advice, developing monitoring and data-gathering tools and providing capacity-building support to the ministry, a U.N. statement said.
State Dept Iraq Weekly Status Report, 11/21/07 (page 4, 26):
UN Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Iraq Staffan de Mistura announced the UN will help the GOI with the increasing number of refugees returning to their homes. The assistance will include technical advice, developing monitoring and data-gathering tools and providing capacity-building support to the ministry, a U.N. statement said.
4. Voices of Iraq, 11/18/07:
The Iraqi Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) called on the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) to better assist journalists in their work and grant them any permission necessary for the fulfillment of their mission.
State Dept Iraq Weekly Status Report, 11/21/07 (page 4, 29):
Strengthen Public Understanding Insurgents
The Iraqi Committee to Protect Journalists called on the Kurdistan Regional Government to better assist journalists in their work and grant them any permission necessary for the fulfillment of their mission.
5.UPI, 11/16/07:
Oil companies are welcome to Iraq, Oil Minister Hussain al-Shahristani said, except for the "opportunist" firms already in Iraqi Kurd territory. Iraq is moving toward signing a batch of oil deals, with or without a national oil law, as it attempts to pick up production of the world's third-largest oil reserves. "All the major oil companies ... are very interested for obvious reasons to come work in Iraq and with the improved security conditions they've been approaching us and indicating their keen interest," Shahristani told reporters on the sidelines of an OPEC summit in Riyadh. "We have always told them that they are most welcome to come work in Iraq with us and we don't necessarily need a new hydrocarbon law to do that. "We have our prevailing laws that allow the minister of oil in Iraq to sign any kind of contract; of course it has to be presented to the Parliament depending on the kind of contract," Shahristani said. "We have already started talking to a few major oil companies who are interested in the super giant fields in the south which are already producing. We are producing oil from there but there are new technologies, they have been working and studying these fields. We'll find a way to cooperate to enhance production from these fields and make more oil available to the world market." While Baghdad has only recently said it would soon sign oil deals, based on a Saddam Hussein-era oil law, the Kurdistan Regional Government passed its own oil law in August and since then has signed 14 oil deals with smaller international oil companies.
State Dept Iraq Weekly Status Report, 11/21/07 (page 13):
Speaking about international investment opportunities, Shahristani said all companies, except for the “opportunist” firms already in Iraqi Kurd territory, are welcome to invest in Iraq. Iraq is moving toward signing a batch of oil deals, with or without a national oil law, as it attempts to pick up production of the world’s third-largest oil reserves. While Baghdad has only recently said it would sign oil deals based on a Saddam Hussein-era oil law, the Kurdistan Regional Government passed its own oil law and has signed 14 oil deals with smaller international oil companies.
6. New York Times, 11/16/07:
Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki of Iraq has approved the trial of two Shiite former officials who are accused of killing and kidnapping hundreds of Sunnis, according to American advisers to the Iraqi judicial system.

The case, which could come to trial as early as this month, would be the first that involved bringing to trial such high-ranking Shiites for sectarian crimes.

An Iraqi judge ruled last month that there was sufficient evidence to try the two former officials, who held senior positions in the Health Ministry. But there had been concern that the ministry might try to block the case by invoking a section of the Iraqi criminal law that proscribes the prosecution of officials who are executing their official duties.

The approval to hold a trial was provided in a memo issued earlier this week by the acting health minister. Mr. Maliki has formally endorsed the decision, American officials said.
State Dept Iraq Weekly Status Report, 11/21/07 (page 4, 25):
According to American advisers to the Iraqi judicial system, Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has approved the trial of two former Shiite officials who are accused of killing and kidnapping hundreds of Sunnis.

o The case, which could come to trial as early as this month, would be the first that involved bringing to trial such high-ranking Shiites for sectarian crimes.

o An Iraqi judge ruled last month that there was sufficient evidence to try the two former officials, who held senior positions in the Ministry of Health (MoH), but there had been concern that the MoH might try to block the case by invoking a section of the Iraqi criminal law that proscribes the prosecution of officials who are executing their official duties.

o The approval to hold a trial was provided in a memo issued earlier this week by the acting minister in the MoH. PM Maliki has formally endorsed the decision.
Read More......

Global warming negatively impacting the poor


It's difficult to lift yourself up with your bootstraps if you don't have any bootstraps or they're under water. As an American or European it's hard to understand or imagine what it's like to live on under $2 per day though millions upon millions in world do precisely that. When I look at the billions blown on Wall Street or the black hole of spending in Iraq, I wonder why it's so difficult for wealthy nations to step up and help those who are in need, at home or abroad. The people that I've met in poor communities work just as hard as anyone else, but are often stuck due to circumstances well beyond their control.
Without the money, the panel found, a warmer world "could stall and then reverse human development" in the countries where 2.6 billion people live on $2 a day or less.

Scientists have reported that temperatures rose an average 1.3 degrees Fahrenheit over the past 100 years, bringing the prospect of a century of extreme weather, rising seas, widening drought and disease and harm to fisheries, forests and farmland.

According to development officials, the unfortunate consequences include women and young girls walking further to collect water in the Horn of Africa, people erecting bamboo flood shelters on stilts in the delta of the Ganges River, and others planting mangroves to protect themselves against storm surges in the delta of the Mekong River.

"These impacts ... go unnoticed in financial markets and in the measurement of world gross domestic product (GDP)," the panel's report said. "But increased exposure to drought, to more intense storms, to floods and environmental stress is holding back the efforts of the world's poor to build a better life for themselves and their children."
Read More......

TIME magazine's laughable "correction"


As Markos notes, the media will simply repeat whatever the Republicans tell them, no matter how absurd, now matter how offensive. But when the Democrats rail about a real issue, more often than not the media is nowhere to be seen because, you know, the Democrats are "just playing politics." But the Republicans talk about how Democrats quite literally want to make America safer for Al Qaeda and TIME magazine thinks that's news. Not to mention, TIME actually believes that the Republicans believe what they're saying. This is simply a standard Republican talking point - that Democrats hate America. Republicans don't actually believe what they're saying (the very definition of playing politics). The only people who believe what the Republicans say are TIME magazine and the rest of the media that's been ref-played into submission by the GOP. Remember when the media used to actually look at an issue and report the objective unvarnished truth? Now they're no better than White House hooker Jeff Gannon. And at least Gannon got paid when he got F'd by a Republican. Read More......

Marriott bans AMERICAblog in Chicago too


You'll recall that yesterday we found out that a Marriott hotel in New Jersey was banning AMERICAblog from its business center computers because our site has used the word "lesbian" in our reporting on gay issues. I just got from the following note from a reader alleging that we're banned in other Marriott hotels as well:
John, I stay at the Marriott Fairfield Inn, downtown Chicago and the Marriott Courtyard Inn downtown Chicago about once a month. They always have Americablog blocked. I was in Concord N.H. last month at a Hampton Inn, and they had Americablog blocked as well, I believe they are part of the Hilton network of hotels. Just thought you would wan't to know.
This is the kind of issue GLAAD and the Human Rights Campaign should be jumping on. It's not just about AMERICAblog, it's about every Web site on the Internet that ever mentions gays and lesbians. The religious right understands these kind of issues, how they are so much more important than just the single incident. Hopefully our side does as well. Read More......

Romney has just made his Mormon faith fair game


TPM Election Central reports that this week wasn't the first time GOP presidential candidate, and serial flip-flopper, Mitt Romney said that he wouldn't permit Muslims to be appointed to the presidential cabinet because of their religion. I'll be writing more on this later, but suffice it to say that Mr. Romney has now made his own belief in Mormonism fair game. If we are to look at Muslims' religious beliefs before placing them in the presidential cabinet, then why not look at a Mormon's beliefs before placing him in the Oval Office? Especially when that Mormon is running as a religious (right) candidate, someone who is promising to inject his religion into our politics. And he calls Muslim's radical. To paraphrase an argument so popular on the original-intent right, "Did the Founding Fathers really intend to hand the scepter of power to a Mormon?" Romney can't have it both ways. Either religion in politics matters or it doesn't. Romney says it does matter, but only when someone else's religion is the subject of scrutiny. His religion only matters when he intends to jam it down our throats after he's elected. Then again, both ways is the way Romney lies it best. First pro-gay, then anti-gay. First pro-gun, then anti-gun. First pro-choice, then pro-life. And now he's flip-flopping on whether the religion of a nominee is a relevant factor in their employment.

Actually, I'm less worried about Romney's religion than I am the growing sense that the man has no substance beyond his hair gel. Read More......

Just like most of us, Condi learns about major international news from the t.v. She is clueless.


Okay, I'll admit it. I often get my news from reading the crawl on the t.v. while I'm working out. But, I'm not the Secretary of State during major international crises, including a war I helped start. But, in fact, your Secretary of State also gets news about major world developments from the t.v. while she's working out. And, bad news does not interfere with her exercise regimen.

Just in case anyone still wonders why U.S. foreign policy is such a disaster, this passage in Maureen Dowd's column is illustrative:
In 2006, when Israel invaded Lebanon and many civilians died, including children, Condi and W. drew Arab and U.N. ire for not forcing Ehud Olmert to broker a cease-fire faster.

That same year, in another instance of spectacular willful ignorance, she was blindsided by the Hamas win in the Palestinian elections.

As she described it to Bumiller, she went upstairs at 5 a.m. the morning after the Palestinian elections in 2006 to the gym in her Watergate apartment to exercise on her elliptical machine. She saw the news crawl reporting the Hamas victory.

“I thought, ‘Well, that’s not right,’ ” she said. She kept exercising for awhile but finally got off the elliptical trainer and called the State Department. “I said, ‘What happened in the Palestinian elections?’ and they said, ‘Oh, Hamas won.’ And I thought, ‘Oh, my goodness! Hamas won?’ ”

When she couldn’t reach the State Department official on the ground in the Palestinian territories, she did what any loyal Bushie would do: She got back on the elliptical.

“I thought, might as well finish exercising,” Rice told Bumiller. “It’s going to be a really long day.” It was one of the few times she was prescient on the Middle East.
Wow. Read More......

Wednesday Morning Open Thread


Good morning.

You're probably all relieved to know that Dick Cheney is back at work after his most recent heart incident. That means he's back at work trying to instigate a war with Iran. Time is running out.

What else is going on? Read More......

New Australian government makes another positive move


Julia Gillard will become the first female Deputy Prime Minister in Australia. Read More......

Wells Fargo joins the billion dollar write-down club


What a sorry state of affairs. Nice computer models in this industry, huh? I still find it hard to believe that all of these companies both in the US and Europe, could all have such pie-in-the-sky forecasting in their systems. Are they honestly saying that nobody out there in the industry could foresee the crash? Many in the Pentagon predicted the sloppy mess in Iraq, so I find it hard to believe the financial industry missed this one.
Wells Fargo & Co (WFC.N), the second-largest U.S. mortgage lender, said on Tuesday it would take a $1.4 billion fourth-quarter charge largely related to losses on home equity loans as the nation's housing market deteriorates.

The company, which is also the fifth-largest U.S. bank, said it also was significantly scaling back making home equity loans through brokers, citing a need to tighten lending standards and reduced demand from investors to buy the loans.
The industry certainly is cyclical though the depth of the losses are something that did not have to happen so what went wrong and why? The obvious first thought is that too many people made too much money from fluff instead of real business. What is more troubling is that people such as Greenspan should have stepped in and raised a few flags but he too was caught up in the excitement. Perhaps he was excited about heading into retirement with a hot economy? I don't know, but this costly debacle will be a drag on the economy and on individuals for a while. We deserve much more from our government than this. Much more. Read More......

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

Open thread


Happy birthday to me.... Just got back from a nice bday dinner of a bacon cheeseburger, onion rings, and a warm brownie with ice cream. And who says America doesn't have cuisine. :-) Read More......

Is this ad campaign appropriate or inappropriate?


I'm divided. And the link probably isn't worksafe, or it's borderline at least. More from the Stranger. Read More......

Airport security scenes that don't instill confidence




The problem wasn't that the women running the x-ray at O'Hare wasn't paying attention - in fact, she was doing a very good job. The problem was that the poor woman was having to hold up a plastic tray to block the sun from hitting her monitor, lest it apparently wash out the evidence of any bombs, guns, or other off-limits materials that potential terrorists might try to sneak on board a plane. It just kind of creeped me out that with all the money we've spent on Homeland Security (a department that is in serious need of a name change when the Democratic president takes over) simple sunlight could cause such problems, and that the woman was forced to use a make-shift solution that was probably tiring her arm out after a few minutes and thus making her less attentive to the monitor (what, O'Hare couldn't get a maintenance person to put some paper over the window?) Hopefully shining a little sunlight on the situation will get the folks at Homeland Security to pay a little attention next time. Read More......

Home prices drop record amount


Republican economics at work.
Prices of existing U.S. single-family homes in the third quarter slumped 4.5 percent from a year earlier, matching a record decline from the previous period as the housing downturn deepened, according to a national home price index on Tuesday.

The S&P;/Case-Shiller National Home Price Index fell 1.7 percent from June, marking the largest quarterly decline in the index's 21-year history, S&P; said in a statement.
Read More......

Romney: Muslims need not apply in his government


This is classic "Romney the hypocrite" in action. Religion for Mitt only matters when it's someone else's religion. He doesn't think it's important to include a Muslim in his administration because they just don't amount to any significant population in the US. While their population is admittedly small, how can any serious presidential candidate not find such inclusion a positive idea considering where we are today? Is it really that horrible that we - gasp! - include a representative who can broaden our horizons and provide feedback on reaching out to this community both at home and abroad?
I asked Mr. Romney whether he would consider including qualified Americans of the Islamic faith in his cabinet as advisers on national security matters, given his position that "jihadism" is the principal foreign policy threat facing America today. He answered, "…based on the numbers of American Muslims [as a percentage] in our population, I cannot see that a cabinet position would be justified. But of course, I would imagine that Muslims could serve at lower levels of my administration."

Romney, whose Mormon faith has become the subject of heated debate in Republican caucuses, wants America to be blind to his religious beliefs and judge him on merit instead. Yet he seems to accept excluding Muslims because of their religion, claiming they're too much of a minority for a post in high-level policymaking. More ironic, that Islamic heritage is what qualifies them to best engage America's Arab and Muslim communities and to help deter Islamist threats.
Well, as long as they can carry Mitt's bags or perhaps sweep a floor or two. This is all quite interesting coming from a guy who belongs to a faith that barely represents 2% of the population, compared to the 1% in America who are Muslims. Are we really doing that well with our existing Muslim outreach programs that we can afford to exclude Muslims from senior positions in the next administration? Yes, he's the guy who cries "foul" when anyone discusses his Mormon faith (that he can't stop talking about) but he doesn't mind making a bigoted remark about Muslims. During our so-called war on terror, no less. How insulting, careless and downright offensive. Read More......

Questions raised about Zogby poll on Hillary's chances


Yesterday we reported that Zogby had a new poll showing Hillary losing to all of the major Republican presidential candidates. Since that time, there's been a lot of discussion as to whether Zogby's poll was a valid poll. Apparently, Zogby's polled people who opted in to a "please poll me" email list that he runs. Normally polls are done with random voters from around the country, not people who opt in to an email list. For starters, I'd be concerned that known partisans would opt-in to this list with the intent of totally skewing its results - i.e., it might not be a representative cross-section of random voters. Pollster.com has far more about the poll and its problems. Read More......

Hillary tied with Obama in Iowa; Romney and Huckabee neck and neck


From Political Wire:
Political Wire got an advance look at a new Strategic Vision poll in Iowa that shows Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama tied in the Democratic presidential race at 29%, with John Edwards trailing at 23%.

On the Republican side it shows, Mitt Romney barely leading with 26%, followed closely by Mike Huckabee at 24%, Rudy Giuliani at 14%, Fred Thompson at 10% and Sen. John McCain at 7%.
Read More......

Bush forgives Gore


Bush forgives Gore for Bush stealing the 2000 election. What a mensch. From the NYT:
Mr. Bush made no comment when the Nobel was announced, and today, the two stood silently, and a bit awkwardly, during the photo opportunity.

But the president did personally telephone Mr. Gore to extend the invitation, and the White House changed the date of the event so Mr. Gore could attend. Mr. Bush’s press secretary, Dana Perino, told reporters the president is willing to let bygones be bygones.

“This president does not harbor any resentments,” she said. “He never has.”
(Hat tip to Riki.) Read More......

Edwards: Repeal Don't Ask Don't Tell


The Human Rights Campaign is asking the candidates to clarify what they will do to repeal Don't Ask Don't Tell if elected president. John Edwards is the first up.

UPDATE: Senator Dodd agrees. Read More......

Annapolis gathering


I haven't said much about next week's Middle East meetings because, well, it certainly looks like it will just be a huge photo op. There doesn't seem to have been any significant diplomacy in preparation, and there are 46 countries and international organizations coming. But hey, don't take my word for it, apparently the Bush administration doesn't see it as particularly important either:
In fact, Mr. Bush and his aides still deplore what they view as President Clinton’s disastrously hands-on involvement in the peace process in 2000. And they insist that Mr. Bush does not intend to negotiate personally the two-state peace he has pronounced as his vision . . . For all the pomp of the Annapolis gathering, the White House is not calling it a summit meeting or anything else suggestive of substantive progress. Mr. Bush’s vision is ambitious, but his strategy is cautious — he may be repeating Mr. Clinton’s role, yet he rejects what he sees as the meddlesome quality of it.
To call this "repeating" the role that President Clinton played is hyperbole, to say the least -- while people can (and do) argue over particular Clintonian successes and failures, by all accounts he really, really knew his stuff when it came to Israel/Palestine issues. Down to the neighborhoods in Jerusalem, locations of settlements, etc. Somehow I don't think Bush has quite the same command of the details.

In any case, though, there's no real goal to the conference, the administration has ignored the issue for seven years, and it refuses to put any pressure on Israel, so it's not like anybody has high hopes. On the other hand, one *can* hope that it goes well, because as with most diplomacy, baby steps are needed at the beginning. Perhaps this can set the stage for further movement in the coming years, especially if a Democrat takes office in 2009 (anybody want to guess who might be names Special Envoy to the Middle East in a Clinton administration?).

Finally, kudos to the Times for including this paragraph:
Mr. Bush’s aides often point out that in 2002 he was the first American president to declare support for a Palestinian state. That is true, but they fail to mention that he did so while refusing to negotiate with Yasir Arafat, then the Palestinian leader, effectively endorsing a deadly stalemate.
Far too often, that kind of ridiculous administration claim is allowed to pass without context of, y'know, the facts. Nice to have them in this instance. Read More......

GOP's 2008 prospects getting uglier by the day


Remember all the talk about George Bush and Karl Rove making Republicans the dominant party for the foreseeable future? Remember how the punditry gobbled that up? Remember that? Yup. Not exactly:
Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott's resignation announcement on Monday was the latest in a wave of retirements to hit congressional Republicans, making an already difficult 2008 electoral landscape even more complicated for the minority party.

Party officials insist that the retirements -- 17 members of the House and six senators -- are simply the result of individual decisions and not indicative of a broader negative sentiment within the party. "I don't hear a drumbeat that 'We're not effective and I don't like it here anymore,' " said National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman Tom Cole (Okla.).

But with so many lawmakers -- including a large number from competitive states and districts -- heading for the exits, it's hard not to point to the GOP's newfound minority status in Washington, the turnover in party leadership and the perilous political environment heading into 2008 to explain the exodus.
Read More......

Tuesday Morning Open Thread


Lots going on. The Mideast summit starts today. The campaigns in Iowa and New Hampshire are really heating up. Oh, and Dick Cheney is fine. Just fine. His staff said so. They won't tell the media what medication Cheney takes. But, he's fine. Just believe them.

Get it started. Read More......

Riots return to France


This comes as no surprise. After the 2005 riots there was the usual talk though nothing really changed. On the left, there has been a stubbornness to take any useful action because in the eyes of many (especially the traditional, white elite men who never share power) the French constitution provides equality so to even suggest otherwise or treat any disadvantaged group differently, would go against the constitution. On the right there have been numerous inflammatory public comments that have offered nothing to help bridge the gap.

With such positions it's hard to make any progress on this ongoing problem. Sarkozy used to talk about affirmative action plans and perhaps that will receive renewed interest. In France, affirmative action is considered to be an idea of the right, not the left. It's interesting to see how there is such a different interpretation on this issue. Somehow I doubt the pro-Sarko crowd in America would be in agreement with him. Regardless, something needs to change if France is ever going to start moving on with this problem. It's not going to disappear by throwing police at the problem.

UPDATE: CNN has a video discussion with a local reporter that is worth watching. Read More......

Recent Archives