Tuesday, August 03, 2010

Solar flare plasma could bring 'dancing 'curtains' of green and red light'


Okay, this sounds really cool. It's a solar tsunami. And, yes, it's a little geeky, but the bottom line is that there should be celestial show tonight over the nothern U.S. and Canada. From NASA:
On August 1st around 0855 UT, Earth orbiting satellites detected a C3-class solar flare. The origin of the blast was Earth-facing sunspot 1092. C-class solar flares are small (when compared to X and M-class flares) and usually have few noticeable consequences here on Earth besides aurorae. This one has spawned a coronal mass ejection heading in Earth's direction.

Coronal mass ejections (or CMEs) are large clouds of charged particles that are ejected from the Sun over the course of several hours and can carry up to ten billion tons (1016 grams) of plasma. They expand away from the Sun at speeds as high as a million miles an hour. A CME can make the 93-million-mile journey to Earth in just three to four days.

When a coronal mass ejection reaches Earth, it interacts with our planet’s magnetic field, potentially creating a geomagnetic storm. Solar particles stream down the field lines toward Earth’s poles and collide with atoms of nitrogen and oxygen in the atmosphere, resulting in spectacular auroral displays. On the evening of August 3rd/4th, skywatchers in the northern U.S. and other countries should look toward the north for the rippling dancing “curtains” of green and red light.
This is what a CME looks like:

More from the Winnipeg Free Press:
Those events happen fairly often on the sun, but it's rarer for them to be directed at the Earth, said astrophysicist Leon Golub. The light show could be visible around 2 a.m. Wednesday and last 24 hours — but the emphasis should be on the word "could," he said.

Golub, speaking from Cambridge, Mass., said viewing chances in the U.S. are probably limited to the northern states. But Welch said in Canada it may be possible to see them "any place where it's dark."

People in big cities likely won't be able to see anything, and still the best locations for viewing the northern lights will be farther north, Golub said. But it's not every day that southern Canadians can see the lights.
Read More......

Demand for shark fin soup in Asia has been blamed for the illegal killing of nearly 300,000 sharks off Brazil


Nasty if true. From the BBC:
The Environmental Justice Institute in Brazil has accused a seafood exporter (Siglo do Brasil Comercio) of illegally killing nearly 300,000 sharks.

It is suing for what it says is massive damage to the marine ecosystem.

It alleges that many of the sharks were thrown back into the sea after their fins were taken for clandestine export.
Read More......

Gingrich says no mosques near Ground Zero until Saudi Arabia has some churches and synagogues


Um, when did Saudi Arabia come into this? And how does Muslims trying to build a mosque in America have anything to do with the ridiculous lack of any freedom in Saudi Arabia? So Gingrich is now going to interpret the Constitution, and America's overall freedoms, based on the lowest common denominator of "what would Saudi jesus do?" They don't let women drive over there either, so should we yank Muslim-Americans' drivers' licenses, Newt? That'll show em.

He really is a bright man, but sometimes he really panders to the stupid when he's desperate for attention. More from Richard Cohen at the Post. (I swear I wrote that part about yanking driver's licenses before reading Cohen's piece.) Read More......

Countdown: Target moves into Mr Robert's neighborhood


Mr. Robert's neighborhood just got a new resident. The store chain Target (Targét as was) decided to flex its corporate muscle by throwing $150,000 at the 2010 Minnesota race, via the ironically named "MN Forward", a creature of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce (h/t Steve Perry).

MN Forward is a big supporter of Republican Tom Emmer in the governor's race. Keith Olbermann has the story. (I'm not sure why this segment is only available on YouTube, but the Countdown site appears not to have it.)



Target hits all the ... targets ... with this little bon-bon. A rich chocolate coating of Citizens United, testing just how to control elections with corp funding; with a tangy anti-gay crunch hidden in the middle.

Emmer is also anti-tax, anti-union, anti-minimum wage, anti-abortion, anti-contraception, pro-"pharmacy conscience" . . . and pro-"more rights for DUI arrestees" (yep, he's got two convictions for DUI-related offenses). A real forward-looking guy for MN Forward* to support.

What's Target's defense? As quoted in the show, they only "seek to advance policies in line with our business objectives." (They might as well have said: "Don't blame me; I only want money.")

Quoting pro-gay activist Randi Reitan, "My son is gay, and I love him more than anything I could buy at Target." Thank you for saying it out loud, Ms. Reitan — in the world of actual humans, it's people before things, always.

Note what Christina Bellantoni says, that MN Forward is spooked by the negative publicity. Action, folks.

Action opportunity: Both major DFL party candidates are running 40% to Emmer's 35% in the latest Rasmussen poll. Those candidates are former Senator Mark Dayton and state House Speaker Margaret Anderson Kelliher — and the primary is set for August 10. If you're a Minnesotan, pick one and vote; and then get active in the general election. Emmer's a real troglodyte.

GP

*MN Forward — A prime example of the 180 Tell (whatever they say about themselves is always 180-degrees wrong). If the group were correctly named, they'd be "MN Backward". Read More......

Beautiful vintage gay photos


This site has collected a ton of old gay photos (and some that might just be friendly foreigners, hard to say). They're very cool. (H/t to GayTwogether.com, some of the pics come from there as well.)



Read More......

7-year-old's art sells for over $200k




It really is quite good. From ABC:
A child's art is often displayed prominently on the family fridge, but one English boy has far surpassed that standard, recently exhibiting and selling his collection of paintings for more than $200,000.

Seven-year-old Kieron Williamson of Norfolk, U.K., known in the British media as "Mini Monet," has impressionist style and impressive impact: All 33 works in his latest collection sold in 27 minutes, earning $236,850.

People from as far away as South Africa, Arizona and New Jersey showed up at the Picturecraft Art Gallery to purchase the prodigy's prized work. Many camped outside the gallery for two days awaiting the 9 o'clock sale, gallery owner Adrian Hill said.
You can see some of his works here.

Read More......

Scientists concur, BP largest accidental oil spill in history


From the Guardian:
Nearly 5m barrels of oil have gushed into the ocean since the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded and sank in April, according to federal scientists. That makes the spill larger than the 3.3m barrels released into Mexico's Bay of Campeche when the Ixtoc I oil rig suffered a catastrophic blowout in 1979.
The new estimate of the size of the spill – of a total of 4.9m barrels – means the potential penalty that BP faces under US law has ballooned. Under the Clean Water Act, BP faces a fine of $1,100 (£691) a barrel, or $4,300 a barrel if it is found that the spill was the result of gross negligence. As a result, BP could be fined either $5.4bn or $21bn. The federal team reckon BP's own containment efforts saved about 800,000 barrels which could be taken into account as a mitigating factor, reducing the fine to either $4.5bn or $17.6bn.
Read More......

When Paul Krugman used Monty Python to rebut Tim Geithner


The Secretary of the Treasury, Tim Geithner, penned an op-ed in today's New York Times titled, Welcome to the Recovery.

Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman has a rebuttal on his blog. And, it begins with this video:

And, includes this analysis:
Here’s the reality: the stimulus was too small; we’re not seeing growth at a pace that will bring unemployment down rapidly, if at all; we clearly should be doing more; but obstructionism from Republicans is preventing action. And the administration knows all this perfectly well.

So one way to play this politically would be to tell the truth, and try to place the onus on Republicans, accusing them of perpetuating high unemployment.

Instead, however, the administration has decided to engage in happy talk, saying that it’s all good.
It's not all good. Geithner does admit that in his op-ed. Americans aren't feeling happy these days.

If the recovery is here, that's great. It's overdue. But, if it's not (and it's not for millions of Americans), "happy talk" isn't going to convince people. Tough talk with GOPers who are blocking economic progress would work better. The American people want to know the President is on their side and will fight anyone who blocks progress. Read More......

FBI threatens Wikipedia over display of FBI logo


The best part of the article is how the NYT publishes the FBI logo alongside the story! A wee bit of editorial content slipping into the news? :-) So can the NYT get in trouble, and can we?

Read More......

SEC looking at BP for insider trading


From Reuters:
U.S. securities regulators are investigating whether people may have illegally profited from trading on nonpublic information at BP Plc in the weeks and months following the disastrous Gulf of Mexico oil spill, two sources familiar with the investigation said on Monday.
Gonna be hard to photoshop this one away. Read More......

GOP Senator Ensign, under criminal investigation over affair with staffer, may try to block DADT repeal


Ensign, who is facing a criminal investigation over an affair he had with a staffer, is opposed to passing the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" compromise because he thinks it "repeals" DADT before the military's study is done. He's a bit of an idiot in addition to a philanderer. The legislation does not repeal DADT at all. It only permits DADT to be repealed once the study is done - the legislation says that, explicitly. So to oppose the legislation because somehow it would repeal DADT before the study is done, when the legislation specifically says the study has to happen first, makes Ensign either a liar, or an idiot. More from Joe over at AMERICAblog Gay. Read More......

Sharron Angle: Press should 'ask the questions we want to answer'


Read More......

Abe Foxman at the ADL responds to charges of bigotry surrounding Muslim cultural center near Ground Zero


As we wrote the other day, the ADL joined those calling for an Islamic cultural center not to be built a few blocks away from the former site of the World Trade Center in NYC. While I suspect much of the opposition to the center is based in anti-Muslim bigotry, the ADL claims that its opposition was based solely on concerns that the cultural center might upset some of the families of those who died on September 11.

Here is what the ADL is now saying, and it's an interesting argument at first blush:
However, we also must take into consideration the feelings of the families who lost loved ones at Ground Zero.

The lessons of an earlier and different controversy echo in this one. In 1993, Pope John Paul II asked 14 Carmelite Nuns to move their convent from just outside the Auschwitz death camp. The establishment of the convent near Auschwitz had stirred dismay among Jewish groups and survivors who felt that the location was an affront and a terrible disservice to the memory of millions of Jews who died at the hands of the Nazis in the Holocaust.

Just as we thought then that well-meaning efforts by Carmelite nuns to build a Catholic structure were insensitive and counterproductive to reconciliation, so too we believe it will be with building a mosque so close to Ground Zero.
Of course, the ultimate irony in the ADL invoking the Holocaust to justify its position on an issue that doesn't involve the Holocaust at all, is that the ADL would be the first organization to eviscerate any of us who dared invoke the Holocaust to explain anything that didn't directly deal with the Holocaust. And I quote the ADL's own head, Abe Foxman:
No matter how odious, bigoted, biased and unconstitutional Arizona’s new law may be, let’s be clear that there is no comparison between the situation facing immigrants, legal or illegal, in Arizona and what happened in the Holocaust....
Can the same not be said of September 11?

Putting that bit of situational ethics aside for a moment, there is the story of the nuns to deal with. Is it the same thing for Muslims to build an Islamic cultural center a few blocks from Ground Zero, as it is for Catholic nuns to build a convent outside Auschwitz?

First thing, a couple blocks from Ground Zero is the heart of New York City. Right outside the Auschwitz gates is not a comparable urban center where you'd expect much new construction. There'd have probably been almost as much outrage if they tried to build a McDonald's just outside the Auschwitz gates - not true of building a McDonald's a couple of blocks from Ground Zero, I suspect.

Second, there's the role of the Catholic church in WWII, a shady one at best, versus the role of the Muslim faith in September 11. There really isn't a Muslim pope, so the Muslim high command wasn't exactly colluding with the terrorists who took down the WTC in the same way many fear the Catholic church colluded with the Nazis.

Of course, there's more to the story of the nuns at Auschwitz. Funny that the ADL didn't tell us the rest of the story. It seems that the nuns didn't build a convent NEAR Auschwitz, they built a convent IN Auschwitz. This would be akin to the Muslim Cultural Center being built in the remains of the World Trade Center - perhaps a tad more culturally sensitive than a few blocks away. From the NYT:
The presence of the nuns, who live in a convent converted from a two-story building used by the Nazis as a storehouse for the deadly Zyklon B gas, has been an impediment to improved relations between Roman Catholics and Jews in Poland and elsewhere.

Many Jews view the red brick convent just outside the barbed wire perimeter at Auschwitz, where some 1.5 million Jews perished, as an affront to Jewish sensibilities. The World Jewish Congress threatened earlier this year to boycott the ceremonies planned for Monday to mark the ghetto uprising unless the issue of the Carmelite nuns was resolved.
The nuns also put up religious symbols IN Auschwitz - pretty cheeky:



And there's another point: Christians don't own September 11. It was an attack on all Americans, not just Christian Americans. Whereas the controversy over Auschwitz was very much a Christians vs Jews issue (even though more people than just Jews were killed in the Holocaust, Jews still suffered the overwhelming brunt of the assault). From TIME:
[T]he establishment of a Christian institution at a place that will forever symbolize Jewish martyrdom has stirred outrage among Jews.
It struck many at the time that the Christians were involved in a sort of religious imperialism at Auschwitz, not just insensitivity. Do we really think the Muslims are somehow trying to steal September 11 from us? Trying to convert a symbol of "our" religion, or convert us? Whoever "us" is.

I'm just not convinced that the comparison works.

And finally, was September 11, as bad as it was, really as bad as the Holocaust? Really? That's what the ADL seems to now be arguing. And if the ADL comes out and says that September 11 wasn't as bad as the Holocaust - where over 6 million people were killed, 2/3 of the Jews in Europe - then their comparison just doesn't hold water, since per se we should be more appalled by anything seen to undermine something as huge as the Holocaust.

Still feels like the ADL caved to the bigots on this one. Read More......

Tuesday morning Parisian open thread




Last night I went with my friend Serge to the "Dreamland" exhibit at the Pompidou Center, located in the Marais. You'll recall that the Pompidou Center is the inside out glass and tubes building. The exhibit was difficult to describe, I'm really not sure what it was about. But it was really interesting. It went from the World's Fair to Vegas to artists' visions of the future. I think the idea overall was varying visions of the future, or more than the future, visions of an almost whimsical architectural future. It was very cool.



The exhibit was on the top floor of Pompidou, which might be 7 floors high or so, but in Paris seven floors is huge. The city is so low, the buildings are so small, that, like Washington, DC, the seventh floor can be amazing. And at Pompidou it is. All of these photos are from that top floor. I kind of the like the one just above, you'll note the Eiffel Tower peaking over the tube in the middle of the photo.



That would be Serge, above, in one of the people moving tubes. Serge is an interesting guy. An artist by training - he went to the school of the Louvre - he also, for some odd reason, seems to know a lot about everything. From French history to the GATT accords. He's a very typically French, or even European, "intellectual" - a word we don't use much in American English. Just absurdly educated, and strangely so, in terms of the breadth of the education beyond his primary discipline. Being an artist, Serge has an 'artist's card' which gets him, and me, into any museum in France for free. You gotta love this country.



You couldn't ask for better timing. Just as the exhibit closed, at 9pm, the sun set over Paris. There's probably nothing better in Paris than sunset time. Whether on a bridge, or atop a building, or having a nighttime picnic along the Seine or in a park, nothing beats the sunsets in this town. Read More......

Krugman: 'Our governing elite doesn’t care' about economic distress


In this article, featuring the frustrated stylings of the Times' Bob Herbert, I talked about how the mis-treatment of workers by our betters is both treacherous (his word) and getting noticed. (Look here for why that "getting noticed" bit matters.)

Now comes Paul Krugman, adding his slightly more muted voice (and my slightly less muted emphasis):
Yes, growth is slowing, and the odds are that unemployment will rise, not fall, in the months ahead. That’s bad. But what’s worse is the growing evidence that our governing elite just doesn’t care — that a once-unthinkable level of economic distress is in the process of becoming the new normal. . . .

[A] large part of Congress — large enough to block any action on jobs — cares a lot about taxes on the richest 1 percent of the population, but very little about the plight of Americans who can’t find work.

Well, if Congress won’t act, what about the Federal Reserve? The Fed, after all, is supposed to pursue two goals: full employment and price stability, usually defined in practice as an inflation rate of about 2 percent. Since unemployment is very high and inflation well below target, you might expect the Fed to be taking aggressive action to boost the economy. But it isn’t.
His conclusion (which comes near the beginning of the piece):
I worry that those in power, rather than taking responsibility for job creation, will soon declare that high unemployment is “structural,” a permanent part of the economic landscape — and that by condemning large numbers of Americans to long-term joblessness, they’ll turn that excuse into dismal reality.
Hmm. Maybe I missed that class. Since when did bankers and Big Money ever care about high wages and full employment? Isn't that, always and by definition, inflationary? In fact, our betters need unemployment, to keep wages down. Profit, a much-desired good; wages, a necessary evil.

As I said above, the fact that this point is getting media play is an opportunity, should you choose to use it. Action is the antidote to depression (in the political sphere anyway).

Actively yours,

GP Read More......

Recent Archives