No space in the middle
16 seconds ago
1. It was conducted in one night -- which is notoriously unreliableRead More......
2. It has a 20 percent Republican sample -- which is 5-8 points more than most polls. Obviously skewing the sample more Republican than the electorate is -- is going to skew the result in Brown's favor.
3. The poll was conducted, and the charged quotes in the article are attributed to, a former aide to NEWT GINGRICH -- which Politico pointed in the 6th paragraph.
4. Does anyone really believe -- as this skewed poll shows -- that Brown is going to win 77% of Hispanics and 26% of blacks? Those results alone should ring alarm bells about the accuracy of this poll.
[N]ow we find that the exclusive focus on health reform has disillusioned the public as well as demoralized the progressive base because its mandates are so weak – that is the cautionary tale of Coakley.I'd go even further. It's not health care reform per se, or even the way health care reform was handled. It's health care reform as metaphor writ large for how the Democrats approach leadership and legislating. Weakly. Read More......
Wouldn’t it be ironic, if health reform, the issue many LGBT leaders said must pass before we pushed more fervently for equality, became the stumbling block to every other progressive agenda item in Obama’s first term (not to assume a second one).
President Barack Obama received a failing grade from the a gun control advocacy group on Monday.Every year or so we have a major gun eruption in this country, whether it's the DC shooter, Fort Hood, Columbine, the shooting at the school in Virginia, the shooting at the Holocaust Museum, and where have the anti-gun groups been to channel the anger and fear over these tragedies into greater gun control? It's time our gun control groups, if they even still exist, started borrowing a page from the GOP playbook. A Republican would know what to do. Then again, the gun control groups are no different than any other liberal advocacy group over the past decade. Missed opportunity is their middle name. Read More......
The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence blasted the president, whom the group endorsed in 2008, for not having taken significant steps to advance gun control laws.
"It's been a very disappointing year for us, especially considering what he campaigned on," the group's president, Paul Helmke, said during an appearance on MSNBC. "This year they ran away from the issue, and actually signed two repeals of good gun legislation."
How could the health care issue have turned from a reform that was going to make Barack Obama ten feet tall into a poison pill for Democratic senators? Whether or not Martha Coakley squeaks through in Massachusetts on Tuesday, the health bill has already done incalculable political damage and will likely do more. Polls show that the public now opposes it by margins averaging ten to fifteen points, and widening. It is hard to know which will be the worse political defeat -- losing the bill and looking weak, or passing it and leaving it as a piñata for Republicans to attack between now and November....Regardless of what happens in Massachusetts tomorrow, Democrats need to do some serious soul-searching about how it got to the point where we were fighting, tooth and nail, for Ted Kennedy's seat in liberal Massachusetts. And hopefully we can stop with the platitudes about needing to be more bipartisan and needing to move more to the middle. Been there, done that, isn't working, and actually seems to be hurting. Read More......
As a resident of Massachusetts, in the last two days I've gotten robo calls from Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Bill Clinton, Martha Coakley, and Angela Menino, the wife of Boston's mayor -- everyone but the sainted Ted Kennedy. In Obama's call, he advised me that he needed Martha Coakley in the Senate, "because I'm fighting to curb the abuses of a health insurance industry that routinely denies care." Let's see, would that be the same insurance industry that Rahm was cutting inside deals with all spring and summer? The same insurance industry that spent tens of millions on TV spots backing Obama's bill as sensible reform?
If voters are wondering which side this guy is on, he has given them good reason.
The latest emails show a proposed letter to the SEC requesting the withdrawal of the confidential treatment request around March 10, 2009, after some information on payments was reported by media, but the letter was never sent to the SEC.Read More......
Instead of withdrawing the confidentiality request, the emails show further exchanges between New York Fed and AIG lawyers, that led to the insurer days later submitting a new confidentiality request. A draft of the request shows AIG asked the SEC to keep secret details about specific securities, their notional values, collateral posted against them and mark-downs in their market values.
When heavy snowfall threatened to scupper Paul Chambers's travel plans, he decided to vent his frustrations on Twitter by tapping out a comment to amuse his friends. "Robin Hood airport is closed," he wrote. "You've got a week and a bit to get your shit together, otherwise I'm blowing the airport sky high!!"Read More......
Unfortunately for Mr Chambers, the police didn't see the funny side. A week after posting the message on the social networking site, he was arrested under the Terrorism Act and questioned for almost seven hours by detectives who interpreted his post as a security threat. After he was released on bail, he was suspended from work pending an internal investigation, and has, he says, been banned from the Doncaster airport for life. "I would never have thought, in a thousand years, that any of this would have happened because of a Twitter post," said Mr Chambers, 26. "I'm the most mild-mannered guy you could imagine."
Straw, foreign secretary at the time, gave what now seems prophetic advice in a letter marked "secret and personal", 10 days before Blair met George Bush at the US president's ranch in Crawford, Texas, in April 2002. That was nearly a year before the invasion.Read More......
In his letter, about which he is expected to be questioned when he testifies at the Chilcot inquiry this week, Straw warned Blair, then prime minister: "The rewards from your visit to Crawford will be few … there is at present no majority inside the PLP [parliamentary Labour party] for any military action against Iraq."
Straw warned of two legal "elephant traps". He said, "regime change per se is no justification for military action", and "the weight of legal advice here is that a fresh [UN] mandate may well be required".
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
© 2010 - John Aravosis | Design maintenance by Jason Rosenbaum
Send me your tips: americablog AT starpower DOT net