Open Thread and Diary Rescue
2 minutes ago
"Verizon does not, and will not, provide any government agency unfettered access to our customer records or provide information to the government under circumstances that would allow a fishing expedition," the company said on Friday.Verizon didn't provide the government "unfettered" access to my phone records.
'Too little, too late' for Cheney's daughter to speak upRead More......
Posted 5/11/2006 11:19 PM ET
Now It's My Turn reads the cover of Mary Cheney's book ("Mary Cheney has her turn to speak — and write," Life, Monday).
Now? She and her father have nothing to lose publicly, so now she wants our attention. In 2004, Mary Cheney was in an enviable position of power and influence. The microphone was all hers.
Yet, she states she was "happier and more comfortable staying behind the scenes." Well then by all means, stay there. We needed to hear from you then. Now is too little, too late.
Robert Fahr,
Dallas
-----------
Apologist for the GOP
Mary Cheney writes that she was "furious" when John Kerry mentioned her sexuality during a 2004 presidential debate. If Kerry had any advantage to gain, it was in pointing out the chilling example of parents — in this case, Vice President Cheney and his wife — who look the other way while their gay children are used as symbolic whipping posts by the Republican Party. If this was Kerry's intent, it was justified and timely.
Ms. Cheney also writes that she "never imagined that there were people who would try to use me and my sexual orientation for their own political benefit." If anyone has used sexual orientation in a bid to gain votes, it is the Republicans, with their scaremonger electoral tactics. To suggest otherwise is patently absurd.
How sad that Mary Cheney continues to be an apologist for the Republican Party. I understand that she loves her father, but her loyalty to his career comes at a tremendous cost to millions of gay Americans who don't hold a fraction of the rights of other Americans.
The fact that she "almost" quit her job with the 2004 Bush/Cheney ticket should not be congratulated or applauded. Almost doesn't count. In the old days, we had a name for people like her: We called them Uncle Tom.
Greg Durham,
Brooklyn, N.Y.
------------
Take a stand, Mary
After reading USA TODAY's article on Mary Cheney, I ask: How can anyone respect her opinion?
She says she and her girlfriend consider themselves married, and her last quote is that they are "just waiting for the state and federal laws to catch up with us" — referring to bans of same-sex marriages and even civil unions. Yet, she worked hard to re-elect an administration that wants to make sure that never happens.
Mary, you can't have it both ways. It is time you truly stand up for what you say you believe in.
Dave Cook,
Miami Beach
Mr. xxxxxNo problem, Bob. Your customers can move to another carrier that doesn't have a problem saying whether or not they just massively violated their privacy. Read More......
Verizon appreciates that the media reports about the possibility that the NSA is able to analyze local call data records is causing concern. Please be assured that Verizon places the highest value on protecting the privacy of our customers.
Anything to do with the NSA is highly classified, so I can't comment on whether or not the news article causing concern is even accurate. But I can say that, to the extent that we cooperate with government authorities, we are confident that we are complying with all applicable statutes.
Bob Varettoni
Verizon Media Relations
Hi John,Uh, gee, lie much AT&T;?
I finally got through to AT&T; to tell them that I will be switching and they will not have my business, as soon as I figure out what company to go with. The representative first gave the line that they must comply with the law, which I shot down with some quotes from your wonderful postings. She then basically said we are screwed here because in DC there are no carriers who didn't turn records over.
I'm confused, but anxious to leave AT&T.;
The U.S. government's secret collection of Americans' phone records may not breach the Fourth Amendment's privacy guarantee, legal analysts said Thursday, but it could violate federal surveillance and telecommunication laws.Just another example of Bush breaking the law.
More broadly, USA TODAY's report about the National Security Agency's deal with three major phone companies fed a debate over whether the Bush administration is going too far — and setting dangerous precedents — in trying to protect the nation from terrorism.
"This may well be another example where the Bush administration, in secret, decided to bypass the courts and contravene federal law," said Georgetown University law professor David Cole.
A grand jury indicted Gov. Ernie Fletcher (R) on misdemeanor charges Thursday, accusing him of illegally rewarding political supporters with state jobs since he took office two years ago.Read More......
Fletcher was charged with conspiracy, official misconduct and violating a prohibition against political discrimination.
Angered that his name appeared on a press release touting a gay pride parade, Governor Mitt Romney moved yesterday to curtail the activities of a 14-year-old advisory commission on gay and lesbian youth.Read More......
The commission chairwoman, Kathleen M. Henry, said she was called yesterday by Beth Myers, the governor's chief of staff, who told her that the governor planned to issue an executive order ''revoking our existence" and creating another youth commission whose purview would be all of the state's youth, not just gays and lesbians. The commission would have all new members, she said.
But a few hours later, Myers called again, Henry said, and said the governor had switched course.
At first blush there’s something truly unnerving about the idea that government spies have their mitts on our private phone records. Really, does the National Security Agency need to know when Aunt Millie dials up her sister on the Cape?Read More......
...Since 9/11 the American public has been willing to rely on the assurances of government leaders that they are preserving our privacy while fighting terrorism.
Unfortunately, and perhaps understandably, many Americans no longer believe them.
WHEN THE New York Times revealed the National Security Agency's domestic wiretapping program late last year, President Bush assured the country that the operation was carefully limited to international calls, targeted only al-Qaeda suspects and did not involve snooping on law-abiding Americans. That turns out to be far from the whole truth.And the Post gets bonus points for a second editorial suggesting that the HUD secretary needs to step down:
Either Mr. Jackson broke the law and then lied about it, or he lied that he had broken the law. Which of those actions makes him fit to be secretary of housing and urban development?Boy oh boy, two rather logical editorials in a row on the same day. Fred Hiatt's gonna be pissed when he gets back from his vacation. Read More......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© 2010 - John Aravosis | Design maintenance by Jason Rosenbaum
Send me your tips: americablog AT starpower DOT net