The argument against assisted suicide never adds up for me though admittedly, I'm not religious at all.
If there is something unambiguous in religion that forbids it and there are consequences, sure, I can see where a religious person would not want to do this. That's OK, don't do it. It seems reasonable to me that an individual should be able to at least choose whether they want nature to run its course or choose their own timing.
I watched my father die in a hospital bed and failed to see anything glorious or fortunate about it, as the religious moralists suggest. I doubt he would have chosen to take his own life (though he talked about it in the end while taking his morphine to ease the pain) but having the option would have been nice. People in that state feel helpless because their illness is dictating their life. What's so wrong about
having options?
The 66-year-old woman with late-stage pancreatic cancer wanted to be clear-headed at death, so she became the first person to kill herself under Washington state's new assisted suicide law, known as "death with dignity."
"I am a very spiritual person, and it was very important to me to be conscious, clear-minded and alert at the time of my death," Fleming said in a statement released Friday. "The powerful pain medications were making it difficult to maintain the state of mind I wanted to have at my death. And I knew I would have to increase them."
With family members, her physician and her dog at her side, Fleming took a deadly dose of prescription barbiturates and died Thursday night at her home in Sequim, Wash.
I suspect most of our readers would agree that Fleming should have been permitted to take her own life. But I'm curious if anyone out there disagrees, and can explain to us, rationally, why this isn't a good thing.
Read More......