Tuesday, August 31, 2004

LA Times on Schrock outing


From the LA Times:
John Aravosis, a Washington political consultant, runs another Web site, www.DearMary.com, which encourages supporters to write Vice President Dick Cheney's openly lesbian daughter, Mary, entreating her to lobby her father against Bush administration policies.

Aravosis said the White House all but invited the outing tactic by endorsing the constitutional amendment.

"They declared war," he said. "We're not going to respond with a hug."
Read More......

CNN bans Log Cabin ad


CNN has refused to broadcast the Log Cabin Republicans' (gay Republicans) new ad. You can view the ad here. Read More......

Oh, so THAT's what he meant


when he said the war against terrorism was unwinnable. Associated Press reports:
The Justice Department has asked a judge to throw out the convictions of members of a suspected terror cell in Detroit because of prosecutorial misconduct, reversing course in a case the Bush administration once hailed as a major victory in the war on terrorism, legal sources said Tuesday.

So I think what he really meant was we can win the war, but then we have to drop the charges.

My.
Pet.
Goat.
Read More......

Bush tells environment: Go Cheney yourself!


Wake up Kerry. Here's another issue that will ignite Americans: Bush and the environment. Considering how they have lied about everything else, I do not believe them when they say that they won't destroy these areas. Why else would they open them up to logging? They're serial liars and we now know better than to trust their word. Follow the money.
About one of every 13 miles of the Appalachian Trail between Maine and Georgia passes through national forests where a Bush administration plan could allow clear cutting of wooded areas, an environmental group said Tuesday.

The administration announced in July that it would allow logging in areas that former President Clinton had put off-limits to such activity shortly before he left office in 2001.

Read More......

this is an audio post - click to play
Read More......

Suicide Bombers Attack Innocent Israeli Citizens


I don't care where you stand on the Israeli-Palestinian debate, suicide bombers are immoral and despicable and should be condemned at every step. They undermine the moral legitimacy of the Palestinians and target innocent people. Isn't the biggest attack on Israeli men, women, and children in six months -- 15 dead so far and more than 85 wounded -- shameful? Does it compare to targeted Israeli attacks against top Palestinian militia people which try to minimize civilian casualties? No.

So is this the latest front in the war on terror (which we can or can't win, depending on which Bush quote you want to use)? Or, as some would have you believe, is the fact that we defend and support Israel (the only legitimate democracy in the Middle East) the only reason there's a war on terror in the first place?
Read More......

As predicted, Bush flip-flops on terror war


It's time to ignore today's flip-flop and simply run ads, over and over again, showing Bush saying we can't win. Then let his campaign explain that he really didn't say that, well, that he did but now has changed his mind in one day. Devastating.
President Bush said Tuesday 'we will win' the war on terror, seeking to quell controversy and Democratic criticism over his earlier remark that victory may not be possible.

In a speech to the national convention of the American Legion, Bush said, 'We meet today in a time of war for our country, a war we did not start yet one that we will win.

That statement differed from Bush's earlier comment, aired Monday in a pre-taped television interview, that 'I don't think you can win' the war on terror. "
Read More......

Worthless media once again re: Purple Heart band-aids


As TBogg is rightly mentioning, Morton Blackwell, the man who has organized the purple heart band-aids at the RNC is yet another Chickenhawk. Considering the fact that Blackwell is giving jabs to Kerry, Blackwell apparently had other priorities as well during the war. Apparently being a College Republican and then a Young Republican in the National Committee was given priority over military service. I can't say that I would have been keen to go to Vietnam back then but this punk ought to be exposed. I have already sent an email to CNN asking them to offer his full background so we can all join in on the joke. Visit here to send your comments to CNN. Maybe one day we will again have a media that investigates instead of repeating what these people want repeated.
That isn't to say that Morton hasn't had some experience with militaries:

Blackwell has also trained rightist political forces in Latin America and Africa(19) through IPF, notably supporters of the Pinochet military dictatorship, Argentinean rightists, and supporters of Inkatha chief Buthelezi in South Africa.

Read More......

Consumer confidence drops sharply in August


No wonder Bush wants to talk about Vietnam. The economy has been looking weak for a while now and another tax cut is going to send Wall Street into a tailspin. Bush must be pretty happy about his tanking economy (how many job losses are we at now?) now that he's blown the bank on tax cuts and war. Oh the options that you've left for yourself are limitless, aren't they George? Great planning, once again. Is he going to announce another miscalculation or will he hold firm, no matter how wrong he is? Confidence all around is dropping hard and fast.
Read More......

NOW Bush says we CAN win war on terror, total FLIP FLOP


AP is reporting that Bush is NOW saying we CAN win the war on terror, and we're already winning it! This only ONE DAY after he told NBC's Matt Lauer that we CAN'T win the war on terror. Now who is the king of flip flops? Less than ONE DAY and he's totally changing his tune on - what issue? - no less than THE WAR ON TERROR. The president who, say what you will about him, ALWAYS had CONVICTION and always STUCK TO HIS GUNS, has now gone soft. He's now pandering to the polls, pandering to the media, pandering to the electorate. When the going gets tough, George Bush simply sings a different tune.

It's time WE wore flip flops to every Bush event.

From the AP:
President Bush will tell the nation's largest veterans' group Tuesday that "we will win" the war on terror, seeking to quell controversy and Democratic criticism of his remark aired a day earlier that victory in the anti-terror battle may not be possible, his spokesman said.

In a speech before the national convention of the American Legion, the president will make it "crystal clear" that America will win the war on terrorism, White House press secretary Scott McClellan said.

"Not only are we winning it, but we will win it," McClellan said in describing Bush's speech.

That message contradicts Bush's statement, aired Monday in a pre-taped television interview, that "I don't think you can win" the war on terror.
Read More......

GOP Invokes 9/11 to Make Case for Bush


Wellstone's funeral, my ass. When the Dems simply tried to have a memorial service for a dead man, the GOP went down their throats and it lost us an election. Now we have the GOP holding a partisan political rally and intentionally focusing the entire thing on 9/11 with the purpose of, as the headline notes, "GOP Invokes 9/11 to Make Case for Bush," and that's NOT a problem?

These guys chose NYC to take advantage of 9/11 to help Bush's election, and now they got caught red-handed. Let's not miss the opportunity to point this out, early and often. Read More......

Network news giving more air time for RNC


Who would have guessed this outcome? Fortunately Media Matters is pointing out the inconsistencies of network coverage. Not that it should be a surprise to any of us, but Faux News has already aired 1:14 of the RNC compared to 0:41 in the first day or the DNC. ABC even slipped in a special program during Monday Night Football. How about a little balance folks? I expected this from Faux but CNN and ABC also are coming up short.
Read More......

Another Republican lie exposed. Do they know how to tell the truth about anything?


From DailyKos, a review of the commonly reported pitch about Kerry being the most liberal member of the Senate and Edwards being number four. Hell, I don't care if either is or was a liberal but for national politics, there's always the issue of attracting independent voters in the middle. It's interesting that the GOP has to keep making up lies and repeating them when they attack Kerry. With a record like theirs though, I suppose what else can they do?

The actual National Journal ratings look a little bit different:
But if the standard is votes over a lifetime, Kerry isn't the most liberal senator. By that measure, Kerry is the 11th-most-liberal senator, coming in below such Democrats as Paul Sarbanes of Maryland, Barbara Boxer of California, and, yes, Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts, according to a National Journal analysis published in March.

John Edwards, who was ranked the fourth-most-liberal senator in 2003 (and who also missed many votes that year), is the 27th-most-liberal senator based on votes over his career.

Read More......

US dead in Iraq now 975, wounded 6,323


After a politically influenced cease-fire (just before the RNC, as the numbers were rapidly approaching 1,000) US soldiers continue to die and be wounded for a war that is not making us safer and has nothing to do with 9/11. Iraqi death toll figures are estimated to be in the range of 11,717 and 13,724. It's interesting to see that despite earlier criticisms of politicians meddling in the war in Vietnam, he seems to be doing the same thing. Does this qualify as a flip-flop? Perhaps after reading My Pet Goat he changed his mind on the matter.
Read More......

"There ought to be limits to freedom"


Here's a Bush supporter in Oregon who, like her president, doesn't think much of free speech and the right to protest or question a government that continues to lie to the American people.
Read More......

Bush Bitch-Slaps Cheney


Bush amended his platform to make it virulently anti-gay, which proves he was lying when Bush claimed he just wanted to "protect" marriage. But more interesting, far right radicals admit it was also done as a slap in the face of the Vice President, who wanted to pretend he respects his daughter when in fact his voting record in Congress was one of the most anti-gay possible.

"At a news conference yesterday, Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, a group of social conservatives, said that the push to strengthen the platform's opposition to same-sex civil unions was partly a response to Vice President Dick Cheney's statement last week that he personally favored leaving the issue up to the states.

"'We are obviously troubled by the vice president's comments last week, which in ways led to the strengthening of the language in the platform,' Mr. Perkins said. "


Read More......

Bush Flip Flop Over War On Terror


By now, everyone has heard Bush's awkward, politically stupid comment that you can't win the war on terror. Does anyone doubt that if Kerry had said this that Bush would have ripped him for it and there'd be an ad on the air in every battleground state within hours? Of course not. The White House has been desperately backpedaling and coming up with all sorts of excuses. (Our favorite was on 'Nightline" where a Bush spokesperson started off by saying well, hey, he was being interviewed on a moving bus!)

But the New York Times does a good job of showing how Bush's new, nuanced view of the war on terror flatly contradicts many statements he's made in the past. Then they twist the knife by saying his stance is now close to that of Europe.

"In the interview with Matt Lauer of the NBC News program "Today," conducted on Saturday but shown on the opening day of the Republican National Convention, Mr. Bush was asked if the United States could win the war against terrorism, which he has made the focus of his administration and the central thrust of his re-election campaign.

"'I don't think you can win it,' Mr. Bush replied. 'But I think you can create conditions so that those who use terror as a tool are less acceptable in parts of the world.'

"As recently as July 14, Mr. Bush had drawn a far sunnier picture. 'I have a clear vision and a strategy to win the war on terror,' he said.

"At a prime-time news conference in the East Room of the White House on April 13, Mr. Bush said: 'One of the interesting things people ask me, now that we are asking questions, is, 'Can you ever win the war on terror?' Of course you can.'

"It was unclear if Mr. Bush had meant to make the remark to Mr. Lauer, or if he misspoke. But White House officials said the president was not signaling a change in policy, and they sought to explain his statement by saying he was emphasizing the long-term nature of the struggle. Taken at face value, however, Mr. Bush's words would put him closer to the positions of the United States' European allies, who have considered Mr. Bush's talk of victory simplistic and unhelpful."
Read More......

THE transcript


"Uh, hi, I weigh 200 pounds, I'm 6'4" (inaudible) blond hair....very muscular, very buffed up, uh, very tanned, uh, I just like to get together a guy from time to time, just to, just to play. I'd like him to be in very good shape, flat stomach, good chest, good arms, well hung, cut, uh, just get naked, play, and see what happens, nothing real heavy duty, but just, fun time, go down on him, he can go down on me, and just take it from there... hope to hear from you. Bye." - From the RawStory.com (home page link)
Feel free to come up with your own version of the transcript :-) Read More......

Nightline leads Convention night coverage w/ Bush's unwinable war


Nightline tonight, Bush's unwinable war is the topic du jour. From a political perspective, this is probably not what one wants to have as the lead coming out of your convention. Edwards is the primary guest.

If you want to know where momentum gets tripped up in an election, this is it. Hence the ebb and flow of polls up until the end of an election. Things like this raise doubts, switch a few minds, move the polls a point or two.

In the end, in an election like this, there will be a number of events like these over the next two months. Get out the vote will be what drives this election in the end. That's my call. Read More......

Monday, August 30, 2004

Wash Post on Schrock, PAGE TWO!!!


And they mention the "gay" thing, and everything. Page FRIGGIN TWO of the Washington Post tomorrow (Tuesday). This is going to be THE talk of the convention tomorrow.
In 2000, the Virginian-Pilot said of Schrock that he favored ending the Clinton administration's "Don't ask, don't tell" policy on gays in the military. He supported asking enlistees whether they have had homosexual experiences in an effort to try to keep gays from serving.

"You're in the showers with them, you're in the bunk room with them, you're in staterooms with them," Schrock told the Virginian-Pilot. "You just hope no harm would come by folks who are of that persuasion. It's a discipline thing."
And apparently, you're in the halls of Congress with them.
Republican Party Chairman Kate Obenshain Griffin, who presides over a state organization that has been rocked by one scandal after another in the past several years, said she hoped that her party would come together quickly to move on.

"It is now important for Virginia Republicans to unite behind our nominee..."
Wouldn't have been MY word choice :-) Read More......

Bush and Giuliani disagree War on Terror can be won


Watching Giuliani, still (he MUST be over time). Unlike President Bush, Giuliani thinks we can win the war on terror. Just ask him. He "can see it!"

Well, according to the NY Times:
Mr. Bush was asked if the United States could win the war against terrorism, which he has made the focus of his administration and the central thrust of his re-election campaign.

"I don't think you can win it," Mr. Bush replied. "

Maybe someone should have told Giuliani. Read More......

Giuliani thinks Nixon when supporting Bush


Watching Giuliani's speech, big applause line on him saying we need Bush "now more than ever". Sounds familiar, I think he got confused:


Apt comparison. Anyone have an ideas how we could play with this little button and make something fun? Read More......

Where the F is Mary Cheney?


Watching the Convention coverage on CNN - couple of thoughts.

See Dick, See Lynne, See Elizabeth - anyone see Mary? Nice f-ing familiy values.

Also, McCain's best line so far, bashing Michael Moore - did you all see the reaction from the audience? Looks like a parade of hate will be getting all the applause lines. Looking like 1992 again :) Read More......

this is an audio post - click to play
Read More......

test


Read More......

In case you doubted McGreevey...


His accuser has fled to Israel and has now decided, according to AP:
NEW YORK - A former aide who claims New Jersey Gov. James E. McGreevey sexually harassed him said Monday he will not sue the governor.

The governor's resignation announcement was sufficient admission of his wrongdoing, Golan Cipel said in a statement written in Hebrew and released Monday by an Israeli public relations agency. Cipel is in seclusion with his family in Israel.

So much for him having been harassed and needing justice. Read More......

this is an audio post - click to play
Read More......

My favorite mistakes...


A couple weeks back I wrote a post about an idea for a commercial that featured preznit's last press conference -- April -- where he couldn't come up with a coherent answer on any mistakes he'd made since Sept. 11.

Turns out DNC already did it. My bad.

Again, going right at the heart of strong, decisive leadership. The guy can't even handle a press conference where he gets to choose who asks questions.

I think DNC might want to dust this one off, maybe tweak a bit, add the latest "mistakes" and run it again. You know, a million more in poverty, a million more uninsured, and...

my... pet... goat.
Read More......

Moderate Republicans Fighting Back


The LA Times pieces were interesting, showing some real divisions within the Republican Party. As I was flipping through the NY Times Convention section today, I came across a full page ad by these guys, Mainstream2004.

"As Republican former Governors, Senators and public officials,
we urge our party to renew its allegiance to the proven, common sense values which unite America.

Instead of partisan ideology - which increasingly has led moderates to leave the party - what's needed is a speedy return to the pragmatic, problem-solving mainstream."

They have a petition online that they indicate will be delivered to the Chairman during the convention. They talk about the current administration "weakening environmental law", the need to "end record defects", "rebuild alliances". On social issues, two interesting things:
"- put the health of millions first, and clear the way for embryonic stem cell research;

- appoint mainstream federal judges, and respect the Constitution;"

And this is coming from REPUBLICANS. Given that this ad was signed by a number of former Republican Governors and Senators, this is not shaping up to be what I would call a "unified" convention. I give them a lot of credit for standing up for what the Republican party used to be all about. For those who want to have one more go to try and change the party from within, might be a good group to join up with. Sign their petition - give the repubs a little indigestion during their convention. :) Read More......

Bush admits he had plans to invade Iraq pre 9/11, kind of


President Bush admitted, almost, on Friday that he was thinking of invading Iraq even before 9/11. Not that this is news, but it's something that we all keep forgetting, and it's important to keep on him about this. What WAS the point of this war?

From USA Today:
I believe the decision to go to war was the right decision, particularly after September the 11th.
So, even without Sept 11, it would have been valid to go to war. But before Sept. 11, there wasn't a war on terror, so what would the justification have been? Look, I don't like Saddam, I don't think the Iraqis were flying kites before we invaded, but it's BS for the president to start coming up with alternative pre-9/11 reasons to invade, now that the WMD discussion has gone out the window (not to mention, what DID happen to Sarin gas shells they "discovered" a few months ago?) Read More......

Three Words


Strong, decisive leadership. That will be the theme of the convention and what the R's hope everyone understands about their candidate. There will be flags, soldiers, firemen, flags, police, sailors, and flags. Above all, we'll hear about strong, decisive leadership.

Three simple words that create an effective message.

I have three words in response.

My.

Pet.

Goat.
Read More......

Bush admits defeat in war on terror


This guy just gets worse by the day. Now he's giving up on American security in the War on Terror.
When asked "Can we win?" the war on terror, Bush said, "I don't think you can win it."
Why does Bush not believe in America? It's time to rebuild our alliances around the world and win this war. Just because Bush is giving in doesn't mean everyone else should.
Read More......

this is an audio post - click to play
Read More......

Catania does Air America at RNC...


Gay, Republican DC City Councillor David Catania will make an appearance on the Al Franken show on Air America Radio in the next hour or two. Should be interesting...
Read More......

BIG ASS article on gay-baiting, and gay staffers, in Florida Senate campaign


AMAZING article in the Miami Herald about how Republican Senate candidate Mel Martinez in Florida is using gay-baiting TO THE MAX in his campaign. This, even though Martinez has two openly-gay staff in senior positions.

What a pig. And what very sad morons these staffers are.
As Christian conservatives rally around Mel Martinez, their favorite candidate in the U.S. Senate race, a key reason for their support is his strict stance on one of their hot-button issues: homosexuality.

The Martinez campaign has made the fight against what it calls ''the radical homosexual lobby'' central to its campaign. It's the subject of an attack ad -- removed Saturday under political pressure -- and a stinging mailer that criticizes rival Bill McCollum, a fellow conservative, for ''pandering to gays'' because he supported so-called hate crimes legislation in Congress.

Yet the Martinez campaign and the candidate's religious allies find themselves having to carefully parse their positions for one reason: Both Martinez and McCollum -- Republican politicians with impeccable conservative credentials -- have highly placed campaign staffers who are gay.
I don't know why a local gay group doesn't launch protests calling on these gay staffers to quit. Read More......

BIG ASS NYT article about Mary Cheney


Allow me one small gloat. You'd likely have NEVER seen the New York Times writing about Mary had we not launched DearMary.com (and had many of you not donated to the DearMary.com ad campaign) and made it "okay" to talk about her being a lesbian.

This part of the article made me go YEAH (again, wouldn't have happened had we not alerted the country to the fact that Mary is gay):
Mr. [Alan] Simpson recalled a tense confrontation on the campaign trail when one of Mr. Bush's Christian conservative backers advised Mr. Cheney to "pray for her" and "to urge her away from her aberration."

"Dick just starred at him," Mr. Simpson recalled. "If you said that to Dick or Lynne Cheney, you will get a look that would sizzle your underwear, I tell you."
And this part of the article made me want to spit on Mary Matalin. What kind of homophobic crap is this? She knows better.
"When people are open, which Mary is, they are not trying to make a statement,'' Ms. Matalin said. "There are other reasons to be politically active besides your sexual orientation. That is not her raison d'être."
And that, my friends, is why Mary is a big fat traitor. Hell, I'm beginning to think her dad is more pro-gay than she. Read More......

HETERO Cheney daughter speaking at convention, NOT Mary


From the Chicago Trib:
Speaking of the gay equality movement... What about Mary? Mary Cheney, that is. She's the gay daughter of vice president Dick and his wife, Lynne.

Lynne Cheney and one of her two daughters are on the roster of top Republican wives and offspring listed as speakers at Monday's "W Stands for Women Forum." But notably absent from that list is Mary Cheney.

Meanwhile -- how retro -- all the married women are listed as "Mrs.": Mrs. Barbara Bush, Mrs. Liz Cheney Perry (the Cheney's other daughter); Mrs. Doro Bush Koch (President Bush the First's only daughter; sister of the current president). Also listed, the president's twin 22-year-old twin daughters, Barbara and Jenna, who everyone wants to meet, or at least eyeball this convention week.
Yep, ALL the straight Bush-Cheney women are talking, but not Mary. Gosh I hope she's proud of what she's doing. Read More......

Gay Republicans fighting back at the convention


Two interesting articles about how gay Republicans are fighting back at the convention, and Pataki, among others, has been egging them on. Interestingly, Giuliani was NOT mentioned as someone giving them support.

LA Times 1

LA Times 2 Read More......

Tucker Carlson blasts Bush for hiding on 9/11


From Daily Kos, a piece about Tucker Carlson and his blunt remarks about Bush running and hiding most of the day on 9/11.

I could not agree with it any more and have been saying this since 9/11. As much as I may have disliked and still dislike Guiliani (Bush = Churchill? Get a grip pal) he was the only voice of America on 9/11. Operation Flight Suit boy was a coward, no bones about it, as he hid away in a bunker in the middle of the US. It's time to take the gloves off on this issue because this is the cornerstone of his campaign. On 9/11 Bush dicked around for those famous seven minutes and then he wet his pants and hid leaving the country and the world wondering what was happening. If Rudy thinks that is what Churchill or even Reagan would have done, call the men in white jackets because there is no way in hell either (or Clinton or Bush I) would have hid out sucking his thumb. What an embarassment it was.

Bush ran to Nebraska and cowered in fear. This issue needs to be pounded home every day until the election. Bush hid. He showed his colors and they were yellow.

Here's what Carlson said:
... The attacks initially made me sorry I voted for him. For most of that day, as my wife and children stayed inside our house listening to the roar of fighter jets overhead, and black smoke from the Pentagon hovered above our neighborhood, Bush failed to return to Washington. My family sat unprotected a few miles from the scene of a terrorist attack; Bush hid in a bunker on some faraway military base.

It infuriated me, as did the subsequent excuses from White House spokesman. There was a risk in coming back, they said. There was a risk in coming back, they said. Of course there was. That's the point: Leaders must take risks, sometimes physical ones. Bush should have elbowed his Secret Service detail out of the way and returned in a display of fearlessness to his nation's capital. I found it distressingly revealing that he didn't.
As Kos notes:
But as Carlson says, the incident was revealing. Just as Kerry's heroism half a world away is revealing. There's a reason the Swift Boat Liars are going after the story so hard. Kerry turned his boat into the danger he faced.
Read More......

Two little Hitlers


I'm pretty sure these are the two guys who Sheri Dow, the woman doing the GOP convention invocation, thinks are an evil akin to Hitler. (Thanks to reader James for finding this link.)

Read More......

"Shadowy struggle within Bush administration"


Forget about the shadowy whatevers that Bush is talking about because the seriously shadowy business is going on right under his nose. Let's remember that this guy is promoting himself as a strong leader in times of trouble yet he's taken us into a war in Iraq that is a complete mess with no end in sight and he has rogue teams and moles operating in the Pentagon under his watch. The new Washington Monthly article "Iran-Contra II?" sheds new light on a few facts that have been previously dismissed by Rummy and others. Who's buying the "chance encounter" nonsense story? These people have zero credibility left.
...the FBI is looking with renewed interest at an unauthorized back-channel between Iranian dissidents and advisers in Feith's office, which more-senior
administration officials first tried in vain to shut down and then later attempted to cover up.

The administration's reluctance to disclose these details seems clear: the DoD-Ghorbanifar meetings suggest the possibility that a rogue faction at the Pentagon was trying to work outside normal US foreign policy channels to advance a "regime change" agenda not approved by the president's foreign policy principals or even the president himself.

The Agency believes Ghorbanifar is a serial "fabricator" and forbids its officers from having anything to do with him. Moreover, why were mid-level Pentagon officials organizing meetings with a foreign intelligence agency behind the back of the CIA -- a clear breach of US government protocol?

Newsday broke the original story about the secret Ghorbanifar channel. Faced with the disclosure, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld acknowledged the December, 2001 meeting but dismissed it as routine and unimportant. Later that day, another senior Defense official acknowledged the second meeting, in Paris, June, 2003, but insisted that it was the result of a "chance encounter" between Ghorbanifar and a Pentagon official.

Read More......

Sunday, August 29, 2004

GOP Convention invocation to be given by woman who compares gays to Hitler - SO not kidding


As Atrios wrote about this, apparently Jerry Falwell didn't hate gays quite enough to get the opening invocation spot at the GOP Convention. Instead they chose Sheri Dow, a woman WHO COMPARED GAYS TO HITLER. I am SO not making this up, or even vaguely twisting her words. This is so despicable, so vile, that it's difficult to even express the approriate level of outrage.

Ms. Dow made her wonderful comparison of gays to Hitler in a speech she gave about her horror at having viewed a magazine in which two gay men were married in the presence of their twin "daughters" (the added quotation marks are HERS). She rails for a bit about how these girls will likely be scarred for life by their horrible dads, then says this about the threat gay families pose to the "traditional" family (read the entire article via the link to get the full horrifying context):
Lining Up With Hitler or Against Him

This escalating situation reminds me of a statement of a World War II journalist by the name of Dorothy Thompson who wrote for the Saturday Evening Post in Europe during the pre-World War II years when Hitler was building up his armies and starting to take ground. In an address she delivered in Toronto in 1941 she said this: ?Before this epic is over, every living human being will have chosen. Every living human being will have lined up with Hitler or against him. Every living human being either will have opposed this onslaught or supported it, for if he tries to make no choice that in itself will be a choice. If he takes no side, he is on Hitler?s side. If he does not act, that is an act­for Hitler.?

May I take the liberty of reading this statement again and changing just a few words, applying it to what I fear we face today? ?Before this era is over, every living human being will have chosen. Every living human being will have lined up in support of the family or against it. Every living human being will have either opposed the onslaught against the family or supported it, for if he tries to make no choice that in itself will be a choice. If we do not act in behalf of the family, that is itself an act of opposition to the family.?

At first it may seem a bit extreme to imply a comparison between the atrocities of Hitler and what is happening in terms of contemporary threats against the family­ but maybe not....
Ironically, Ms. Dow may have a point. The GOP is increasingly embracing the kind of social policy that Hitler loved. Perhaps some enterprising journalist at the convention will ask Mr. Cheney how he feels about the opening invocation being given by a woman who compared his daughter to Hitler. Not to mention, why is Ms. Dow even willing to appear at a convention where Hitler's dad is the VP? Read More......

I'm off to NYC - I'll check in later tonight - this means a BIG ASS open thread :-)


Toodles. Read More......

Laura Bush defends Swift Boat ads, say they're "fair"


Laura Bush now tells Time Magazine that she thinks the Swift Boat attacks on Kerry are fair. Her husband, meanwhile, says that John Kerry is a bigger hero than he, and that the ads should come off the air. Gov. Pataki, meanwhile, was on ABC's This Week this morning saying it's time to move on past Vietnam, then the throws in, but it isn't horrible that John Kerry lied about being in Cambodia on Christmas Even 36 years ago?

Bush has moved beyond using the Swift Boat liars, and now is using people even closer to his campain to continue the attack on Kerry while publicly pretending he's so over it.

Time to ask the president why his wife just attacked John Kerry on the very issue he said we need to stop discussing. Why does George Bush say John Kerry is a hero and the next day Laura Bush attacks Kerry's Vietnam record? It's time for the media to start asking the White House if they are going to stop using Vietnam as a political issue? Read More......

this is an audio post - click to play
Read More......

More polls from NBC/WSJ


Where the country is headed
Right direction 36%
Wrong track 50%

Bush's handling of the economy
Approve 43%
Disapprove 52%

Was removing Saddam Hussein worth the $ cost and US casualties?
Yes 43%
No 49%

Bush's handling of war on terror
Approve 53%
Disapprove 42%

When it comes to issues such as the economy, education and health care do you think President Bush has provided a clear set of goals?
Has 29%
Has not 63%

Bush is easygoing and likeable?
Yes 55%
No 27%

If election held today
Bush 47%
Kerry 45%
Nader 3% Read More......

Falwell stands by his "gays caused 9/11" comments; gets VIP pass to GOP Convention


So Falwell stands by his incredibly offensive comments blaming gays and other liberals for September 11, he's getting a VIP pass to the GOP Convention, and he appears to talk a lot with the president. Why does this man continue to be embraced by the Bush White House?

SF Chronicle:
Falwell, the founder of the Moral Majority and a veteran in conservative evangelical politics, will be at the convention.

"I'm in New York right now," he said in a phone interview with The Chronicle on Thursday afternoon. "I have V.I.P. credentials, and I will be there.'' ....

Falwell said God was especially upset with pagans, abortionists, feminists, homosexuals, the American Civil Liberties Union and the People for the American Way, a liberal watchdog group.

In his interview Thursday, Falwell said he still stands by that statement, but wishes he had added "the sleeping church" to the list of responsible parties....

[Falwell] insists that he remains close to President Bush.

"We've talked many times,'' Falwell said. "I've had many photo ops with the president.''

"Listen,'' he added, "I've been doing this for 50 years, and I don't know of any president who is more beloved by conservative evangelicals than President Bush.''
Read More......

'This administration believes the less known the better"


Sounds like some crazy lefty, right? Too bad it is a quote from Representative Christopher Shays, Republican of Connecticut and chairman of the Government Reform Committee's national security panel.
The problem is growing, said J. William Leonard, director of the Archives' Information Security Oversight Office, which monitors federal practices. Officials classified documents 8 percent more often in 2003 than in 2002.

''This administration believes the less known the better," said Shays, noting that he was speaking of a GOP administration. ''I believe the more known the better."

But in 2003, President Bush ordered officials to use the more restrictive level.

Steven Aftergood, director of a Federation of American Scientists project on secrecy, said some classification clearly aimed to conceal illegality or avoid embarrassment, even though that is forbidden.

Aftergood cited the ''secret" stamp on Army Major General Antonio Taguba's report of ''numerous incidents of sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses" inflicted on Iraqi inmates at Abu Ghraib prison.

Read More......

How did Bush blow such a massive lead?


Interesting analysis in the Washington Post today about Bush and his misjudgements. In 2000 he promised to be "a uniter not a divider" and on 9/11 he had the American public and even many parts of the world in his hands. It sickens me to think of what could have been around the world, considering how much support there was out there. If Bush had truly run an inclusive government as he promised, this election campagin would not even be close.
As Bush heads to the Republican National Convention in New York this week, the man who stood astride the political world at that news conference in 2002 is a distinctly more life-size figure. With the election just 65 days away, there is a puzzle: How did a leader who was so formidable become so vulnerable?

In small ways, the answer is an accumulation of miscalculations and missed opportunities that have marred the president's political operation this year... In a large way, however, Bush's predicament is less a reversal of his 2002 success than a natural progression of it -- the consequence of two confrontations he sought that autumn.

...his decision to confront Democrats directly and immerse himself in partisan electioneering ensured that he would face reelection with little of the rally-behind-the-leader sentiment that flowed to him after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Among the two biggest blunders:
  • The enactment of a prescription drug benefit under Medicare in December
  • The missed opportunity of the State of the Union address in January.
Read More......

Is Bush interfering (and flip-flopping) with Iraq military policy because of the convention?


Despite past criticism of politicians who did not let the military fight the war, Bush appears to be tweaking military policy in Iraq against the will of the military in the field. (That criticism has always been a funny argument to me since we live in a democracy and not a military dictatorship.) I'm not even debating the issue of whether or not it was right or wrong to pull back from Najaf and the fighting, but he is certainly flip-flopping on this issue so he doesn't have to deal with the black eye of 1,000 US dead during his convention.

What many feared about pulling back was the Sadr militants would simply pick up the battle elsewhere and it looks as though it did not take them very long to do so. All of this from a man who doesn't read newspapers or follow the polls. Uh-huh.
Read More......

Recent Archives