when the whole gang of GOP ops goes nuts at the same time, MMA & NPR have done a good job.... keep it up, i love to see them hyperventilate... and it keeps them off their talking points loop they run all day...........
There's actually a pretty fascinating model at work here. You can trace how a crazy idea spreads through the right in a pretty organic way, like a contaminant spreading through a water supply. Beck harps on something, and it gains a little traction with his audience. Then Limbaugh picks it up, and it spreads a bit more.
O'Reilly is sort of the end of the cycle. Fox sets him up as somewhat of a foil to Beck, so once he adopts a Beck idea, you can tell that it's reached maximum saturation.
Read about that immediately after my stupid post. Honestly, the best way to make money in this country nowadays is to be stupid, fired or involved in some sexual scandal.
If Juan williams is what he portrays himself as, he should not take up the offer.
He should reflect on how he allowed himself to turn into a Fox News character. Sure, I can understand what he said about being on a plane, but it was wrong of him to say it on public airwaves, that too on a muslim bashing channel. And he should have known that OReilly was expecting to have his own muslim bashing defended.
I believe Mr. Williams is a decent guy but being on non partisan and an uber partisan companies at the same time takes its toll.
He has only himself to decide on what his next step is. He can take the money and turn into another Morris or 'democrat expert' or, come clean.
Thanks.
A little correction. If I got on a plane and saw a bunch of strange religious looking people, I would have the same feeling, regardless of the group's appearance.
It's not like 911 killers were dressed in burqas.
Williams' statement was irrational.
A little correction. If I got on a plane and saw a bunch of strange religious looking people, I would have the same feeling, regardless of the group's appearance.
It's not like 911 killers were dressed in burqas.
Williams' statement was irrational.
Actually he has been for quite some time now, he started with Fox in 1997. They didn't sign him up today as you claim, they extended his contract and expanded his role with the station. So far you are wrong on everything I have seen you post tonight. Par for the course.
No, I'm not wrong. Fox offered Williams a new contract today with an expanded role and with more money. Prior to today, he was simply a part time "contributor." In other words, they SIGNED HIM UP TODAY.
Not wrong, fairliberal. Wow, you really do have a very limited ability to discern content, don't you?
when the whole gang of GOP ops goes nuts at the same time, MMA & NPR have done a good job.... keep it up, i love to see them hyperventilate... and it keeps them off their talking points loop they run all day...........
You call firing a man for no reason except to shut him up, a good thing. How heartless are you. Keep up the lie. Remember you could be next. Watch your back, It is getting easier for the libs to throw their own under the bus.
He was fired for bringing a negative image to his employer. Juan Williams wasn't silenced in any way. BTW, you throw that lib label around very liberally. Juan Williams might be to the left on some issues, but on many he is on the right.
He got fired because he said something his employer didn't like. Too bad you wingnuts spent so much energy in union busting because he might have had a valid grievance. He was fired for getting on the wrong side of his employer.
Excuses, excuses. You can look for any reason to fire someone and feign outrage about what he said. He was fired because the thought police couldn't keep him in check. He became dangerous to them.
He was fired for bringing a negative image to his employer. Juan Williams wasn't silenced in any way. BTW, you throw that lib label around very liberally. Juan Williams might be to the left on some issues, but on many he is on the right.
He was fired for bringing a negative image to his employer. Juan Williams wasn't silenced in any way. BTW, you throw that lib label around very liberally. Juan Williams might be to the left on some issues, but on many he is on the right.
He got fired because he violated NPR employment guidelines. Guidelines which he had violated before and which he had been warned about. This has nothing to do with politics, BH. It has nothing to do with the First Amendment. It has to do with an employee violating his employer's RULES. He got fired for it.
If you want to talk conspiracy.......Juan Williams got fired to give him some foc cred.Bill O'Reilly set it up by going on about Juan WIlliame working for NPR,after both had been instructed to do so...Fox news offered Juan Williams a $2 million contract,and his own show ...To take whose place on fox news.........Beck...Beck...Beck...Beck....Beck.....Beck.....
If I were a conspiracy theorist I would put together several events of late (Williams on notice; Fox yearning for credibility; O'Reilly eliciting the response; Predictable noise about Williams' predictable termination; $3M contract for Williams) to posit instead that NPR was set up by Fox. But I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
If I were a conspiracy theorist I would put together several events of late (Williams on notice; Fox yearning for credibility; O'Reilly eliciting the response; Predictable noise about Williams' predictable termination; $3M contract for Williams) to posit instead that NPR was set up by Fox. But I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
So what IF Soros did pull the strings? The tacit premise is that that would be a bad thing. If it would be bad, then why would it be bad? We're social animals and conspire by nature. Are they saying they are above it all? Elitist hypocrisy.
Ugh. Spineless Juan finally gets mad when it gets personal.
But my main beef today is this: hey MMTV--why must you always cut the video off PRECISELY at the best part? This is the latest in hundreds of trauma dramas that are unceremoniously chopped off at the exact moment a seemingly portentous point is about to be made. I know it's not Fair Use issues; your clips are too brief.
Maybe TOO brief.
I take back every positive comment I've ever made about Juan Williams. I used to think he had at least 2 bits of sense about him. He's just a bitter and angry whack job.
If Williams had said that every time he attended a Tea Party rally he felt afraid, you people cheering the vilification of a person who merely told the truth about his irrational, unresonable fears, would be calling him a hero. Hypocrites.
Let's see -- I'm not on board with the majority of users here or towing the liberal party line. I wonder how long my account will last before I'm silenced by those who are tolerant of everything but a difference of opinion?
Keep in mind, folks, that I am being polite and merely expressing a different point of view. Let's see how long before my account is squashed like an unwelcome insect.
Yeah, liberal. A word that generally means open to new ideas. Except in America in 2010, when it means get on the bus or be run over by it.
What kind of people fire someone without taking time to learn their side of the story Williams placed himself in jeopardy when he jumped off the Obama can do no wrong bandwagon.
Actually, no. He put himself in jeopardy when he ignored previous warnings from his employer regarding controversial statements made on air at his second job. He had been warned by his employer, he ignored the warnings, and he got fired.
What's the matter? Don't you support an employer's right to fire an employee who is violating the conditions of their employment? How very faux conservative of you. Sounds to me like you're not a conservative, you're just a Fox groupie.
What kind of people fire someone without taking time to learn their side of the story Williams placed himself in jeopardy when he jumped off the Obama can do no wrong bandwagon.
O'Reilly is sort of the end of the cycle. Fox sets him up as somewhat of a foil to Beck, so once he adopts a Beck idea, you can tell that it's reached maximum saturation.
He should reflect on how he allowed himself to turn into a Fox News character. Sure, I can understand what he said about being on a plane, but it was wrong of him to say it on public airwaves, that too on a muslim bashing channel. And he should have known that OReilly was expecting to have his own muslim bashing defended.
I believe Mr. Williams is a decent guy but being on non partisan and an uber partisan companies at the same time takes its toll.
He has only himself to decide on what his next step is. He can take the money and turn into another Morris or 'democrat expert' or, come clean.
Thanks.
It's not like 911 killers were dressed in burqas.
Williams' statement was irrational.
It's not like 911 killers were dressed in burqas.
Williams' statement was irrational.
will you apologize to her? They did offer him a new contract.
If he was, why? Murdoch standing up for free speech?
Not wrong, fairliberal. Wow, you really do have a very limited ability to discern content, don't you?
Maybe you should try being a journalist, a professional journalist, instead of a shill for what is essentially a propaganda operation.
Who's kidding whom here, anyway?
That will just leave you less time to campaign for Republicans before the midterms.
Dance, puppets, dance!
/snark/
By the way, I think I figured out why Fox is going so crazy over this. I think they want to prove their not racist by defending him.
That is the reason he got fired. He has his own mind and the extreme left cannot have that.
He was fired for getting on the wrong side of Soros.
But my main beef today is this: hey MMTV--why must you always cut the video off PRECISELY at the best part? This is the latest in hundreds of trauma dramas that are unceremoniously chopped off at the exact moment a seemingly portentous point is about to be made. I know it's not Fair Use issues; your clips are too brief.
Maybe TOO brief.
What a f***ing sellout.
Also, you're not helping.
Let's see -- I'm not on board with the majority of users here or towing the liberal party line. I wonder how long my account will last before I'm silenced by those who are tolerant of everything but a difference of opinion?
Keep in mind, folks, that I am being polite and merely expressing a different point of view. Let's see how long before my account is squashed like an unwelcome insect.
Yeah, liberal. A word that generally means open to new ideas. Except in America in 2010, when it means get on the bus or be run over by it.
Nice, really nice.
What's the matter? Don't you support an employer's right to fire an employee who is violating the conditions of their employment? How very faux conservative of you. Sounds to me like you're not a conservative, you're just a Fox groupie.
You are a believable person because?