While I can appreciate the media wanting to give the Palins privacy, the McCain campaign and her
own mother's decision to release the status of her pregnancy - for
whatever reason - put this issue front and center. Let's not forget, it was the McCain campaign itself that told us Palin's 17 year old daughter was pregnant. No givesies backsies.
McCain "picked" Sarah Palin to appease the Religious Right. This is in spite of who he really wanted to pick -
Lieberman or Ridge. McCain's pandering to the right-wing conservative agenda, by definition, brings up all manner of social issues. So what kinds of issues did McCain dredge up? Part of John McCain and Sarah Palin's agenda according to their own words is to oppose sex education in our schools. From
McCain's campaign earlier this year:
Senator McCain strongly opposes efforts by the Democratic-controlled Congress to eliminate abstinence-only sex education classes for school-aged children. Senator McCain believes the correct policy for educating young children on this subject is to promote abstinence as the only safe and responsible alternative. To do otherwise is to send a mixed signal to children that, on the one hand they should not be sexually active, but on the other here is the way to go about it.
And from
Palin in 2006:
In an Eagle Forum Alaska questionnaire, Palin gave this response to the following question:
Will you support funding for abstinence-until-marriage education instead of for explicit sex-education programs, school-based clinics, and the distribution of contraceptives in schools?
Palin: Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.
It's an obvious failure of judgment on both McCain and Palin to support abstinence only education - we have
study after
study that says it doesn't work - girls are more likely to get pregnant or contract an STD. But even in the face of logic and data, if you're going to support abstinence only education, you should at least practice what you preach.
That Palin's own daughter got pregnant
should, to any reasonable human being, encourage McCain and Palin to revise their thinking. Do McCain and Palin now support sex education in our schools? That's a fair question the media should be asking both of them. If either of them now support sex education, we haven't heard about it.
If this scale of failure of abstinence only education isn't enough to shake up at least Palin, then these aren't leaders ready for the world stage, they are religious ideologues. This is a question of policy judgment in the face of not only facts but indisputable proof that abstinence only programs don't work. This is a legitimate policy issue to be explored by the press.
Moreover, McCain and Palin have no problem telling gay and lesbian families how to live their family lives. In spite of their "pro-life" commitment, McCain and Palin are opposed to gay marriage. Children of gay parents aren't afforded the same protections Palin's own soon-to-be married daughter is going to have, and therefore running on family values brings up these kinds of issues. From her 2006 campaign site:
If Sarah Palin is going to tell gays and lesbians how to live their lives, it's a fair question to see whether she practices what she preaches. She is the Vice Presidential candidate of a party that has put the private lives of millions of Americans front and center - right in the
platform.
As for McCain, his campaign is such a disaster at the moment they are now trying to bat down the very information they released to the media. This is a question of judgment in selecting a running mate. If you're going to run on family values, maybe you should check yourself in the mirror before you walk out the door.
As uncomfortable as some of the questions surrounding Palin are, this woman is a 72 year-old's heartbeat away from the Presidency should McCain win. The public deserves to know who the real Sarah Palin is. And if they don't like what they see, they have a right to judge John McCain's decision-making.
Read More......