The US Senate Democratic Policy Committee has issued a
new report detailing some of the costs of our current health care system, including one tidbit I heard about for the first time the other day:
Real per person spending on health care has been increasing rapidly, rising over 40 percent in the past decade alone. Between 1980 and 2007, the share of gross domestic product (GDP) devoted to health care almost doubled. In 2007, the United States spent a total of $2.2 trillion on health care, which represents $7,421 per person or 16 percent of GDP. [Health and Human Services, accessed 3/11/2009] This is nearly twice the average of other developed nations. [Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 12/10/2008]
We're spending twice as much as other developed countries on health care, and our health care isn't all that. In fact, as Chris has written repeatedly, we rank pretty close to the bottom of the list of developed countries in terms of the quality of our health care:
The WHO ranking that puts France at the top (Freedom Health, perhaps?) and the US arriving at number 37, just behind global heavyweights Dominica and Costa Rica.
The report has a ton of good summary information about health care in the US, even just on the
summary page. The only fault I'd find with the report is the focus on, yet again, working families and businesses, as if our country existed of no one else.
I'll keep writing this until I am blue in the face. I can afford my current health care. It's expensive as hell, over $400 a month premiums, and goes up 25% a year, but yes I can afford it. The problem? I have the best self-employed plan that Blue Cross offers in DC, and it only provides me $1500 a year in prescription drugs. That's it. (Fun fact: How much prescription drug coverage did Blue Cross give me back in 1997 when I started with them under this plan? $1500. The amount never goes up, and with inflation and increasing drug costs, it will soon be meaningless, even though my premium has tripled in that time.) When I hit my $1500 limit, like I did last fall, Blue Cross cuts me off. I can't buy better coverage from Blue Cross, it doesn't exist, so my income is irrelevant - the fact that I'm not blue collar or working class is irrelevant. No matter what your income, the best plan Blue Cross offers to the self-employed gives you practically no prescription drug coverage whatsoever. And if I get MS, HIV or some other horrible disease, even my "good" income won't be able to afford $2000 a month in prescription costs. So please, stop talking as though this is a problem that only affects the poor and businesses. After a while, it's a bit of a slap in the face.
Not to mention,
just from a purely political perspective, who votes in our country? Who lobbies? Who has the power and the money to block health care reform? Is it poor blue collar workers, or is it the upper middle class and wealthy? Why are Democrats not trying to educate the middle class, upper middle class, and even wealthy Americans about how bad their health coverage really is? About how they're quite literally one illness away from bankruptcy in many cases? Wouldn't it help to have those people on your side too?
It's a good report, don't get me wrong. I just wish Democrats could get beyond their obsession with the poor, to the exclusion of everyone else. We're all Americans, and we all deserve your help.
There are also a few videos. Senator Durbin points out that if you want to keep your current plan, under the new health care reform regime, you can:
And Schumer points out that the new health care reform plan would force private companies, like Blue Cross, to actually compete. How much more capitalistic can you get than that?
Read More......