I thought I had seen it all from the moralizing, anti-gay, bible beating mouthpieces, but I think this may take the cake. As commenter
Justabill noted in another thread, we've had these Republican Sexual Hypocrite reveals in
the last month and a half:
*
Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID), cruising for potty sex, somehow "mistakenly" pleads guilty.
*
Diaper David Vitter (R-LA) admits he's a "bad", "naughty" and "nasty boy" with hookers.
*
Glenn Murphy, Jr., the recently elected chairman of the Young Republican National Federation, caught sexually assaulting a sleeping man.
* former White house spiritual advisor and fallen megachurch pastor Tweaker
Ted "I'm completely heterosexual"
Haggard asking whatever fans he has left for money.
* former NC Republican lawmaker and Christian Action League president,
Coy C. Privette -- caught at the no-tell motel with a sex worker -- also guilty.
*
Mark Foley is back in the news, he won’t turn over his former congressional computer to investigators.
*
Rep. Bob Allen, another Republican, caught asking to blow an undercover officer and willing to pay $20 for the pleasure; currently coming up with an excuse for the day (scary black men, thunderstorms) for his same-sex appetite.
With the hypocrite closet bursting open, and its occupants falling out on top of one another,
there's not a lot the Moral Values SetTM can do except wring their hands and fret about the state of things, right? They rallied the faithful in the evangelical pews and placed their faith in -- and cast their votes for -- publicly pious, "family values" politicians and community leaders who now are destroying the right-wing campaign to retake the secular culture back from the godless heathens, wanton women who dare to want to control their womb and sexuality, and the homosexuals.
As Nadine Smith of
Equality Florida said in this article in the
Florida Times-Union,
Does private behavior matter?:
"It seems like the people who are the most vocal, the most condemning, the most judgmental, seem to be people struggling deeply with their own personal conflicts, and that's where the scandals come from whether it's the church or politics. It's fairly routine. Find someone banging the drum of hysteria around an issue, and you'll find someone, generally speaking, who is wrestling themselves internally."
However, you would be wrong if you thought the fringe right couldn't come up with a "better" rationalization for all the moral falls from grace, as it were.
Should private behavior matter in public leaders? Some political observers say yes, arguing that morality is the only way to ensure a politician's voting record stays consistent with his or her personal values. But others say the recent revelations only prove hypocrisy, and some politicians say public expectations can be unreasonable.
Note to readers:
bookmark this post; you will want to refer to the following mind-blowing quotes from this article time to time.
First up, Jim Smith, editor of the Jacksonville-based Florida
Baptist Witness:
"If someone's walk doesn't match their talk, of course it's relevant. But a politician's conduct "also has to be evaluated in light of other considerations, and we aren't electing saints here," Smith said. "All of us are fallen and subject to sin. We're not looking for perfection. But we do want integrity."
They accuse the left of moral relativism and hair-splitting? On to Father Tony Palazzolo, priest and pastoral consultant at the Diocese of St. Augustine:
"Is it a one-time indiscretion, or a pattern? Was there an apology? Repentance? It seems to me your religious values determine how you make a decision about right or wrong and good and bad, and if you're willing to compromise those values in your private life, it seems the same thing would hold true for a person's public life."
How about this, from John Stemberger, of the Florida Family Policy Council Inc. (he's working to pass a same-sex marriage ban amendment in the Sunshine State). The article notes that he
suggests a "sliding scale" when evaluating a politician's fall from grace.
"If I'm going to hire a plumber, their primary job is to do it right, and I'm not too concerned with their character and moral life. When does it become relevant? To be a lawmaker and then a lawbreaker means there has been a violation of trust. Character does matter."
Oh, so it only matters if you're
caught breaking the law. What this is really about is going back to the good old days where "forbidden immoral acts" occurred on the DL on Saturday night, and you turned up in church in your Sunday best the next day -- and no one knows you broke your marital vows by blowing that guy in that highway rest stop, potentially exposing your spouse to STDs. That's correct "Christian" behavior.
My personal favorite comes from
Ralph Reed, the former executive director of the Christian Coalition, associate of Jack Abramoff, and frequent talking head when the MSM wants a rep from the far right:
Let's be clear what voters of faith are saying. They're not saying that every single politician who professes a conservative viewpoint should live up to that standard. It's really the opposite. None of us are perfect, and we all fall short of God's grace. A lot of times that gets lost when someone's failing becomes politicized."
Yes, working to elect people to deny tax-paying, law-abiding LGBT citizens civil rights while those self-loathing pols cruise for gay sex makes
perfect sense.
One frustrated Florida pol wants more
reasonable standards for hypocrites. Republican State Senator Jim King of Jacksonville has been fighting off rumors that he was frequenting t*tty bars.
"I live a pretty good Christian life, but in the eyes of some people I'm being disrespectful because sometimes I like to drink wine with dinner. That's frustrating. Elected officials are expected to live a totally different life than their neighbors."
Stay out of
our wombs and bedrooms and then we'll stop talking about the moral hypocrites when the stories hit the front pages.
Read More......