Dead Heat in Pennsylania
5 minutes ago
Dozens of terror suspects on federal watch lists were allowed to buy firearms legally in the United States last year, according to a Congressional investigation that points up major vulnerabilities in federal gun laws.But remember: Guns don't kill people, terrorists kill people. Read More......
People suspected of being members of a terrorist group are not automatically barred from legally buying a gun, and the investigation, conducted by the Government Accountability Office, indicated that people with clear links to terrorist groups had regularly taken advantage of this gap.
The frenzy to discredit Gannon - like the frenzy to discredit Daschle - became nasty and personal as bloggers (and some mainstream journalists) dug into his past. I won't repeat most of what they found; that's stooping to the level of bloggers, and it serves no good purpose here.Note his use of the phrase "stooping to the level of bloggers." He's talking generically about ALL bloggers, not "the" bloggers, but "bloggers." Apparently we, as a class, have a level, and according to the executive editor of the Argus Leader it's pretty low. So here's the email I sent to Beck:
From: John AravosisI thought I was fair. And I simply, and not too rudely, pointed out that he shows disdain for bloggers in the story without realizing that a lot of us are accomplished journalists, etc. So what response do I get?
To: Beck, Randell
Sent: Mon Mar 07 19:55:59 2005
Subject: stooping to the level of bloggers?
Mr. Beck,
As one of those bloggers who apparently stoop, in your view, I'm curious why you think a practicing male prostitute working in the White House and operating within a knife's throw of the president isn't a valid point of concern?
Now, I admit, I don't know much about South Dakota values, but I'm willing to bet that gay prostitution isn't real high on the list, especially when gay prostitutes are given access to the West Wing and the president, and find themselves involved in CIA scandals and more.
And as an aside, this blogger has a Georgetown law degree and has written for the Economist magazine, among others. You do your readers a disservice by pandering to the canard that bloggers are lesser journalists than you and your staff. Many of us have better credentials than many of you.
JOHN
Subject: Re: stooping to the level of bloggers?And people wonder what's wrong with the mainstream media. This is the guy who runs the entire newspaper. Read More......
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 21:26:37 -0500
From: "Beck, Randell"
To: AMERICAblog
Wow. Georgetown? The economist? Really? Us'n rubes is mighty impressed. Thank you for your comment. R. Beck
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
4:17pmNow, GannonGuckert is either lying or telling the truth. If he's lying, his already sinking credibility will sink even further. If he's telling the truth, however, then things get even more interesting with this story as "some years ago" would be at least two years ago, and it's only two years that Gannon has been covering the White House. That would put GannonGuckert and Biden's "meeting" smack dab in the middle of Gannon's known prostitution years.
I watched a clip of Sen. Joe Biden on Bill Maher's HBO crapfest. I wonder why he didn't mention meeting me some years ago. C'mon Joe, think...
A conservative activist says if you're looking for radicals, the U.S. Supreme Court is the place to start. Author and political commentator Mark Levin says the Supreme Court is the last bastion of radicalism left in America today. The high court, he says, confers rights on terrorists, confers benefits on illegal immigrants, and seeks to eliminate all references to religion from the public square. "They want to deny you and me our free-speech rights before an election," he adds, "but they have no problem with upholding cyberspace child pornography as a constitutional right." Levin says the judicial activists on the high court believe they can do anything they want when, in reality, it is the people who decide the issues of the day -- not nine elevated lawyers.Read More......
''As far as Jeff Gannon goes, anyone who follows the briefing on a regular basis knows there are a number of people on both sides of the political aisle who come to the briefing to express their views," McClellan wrote in his e-mail. ''I try to call on everyone who has a question. The briefing room should be an inclusive place, and it should not be the press secretary's role to pick and choose who covers it."Maybe if we had all the gay male Republican prostitutes try to get married FIRST, the Bush administration would welcome them and then not try to write us out of the US Constitution. Read More......
While we're on the subject of Jeff Gannon, Ann Coulter posed some curious questions in a recent article. "Are we supposed to like gay people now, or hate them? Is there a Web site where I can go to and find out how the Democrats want me to feel about gay people on a moment-to-moment basis?" This was, of course, in response to revelations that Jeff Gannon is a gay prostitute.Be sure to scroll up on that page and read their take on Gannon's latest. Read More......
So I have a couple questions of my own: Are we supposed to like gay people now, or hate them? Is there a Web site where I can go to and find out how the Republicans want me to feel about gay people on a moment-to-moment basis?
It's just that I'm perfectly consistent in my support for gay rights. What I'm not comfortable with is the White House giving a real live prostitute with a fake name who works for a fake news organization that is actually a front for a Republican activist group free and easy access to press briefings so that the aforementioned prostitute can toss softball questions at the president to get him out of sticky situations.
But now we're in a bizarre situation where Republicans like Coulter are one day screaming about amending the Constitution in order to discriminate against gays, or telling me that gays are sinners who are going to hell, or that cartoon characters are secretly working on an evil gay agenda to corrupt our children, or that "tolerance" and "love" are secret gay code words, and then the next day they're telling me that I'm the homophobe and poor gay people like Jeff Gannon need to be defended from the likes of me and my awful liberal friends.
I mean, if gay prostitution is okay - which, according to all these Republicans who are now accusing the left of homophobia, it is - then gay marriage must be double-plus-good, right? Otherwise I just don't get the argument. How come, according to Republicans, it's fine for a gay man to sell himself for no-strings-attached sex with other men online, but it's not fine for two gay men to enter into a lifelong, loving marriage partnership?
Still, at least there's no ambiguity about the fact that Republicans think all Arabs are terrorists. In the same column, Coulter says, "Press passes can't be that hard to come by if the White House allows that old Arab Helen Thomas to sit within yards of the president." So while Ann may have suddenly had a dramatic transformation on gay rights, at least that ol' racism is alive and well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© 2010 - John Aravosis | Design maintenance by Jason Rosenbaum
Send me your tips: americablog AT starpower DOT net