Marcy’s hypothesis about Fannie and Freddie’s deal with the title insurance industry appears to be coming to fruition, but let’s look at what this means in practice. The title insurance industry wants servicers – mostly divisions of the big banks – to indemnify them if any problems arise in post-foreclosure sales. That’s basically the entire deal.
If someone wants to tell me how this protects the banks from consequences of their errors, they can tell me. As I read it, the banks would be liable for picking up the title insurers’ expenses in the event of those errors.
You can argue, as Marcy and some others do, that Fannie and Freddie was uniquely positioned to investigate the foreclosure process, or put it on hold. I don’t really see that. I see Fannie and Freddie as businesses. They have a business motive, based on their position as owners of a lot of these mortgages, to put back onto the banks sour mortgage pools that didn’t live up to underwriting or origination standards on the banks. That repurchase surge shows no sign of letting up and could ultimately by incredibly painful for the banks. But Fannie and Freddie also have a business motive to mitigate taxpayer losses in the housing market. You could change the GSE structure and make them a guarantor and a regulator of the marketplace, but that’s not really what they are right now (it’s part of why their model needs to change).
The title issue is a legal matter; the title insurers seek legal indemnity. As such, this whole thing will be ultimately decided by the courts. And guess what, the courts aren’t inclined to help the banks out on this score.
Bank of America Corp. and GMAC Mortgage may be restarting some foreclosures, but this does not mean their legal problems with bad documents are over.
According to lawyers, supplemental or amended affidavits, which the servicers have begun to file after their process reviews, do not necessarily override the original documents. There is a chance some judges will not approve the new documents or could even demand that entire cases be thrown out and refiled. The legal uncertainty extends to any other servicer following in Bank of America or GMAC Mortgage’s footsteps.
“Judges will be a little bit leery, at least initially, as to how they allow some of these suits to proceed,” said Jeffrey Taft, a partner in Mayer Brown LLP. “I would expect that judges are going to carefully scrutinize what’s been provided in the past and what’s being presented now.”
In fact, there’s evidence that judges are throwing out cases left and right. [cont'd]