Thursday, September 30, 2010

Paris installs first 'sparkling water' public drinking fountain




Seriously, they've installed a sparkling drinking fountain (in the neighborhood of one of my friends, I told him to go get video).  As for me, I'd simply like to be able to walk home at night in DC without worrying about being mugged.  In Paris, mugging isn't really an issue in most of the city, even at 3am on a deserted street.  So they get bubbly water.  More from the City of Paris' Web site.
Read More......

French politician confuses 'inflation' with.... a sexual act


Oh, come on, it's a political story. ;-) Read More......

Successfully taking on the mafia in Sicily


Neat story of how people are finally taking on the mafia, and winning, in Italy. Makes what we face, and do, look almost miniscule in comparison.
For two years, Maniaci aired exposés about a mob-owned distillery in Partinico that was violating Sicily’s antipollution statutes and pouring toxic fumes into the atmosphere. At one point he chained himself to the distillery’s security fence in an effort to get police to shut it down. (It closed in 2005 but reopened last year after a legal battle.) He identified a house used by Bernard Provenzano and local Mafia chieftains to plan killings and other crimes: authorities confiscated it and knocked it down. In 2006 he got the scoop of a lifetime, joining police as they raided a tin shack near Corleone and captured Provenzano. The Mafia has burned Maniaci’s car twice and repeatedly threatened to kill him; in 2008 a pair of hoodlums beat him outside his office. Maniaci went on the air the next day with a bruised face and denounced his attackers. After the beating, he declined an offer of round-the-clock police protection, saying it would make it impossible for him to meet his “secret sources.”
Read More......

GOP Senate candidate, and anti-masturbation activist, caught lying about a new lie


Absolutely incredible. Mind you, she's posing as some conservative do-gooder. And she's now a proven serial liar, in addition to a (former?) witch. Greg Sargent over at the WashingtonPost.com even caught her today lying about a new lie. It's a complicated post, so I'm going to take the liberty of just this once quoting it extensively:
This morning, the Democratic National Committee pointed out that O'Donnell is also described in a ZoomInfo entry as having achieved a "certificate" in "Post Modernism in the New Millennium" from the "University of Oxford." The Zoom Info entry was labled, "user verified."

ZoomInfo, which has spent the day looking into this, has sent over a statement detailing what happened with this profile. According to the company, O'Donnell's profile was claimed in 2008 through something called a "double opt-in process."

The company says this process cannot function without "response to a verification e-mail message." ZoomInfo is not releasing that email address, citing privacy. But here's the rub: The company is confirming that they have identified the emailer:
We can say, however, that the email address was not of an anonymous nature -- that is, the address was not from a personal free email service and contained identifying information. ZoomInfo's Terms of Service require users to agree that they will not "impersonate any person or entity or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent" their affiliation with a person or entity.
The company is also confirming that O'Donnell -- or whoever claimed the profile -- would have had ample opportunity to change any wrong info, and that after it was claimed, it could not be changed any other way:
All persons who claim profiles on ZoomInfo have the opportunity to review, update, delete and change information that ZoomInfo has compiled from other sources. In addition, persons who claim their profiles may add information of their choosing, including employment and educational history. All employment history (titles and companies), educational background, etc. is "locked" when the registrant claims the profile. Our automated system does not add any new titles, companies or educational records to claimed profiles, even if we find new Web articles and update a profile with these references.
In other words, ZoomInfo knows who claimed this profile and verified the information. And in response to my questions, it's not disputing the idea that it was claimed by O'Donnell or someone apparently authorized by her to do so. Keep in mind: The company could say this wasn't done by O'Donnell or someone authorized by her without violating the poster's privacy.
Read More......

Many big donors pulling support for Dems this election


NYT:
Many wealthy Democratic patrons, who in the past have played major roles financing outside groups to help elect the party’s candidates, are largely sitting out these crucial midterm elections.

Democratic donors like George Soros, the bête noire of the right, and his fellow billionaire Peter B. Lewis, who each gave more than $20 million to Democratic-oriented groups in the 2004 election, appear to be holding back so far.
The donors’ reluctance stems from a variety of factors, including pessimism about the party’s prospects in November, but also President Obama’s strong condemnations of this kind of independent activity, both during the 2008 campaign and after he was elected.
Democratic consultant Mike Lux explains more about how the anti- strategy has killed Democratic donations. Read More......

Ian Welsh: 'Tax Cuts for the rich create jobs outside the US'


This is a drive-by, and it won't be news to some of you. But it's not a connection that many have made, since it's a series of dots, where the endpoints aren't obviously related.

Ian Welsh says it simply: Tax cuts for the rich create jobs outside the US. And he's right. If you sweeten the purse of the rich, they put money where it will earn. At this point, that's not the U.S. So if you want jobs here, make investment attractive here, or unattractive abroad. Or both.

Yes, that's managed capitalism (but so are bailouts). And yes, that's contra what Bush defined as "freedom" — meaning freedom for capital to move wherever (you didn't think the Bush definition of "freedom" involved real people, did you?).

But so what. You want jobs here, keep money here. Ian Welsh:
If you can build a factory overseas which produces the same goods for less, meaning more profit for you, why would you build it in the US?

Until that question is adequately answered, by which I mean “until it’s worth investing in the US”, most of the discretionary money of the rich will either go into useless speculative activities like the housing and credit bubbles, which don’t create real growth in the US, or they will go overseas.

There are a number of ways this question can be answered.
Then he lists the ways. A good read, highly recommended.

If when you're done reading, the details float away, just remember — every dollar you hand to the rich in this post-Reagan fever to serve them, means fewer Wheaties for Americans.

If we don't stand up for us, who will?

GP

Update: Edited the last sentence for clarity. Read More......

GOP member of Congress says it's too soon to support Boehner for speaker


Seems the Tan One isn't as popular as he thinks. Read More......

24% of second quarter home sales were foreclosures


Another sign that there is still a lot of surplus in the market. Some banks had been holding back foreclosed inventory though there could be years worth out there. Those in Washington who thought this problem could potentially be turned around quickly are being proven wrong.
Nearly one in every four U.S. homes sold in the second quarter was a deeply discounted foreclosed house, putting the market on pace to work through distressed properties in about three years, RealtyTrac said.

Banks stepped up foreclosures through the summer and will take over a record 1.2 million homes this year, up from around 1 million last year and about 100,000 in 2005 before the housing bust, according to a forecast from the real estate data company.

Foreclosed homes accounted for 24 percent of all second-quarter sales, at an average price discount of more than 26 percent compared with homes not in the foreclosure process.
Read More......

It's official. Rahm is leaving the White House to run for Mayor


The first campaign event will be at the White House tomorrow. I say, Good riddance:
President Obama will give his chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, a send-off Friday as Mr. Emanuel officially announces his departure from the West Wing to run for mayor of Chicago, officials familiar with the decision said.

The White House press secretary, Robert Gibbs, at his daily briefing on Thursday afternoon said that the president will give two personnel announcements on Friday morning from the East Room of the White House. Mr. Gibbs, admitting that he was being purposely “oblique,” would not confirm whether the announcements would concern Mr. Emanuel.

The two officials, who declined to be named in advance of the official announcement, confirmed that Mr. Obama plans to name Pete Rouse, a senior adviser, to replace Mr. Emanuel. Mr. Rouse has been at the president’s side since Mr. Obama arrived in Washington nearly six years ago as a senator, serving as his chief of staff.
Can some enterprising reporter ask candidate Rahm his position on same-sex marriage? I suspect Rahm will be seeing and hearing a lot from LGBT activists as he campaigns over the next few months.

Also, I do wonder what Rahm Emanuel would say to any senior staffer who quit a key job with under five weeks to go before an election? I can't imagine it would be pretty, unless said staffer was the kind of disaster that Rahm has been. Read More......

Olbermann examines WI GOPer Ron Johnson's role in Catholic child rape scandal


Getting ensnared in the Catholic Church's child rape scandal -- and the subsequent cover-up isn't the best place for a candidate to be. But, that's where Wisconsin GOP Senate candidate Ron Johnson is. And, he put himself there.

Watch this clip from Olbermann. It's devastating.

Johnson, who is spending millions of his own money to buy the Senate seat, is running against Russ Feingold, who actually is a true progressive. Johnson has been ahead in recent polling.

Feingold's website is here. His ActBlue page is here. Read More......

S. 3804, the Internet Blacklist bill


As a follow-on to this post about Obama law enforcement and security officials seeking sweeping changes to Internet-related devices (if you haven't read that yet, you should) — comes this, from Jim in the comments.

It's S. 3804, the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA; I almost want to say cloaca). It's ostensibly designed as a sledge hammer against any site where counterfeit or copyrighted material are "central to the activity of the Internet site." It bypasses take-down orders for specific infractions, and goes right to "your whole site is evil — banned."

Targeted sites could be placed on a required-to-block list via a court order, or on a suggested-to-block list by the Attorney General. You read that right; the exec branch gets to unilaterally "suggest" which sites to block.

Can you see Comcast bucking the AG's suggestions list? Heck, I can see Comcast paying (sorry, bribing; sorry, campaign-donating to) the party-in-power to get its own targets on that list. I can also see the White House political adviser directing (sorry, suggesting; sorry, whispering over cocktails) that the AG might remember there's an election coming. There's always an election coming, right?

They're calling it the Internet Blacklist; they wouldn't be wrong.

The sponsors of COICA are Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) and Orrin Hatch (R-Utah); now there's a pair to conjure with. More information is here and here. The Chamber of Commerce loves this bill's precious butt, as does Viacom. The Electronic Frontier Foundation hates it. 'Nuff said?

Rumor is the vote will come soon, though the bill is still in committee; I can't verify the schedule one way or the other.

Action opportunity — If you want to, you could google "petition stop coica" to see how many petitions you can sign. Or if you prefer to roll your own, you might start with Sheldon Whitehouse or Amy Klobuchar; they're on the sponsors list. The rest of the Dem sponsors are either unknown to me (Herb Kohl-Wis, net worth roughly $200 million; and Ben Cardin-Md) or look like lost causes (for example, Chuck Shumer).

GP

Update: Links added for Whitehouse and Klobuchar. Read More......

Are liberals being set up to the take fall for the (possibly) looming election disaster?


Jane says yes. And it's the only logical reason I can think of to explain why the President and the Vice President, nearly four weeks before a crucial election, are out there denigrating the Democratic base.
President Obama is at it again, this time scolding Democratic voters in the pages of Rolling Stone:
[I]f people now want to take their ball and go home, that tells me folks weren't serious in the first place...The idea that we've got a lack of enthusiasm in the Democratic base, that people are sitting on their hands complaining, is just irresponsible.
When people scratch their heads and wonder how a campaign based on hectoring your supporters expects to turn out voters, the answer is, it doesn't. And you don't see anyone who's actually running for office this November engaging in it. They well know that your job is to inspire and energize voters in advance of the election. Obama did too -- when he was running for office himself.

No, this isn't about getting voters to the polls in November. It's about setting up a narrative for who will take the blame for a disastrous election. And once again, the White House doesn't care if they make matters worse in order to deflect responsibility from Obama.
Jane goes on to present a compelling case of how the White House has previously written off elections early in order to escape blame. Is she right? I'm not sure. But for the life of me I have no idea how maligning your own voters inspires more of them vote. Read More......

Republicans block Net Neutrality for this session


The Party of No strikes again.
Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) confirmed Wednesday afternoon that his net neutrality bill was effectively scrapped after Rep. Joe Barton (R-Tex.) declined to support the legislation.

In a statement, Waxman urged the Federal Communications Commission to reassert its authority to regulate broadband access providers. Doing so would allow the FCC to create its own net neutrality rules -- an effort that was thrown into doubt when a federal court ruled the agency overstepped its authority by sanctioning Comcast for allegedly violating broadband rules.

Waxman said he and his staff had worked with public interest groups, Internet service providers and Web content companies to try to reach an agreement around a bill that all parties could support. Waxman, chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, said he had also kept Republican members on the committee abreast of his work. He said it was essential to gain Republican support for the bill.
Read More......

Thursday Morning Open Thread


Good morning.

The President is back in Washington after his whirlwind trip through backyards across America -- and that huge rally in Madison.

Congress has, on the other hand, left town. Both bodies wrapped up last night -- and are heading home to campaign. Democratic leaders, however, are still in town and will be meeting with Obama later today. That group includes: Senators Reid, Durbin, Schumer and Murray, Speaker Pelosi, Reps. Hoyer, Clyburn and Van Hollen. I'm sure that crowd is all real happy with each other.

There's lots of work left for Congress to do. They're going to cram in a lot of work in the lame duck. Anyone really expecting great results from that?

If you haven't read John's post on the suicide of Tyler Clementi, you should. It's a very painful story. There have been a number of suicides of young gay teens lately. One is too many. Something is out of whack -- and it doesn't help when prominent Americans bash gays for political gain.

We're under a tornado watch here in the District. Tropical Storm Nicole, or what's left of the storm, is working its way up the East Coast today. That poses a particular problem for the canine member of my household. Petey hates to go out in the rain. Just hates it. Looks at me like I'm torturing him. It's not fun.

Heading out now. Read More......

EU facing more economic hurdles


Ireland has now constructed a worst case scenario for the cost of bailing out Anglo Irish Bank. The estimate is that it could reach as high as 32% of the Irish GDP. Elsewhere in Europe, Spain has had its credit rating cut by another ratings agency which means the cost of borrowing to pay the debt will be more expensive. Spain faces a challenging transition from a construction-focused work environment to something else. Both cases highlight the problems ahead for Europe. In the US, many of the problems have been pushed out to the state level so we're also not out of the woods yet either. Read More......

Most recent Tour de France winner tests positive during the Tour


The banned substance levels appear to be quite small though his story isn't the most convincing excuse. What makes it all sound even worse is that he's known since late August and only now is he planning to schedule a press conference to discuss his side of the story. No matter how you look at it, it doesn't sound positive for what used to be a great sport. BBC:
Cyclist Alberto Contador, winner of the 2010 Tour de France, has said he has tested positive for a banned substance.

Contador's press officer said he had tested positive for clenbuterol during a rest on the Tour in July.

In a statement, the spokesman added that the Spanish rider was the victim of "food contamination" and would hold a news conference later on Thursday.

Cycling's governing body, UCI, later confirmed that Contador had been provisionally suspended.
Read More......

Majority of Americans believe free trade agreements hurt the US


So was it a poor job of selling free trade or is free trade in fact a bad thing for the country? NBC/WSJ Poll:
A new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll shows that 69 percent of Americans believe free trade agreements with other countries have cost jobs in the United States, while just 18 percent believe they have created jobs. A 53 percent majority—up from 46 percent three years ago and 30 percent in 1999—believes that trade agreements have hurt the nation overall.

Moreover, that rising skepticism extends across the political spectrum—a sign that continued trade expansion may be no easier for Republican leaders to promote if they regain control of Congress than it has been for Democrats.

While 65 percent of union members say free trade has hurt the U.S., so do 61 percent of Tea Party sympathizers. Democratic pollster Peter Hart and his Republican counterpart Bill McInturff, who conduct the NBC/WSJ poll, say the greatest shift against free trade has come among relatively affluent Americans, or those earning more than $75,000 a year.
Read More......