Smarter Ideas| More...
 

Adrian Grenier

Adrian Grenier

Posted: October 27, 2010 09:46 AM

We're Driving the Bluefin Tuna Population Towards Extinction

What's Your Reaction:

Diving into the 55-degree water, I didn't know what to expect. I was hoping to see a blue fin, a lot of bluefin tuna.

Bluefin are some of the biggest and baddest fish in the ocean. They can grow to 15 feet long, weigh over 1,000 pounds, and swim up to 50 miles per hour when pursuing prey. Like tigers or lions, they are fierce predators that play a critical role in the ecosystem.

Most people don't have the opportunity to see an animal like this in the wild. I got to, because I've teamed up with several organizations -- Nautica, an international ocean conservation group called Oceana, and GQ's Gentlemen's Fund (an initiative that encourages men to become agents of change by supporting charities important to them) -- to shoot a PSA about bluefin. I'm no marine biologist -- just an actor who loves to dive and loves the ocean. Our goal was to get close enough to film with them, and that is very hard to do, because they are so fast. You see them, and then they are just gone. It is clear why they are among the ocean's top predators.

Unfortunately, bluefin are also among our top prey these days. Too many of us love to eat them -- particularly as sushi or sashimi. To satisfy our appetite, the fishing industry has developed better and faster techniques for catching bluefin. The tuna industry has also adopted the practice of catching juveniles and "fattening" them in large pens out on the open ocean. The removal of these fish from the wild before they are able to spawn is rapidly becoming one of the biggest threats to their survival.

The end result? An ocean with fewer and fewer bluefin. This amazing creature, according to many experts, is now teetering on the edge of complete collapse.

The international group that oversees the Atlantic bluefin fishing business is about to hold its annual meeting in Paris. But this group, the International Convention to Conserve Atlantic Tunas, has too often ignored its own scientists' recommendations for setting responsible tuna quotas. An independent body commissioned to review the organization has called it "an international disgrace."

Earlier this year, several nations were calling for a total ban on fishing for Atlantic bluefin tuna. ICCAT could at least follow scientists' recommendations to cut way back on bluefin fishing, allowing this incredible creature the chance to thrive.

The path ICCAT is currently on leads to the extinction of one of the great ocean predators and an uncertain future for the marine ecosystem.

 
Diving into the 55-degree water, I didn't know what to expect. I was hoping to see a blue fin, a lot of bluefin tuna. Bluefin are some of the biggest and baddest fish in the ocean. They can grow to...
Diving into the 55-degree water, I didn't know what to expect. I was hoping to see a blue fin, a lot of bluefin tuna. Bluefin are some of the biggest and baddest fish in the ocean. They can grow to...
 
Comments
241
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (7 total)
photo
Elizabeth Kipp   5 hours ago (12:33 PM)
The demise of the blue fin tuna is just one in a long line of species marching their way to extinction.
Paul Erlich, the activist and evolutionary biologist, spoke of this phenomenon as "rivet-popping", as in you can pop one rivet in an airplane, and it will problably still hold together; but, the more rivets you po, the more likely it becomes that the airplane will falla part. The airplane was his metaphor for the ecosystem. Even Rachel Carson in "Silent Spring" warned of this issue. What will it take for our leaders to take this SERIOUSLY?
photo
LiberalOutlaw   02:08 PM on 10/29/2010
Lets, just for a moment, put aside the fact that if the bluefin tuna goes extinct, the entire marine ecosystem would likely collapse.

It's a proven fact that bluefin tuna contain the highest amount of mercury than any other type of tuna. And tuna, in general already contain incredibly high amounts, considering where they sit on the food chain.

http://www­.nytimes.c­om/2008/01­/23/dining­/23sushi.h­tml
http://www­.nytimes.c­om/2008/01­/24/opinio­n/24iht-ed­tuna.1.947­2028.html

So basically, that sushi roll or tuna fish sandwich, or even that McFish sandwich from McDonalds that so many people enjoy, could very well be poisoning our brains with mercury; mercury poisoning is no joke, and it's just as bad or worse than, lead poisoning.

It would be interesting to see how high the mercury levels are in the members of the supposed "Tea Party movement."
Steelheadangler   05:43 PM on 10/29/2010
photo
Halsey   01:27 PM on 10/29/2010
Isn't it ironic that some of the ads after this piece are for either buying tuna to eat or fishing charters. Good job HP on taking those ad dollars, I guess for the greater good?

Adrian, a good piece but short on the next step. I already know I won't eat bluefin; I think yellowtail (my former fav) is also in trouble. Sad thing is we CAN live without the buttery taste of these great sea creatures, but can the oceans live without them? It would appear not.

We are leaving such a sad legacy to future generations. I am sorry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day   23 hours ago (7:16 PM)
" we CAN live without the buttery taste of these great sea creatures"

Speak for yourself. The article makes me feel hungry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day   12:06 PM on 10/29/2010
This article brought to you by- Nautica & GQ.
photo
Stewpendous   08:54 AM on 10/29/2010
I believe the US consumption of blue fin tuna is only around 1% of the worlds total. I also believe Japan accounts for around 80% give or take. If the world can not stop Japan from hunting and killing whales then is it even plausible to think we or any1could deter them from consuming so much Blue fin tuna?!?!?! I hope so!!!!!!!!
SyrtisMajor   11:22 AM on 10/29/2010
A very good point. This is a global problem and requires global solutions. All countries need to come around to the fact that a problem exists and they need to become part of the solution. Considering how much fish Japan eats, for example, if they keep on like they are, they're in for a very rude awakening (along with the rest of us, I fear).
photo
Dr Scott   11:57 AM on 10/29/2010
I agree. It's nice to think that we could get Japan to stop fishing tuna, but that ain't gonna happen. To Japanese fisherman and every middleman down the line to the restaurant or kitchen table, BF tuna is a huge business. Just like whale and dolphin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day   12:04 PM on 10/29/2010
What will the Japanese eat after they've depleted the oceans?

Big Macs for everyone!
thebigbike   6 minutes ago (5:41 PM)
Well, we could always bomb japan, that worked so well before
photo
Amber Berglund   10:53 PM on 10/28/2010
Tuna contains a lot of mercury, and shouldn't be eaten in large quantities or even every day.

Smaller fish are better, if one chooses to eat fish.

You can get a higher concentration of omega fatty acids from Hemp Seed Oil, rather than Fish Oil. Fish Oil tends to make a person smell like fish. I haven't found that happening to me with Hemp Seed Oil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day   12:04 PM on 10/29/2010
Something here smells fishy.
Kashnowe   09:55 PM on 10/28/2010
this is always a two sided argument for me. one side says "well my can says yellowfin tuna so i don't care. besides i wouldn't be too upset to never have a tuna sandwich again. even tho i like them a lot."
the other side says its "terrible horrible and every species neeeds to be saved for this and that and the other reason"

oh yeah and just think of all the new species being discovered.. in some way shape or form life will go one. so lets let bygones be bygones and let nature take its course. we humans and our actions are forces of nature u know... we are earthlings aren't we? we are made of natural organic stuff huh? yup.

life will go on. until the sun does something wacky or some chemical erruption comes from the core of the earth. either way not our fault. so there.
photo
MrMoggy   10:18 PM on 10/28/2010
erm....yeah....eh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day   10:18 PM on 10/28/2010
Blue Fin tuna is to blame for being so delicious.

We are just doing what comes naturally. Its evolution at work. Survival of the fittest.

Natural selection will work its will. Why do so many people hate nature?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
genmanager   12:37 AM on 10/29/2010
Right but, bluefin tuna is not caught for canning. Far from it. It's simply one of the most delicious raw fish one can eat. So tasty that we've almost fished it to extinction. In the market in Japan, each fish brings in the high tens of thousands dollar range. I understand your sentiments but this is one that we have to stop. Let the bluefins reflourish for ten years and see what happens. By the way, as Adrian says, they are also one of the very most beautiful fish in the ocean to watch. Just incredibly strong and fast.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day   12:05 PM on 10/29/2010
Not strong and fast enough. Apparently.
wdw505   01:05 AM on 10/29/2010
agreed
aldebaranredstar   06:29 PM on 10/28/2010
i have felt so uncomfortable about this for the past few years. i wasn't eating sushi--but i used to eat shrimp. i was always very uncomfortable when i went out with friends and they order huge cuts of farm-raised salmon--or if they recommend fish oil pills. what is used to feed a big fish like salmon--also a predator--the little fish that the wild fish that are still out there need to survive. what is fish oil made out of? menhaden--small fish that the wild fish need to survive. we are taking the food out of their mouths. will the ocean just be a big polluted fish farm? i agree that it is time to stop eatingt fish--i no longer eat shrimp (mostly farm-raised) and even looking at people shoving down huge plates of salmon in the name of omega-3 and their need for protein makes me squirm. i can't look. i try to gently present info but they don't want to switch to other sources of protein or omega-3 (walnuts, pursley, kiwi). i am now trying to go vegan. it would have been nice if the author had included a reference to the fact that one of the known breeding grounds of the atlantic blue fin is the gulf of mexico. we need to find out what happened to that populatiuon. how badly was it affected? in the paris meeting, i hope people will take steps to protect the bluefin!!
SyrtisMajor   11:16 AM on 10/29/2010
To be fair, if your friends choose to eat wild caught Alaskan salmon it's actually a pretty reasonable choice. The stocks are well managed and currently flourishing. Farmed salmon are bad choices because of the pollution the farms generate and the potential for disease/parasites that come from having so many animals in such a small space.

I applaud you for giving up shrimp (it was hard for me when I did it as they're so tasty). Generally it's tough to find any that are environmentally friendly. Farmed shrimp have issues the same as farmed fish and most other shrimp are caught by net trawling. Basically the fishermen drag a net across the bottom of the ocean scooping up whatever is in it's path. They separate out the usable food animals and toss any bycatch overboard. It's quite disruptive to the ocean floor ecosystems.

If you can find trap caught shrimp it's a decent alternative, but it's a lot less common and I guarantee any restaurant you go to isn't going to know if their shimp is trap caught even if it is.

Good luck too on your quest after veganism. I'm a vegetarian, but I have to admit that cheese is one thing I'm not sure I can give up. ;)
photo
HighDesertBob   05:39 PM on 10/28/2010
Tuna shmuna, if you want good fish try Walleye or Copper River Salmon. Halibut cheeks are great, too, but hard to get outside the Pacific Northwest. No, I am not kidding, Halibut cheeks, check it out at http://www­.fishex.co­m/fish-mar­ket/halibu­t/halibut-­cheeks.htm­l?gclid=CL­j_2M_C9qQC­FQULbAodlg­6Hig
photo
Eddy333   03:23 PM on 10/28/2010
The only seafood my family really eats anymore is wild-caught pacific salmon and Maine lobster. Both are taken from incredibly well-managed fisheries that should serve as models for the rest of the world. Unfortunately greed on one side and desperation on the other always win the day.
SyrtisMajor   01:34 PM on 10/28/2010
Unfortunately, the decline of the bluefin is just a symptom of a massive problem... the overfishing of the oceans. If anyone remembers a study was published in Science back in 2006 asserting that fish food stocks could be depleted as early at 2048 if nothing is done.

Personally, I stopped eating all seafood in 2003 after reading Richard Ellis' fantastic (and frightening) book, The Empty Ocean (he also chronicles the decline of the bluefin in his more recent Tuna: A Love Story, BTW).

Enforcing sensible fishing practices worldwide is something that needs to be tackled by the global community before the havoc we wreak becomes irreversible.
Princess Esya   11:46 AM on 10/28/2010
People, lets just stop eating fish or at least REDUCE its consumption. I mean, there are about 200 comments and, as I can see, the majority agrees that tuna must be protected. We all care, so why not we just set an example for others?
photo
ekg   04:17 PM on 10/28/2010
I catch what I eat or buy from someone I know personally. I do not intend to stop
photo
Paul Roush   11:22 AM on 10/28/2010
West coast bluefin occasionally show up along the mid-California coast. They are rarely available to sportfishermen more than a day or 2 until the spotter planes see them and the ENTIRE school is purse-seined and taken. The efficiency of it all is astounding.
PR - McKinleyille, CA
photo
ekg   04:18 PM on 10/28/2010
I am definitely not an advocate of purse-sein netting. The do that for menhaden here in NC and it ruins our winter BFT run.
photo
LarryinMiami   09:51 AM on 10/28/2010
Imagine if that species is actually driven to extinction, what future generations will say.
Masonx   11:57 AM on 10/28/2010
Actually, given the peak resource crisis and its impact on human food production in the next 50 years - damn few humans are likely to be around to say anything about tuna. That is - assuming the commenter below has his facts straight:

http://www­.guardian.­co.uk/envi­ronment/ci­f-green/20­10/oct/28/­oil-us-mil­itary-biof­uels?showa­llcomments­=true#end-­of-comment­s (see comment by dduggerbiocepts)
photo
theobserver4   05:49 PM on 10/28/2010
dduggerbiocepts is right. This ethanol craze uses almost exactly as much fossil fuels in transportation and fertilization as it does fuel. It's almost a 1:1 ratio and it burns our farmland and poisons our water in addition to not being effective.

The only reason the earth is currently supporting over 6 billion people is because we found ways to integrate petroleum and other chemicals into our food production. As that begins to break down we will have starvation beyond what any of us can comprehend.
NuclearWar   05:40 AM on 10/28/2010
Finally, an article on the Huffingtong Post that I can agree with. The bluefin situation is a shame and don't expect Obama to care or help with this dire ecological trajedy.
photo
LarryinMiami   09:18 AM on 10/28/2010
troll
photo
CraigLove   06:06 PM on 10/28/2010
Hey Nooculer, better Obama than one of your preferred religious fundamentalists who thinks it's our god-given destiny to pillage the earth til there's nothing left.

Twitter Edition