Tuesday, July 04, 2006

The national anthem has four stanzas?


Okay, I never even heard about this. Survey time - who out there even knew we had more than one stanza? What follows is an email dad sent me - I've googled it, the four stanza thing is for real, though I can't confirm that Asimov wrote this (having said that, this is quoted all over the Web):
The American National Anthem - By Dr. Isaac Asimov

Near the end of his life the great science fiction author Isaac Asimov wrote a short story about the four stanzas of our national anthem. However brief, this well-circulated piece is an eye opener from the dearly departed doctor...

I have a weakness -- I am crazy. Absolutely nuts, about our national anthem. The words are difficult and the tune is almost impossible, but frequently when I'm taking a shower I sing it with as much power and emotion as I can. It shakes me up every time.

I was once asked to speak at a luncheon. Taking my life in my hands, I announced I was going to sing our national anthem -- all four stanzas. This was greeted with loud groans. One man closed the door to the kitchen, where the noise of dishes and cutlery was loud and distracting. "Thanks, Herb," I said.

"That's all right," he said. "It was at the request of the kitchen staff."

I explained the background of the anthem and then sang all four stanzas. Let me tell you, those people had never heard it before -- or had never really listened. I got a standing ovation. But it was not me; it was the anthem.

More recently, while conducting a seminar, I told my students the story of the anthem and sang all four stanzas. Again there was a wild ovation and prolonged applause. And again, it was the anthem and not me.

So now let me tell you how it came to be written.

In 1812, the United States went to war with Great Britain, primarily over freedom of the seas. We were in the right. For two years, we held off the British, even though we were still a rather weak country. Great Britain was in a life and death struggle with Napoleon. In fact, just as the United States declared war, Napoleon marched off to invade Russia. If he won, as everyone expected, he would control Europe, and Great Britain would be isolated. It was no time for her to be involved in an American war.

At first, our seamen proved better than the British. After we won a battle on Lake Erie in 1813, the American commander, Oliver Hazard Perry, sent the message, "We have met the enemy and they are ours." However, the weight of the British navy beat down our ships eventually. New England, hard-hit by a tightening blockade, threatened secession.

Meanwhile, Napoleon was beaten in Russia and in 1814 was forced to abdicate. Great Britain now turned its attention to the United State s, launching a three-pronged attack.

The northern prong was to come down Lake Champlain toward New York and seize parts of New England.

The southern prong was to go up the Mississippi, take New Orleans and paralyze the west.

The central prong was to head for the Mid-Atlantic States and then attack Baltimore, the greatest port south of New York. If Baltimore was taken, the nation, which still hugged the Atlantic coast, could be split in two. The fate of the United State s, then, rested to a large extent on the success or failure of the central prong.

The British reached the American coast, and on August 24, 1814, took Washington, D.C. Then they moved up the Chesapeake Bay toward Baltimore. On September 12, they arrived and found 1,000 men in Fort McHenry, whose guns controlled the harbor. If the British wished to take Baltimore, they would have to take the fort.

On one of the British ships was an aged physician, William Beanes, who had been arrested in Maryland and brought along as a prisoner. Francis Scott Key, a lawyer and friend of the physician, had come to the ship to negotiate his release.

The British captain was willing, but the two Americans would have to wait. It was now the night of September 13, and the bombardment of Fort McHenry was about to start.

As twilight deepened, Key and Beanes saw the America n flag flying over Fort McHenry. Through the night, they heard bombs bursting and saw the red glare of rockets. They knew the fort was resisting and the American flag was still flying. But toward morning the bombardment ceased, and a dread silence fell. Either Fort McHenry had surrendered and the British flag flew above it, or the bombardment had failed and the American flag still flew.

As dawn began to brighten the eastern sky, Key and Beanes stared out at the fort, trying to see which flag flew over it. He and the physician must have asked each other over and over, "Can you see the flag?"

After it was all finished, Key wrote a four-stanza poem telling the events of the night. Called "The Defense of Fort McHenry," it was published in newspapers and swept the nation. Someone noted that the words fit an old English tune called, "To Anacreon in Heaven" -- a difficult melody with an uncomfortably large vocal range. For obvious reasons, Key's work became known as "The Star Spangled Banner," and in 1931 Congress declared it the official anthem of the United State s.

Now that you know the story, here are the words. Presumably, the old doctor is speaking. This is what he asks Key:

Oh! say, can you see, by the dawn's early light,
What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming?
Whose broad stripes and bright stars, through the perilous fight,
O'er the ramparts we watched were so gallantly streaming?
And the rocket's red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof thro' the night that our flag was still there.
Oh! say, does that Star-Spangled Banner yet wave,
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?


"Ramparts," in case you don't know, are the protective walls or other elevations that surround a fort. The first stanza asks a question. The second gives an answer:

On the shore, dimly seen thro' the mist of the deep,
Where the foe's haughty host in dread silence reposes,
What is that which the breeze, o'er the towering steep.
As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses?
Now it catches the gleam of the morning's first beam,
In full glory reflected, now shines on the stream
'Tis the Star-Spangled Banner. Oh! long may it wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!


"The towering steep" is again, the ramparts. The bombardment has failed, and the British can do nothing more but sail away, their mission a failure. In the third stanza, I feel Key allows himself to gloat over the American triumph. In the aftermath of the bombardment, Key probably was in no mood to act otherwise.

During World War II, when the British were our staunchest allies, this third stanza was not sung. However, I know it, so here it is:

And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion
A home and a country should leave us no more?
Their blood has washed out their foul footstep's pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave,
And the Star-Spangled Banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.


The fourth stanza, a pious hope for the future, should be sung more slowly than the other three and with even deeper feeling:

Oh! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
Between their loved homes and the war's desolation,
Blest with victory and peace, may the Heaven - rescued land
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation.
Then conquer we must, for our cause is just,
And this be our motto --"In God is our trust."
And the Star-Spangled Banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.


I hope you will look at the national anthem with new eyes. Listen to it, the next time you have a chance, with new ears. And don't let them ever take it away
Read More......

New York's Highest Court Set to Rule on Gay Marriages Wednesday


From the NYT:
In what one legal scholar called a contest between judicial hearts and minds, parsing of legal texts and private sympathies, New York's highest court is expected to rule Wednesday on whether to permit gay and lesbian marriages in the state.

There are several directions the Court of Appeals could take, lawyers said. The most sweeping would be a clear affirmation of a constitutional right of same-sex couples to marry, which would make New York the second state in the nation after Massachusetts to allow such marriages. In that case, the court could order the Legislature to rewrite the state's marriage law.

Stephen Gillers, a law professor at New York University, suggested that a majority of the six judges deciding the case — a seventh recused himself — are personally sympathetic to what the plaintiffs are asking for. But the issue, he said, will be how they read New York State's marriage law, the state constitution, and legal precedents, which are all different from those in Massachusetts.
Read More......

North Korea test its missiles


Happy Fourth from Pyongyang:
North Korea launched a long-range Taepodong-2 missile early Wednesday in an apparently unsuccessful test that failed in flight, a senior State Department official said.

North Korea also tested at least two smaller missiles, U.S. sources told CNN.
Read More......

Iraq demands UN Security Council intervene to stop "monstrous" and "inhuman" US military attacks on civilians


Well a happy Fourth of July to you too.

They hate us. And Bush is giving yet more speeches about how great everything is going in Iraq, how we can't pull out. They HATE us. What are we doing there?

From AP:
The justice minister demanded Tuesday that the U.N. Security Council ensure that a group of U.S. troops are punished in the alleged rape and murder of a young Iraqi and the killing of her family, calling the attack "monstrous and inhuman."...

"If this act actually happened, it constitutes an ugly and unethical crime, monstrous and inhuman," said Justice Minister Hashim Abdul-Rahman al-Shebli, a Sunni Arab. "The Iraqi judiciary should be informed about this investigation which should be conducted under supervision of international and human organizations. Those involved should face justice."

"The ugliness of this crime demands a swift intervention of the U.N. Security Council to stop these violations of human rights and to condemn them so that they will not happen again," he added.
And do read the rest of article for a long list of other atrocities that took place in Iraq over the past few days. Utter disaster. Read More......

Happy Fourth, Mr. President




A little Fourth of July patriotism from Pink. Read More......

Bush shut down CIA's "Osama bin Laden" unit a year ago


(UPDATE: posted this last night, but we're bumping it up. It's an article that says a lot...because Bush is out talking tough on terror today. But once again, his actions speak louder than words. And in case there was any question, it seems Osama is still alive.)

Mexican seeking a better life in America? No amnesty.

Biggest mass murderer in US history? Amnesty.

Any questions?

Nice. So Bush gave up on hunting Osama a year ago and never told us. Real nice. And spare us the "they're still hunting for him" bs. They're not hunting for him if they disbanded the special unit that's been hunting for him for ten years. And by the way, that means it was Bill Clinton who decided way before September 11 that we needed to get bin Laden, and it was George Bush who gave up the fight.

From the NYT:
Michael Scheuer, a former senior C.I.A. official who was the first head of the unit, said the move reflected a view within the agency that Mr. bin Laden was no longer the threat he once was.

Mr. Scheuer said that view was mistaken.

"This will clearly denigrate our operations against Al Qaeda," he said.
Happy Independence Day everyone, our president just screwed the memory of 3,000 dead Americans.

(Hat tip, Raw Story.) Read More......

Happy 4th of July






Read More......

The Republicans would rather we live in China?


UPDATE: Today's NYT takes China to task for its new censorhip of the press - does this sound that different than the Bush administration?
The Soviet Union dealt with the problem with the infamous Article 70 of the penal code, which basically defined anything the state didn't want people to hear as "anti-Soviet agitation and propaganda." Now China proposes to take the art of censorship a step higher with a bill that would severely fine news media outlets if they report on "sudden incidents" without prior authorization.

"Sudden incidents" sounds awfully similar to what most of the world knows better as "breaking news," and in most countries it's considered a core function of the news media.
In light of the total insanity over the past several days regarding the NYT, Wall Street Journal, and LA Times articles about spying on terrorist finances, I think it's worthwhile to take a look at a country with the kind of media policies Republicans are apparently hoping for: China.

In China, police randomly fired into a crowd of demonstrators, reportedly resulting in the bloodiest government action since Tiananmen Square 17 years ago . . . and then the government completely covered it up. Because the state has control over virtually all domestic media, the story simply disappeared, and for most of the nation's 1.3 billion people, the event never occurred.

My first reaction to this is sadness and total disgust.

My secondary reactions are twofold. First, the Chinese government has apparently done a masterful job of whitewashing this incident. According to China (and the "press" there), this basically never happened. Now, what if China made a statement that these villagers were actually domestic terrorists, and to reveal information about operations against them would be a detriment to national security? Sounds pretty ridiculous, but not beyond the realm of possibility -- especially if no facts can get out. If China said that, would conservatives who support similarly limiting the freedom of the press in American accept and support such an explanation? In China, we can see the result of government control of information flow. Is that what the right wants here, too?

And second, where's the outrage? Where are the right wing groups lining up an invasion plan? Where are the conservative blogs advocating regime change? We have all the hallmarks of Invasion Time: a repressive government killing its own people, shadowy and untrustworthy leadership with connections to rogue states (North Korea being at the top of the list), and . . . wait for it . . . possession of weapons of mass destruction!

I wouldn't personally support a violent U.S. response, of course, I'm just asking for a little consistency from the right. If conservatives can't quite get up the energy to advocate attacking the evil Communist Chinese, how about some pressure on our own Dear Leader to help along democracy in the Far East as well as the Middle East?

One of the more irritating habits of right blogistan is the constant challenges to we lefties to denounce baddies. Well, here it is. China's behavior is disgraceful, so how about a little soft power? Remember, the kind that we used to assert ourselves with? And regarding the clamor against the free press, be careful what you wish for . . . Read More......

FOX News has done far more damage to conservatives than liberals


Excellent point from Kristoff at the NYT:
When I was covering the war in Iraq, we reporters would sometimes tune to Fox News and watch, mystified, as it purported to describe how Iraqis loved Americans. Such coverage (backed by delusional Journal editorials baffling to anyone who was actually in Iraq) misled conservatives about Iraq from the beginning. In retrospect, the real victims of Fox News weren't the liberals it attacked but the conservatives who believed it.
Read More......

Senator Ted "bridge to nowhere" Stevens teaches us how the internet works


Tubes. It's all about tubes, dammit. It's terrifying to think that this buffoon is actually responsible for decisions on this important subject. I don't know what kind of email he's using but I use at least four different email accounts for different projects and it's extremely rage to have any emails take days as he says. Most arrive within seconds when I am talking around the world.

I know the GOP loves a good boondoggle so I would suggest that they come over here to France, yes France, and do a fact finding mission to see how much more competition and quality we have over here. If Stevens thinks that the internet is so slow, maybe he can check out the various video compression tools that exist in the world that allow "cable" TV to be shown across Europe via our phone lines. Just because the GOP and some Dems can't get rich in campaign finance dollars from open competition doesn't mean the problem is real.

So now we know that Stevens is not only an earmark weasel, but now we know he's a fool when he tries to tell people why he voted against net neutrality. What ever happened to competition, free enterprise and democracy with his lot anyway? Read More......

Independence Day Open Thread


The Fourth of July.

This really is a great country -- despite what George Bush is doing to destroy our constitution, our reputation and our freedoms.

And does anyone else think Tony Orlando is getting way too much t.v. time these days? He has milked that yellow ribbon song for decades. Read More......

Ahhhhh, no


Not even close. Haven't we had enough wishy-washy types like this before? Read More......

Global corporate shenanigans


There has been no shortage of ugly stories in the corporate world lately, with the resignation of EADS CEO and his managing director of Airbus departing on short notice being the latest. After some suspicious big sales of stock shortly before public announcements regarding late deliver of the new Airbus double-decker beast, which of course, sent the stock diving, the CEO and his Airbus executive could no longer stand the heat. Meanwhile in the US, there has been a steady stream of stories about stock option deals that have been flagged by the SEC for violations and a few have already resigned over those deals.

With all of this activity, is it the system working or are these people just working the system more? Read More......