Swedish Meatballs
16 hours ago
A Republican election-year effort to fuse a cut in inheritance taxes on multimilllion-dollar estates with the first minimum wage increase in nearly a decade was rejected by the Senate late Thursday.UPDATE: This was a "significant defeat" for Bill Frist according to the NY Times. Read More......
Republicans needed 60 votes to advance their bill, which links a $2.10 increase in the $5.15 federal minimum wage over three years to reductions an estate taxes next decade. Passed by the House last Saturday, the bill got a 56-42 vote, four votes short of succeeding.
Former Newsday and Knight Ridder White House correspondent Saul Friedman writes on NiemanWatchdog.org: "I believe this to be the first time in modern American history that a president's religion, in this case his Christian fundamentalism, has become a decisive factor in his foreign and domestic policies. It's a factor that has been under-reported, to say the least, and that begs for press attention. . .Scary. Very scary. And, of course it's under-reported, like every other scary thing from Bush. Read More......
"It may help explain George W. Bush's single-mindedness, his oblivious inability to face reality as his war in Iraq, his war against terror and his policies towards Arabs and Israeli have collapsed."
On Wednesday, Senator Rick Santorum (R - PA) became the 170th Member of Congress to affirm that they do not discriminate in their own employment practices based on an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity and expression.Read More......
"We welcome Sen. Santorum's signature affirming the need for basic equality in his own hiring practices," said Riki Wilchins, Executive Director of the Gender Public Advocacy Coalition (GenderPAC.) "It puts him in good company with 169 other Members of Congress who have signed this statement."
The Senator's signature came after a meeting last week with GenderYOUTH activist Adrian Shanker.
"The secretary has lost credibility with the Congress and with the people. It's time for him to step down and be replaced by someone who can develop an effective strategy and communicate it effectively to the American people and to the world."Read More......
One Veteran from Virginia who returned from Iraq late last year needed psychological counseling, but he was told the next available appointment was months away. When he asked why, he was told 'Because of all you guys coming back'."In addition to being an absolute disgrace, this deserves to be a political disaster for Bush and his rubber-stamp legislature. Every single Democrat either in or running for Congress should have veterans affairs at or near the top of their list of priorities, and they should hammer the point home over and over and over: Republicans don't support our troops. Read More......
In a ruling that has enraged women’s groups, an elementary school teacher, a married woman in her 30’s, was sentenced on July 21 to caning for working in the headquarters of a political party on a Sunday afternoon at the same time as the party leader, who was not her husband.The poor? Check.
What also rankled her, she said, was the fact that the laws on drinking, gambling and relations between men and women tended to affect poor people the most. “Why,” she asked, “have they not introduced the Shariah laws on corruption? Stealing in Islam is a bigger sin than these small sins.”Foreigners? Check.
In mid-July, an Italian aid worker was arrested by the Shariah police for being with an Acehnese woman late at night. It was the second arrest of a foreign aid worker and an Acehnese person of the opposite sex in the last several months.Islam is a great religion. There's nothing wrong with Islam. But punitive fundamentalist Islam is a pernicious influence, not unlike how Christianity was perverted by practitioners of the Inquisition. It's bad for the people who have to live under its yoke, and I wish our government would use diplomacy (remember? when a country talks to another country, and if, say, one of them is a superpower sometimes you can peacefully influence beneficial change?) to help these people.
It will be the first time Rumsfeld has testified publicly about the war before the committee since February 2006. Here’s what’s happened in Iraq since then:UPDATE: Hillary smacked him around...but Rummy is delusional. She challenged him for consistently misleading Congress, which he denied, "I have never painted a rosy picture...you'd have a dickens of a time trying to find instances where I've been excessively optimistic." Huh???? He's never told the truth about Iraq...and the whole Bush administration has been overly optimistic for the past five years.
– Approximately 300 U.S. troops have died in Iraq
– Approximately 2,530 U.S. troops have been wounded
– Well over 10,000 Iraq civilians have been killed
– Insurgents have conducted an average of 620 attacks per week
– In March there were 7.8 hours of electricity per day in Baghdad (down from 16-24 hours before the war), last month there were 7.6 hours.
– In March there were 133,000 U.S. troops in Iraq. Today there are 132,000 U.S. troops in Iraq and plans to raise that number to 135,000.
That’s Rumsfeld’s record. Now he has to explain why it shows that we should “stay the course.”
Here’s just a few of the “overly optimistic” comments made by Rumsfeld (and no, we did not have a “dickens of a time” finding them):Read More......
Dec. 18, 2002: KING: What’s the current situation in Afghanistan? RUMSFELD: It is encouraging. They have elected a government through the Loya Jirga process. The Taliban are gone. The al Qaeda are gone.
Feb. 7, 2003: “It is unknowable how long that conflict will last. It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months.”
Feb. 20 2003: “‘Do you expect the invasion, if it comes, to be welcomed by the majority of the civilian population of Iraq?’ Jim Lehrer asked the defense secretary on PBS’ The News Hour. ‘There is no question but that they would be welcomed,’ Rumsfeld replied, referring to American forces.”
Mar. 30, 2003: “It happens not to be the area where weapons of mass destruction were dispersed. We know where they are. They’re in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.”
Jean-Paul Sartre lived with his mother above the Deux Magots, Simone de Beauvoir lived at the nearby Hotel Louisiane and noted that the style for cafe intellectuals was to "spend the day exhaling disgust in blase little phrases cut by yawns."What a wickedly wonderful sentence.
Lamont, a political novice, has support from 54 percent of likely Democratic voters in the Quinnipiac University poll, while Lieberman has support from 41 percent of voters. A similar survey July 20 showed Lamont with a slight advantage for the first time in the campaign.Most of those polled (65 percent) are voting against Lieberman. They've had enough. And, they are making a statement. That's the prerogative of voters -- despite all the moaning from the chattering class.
"Senator Lieberman's campaign bus seems to be stuck in reverse," poll director Douglas Schwartz said. "Despite visits from former President Bill Clinton and other big-name Democrats, Lieberman has not been able to stem the tide to Lamont."
Quinnipiac CT SEN Poll (Lamont 54-41)]Read More......
Lamont's fav rating: 46%-14%
Lieberman's: 37%-34%
By 88%-12%, Lamont voters have made up their mind. 83%-16% of
Lieberman voters say the same.
Among moderates/conservatives, Lieberman has only a narrow lead: 49%-45%. Lamont leads 66%-31% among liberals.
Lamont's lead among women (53-43) is smaller than among men (55-40).
Lamont leads by 51%-43% among those without college degrees and trails by just 49%-46% among those earning less than 30k. He leads among every other income group.
94% cite Lieberman's support for the Iraq war as a main reason (44%) or one one of the reasons (50%) they are voting for Lamont.
2% of Lieberman's supporter cite Bill Clinton's endorsement as their main reason for supporting him.
7% of Lamont voters cite Lieberman's intention to run as an Indy as their main reason for supporting Lamont. (another 31% cite it as one of the reasons)
A White House aide, who requested anonymity because his information was preliminary, said Wednesday that he knew of no top Bush administration official who had a relative who had served in Iraq and Afghanistan.Read More......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© 2010 - John Aravosis | Design maintenance by Jason Rosenbaum
Send me your tips: americablog AT starpower DOT net