Swedish Meatballs
9 hours ago
President Bush lamented the deaths of 14 Marines in Iraq Wednesday, calling the deadly attack a ''grim reminder'' America is still at war.Not a bit of irony. Remember, being President is hard work. Read More......
''These terrorists and insurgents will use brutal tactics because they're trying to shake the will of the United States of America. They want us to retreat,'' Bush told some 2,000 state lawmakers, business leaders and public policy experts gathered here.
The president spoke on a day when a Marine amphibious assault vehicle patrolling during combat operations in the Euphrates River valley hit a roadside bomb, killing 14 Marines from the same Ohio battalion that lost six men two days ago.
''Make no mistake about it,'' Bush said. ''We are at war.''
• Drug companies are marketing their products more aggressively to consumers and doctors. "Many parents come in and want that 'quick fix.' "Now Cruise hates psychiatry in general and opposes ALL medication for mental illness, which is crazy. (Pun intended.) But that shouldn't cloud the fact that young people seem over-medicated and that it's easier for schools to demand that parents put their kids on pills rather than just deal with a kid who may be perfectly normal, just a little bored in class (maybe they're too smart?) or just, you know, a kid.
• One drug often causes side effects; since more medications than ever are available, kids get another drug to deal with these side effects. For example, stimulants may cause insomnia, which leads to prescribing sleeping pills.
• Insurers often are more willing to pay for pills than for therapy.
Two aides to Karl Rove, the senior White House adviser, testified last Friday before a federal grand jury investigating whether government officials illegally disclosed the identity of an undercover C.I.A. operative, according to a person who has been officially briefed on the case.It's basically the same story that ABC had yesterday, but this one has "a person who has been officially briefed on the case" as the source. You know we don't like to go a day without a Rove-specific story. And we need to make sure the MSM is staying on top of this one.
The aides, Susan B. Ralston and Israel Hernandez, were asked about grand jury testimony given on July 13 by Matthew Cooper, a reporter for Time magazine, the person who was briefed said. Mr. Cooper has said that he testified about a July 11, 2003, conversation with Mr. Rove in which the C.I.A. officer was discussed.
Iraqi Maj. Gen. Abed Hamed Mowhoush was being stubborn with his American captors, and a series of intense beatings and creative interrogation tactics were not enough to break his will. On the morning of Nov. 26, 2003, a U.S. Army interrogator and a military guard grabbed a green sleeping bag, stuffed Mowhoush inside, wrapped him in an electrical cord, laid him on the floor and began to go to work. Again.Not exactly "Animal House," is it? Mowhoush was killed, of course.
It was inside the sleeping bag that the 56-year-old detainee took his last breath through broken ribs, lying on the floor beneath a U.S. soldier in Interrogation Room 6 in the western Iraqi desert. Two days before, a secret CIA-sponsored group of Iraqi paramilitaries, working with Army interrogators, had beaten Mowhoush nearly senseless, using fists, a club and a rubber hose, according to classified documents....
"The indig were hitting the detainee with fists, a club and a length of rubber hose," according to classified investigative records.
Soldiers heard Mowhoush "being beaten with a hard object" and heard him "screaming" from down the hall, according to the Jan. 18, 2004, provost marshal's report. The report said four Army guards had to carry Mowhoush back to his cell.
"The interrogation techniques were known and were approved of by the upper echelons of command of the 3rd ACR," [the lawyer for one of the soldiers] said in a news conference. "They believed, and still do, that they were appropriate and proper."And you know what? They were wrong to do what they did, but right to believe the people in power were all for it. Bush has made that perfectly clear again and again. If not, why has no one in charge during these outrages been reprimanded in the least? Why instead has almost everyone involved been promoted and praised? This is the sort of vile nastiness we used to condemn the bad guys for -- the sort of cruel, nasty torture our soldiers endured from the OTHER side during Vietnam and Korea and from the Nazis and the Japs in the last righteous war. It is not a sign of strength -- torture is always a sign of weakness. And it is beneath the dignity of the United States. Read More......
a report Gannon filed for the now-MIA Talon News back in July 2004. In that piece, our intrepid reporter noticed that the Kerry campaign's Web site no longer featured references to [Amb. Joe] Wilson and concluded for himself -- with, it appears, no reporting at all -- that it was "likely" that the campaign had decided to "quietly break official contact with someone who proved to be a loose cannon."And yeah, it's subscription only, but all you have to do is click the free link and watch a 15 second ad - I think you can handle it :-) Read More......
Responding to our post earlier today, Gannon says his story about Kerry and Wilson was "rock solid" and that "Wilson was dumped -- hard." Not so, says Peter Daou, who ran Kerry's Web site and says the Wilson references were deleted as part of a larger redesign. And not so, says David Wade, who was Kerry's campaign spokesman. Wade told us earlier today that Wilson drew standing-room-only crowds as a surrogate for Kerry, and that the claim that he was somehow "discarded" by the campaign is "a classic Novakian regurgitation of only-on-Newsmax misinformation."
And indeed, a little Google searching of our own suggests that Wade is right: In October 2004, just weeks before the election, it appears that Wilson was still on the road for the Democratic nominee, headlining a fundraiser for the Kerry-Edwards campaign in Arizona.
That doesn't sound like the work of someone who was "dumped -- hard," Jeff. But as for the "rock solid" part -- well, we suppose you're the expert on that.
Democratic House campaign committee chair Rahm Emanuel tells First Read that although the Iraq combat veteran was uniquely qualified to talk about the war, his message was primarily about the economy and education. Clearly, though, "the war is not what it was six months ago, or 12 months ago" in terms of being an automatic advantage for Republicans, Emanuel says. Based on Hackett's tally in a district that gave Bush 64% in 2004, he declares, "no district is safe."That's what we want to hear. It's a whole new ballgame. Read More......
The networks and most newspapers ignored Bush's Big Bird, and only a handful of papers printed stories about the incident. Most were light, gossipy and inconclusive, giving the thumb theory more weight than it deserves (try mimicking the video with your own hand; only one finger will do). White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan gave a limp denial: "I'm not going to dignify that with a response," he said the next day. "I mean, I haven't seen the video that you're talking about, but I know the way the president acts."Read More......
Yes, we know how he acts. He has flipped the bird before.
"The president knows his way around his middle finger," says John Aravosis, a Washington consultant and liberal blogger (he runs Americablog). Aravosis has helped keep the presidential finger story alive, and the White House took the unusual step of calling him to try to convince him that the videotape features Bush's thumb, not his middle finger. A weirdly elongated and misplaced thumb.
Aravosis doesn't buy it.
"The president thinks his conservative moral beliefs should be shoved down our throats. Then he flips people off. He's a phony. That's the story. I don't know about you, but my priest doesn't run around in public flipping people off."
The shortcomings of the ministry, which was overhauled under the American occupation authorities last year, are a growing concern to the American commanders. Hoping to withdraw large numbers of the 135,000 American combat troops in the next year, these commanders say their plans hinge on a functioning ministry. If American troops leave without one in place, they say, the Iraqi Army could quickly collapse.How's this for a money quote?
"What are lacking are the systems that pay people, that supply people, that recruit people, that replace the wounded and AWOL, and systems that promote people and provide spare parts," said a top American commander in Iraq, who asked not to be identified because his assessment of Iraqi abilities went beyond the military's public descriptions.But we've got a plan:
So concerned are military planners that, in the event that American combat troops do indeed leave over the next year, they are preparing to keep large numbers of support troops and supplies in Iraq or in nearby countries, ready to assist Iraqi units fighting insurgents, the American commander said.And here's an AP story in the Toronto Star about Iraqi investigations into hundreds of millions of dollars that have been wasted or gone missing. (Thanks to threader aCanadianreader for pointing us to this.)Oy vey. Read More......
The 10-page questionnaire yielded 83 pages of response. It included information about Judge Roberts's financial assets and net worth - nearly $5.3 million, including a stock portfolio worth more than $1.6 million; his work during Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court case that decided the 2000 election in President Bush's favor; and his membership, or lack thereof, in the Federalist Society, a conservative legal group. Other documents, released earlier Tuesday by the National Archives, offered new information about his work for the Justice Department in the Reagan administration....Thoughts? Read More......
In his essay on judicial activism, Judge Roberts spoke of the importance of precedent, a concept particularly important to those who fear that he would tilt the Supreme Court in a more conservative direction, possibly undoing past decisions like Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court ruling that made abortion legal.
He wrote, "Precedent plays an important role in promoting the stability of the legal system, and a sound judicial philosophy should reflect recognition of the fact that the judge operates within a system of rules developed over the years by other judges equally striving to live up to the judicial oath...."
On the role of the courts, Mr. Roberts wrote a long article, presumably as a ghostwriter for Mr. Smith, in which he held that courts should defer to Congress and the executive branch whenever possible.
"Not only are unelected jurists with life tenure less attuned to the popular will than regularly elected officials," he asserted, "but judicial policy making is also inevitably inadequate or imperfect policy making."
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
© 2010 - John Aravosis | Design maintenance by Jason Rosenbaum
Send me your tips: americablog AT starpower DOT net