Swedish Meatballs
17 hours ago
Cingular Wireless has succeeded in the first round of a court fight against websites that offer cell phone records for sale.Read More......
Cingular today obtained a Temporary Restraining Order from the U.S. District Court in Atlanta, GA, against two companies, Data Find Solutions, Inc. and 1st Source Information Specialists, Inc. Several weeks ago, Cingular filed a civil lawsuit alleging that these companies unlawfully obtained and disseminated Cingular customer records. The court has now granted Cingular's request for a Temporary Restraining Order in order to halt these companies' ability to obtain and sell Cingular customer records.
Cingular believes that Data Find Solutions, Inc. previously owned and operated several websites that advertise the sale of phone records, including http://locatecell.com and http://celltolls.com, and that 1st Source Information Specialists, Inc. currently owns and operates these websites. Cingular's lawsuit charges that these companies or their representatives obtained customer records through fraudulent means, such as by posing as customers seeking information about their own accounts.
Dear Samuel,Well, then how did CNN and a friend of ours both buy Sprint customers' phone records today?
I appreciate the opportunity to resolve your concern regarding the purchase of phone records.
We are aware of the article that you are referring to. Sprint has not decided to participate in this cause. I want to assure you that the privacy of our customers is of utmost importance to us and we will not compromise it in any manner.
Our legal advisors are also contemplating a legal action against this company.
Once again, I assure that your information is completely safe and only accessible to you.
Your satisfaction as a Sprint subscriber is important to us. If there is anything else I can assist you with, please reply to this email.
Warm Regards,
Candance S.
E-Care
Sprint together with Nextel
"Where our customers come first!"
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said Friday he will testify publicly at a Senate hearing on the Bush administration's domestic spying program, in the face of questions from lawmakers and legal analysts about whether it is lawful.Read More......
Gonzales said he reached an agreement with Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, to answer questions about the legal basis for the National Security Agency's warrantless eavesdropping on telephone conversations between suspected terrorists and people in the United States.
November 14, 2005- Selling Private Cell Phone Records Must StopRead More......
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Representative Edward J. Markey (D-MA) Ranking Democrat on the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, responded to recent news reports of the commercial availability of consumer telephone records by companies like www.celltolls.com and other web-based companies that sell private cell phone records for as low as $89.95. A CBS – 4 Boston news report detailed that consumer phone records and billing information are now available for sale on several Internet websites.
“It is ILLEGAL to disclose this information without the approval of telephone subscribers,” said Rep. Markey. “The privacy of American citizens is priceless -- the phone records of consumers should not be commodities for sale in any cyberspace bazaar.
“I am requesting that the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission take immediate action – we must make it clear to these companies that they cannot profit off of the exploitation of consumer privacy,” Markey continued.
Rep. Markey reacted swiftly to this violation of private consumer information sending a letter to Chairmen Kevin Martin of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Deborah P. Majoras of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), requesting that immediate action be taken by the FCC and the FTC in order to halt the sale of consumers’ private information on a secret black market.
The letter sent to the trade and consumer agencies stated: “we must send a signal to the public and these website companies that the abuse of private information will not be tolerated.” The letter also requested that the agencies provide information regarding the steps that carriers are currently obligated to take under FCC rules to secure and protect consumer information.
One of the nation's top political bloggers purchased the cell phone records of former presidential candidate Gen. Wesley Clark on Thursday to demonstrate the growing privacy concerns highlighted in a Chicago Sun-Times story last week.Read the rest of the article here, it also talks about the MoveOn action yesterday (click here to sign their petition), legislation etc.
John Aravosis, publisher of AMERICAblog.com, said he bought Clark's records for $89.95 from celltolls.com. Aravosis said he obtained a list of 100 calls made on Clark's cell phone over three days in November -- no questions asked.
Aravosis, whose liberal blog is critical of the Bush administration, said he called Clark's cell phone Thursday to make sure the former NATO supreme commander was informed Aravosis bought his records. Aravosis did not publish the numbers on his blog.
"I am not doing this to be mean, I am doing this to help people," Aravosis said. "I supported [Clark's] campaign when he was running in the beginning.
"This shows nobody's records are untouchable. . . . Wouldn't it be interesting to know who [Sun-Times columnist] Bob Novak was calling in the month that [CIA agent] Valerie Plame's name came out? How about [U.S. Attorney] Patrick Fitzgerald's phone calls?"
Clark said legal remedies are needed to stop companies from selling telephone records.
"When I learned today that my phone records were purchased for less than a hundred dollars I joined millions of Americans who worry about the invasion of their privacy that seems to be the growing price of technology," Clark said. "People should be able to trust that their privacy is being respected and protected by everyone from the government to our internet and mobile phone service providers. Clearly, this is not the case."
Clark urged consumers to contact their senators to urge passage of a law to order the Federal Trade Commission to "restore integrity to the system and give people back a reasonable degree of privacy."....
On one of the few occasions Judge Alito spoke about his general approach to the law, he embraced a mode of constitutional interpretation, originalism, often associated with Justices Scalia and Thomas.That "originalism" theory doesn't have much room for privacy rights, the right to choose and anything that would protect gays and lesbians. And, we already know that Alito will say anything to get a job, so those few words about looking backwards actually said volumes. Read More......
"In interpreting the Constitution," Judge Alito said Wednesday, "I think we should look to the text of the Constitution, and we should look to the meaning that someone would have taken from the text of the Constitution at the time of its adoption."
Madeleine K. Albright, a bit stirred up after hearing an exceedingly upbeat 40-minute briefing to 13 former secretaries of state and defense about how well things are going in Iraq, asked President Bush whether, with the war "taking up all the energy" of his foreign policy team, he had let the nuclear programs in Iran and North Korea spin out of control and allowed Latin America and China policy suffer by neglect.Well, no surprise, that's not true. Witness the situation in Iran which is starting to get really tense and ugly:
"I can't let this comment stand," Bush shot back, telling Albright and the rare assembly of her colleagues, who reached back to the Kennedy White House, that his administration "can do more than one thing at a time."
Iran threatened on Friday to block inspections of its nuclear sites if confronted by the U.N. Security Council over its atomic activities. The hard-line president reaffirmed his country's intention to produce nuclear energy.Iran, which really has nuclear capacity, really wants their nuclear capacity. But, Bush was too focused on Iraq which didn't have nuclear capacity even though he said they did.
"Don't dump your employees that you refuse to insure into our Medicaid system," said the bill's sponsor, Sen. Gloria Lawlah.And if Wal-Mart doesn't want to do business in the state of Maryland, they don't have to either. I'm sure that other companies are ready, willing and able to fill the void. With all of the free give-aways that Wal-Mart asks from local governments I don't think that Maryland will be that damaged by not having Wal-Mart. Who's raking in all of the money anyway? It sure isn't the employees. Read More......
In the House, Delegate Anne Healey compared Wal-Mart to a schoolyard bully. But House Republican Leader George Edwards called the measure an unwarranted intrusion into private enterprise.
"If you don't want to work for Wal-Mart, no one's twisting your arms. Go somewhere else and work," Edwards said.
Internal Army documents about the Iraqi's capture on Jan. 4, 2004, and his subsequent interrogation at an unspecified facility at or near Baghdad International Airport were not reviewed, the records show, because investigators were told they had been lost in a computer malfunction.Read More......
The investigation records were among thousands of pages of records released by the ACLU which obtained them from the Defense Department as part of a Freedom of Information request.
The documents include numerous references to investigators being blocked from a thorough investigation, yet the matter was closed a final time on June 17, 2005, by the Army Criminal Investigation Command.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© 2010 - John Aravosis | Design maintenance by Jason Rosenbaum
Send me your tips: americablog AT starpower DOT net