Swedish Meatballs
17 hours ago
GOP Rep. Thaddeus McCotter has introduced the HAPPY Act to provide a $3,500 tax credit for pet and veterinary care. Terrific! The only problem? Republican plans for human health care reform only offer $2,500 tax credits. This is further evidence that the modern day Republican Party is out of touch with the needs of everyday American families.Okay, I love my Petey, just as I loved Boomer before him. I'm more of a hypochondriac about my animals than I am about myself. When Boomer was sick, I felt like he had better access to health care than I did. So, would I welcome a tax credit? Of course. Can I envision a situation where the tax credit for pets would be higher than a tax credit for humans. No. And, I'm not sure how anyone else could either. Read More......
July saw a real slowing of job losses. In June, non-farm payrolls -- jobs, in other words -- dropped by 467,000. July saw a drop of 247,000. That's not only less than June, but less than June by more than economists had expected. It's weird to celebrate the loss of 247,000 jobs, but it's really a good sign, as you can see on the graph at right. Moreover, this is the sort of news that can help convince businesses that the economy is rebounding and thus they should begin increasing their spending, which in turn actually helps the economy rebound. It's not just good news, in other words, but news with the possibility to do good.Read More......
A new article in The Hill about Medicaid expansion speaks volumes about why Baucus is the wrong person to write health care reform. He is quoted as saying:Read More......“We can’t foot the entire bill for the states. We just can’t do that,” Baucus said. “We can’t let U.S. taxpayers pay the full state bill” for the expansion.This claim is stupidity in its purist form, and I know Baucus is not stupid. It is not like states' revenue comes from magical pots of gold. Whether through state taxes or federal taxes, the U.S. taxpayer will be paying the bill either way. People don't care if their higher taxes are the result a new federal tax or just a federal mandate the causes an increase in their states' taxes.
What Baucus is really saying is that it is more important that his bill looks good instead of being good. Looking at his top priorities it is clear his number one goal is that the he writes a bill that looks pretty. He wants it to be “bipartisan.” He wants it to come in below the random (but pretty) round number of a $1 trillion. He wants his bill to be “paid for.”
The problem is that Baucus achieves his goal of a pretty bill in the worst ways possible. Instead of looking for real reforms to drive down cost, he uses short cuts, loopholes, budget tricks, and cost shifts.
As a columnist who regularly dishes out sharp criticism, I try not to question the motives of people with whom I don't agree. Today, I'm going to step over that line.Rarely do we see traditional media types use the word "lies," let alone "flat-out lies."
The recent attacks by Republican leaders and their ideological fellow-travelers on the effort to reform the health-care system have been so misleading, so disingenuous, that they could only spring from a cynical effort to gain partisan political advantage. By poisoning the political well, they've given up any pretense of being the loyal opposition. They've become political terrorists, willing to say or do anything to prevent the country from reaching a consensus on one of its most serious domestic problems.
There are lots of valid criticisms that can be made against the health reform plans moving through Congress -- I've made a few myself. But there is no credible way to look at what has been proposed by the president or any congressional committee and conclude that these will result in a government takeover of the health-care system. That is a flat-out lie whose only purpose is to scare the public and stop political conversation.
"Um, should I pay when I head out downstairs," I asked.Getting a French hospital to accept payment for surgery is a lot like getting an American insurance company to reimburse you.
"Oh no," she said, "the caisse (cashier) is closed. It's Saturday."
Silly me.
She got up to leave. So I tried again, as politely as I could.
"Um, so, should I pay for the surgery when I come back next week for my check-up?", I tried again, not wanting to offend her with my apparent insolence.
"Yes, I guess that would work - if you like."
Blue Cross employee number one: Yes, you are so definitely covered, regardless of what doctor you visit or where you go - get to a doctor now.Yes, my insurance is so confusing that Blue Cross itself has no idea what my plan covers, so they just make shit up on the telephone to their customers facing emergency health crises abroad.
Blue Cross employee number two: No, you are only covered if your treatment takes place inside an emergency room. If you even step one foot outside the emergency room (possibly to pee, it's not clear) you lose your coverage.
Blue Cross employee number three: Obviously this is an emergency and would be covered.
Blue Cross employee number two then cuts off Blue Cross employee number three on the same call: "I just read you the sentence: Only in an emergency room."
"So what are they doing to you?," friend asks.I noticed that there seemed to be a few different techniques. I also noticed there seemed to be some major cutting of tissue in the eye (I'd though I'd been told the surgery was non-invasive, i.e., not going inside the eye). So I finally asked doc about it today and yes, there was some cutting of the eye. And I found out that I got an individual buckle, not a wraparound the eye kind of buckle, for those in the know.
"The doctor is putting a scleral buckle on my eye," I say.
Sound of friend typing.
"There's a video," friend suddenly says.
Silence.
"Oh." Silence again. "You really don't want to see this video."
John to nurse: Madame, I'm having an allergy attack. It's starting to make my throat close up. Since I'm about to go into surgery and be put asleep, that's probably not a god thing. Can you ask the doctor if I can take one of my allergy pills?As my allergic reaction grew worse, and I more agitated, we asked a second nurse if he could ask if it was safe for me to pop a pill. He asked what I was allergic to. The conversation went downhill from there.
Nurse to John: Allergies? Allergies to what?
John: Well, lots of things, like flowers, for instance.
Nurse: Monsieur, there are no flowers in this room.
And that was the end of that.
Part of the problem is how DADT is perceived inside the Beltway.In many way, especially on LGBT issues, it's still 1993 inside the beltway. And:
For legislation to move through both the House and Senate in a timely fashion (the next 6-12 months), the commander in chief must be an active participant in the legislative process.Repealing DADT is a promise Obama has made many, many, many times. He needs to step up. Read More......
The U.S. government made killing or capturing Mr. Mehsud one of its top priorities this year. Believed to be in his late 30’s, he ranked as Pakistan’s enemy No. 1. “Taking Mehsud off the battlefield would be a major victory,” an American counterterrorism official said Thursday. “The world, and certainly Pakistan, would be a safer place without him.”The Taliban are having a meeting to pick a new leader. Do they vote? Read More......
U.S. employers cut 247,000 jobs in July, far less than expected and the least in any month since last August, according to a government report on Friday that provided the clearest evidence yet that the economy was turning around.Heading in the right direction, for sure. The damage Bush and the GOP did to the economy is slowly being undone. Read More......
With fewer workers being laid off, the unemployment rate eased to 9.4 percent in July from 9.5 percent the prior month, the Labor Department said, the first time the jobless rate had fallen since April 2008.
The government revised job losses for May and June to show 43,000 fewer jobs lost than previously reported.
Analysts had expected non-farm payrolls to drop 320,000 in July and the unemployment rate to rise to 9.6 percent. The forecast was made earlier this week before other jobs data prompted some economists to lower their estimates for job losses.
John Hughes, the once-prolific filmmaker whose sweet and sassy comedies like “Sixteen Candles” and “The Breakfast Club” plumbed the lives of teenagers in the 1980s, died Thursday on a morning walk while visiting Manhattan. He was 59.I just rewatched "16 Candles" for the umpteenth time. It's got some classic lines, or maybe I think they're classic because I've seen that movie so many times. Read More......
The cause was a heart attack, according to a statement from the publicists Paul Bloch and Michelle Bega.
Mr. Hughes turned out a series of hits that captured audiences and touched popular culture — and then flummoxed both Hollywood and his fans by suddenly fading from the scene in the early 1990s. He surfaced sometimes as a writer, occasionally under his pen name, Edmond Dantès, the real name of the Dumas hero in “The Count of Monte Cristo.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© 2010 - John Aravosis | Design maintenance by Jason Rosenbaum
Send me your tips: americablog AT starpower DOT net