Sometimes it's nice to take a short break from politics.
Read More......
Roasted Squash and Einkorn Wheat Salad
2 hours ago
A boat carrying a group of radical anti-whaling activists collided with a Japanese whaling vessel in the Antarctic Ocean on Friday in a clash Japan condemned as "unforgivable." No one was injured.Read More......
Activist Paul Watson of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society said his boat was trying to prevent a Japanese ship from dragging a whale on board when another Japanese boat shot in front of Watson's vessel, causing a collision.
"The situation down here is getting very, very chaotic and very aggressive," Watson told The Associated Press by satellite phone from his boat, named after the late Australian conservationist and TV personality, Steve Irwin.
The Bush administration overpaid tens of billions of dollars for stocks and other assets in its massive bailout last year of Wall Street banks and financial institutions, a new study by a government watchdog says.Read More......
The Congressional Oversight Panel, in a report released Friday, said last year's overpayments amounted to a taxpayer-financed $78 billion subsidy of the firms.
The findings added to the frustrations of lawmakers already wary of the $700 billion rescue plan, known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Congress approved the plan last fall, but members of both parties criticized spending decisions by the Bush administration and former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.
Democratic sources on Friday reported a tentative deal in the Senate on President Barack Obama's economic stimulus package.UPDATE @ 6:27 PM: AP has already updated its report:
Details were not immediately available, but the package earlier teetered after hours of backroom meetings failed to produce an agreement that could attract crucial GOP votes.
Amid stunning new job losses and yet another bank failure, key senators and the White House reached tentative agreement Friday night on an economic stimulus measure at the heart of President Barack Obama's recovery plan.ANOTHER UPDATE @ 6:33 PM: CNN GOP analyst Alex Castellanos just said "The Democrats still own this bill, Wolf. He's getting a few, it looks like a few Republican votes in the Senate but it's kind of the Democratic-lite Republicans...it's the wussy Republicans." Read More......
Two officials said the emerging agreement was for a bill with a $780 billion price tag, but there was no immediate confirmation.
The tentative agreement capped a tense day of back room negotiations in which Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, joined by White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, sought to attract the support of enough Republicans to give the measure the needed 60-vote majority.
Officials strongly suggested that Sen. Edward M. Kennedy's vote would be needed to assure passage. The Massachusetts Democrat, battling a brain tumor, has been in Florida in recent days and has not been in the Capitol since suffering a seizure on Inauguration Day more than two weeks ago. The senator's office did not comment.
Reid met privately in the Capitol with members of his rank-and-file to present the proposed deal.
A New Yorker would have to make $123,322 a year to have the same standard of living as someone making $50,000 in Houston.This is a point that I've tried to make repeatedly in a number of posts. Congress and the administration need to stop making federal financial benefits, such as home tax credits and tax cuts, contingent on salary unless the salary caps take into account where in the country you live. It makes no sense to give someone making $70,000 a year in Houston a $7500 first-time homebuyer tax credit, while telling a New Yorker who makes $101,000 a year that she's too rich to get the same credit - when in fact, the New Yorker is actually making significantly less money than the Houston resident, once you take into account the cost of living both cities. Read More......
In Manhattan, a $60,000 salary is equivalent to someone making $26,092 in Atlanta....
The average monthly rent in New York is $2,801, 53% higher than San Francisco, the second most expensive city in the country.
News Corp., the media company controlled by Rupert Murdoch, slashed its fiscal 2009 profit forecast a second time after slumping advertising and a writedown led to the first loss in 13 quarters.Read More......
Operating income will fall about 30 percent in the year ending in June, more than a November forecast of a percentage drop in the “low to mid teens,” the New York-based company said today on its earnings conference call.
“The downturn is more severe and likely longer lasting than previously thought,” Chief Executive Officer Murdoch said in a statement. The company is implementing “rigorous cost-cutting,” including “major” expense reductions at local TVs, he said on the call.
The global recession is reducing ad sales at News Corp.’s Fox TV stations and newspapers including the Wall Street Journal, bought by Murdoch in December 2007 as part of the $5.2 billion acquisition of Dow Jones & Co. Operating income slumped 8.7 percent at the newspaper unit and 93 percent at the TV stations.
The company recorded an impairment charge of $8.4 billion before taxes in fiscal second quarter to reflect the declining value of its TV, newspaper and other assets. Excluding the impairment, profit fell to 12 cents a share. Analysts projected 19 cents, the average of 19 estimates compiled by Bloomberg.
A not-so-funny thing happened on the way to economic recovery. Over the last two weeks, what should have been a deadly serious debate about how to save an economy in desperate straits turned, instead, into hackneyed political theater, with Republicans spouting all the old clichés about wasteful government spending and the wonders of tax cuts.As one of my friends messaged me today, "it's like the Republicans won the election." How did the Democrats let that happen?
It’s as if the dismal economic failure of the last eight years never happened — yet Democrats have, incredibly, been on the defensive. Even if a major stimulus bill does pass the Senate, there’s a real risk that important parts of the original plan, especially aid to state and local governments, will have been emasculated.
Somehow, Washington has lost any sense of what’s at stake — of the reality that we may well be falling into an economic abyss, and that if we do, it will be very hard to get out again.
So what should Mr. Obama do? Count me among those who think that the president made a big mistake in his initial approach, that his attempts to transcend partisanship ended up empowering politicians who take their marching orders from Rush Limbaugh. What matters now, however, is what he does next.Obama started to do that yesterday. Our president needs to go all out now -- just like he did during the campaign. He's fighting against the same failed policies now that he fought in the fall. But, now the situation is even more dire -- and Obama has to fix it.
It’s time for Mr. Obama to go on the offensive. Above all, he must not shy away from pointing out that those who stand in the way of his plan, in the name of a discredited economic philosophy, are putting the nation’s future at risk. The American economy is on the edge of catastrophe, and much of the Republican Party is trying to push it over that edge.
But what I have also said is -- don't come to the table with the same tired arguments and worn ideas that helped to create this crisis. (Applause.) You know, all of us here -- imperfect. And everything we do and everything I do is subject to improvement. Michelle reminds me every day how imperfect I am. (Laughter.) So I welcome this debate. But come on, we're not -- we are not going to get relief by turning back to the very same policies that for the last eight years doubled the national debt and threw our economy into a tailspin. (Applause.)Yes, we are tired of the same old Republican stuff and the same painful cable chatter. That's the Obama we need to see.
We can't embrace the losing formula that says only tax cuts will work for every problem we face; that ignores critical challenges like our addiction to foreign oil, or the soaring cost of health care, or falling schools and crumbling bridges and roads and levees. I don't care whether you're driving a hybrid or an SUV -- if you're headed for a cliff, you've got to change direction. (Applause.) That's what the American people called for in November, and that's what we intend to deliver.(Applause.)
So the American people are watching. They did not send us here to get bogged down with the same old delay, the same old distractions, the same talking points, the same cable chatter. (Applause.) You know, aren't you all tired of that stuff?
U.S. employers slashed 598,000 jobs in January, the deepest cut in payrolls in 34 years as the national unemployment rate shot up to 7.6 percent, according to a Labor Department report on Friday that underlined a deepening recession.This is getting really, really scary. The Senate better pass the stimulus bill today. Read More......
January's job losses were worse than the 525,000 that had been forecast by Wall Street economists, who also had expected the unemployment rate to come in lower at 7.5 percent. The bleak employment data is certain to be cited by the Obama administration as a fresh reason for Congress to speed up debate over a multibillion-dollar package of proposals to try to stimulate economic activity.
With news of fresh layoffs creeping into the markets every day, investors are bracing for another bad nonfarm payrolls report Friday, which could bring the total job losses of the past two months to more than 1 million.Read More......
And the numbers are not likely to get better until the second half of the year, analysts said.
Nonfarm payrolls likely dropped by 525,000 in January, according to economists surveyed by ThomsonReuters. Those polled by Briefing.com predicted a drop of 540,000, on average.
And there are a number of predictions much higher. Analysts at ING, who still maintain their view that "we could at some point see 1 million payrolls decline," predict a plunge of 750,000 in January.
The unemployement rate is expected to rise to 7.5 percent from 7.2 percent in December. Average hourly earnings are expected to rise 0.2 percent.
Tony Blair gave an extraordinary speech about the global importance of religion yesterday, telling an audience which included the newly-inaugurated President, Barack Obama, that faith should be restored "to its rightful place, as the guide to our world and its future."Read More......
The former prime minister also said he believed the 21st century would be "poorer in spirit" and "meaner in ambition" if it was not "under the guardianship of faith in God." He had been invited by President Obama to lead the prestigious US National Prayer Breakfast, a spectacular event in the ballroom of the Washington Hilton Hotel.
Mr Blair also managed to rain on Gordon Brown's parade, meeting the President before any European leader. He dashed ahead of the Prime Minister and other political heavyweights, including Angela Merkel, Nicolas Sarkozy and Vladimir Putin, to lay on the hands and tell the President: "It is fitting at this extraordinary moment in your country's history that we hear that call to action; and we pray that in acting we do God's work and follow God's will."
The steady expansion of the "surveillance society" risks undermining fundamental freedoms including the right to privacy, according to a House of Lords report published today.Read More......
The peers say Britain has constructed one of the most extensive and technologically advanced surveillance systems in the world in the name of combating terrorism and crime and improving administrative efficiency.
The report, Surveillance: Citizens and the State, by the Lords' constitution committee, says Britain leads the world in the use of CCTV, with an estimated 4m cameras, and in building a national DNA database, with more than 7% of the population already logged compared with 0.5% in the America.
The cross-party committee which includes Lord Woolf, a former lord chief justice, and two former attorneys general, Lord Morris and Lord Lyell, warns that "pervasive and routine" electronic surveillance and the collection and processing of personal information is almost taken for granted.
Although many surveillance practices and data collection processes are unknown to most people, the expansion in their use represents "one of the most significant changes in the life of the nation since the end of the second world war", the report says. The committee warns that the national DNA database could be used for "malign purposes", challenges whether CCTV cuts crime and questions whether local authorities should be allowed to use surveillance powers at all.
Philip Hampton, the new chairman of Royal Bank of Scotland, is wielding the axe in the loss-making bank's boardroom in a determined effort to exert his authority over the troubled operation.Read More......
Seven non-executives are expected to leave the board as Hampton roots out some of the longest-standing members of a board that presided over as many as 24 acquisitions during the eight years in which ousted chief executive Sir Fred Goodwin was at the helm. The taxpayer will soon own 70% of the bank.
The dramatic clear-out of the RBS board will include the long-standing non-executive directors Peter Sutherland and Bob Scott, the senior independent director who was the main point of communication for disgruntled shareholders.
The former Treasury mandarin Sir Steve Robson is also expected to depart along with Jim Currie, Janis Kong, Charles Koch and Bill Friedrich.
Their departures will signal a major change in the management of RBS, which the former chairman Sir Tom McKillop was forced to defend last year when he declared there were "no patsies" on the board.
Three new government-approved non-executive directors will join the board as stipulated by the government as a condition for the injection of £20bn of taxpayer funds. Those appointments were being finalised last night and could be announced as soon as today.
Who do you hold responsible for the economic mess we're in — Paulson? Bernanke? Greenspan?Read More......
Well, now you can hold them accountable — literally — with the Squeeze the Banker line of stress dolls from boutique agency CreativeFeed.
"We thought that a stress ball in the shape of the principal icons of our financial system was a funny (and maybe healthy) way of facing the strain we are all under," said Arthur Ceria, CreativeFeed's founder. "These stress dolls are a symbolic effort at turning the tables on what for most of us is a source of considerable strain," he said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© 2011 - John Aravosis | Design maintenance by Jason Rosenbaum
Send me your tips: americablog AT starpower DOT net