For the next month or two, I’m going to be contributing weekly pieces to the girl-power website Off Our Chests. Here’s my latest. Snip:

So, I have this ex. I dated him for a long time, but we haven’t really talked in ages. I suspect that I hurt him pretty bad when he dated; he hurt me pretty bad, too.

I’ve written about him only a few times. For instance, I wrote about him when I discussed my history of figuring out how to reach orgasm, because he … was not a good sexual partner. He pressured me in a lot of unpleasant sex-related ways. During one fight, he even shouted at me that he didn’t care about my sexual satisfaction.

I know that he was manipulative. I know that he ignored my needs. And I know that he hurt me. But I also believe that he loved me. I know he understands me deeply, and respects me in a lot of ways. I know I was important to him, and I know I wasn’t always the most reasonable partner myself.

Where is the space for me to reconcile these things?

I once wrote a long post about him that got very different reactions from different readers. A commenter on one feminist website informed me that he had abused me; she told me that I “should” admit that I am a victim of abuse. Whereas a writer an an anti-feminist site wrote a whole post about me titled: “Another Sexually & Emotionally Defective Feminist.” The post described me as “histrionic” and “flawed” and “melodramatic”. This armchair psychoanalysis concluded that my sexual identity makes me “defective,” and that the whole experience arose because of my own failure to understand myself.

It seems that from the outside, some observers will conclude that he was “at fault”, and some will conclude that I was “at fault”. Obviously, I’d prefer to believe that he was “at fault”. But maybe “fault” isn’t the most productive way to think about this?

I know he hurt me. The relationship was incredibly problematic. I see some of the things he said to me in descriptions of emotional abuse tactics such as gaslighting

Read more here.

{ 5 comments }

Flying with kids has been the topic of three New York Times articles over the past few weeks (one, two and three), and the responses are predictably polarizing. Because yes, having a screaming kid on your flight absolutely sucks. I would imagine it also sucks to be the parent of a screaming kid on a flight, and the fact is that sometimes families need to travel too — leaving the baby at home is not a fair suggestion. So I’m pretty firmly in the camp of “cut parents and kids a lot of slack on airplanes.”

Which is why airlines really should make some reasonable accommodations for parents. Like, let families with small children board first, so that they don’t hold everyone else up. Seat parents and children together. Let parents stand with their kids at the back of the plane if the kids need to stretch their legs. Etc etc. At the same time, parents need to be realistic. And some of the parents in the Times article seem a little… clueless:
[click to continue…]

{ 116 comments }

This is a guest post by Katherine Greenier. Katherine Greenier is the director of the Patricia M. Arnold Women’s Rights Project at the ACLU of Virginia.

The statistics are staggering: 1 in 5 women are sexually assaulted while in college, and approximately 81 percent of students experienced some form of sexual harassment during their school years. Sexual violence in schools and on campus is a pressing civil rights issue. When students suffer sexual assault and harassment, they are deprived of equal and free access to an education.
According to a recent Richmond Times-Dispatch analysis of reported sex crimes at colleges and universities, “sexual assaults on Virginia college campuses seldom result in an arrest or conviction, in part because half the women who report the attacks decline to pursue charges against their alleged assailants.”

The paper reported that “the analysis of seven schools in Virginia found that campus police investigated 62 reported sex crimes during calendar years 2008, 2009 and 2010, with just seven cases resulting in arrests and four in convictions.” Further, “the collective rate of arrests and convictions for the seven schools is well below the national and state average for reported sex crimes at large, according to federal crime data and a 2009 analysis of national rape statistics.”

The fact that some victims refuse to cooperate with police or don’t want their assailants charged is a complex and sensitive decision. Victims of sexual assault will respond to and seek to recover from assault in different ways. Self-blame, fear of retaliation, and fear of intrusive and re-victimizing court procedures are some of the reasons that prevent many sexual assault survivors from reporting their assault.

However, just because victims do not seek criminal prosecution does not mean that they don’t want protective measures provided by the school itself – protections schools are obligated to provide under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.
[click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

A great piece is in Good this month by Nona Willis Aronowitz about the prevalence of Mormon lifestyle bloggers. Read it all, but Nona is trying to answer the question of why so many female lifestyle bloggers are Mormon. She doesn’t come to an exact answer, but it seems to be some combination of: They’re well-educated, they’re relatively wealthy, they have a strong cultural written tradition, and they’re bored.

{ 18 comments }

Big news:

GAVI announced today that it intends to introduce HPV and rubella vaccines in developing countries. Each year cervical cancer causes 275,000 deaths with 88% taking place in poor countries. It is projected that the number of deaths will rise to 430,000 women each year by 2050 if no action is taken. To reduce the impact, GAVI has set the ambitious goal of vaccinating 2 million women and girls against HPV and thus protecting them against cervical cancer by 2015.

Women in developing countries often lack access to the screening mechanisms that keep cervical cancer rates lower in wealthier nations. This vaccine program could save hundreds of thousands of lives.

{ 2 comments }

Do your thing.

{ 52 comments }

I missed posting about White Ribbon Day yesterday. Fortunately, I realised that most of you are in the USA or other countries in similar timezones, so I can post about it today and it will still be kinda relevant!

White Ribbon Day is Australia’s Day to End Violence Against Women. Yes, it’s extremely gendered and ignores violence committed by people who aren’t men or against people who aren’t women. Male violence against women is so endemic, though, and such a huge problem in our society, and so I believe it deserves some attention of its own.

I’d like all Australian men and boys who read this to take the Oath. If you’re not Australian, have a read anyway. But I don’t just want you to sign it or read it, I want you to really think about it.

The Oath says:

I swear never to commit, excuse or remain silent about violence against women. This is my oath.

I’d like you pay particular attention to the excuse and remain silent about parts. Only a small handful of men have ever been physically violent towards me, but far more have excused male violence against me or remained silent about male violence against me when I needed them to speak out.

If you are told that a mate of yours has been violent towards a woman and you reply that he’d never do that, you are excusing violence against women. If you blame someone for “going back” to a violent situation, you are excusing violence against women. If you “stay out of it” when someone who has been hit by her partner is crying out for someone to support her, you are remaining silent about violence against women. If you hear violence occurring in a neighbour’s house and you think “I don’t want to get involved” or that you can’t help, you are remaining silent in the face of violence against women. All of these things perpetuate violence against women, and all of them discourage victims of violence from seeking help and speaking out. Furthermore, they tell perpetrators that their actions are condoned and will not have consequences. You can help end violence against women by swearing to not only never engage in it, but to never excuse it and to never remain silent about it.

Men are vital in stopping male violence against women. You can change the culture of violence. You can influence each other. If you see or hear about violence against women being committed by someone you know – friend, father, brother, co-worker, partner, uncle, cousin, grandfather – say something. Don’t make excuses. Ask the victim what she needs and support her however you can.

Please share the link amongst your male friends and allies.

{ 67 comments }

I’ve done Black Friday once. Once. In my thirty years. I was 22, there was an artificial Christmas tree I’d seen in a circular, and so my mom and I threw on coats over our PJs, stood outside of Kohl’s at 5:45 a.m., bolted straight to the back of the store, and picked up only those impulse items that were on a straight line from the artificial Christmas tree section directly back to the checkout counter. Then we went home, removed our coats, and went back to bed.

I think one reason I hate Black Friday so desperately is that when I worked for the fashion publication that, as always, shall remain nameless, I had the pleasant job of heading to the mall every weekend during the holiday season for the weekly retail roundup. I got to drag a poor photographer who’d rather be hanging Christmas decorations with his young children around this massive Shopping Center of Earthly Delights, tackling shoppers who also would rather be hanging holiday decorations with their families and asking them what they’re buying and how shopping this year compares to shopping last year. Hell, I would rather have been home with my fish hanging Christmas decorations, or Hannukah decorations, or any other damned kind of decorations than stumble for hours around that Bosch painting of a mall to collect my quotes and then go home and get my story filed in time for my editor to maybe remember to include it in that week’s roundup.

So I make a concerted effort to stay in on Black Friday, contribution to our nation’s flagging economy be damned.

For anyone else planning lock the doors, close the shutters, and stay in their homes, bunker-style, from doorbuster to midnight madness, here are a few suggestions from my own playbook.

[click to continue…]

{ 44 comments }

Vodka.

I’m also 97% sure that “putting vodka on a tampon and then getting drunk through your vagina (or butt)” is an urban legend on par with Rainbow Parties. Has someone probably tried it once or twice? Surely. Human beings are both amazing and awful (and amazingly awful). We are the best creatures, and we are endlessly creative when it comes to doing mind-numbingly stupid things. You know who is a good example of someone who is amazingly awful? Danielle Crittenden. Apparently when she’s not refusing to get on airplanes because brown people are boarding or making a career out of complaining about the women’s movement that enabled her to have a career complaining about the women’s movement, she is testing out the vodka-tampon theory and then acting shocked when it burns. And she didn’t even get drunk! Clearly she should have tried the Diva Cup. That holds a lot more liquid.

You know what else burns? The stupid.

{ 36 comments }

Oh Prudie, you get the most special letter-writers:

Q. Animal Abuse?: Is it animal abuse if the owners of three dogs constantly denigrate their largest, least intelligent dog? They love all three of their pooches, and they shower each dog with affection, but because their largest least intelligent dog is always desperate for attention, they often call him an idiot and make fun of him. Not always to his face, but sometimes to his face. When they make fun of him to his face, they make fun of him in a sing-song voice so he thinks they’re being nice to him. It makes me uncomfortable. Is this animal abuse?

Someone take that dog away from its evil owners! Are those assholes under the impression that the dog doesn’t speak English or something?

{ 102 comments }

Okay, The Walking Dead. I’ve been giving you a lot of passes. The horrible, awful accents. The fact that they were right there at the CDC and nobody thought, Hey, maybe we should stop off for some firearms and SUVs before we leave town, seeing as how Decatur has the greatest number of early-model Broncos with mud tires and a gun rack per capita of any municipality in Georgia. The fact that a show called The Walking Dead hasn’t had more than about three actual walking dead an episode since the beginning of the season. The fact that Daryl, basically the only character on the show with any sense, hasn’t been elected boss, general, and emperor-for-life of their little band. The fact that the entire crew could be in Fort Benning by now if they’d just lay off waiting for–and risking their lives over and over again to track down–one kid who, while cute, didn’t follow instructions and has been nothing but a liability. The solid half-hour of taaaalk talktalktalktalktalktalk every. Single. Episode. The awful, horrible accents. You’ve gotten a lot of leeway from me, show.

But we’re halfway through the second season now, and my patience, my willingness to suspend disbelief, and the handle of Popov I keep just for drinking games are all getting low. I got some stuff to say to you, show, and you’re going to hear about it after the jump, wherein there will be spoilers for S02, E06 (Secrets).

[click to continue…]

{ 47 comments }

We’ve been discussing gaslighting as an abuse tactic in two previous posts in response to this article by Yashar Ali who reassures us that we ladies are not crazy (thanks). In the first, Caperton dissects Ali’s message directly and the problems with male allies presenting problems analyzed by feminists as new and novel issues. In the second, I tried to clarify the definition of gaslighting and invited the readership to share their own personal experiences with this form of emotional abuse, for one because it’s a tool commonly used by abusers in abusive relationships, and two because it’s so often used against women. What bothered me was that Ali’s explanation of gaslighting chalked it up to what we commonly experience as everday sexism, when in reality gaslighting is a particularly insidious form of emotional abuse that primes abuse victims to accept increasing levels of abuse.

I discussed this briefly with Captain Awkward for her insight, in part because she so extensively discusses the importance of boundaries at her blog, and as she wisely put it in our correspondence, “You need a power differential (patriarchy, for example) for true gaslighting – it relies on power and stereotypes.” In a typical heteronormative abuse model, for example, this form of emotional abuse is often levied against women by men, and it works precisely because of prejudices about femininity and masculinity — that women are nervous, hysterical, less prone to intelligent reasoning, and need protected and corrected by a rational man who is not swayed by his emotions. Of course this isn’t true across the board — it happens frequently in abusive same-sex relationships and parent-child relationships (which exploits the child’s dependent status) as well.

Because gaslighting is part and parcel of a larger system of abuse, it can be difficult to tease out exact incidents and outcomes and differentiate them from the larger experience of the abusive relationship. Some commenters expressed confusion over lying versus gaslighting, and whether this is something that is always conscious or whether it can be subconscious as well. “Gaslighting” is a colloquial term and not a clinical one (Practitioners, is there an official recognition of this behavior?), so there is some disagreement on how it’s applied. For our discussion, I consider gaslighting to be a repeat, systematic series of lies that are designed to make the victim doubt her reality. It’s not one lie or two lies, it’s part of a pattern of abuse meant to make the victim more compliant to minimize the effects of abuse, accept blame, and accept the abuser’s version of events that are contrary to her own. In other words, it’s death by a thousand cuts.

Gaslighting can be intentional, such as with the example from the play and its movie adaptations, or the example I use here, where a partner purposely moves or hides your stuff to make you feel forgetful and untethered to your memory.

Gaslighting can also be an unintentional side-effect, as a classic outcome of living with a narcissist, or with a partner who is trying to cover up their pattern of abuse, or with the addict trying to cover up their addiction. It is done in order to preserve the … [gaslighter's] vision of himself” as an honest and upstanding person without actually doing the things that would make it so.

Gaslighting can be physical or emotional. An example of physical gaslighting is the example from the movie or from my example in comments. An anonymous reader emailed me with this horrifying example of physical gaslighting:

I knew someone who lived in his mother-in-law’s house and would do things like reorder the kitchen cabinets (switching the plates to the opposite side of the room) to make her think she was going crazy in the hopes that he could have her committed to a home and he could get the house.

For a sidebar discussion, I’ve heard a practitioner say that this kind of gaslighting is so vindictive and insidious that if someone is pulling a physical gaslight on you and you’re able to identify it, drop everything and run the other way and never stop running from this person.

An example of emotional gaslighting is evident in the recollection of CurrerBell in comments, where the denial of abuse was encouraged in her childhood home in order to preserve peace with a trigger-prone mother.

It’s not limited to interpersonal relationships either. As smash points out in the comments, an example was highlighted recently in Ask Prudie where a guy is bullied by his coworkers, who tell him he has bad breath and harangue him about it at work, while his dentist and doctor tell him there is no issue at all.

Overall, gaslighting has the gradual effect of making the victim anxious, confused, and less able to trust their own memory and perception, which makes you less likely to fight back or feel confident accusing the abuser of bad faith later when he’s siphoning money off of you, for example, or isolating you from your friends and family. And later, when your work and school performance suffers because of the nagging dread you have at home, your abuser blames it on the shortcomings he’s defined you by, so it’s your fault that you’re stupid and unreliable, which is why no one likes you and you’re ugly and you can’t even pick up the cat right. The pattern of lying and denial is meant to make you more susceptible to validating their version of events, and it’s almost always a version where the abuser is the sympathetic party and the victim is a dumb, petty asshole for concentrating on who did what when. It’s meant to tear you down and it’s often effective because you are trying to fight fair with someone who is intentionally slippery. As part of a larger system of abuse, it makes you vulnerable to accept escalations of abuse AND attribute them to your OWN failure and not the ill will of the abuser.

About a dozen women wrote me privately and anonymously to share their experiences, and they had so much insight and wisdom and humor that I hope I do them justice and crystallize their experiences here. Because I think it’s tempting for us survivors to focus on the abuser, which can be detrimental for our recovery, I also asked them to recollect how they put the pieces back together after leaving the relationship. What follows below are bits and pieces of these anonymous conversations, both about gaslighting and abusive relationships in general. While I originally intended to focus on gaslighting alone, there were too many invaluable insights to pare them down.

This is a giant beast of a discussion on emotional and physical abuse and its affects on our mental health, and as such this is your neon, flashing trigger warning. [click to continue…]

{ 69 comments }