The Fortunate/Unfortunate Truth About 9/11

9/11 was fortunate for a few but unfortunate for the many, including you. Watch and learn.

The Category of Terror (9:50)


The Underlying Politics of 9/11, Part 1 (9:17)


The Underlying Politics of 9/11, Part 2 (9:29)


9/11: Press for Truth (1:24:18)


Terror Storm (1:52:45)

Another CIA Analyst Begrudgingly Concedes: 9/11 Was an Inside Job

Who is Webster Tarpley and Why Does Ex Marine Intel Officer & CIA Analyst Robert Steele Agree with His Assertion that 9/11 Was an Inside Job?



In 1960, Webster Griffin Tarpley was tasked by the Italitan government to study the red brigades that were wreaking havoc in Italy. What he found was shocking. He found that the brigades were being run by a private faction of NATO intelligence. It was a false-flag intelligence operation made to appear as a communist operation.

After the rout in Saigon in 1975, there was a belief that the US and British Empire might collapse worldwide.

HILEX 75 or High Level Exercise 75, was themed around a confrontation between top officials with the option of pulling NATO countries into nuclear confrontation with the Soviet Union.

Following the Spiegel leak, Tarpley spent Christmas Eve of 1975 on the steps of the Milan cathedral, passing out leaflets, warning citizens of the drill and preemptively trying to win minds of those who might be presented with government propaganda after we found ourselves clashing with the Sovet Union as a result of some preconceived provocation. HILEX 75 could mean the 3rd World War, Tarpley said.

Tarpley isn't a nut with theories. His concerns about government exercises had already been validated several times in the past decade or so and would again be validated on the morning of 9/11 and the on the day of the 7/7 London bombings. He has since written "9/11: Synthetic Terror", which is about false-flag terrorism and of it's most crowning success, 9/11.

After years of ignoring such allegations, former CIA analyst and marine intel officer Robert Steele read Webster Tarpley's book and has joined the chorus of colleagues such as William Christionson, Robert Baer and Ray McGovern and concluded that in the very least, the neocons allowed 9/11 to occur and were at some level involved in the larger plot.

As I've previously cited on this network, the evidence is conclusive that Russian intelligence engaged in a similar administrative coup de tat in 1999, delivering Vladimir Putin the same license to stamp out domestic dissent in world where nations are being consolidated into regional power centers and probably somewhere down the line, world government.

Further Reading and Viewing

Watch Tarpley's presentation on the subject of false-flag terrorism here.

The documentary film "9/11: Press for Truth" is the definitive guide on the involvement of Pakistani intelligence (ISI) in 9/11. They were the 80s era coduit the CIA used to fund and train Bin Laden's mujahideen in neighboring Afghanistan. All evidence indicates they were again used as a proxy, a hired gun on 9/11, to use genuine muslim fanatics who didn't realize they were working for ISI officials that were part of a rogue military black-op project conceived by Western financial interests.

Here, Ralph Schoenman addresses the first false-flag terror operation on the trade center, the bombing in 1993.

Watch Schoenman address some of the many Western intelligence connections to 9/11 here.

COVERT USES OF MILITARY EXERCISES

From Tarpley’s Synthetic Terror:

Military exercises come in two varieties – there are the field exercises or live-fly exercises, war games in which real tanks or real planes move around in the fields or the sky. There are also staff exercises, which mainly involve officers assigned to the headquarters, who move markers in a sandbox, map grid, or computer screen.

The classic use of war games has been to prepare a sneak attack. The aggressor army announces that it is holding its summer maneuvers near the border of the target state. The deployment takes place under the cover of press releases announcing that these are merely maneuvers. When the troops are in position, they receive an order for a real attack. If field exercises can be used for fooling the adversary, then staff exercises are more useful for deceiving ones own side. In December 1975, in the wake of the US defeat in Vietnam, when the Pentagon was smarting from the reverse and looking for ways to redress the balance, there were certain circles in NATO who considered using the staff exercise HILEX 75 to set up a confrontation with the Warsaw Pact in Europe.

Staff officers of countries who were not party to that plan were told not to be alarmed by the war preparations they saw; after all, those were only part of a staff exercise. Fortunately, due to the efforts of a network of alert citizens in a number of NATO countries, word got out about the really explosive potential of HILEX 75, and the confrontation option was abandoned. But these are at least two models of how maneuvers can be used for deception that we should keep in mind; there are more. Staff exercises or command exercises are perfect for a rogue network which is forced to conduct its operations using the same communications and computer systems used by other officers who are not necessarily party to the illegal operation, coup or provocation as it may be. A putschist officer may be working at a console next to another officer who is not in on the coup, and who might indeed oppose it if he knew about it. The putschist’s behavior is suspicious: what the hell is he doing? The loyal officer looks over and asks the putschist about it.

The putschist cites a staff maneuver for which he is preparing. The loyal officer concludes that the putschist’s activities are part of an officially sanctioned drill, and his suspicions are allayed. The putschist may even explain that participation in the staff exercise requires a special security clearance which the loyal officer does not have. The conversation ends, and the putschist can go on with his treasonous work.

Most civilians would assume that a military exercise or drill, be it a field or live fly exercise, or a staff drill, would tend to enhance the readiness of the military units taking part. This was the view expressed by 9/11 widow Mindy Kleinberg to 9/11 commission in March 2003, when she remarked that: “… on September 11, NEADS (of the North East Air Defense System of NORAD) was several days into a semiannual exercise known as ‘Vigilant Guardian.’ This meant that our North East Air Defense System was fully staffed. In short, key officers were manning the operation battle center, “fighter jets were cocked, loaded, and carrying extra gas on board.’” (Testimony to 9/11 commission, March 31, 2003) But in reality the maneuvers may have introduced confusion and scattered available resources. The drills included false radar blips, military aircraft pretending to be hijacked, and the transfer of many NORAD fighters to northern Canada
and Alaska.

AMALGAM VIRGO: COVER STORY FOR 9/11

The military exercise called Amalgam Virgo bore a close relationship to the events of 9/11. Amalgam Virgo was a military drill that had to do with hijacked airliners, sometimes from inside the United States, and sometimes used as weapons. A cruise missile was included at least once. The best working hypothesis is that Amalgam Virgo was the cover story under which the 9/11 attacks advanced through the bureaucracy.

Preparations for carrying out 9/11 were conducted under the cover of being preparations for Amalgam Virgo. Most of those who took part in Amalgam Virgo could hardly have been aware of this duplicity.
One of the military officers who had been responsible for organizing Amalgam Virgo ’01 was Colonel Alan Scott. Scott testified on May 23, 2003 at the 9/11 commission hearings:

...MR. ALAN SCOTT: Yes, sir. Specifically Operation Amalgam Virgo, which I was involved in before I retired, was a scenario using a Third World united – not united – uninhabited aerial vehicle launched off a rogue freighter in the Gulf of Mexico.

MR. BEN-VENISTE: That was Operation Amalgam Virgo. In fact, this exercise – in this exercise we used actual drones – NQM-107 drones, which are about the size of a cruise missile, to exercise our fighters and our radars in a Gulf of Mexico scenario.

MR. BEN-VENISTE: You are referring to Amalgam 01, are you not?

MR. SCOTT: Yes, sir, Amalgam 01.

MR. BEN-VENISTE: I am referring to Amalgam 02, which was in the planning stages prior to September 11th, 2001, sir. Is that correct?

MR. SCOTT: That was after I retired, and I was not involved in 02.

MR. BEN-VENISTE: Will you accept that the exercise involved a simultaneous hijacking scenario?

MR. SCOTT: I was not involved in 02.

GEN. MCKINLEY: Sir, I do have some information on 02, if you would allow me to read it for the record.

MR. BEN-VENISTE: Please.

GEN. MCKINLEY: [Reads from briefing book.] Amalgam Virgo in general, 02, was an exercise created to focus on peacetime and contingency NORAD missions. One of the peacetime scenarios that is and has been a NORAD mission for years is support to other government departments. Within this mission falls hijackings.

Creativity of the designer aside, prior motivations were based on political objectives – i.e., asylum or release of captured prisoners or political figures. Threats of killing hostages or crashing were left to the script writers to invoke creativity and broaden the required response of the players.

What this means is that the scenario papers prepared for the officers participating in the drill by collaborating writers included crashing planes into targets; these papers were evidently an integral part of the drill.

McKinley is explicitly acknowledging that the drills did indeed inclued the concept of hijacked aircraft being used as weapons. Ben-Veniste, feigning not to understand this, thought McKinley’s answer was “fatuous,” and added ironically “It wasn’t in the minds of script writers when the Algerians had actually hijacked the plane, when they were attempting to fly into the Eiffel Tower….Don’t you agree we could have been better prepared?” But Amalgam Virgo was not fatuous, it was sinister. Here was an exercise which included many of the elements which were put into practice on 9/11.

Amalgam Virgo thus provided the witting putschists with a perfect cover for conduiting the actual live fly components of 9/11 through a largely non-witting military bureaucracy. Under the cover of this confusion, the most palpably subversive actions could be made to appear in the harmless and even beneficial guise of a drill. In addition, a red herring was built in for the purpose of confusing investigators arriving after the fact: the hijacked planes involved were generally imagined as coming from abroad. But even that covering detail was dubious.
These exercises came up again in the April 2004 hearings of the 9/11 commission. In her much-touted appearance, NSC director Condoleezza Rice repeated her well-known and discredited contention that the White House had not contemplated hijacked airliners being used as weapons. Bush himself had chimed in, asserting that “Nobody in our government, at least, and I don’t think the prior government, could envision flying airplanes into buildings on such a massive scale.” As the hearings showed, during the two years before the 9/11 attacks, NORAD conducted exercises using hijacked airliners as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties. Another scenario involved crashing an airliner into the Pentagon, but this was not conducted after the Defense Department objected that this was too unrealistic. But it was done as a staff exercise – one might say, as a rehearsal. Perhaps it was realistic, but too revealing. One drill, planned for July 2001 but not conducted until later, involved planes from airports in Utah and Washington which were hijacked for the purposes of the drill. These aircraft were then escorted by US and Canadian interceptors to airfields in British Columbia and Alaska.

A NORAD statement issued in April 2004 confirmed that “Numerous types of civilian and military aircraft were used as mock hijacked aircraft. These exercises test and track detention and identification; scramble and interception; hijack procedures; internal and external agency coordination and operational security and communications security procedures.” According to NORAD, these were regional drills, not regularly scheduled continent-wide drills. (USA Today, April 18, 2004) Not surprisingly, there is absolutely no mention of Amalgam Virgo in the report of the 9/11 commission.

Mike Ruppert has contributed much to illuminating the causes of the “complete paralysis of fighter response on 9/11…” Ruppert wrote in June 2004 that he had “obtained an on-the- record statement from someone in NORAD, which confirmed that on the day of 9/11 the Joint Chiefs (Myers) and NORAD were conducting a joint, live-fly, hijack Field Training Exercise (FTX) which involved at least one (and almost certainly many more) aircraft under US control that was posing as a hijacked airliner.” Ruppert also concluded that “There never was a stand down order issued. That would have been way too incriminating and risky a piece of evidence.” (From the Wilderness, June 6, 2004)

The exercises that were conducted on 9/11 were these:

1. Vigilant Guardian

From what is known about Vigilant Guardian, it is clear that it closely mimicked the actual events of 9/11. Vigilant Guardian was thus the source of much confusion among the non-witting NORAD personnel. As we will see, NORAD personnel were bewildered as to whether the reports they were getting represented fictitious events within the exercise, or whether they were dealing with a real emergency. (Aviation Week and Space Technology, June 3, 2002) This was a joint US-Canada exercise, and is designed to test the coordination of the two defense establishments. According to GlobalSecurity.org:

“The VIGILANT GUARDIAN (VG) is a VIGILANT OVERVIEW Command Post Exercise (CPX) conducted in conjunction with USCINCSTRAT-sponsored GLOBAL GUARDIAN and USCINCSPACE-sponsored APOLLO GUARDIAN exercises. The exercise involves all HQ NORAD levels of command and is designed to exercise most aspects of the NORAD mission. One VG is scheduled each year and the length will vary depending on the exercise scenario and objectives.” (www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/vigilant-guardian.htm)

According to another source, “The planning for Vigilant Guardian Exercise-2001 probably began in 2000; and it was responding to a growing uneasiness of the US government and intelligence reports, world-wide – including NORAD – about plans for terrorist seizure of commercial air planes to be used as missiles against American targets.” (www.911teachin.net/L5A.html)

The 9/11 commission had this to say about Vigilant Guardian: “On 9/11, NORAD was scheduled to conduct a military exercise, Vigilant Guardian, which postulated a bomber attack from the former Soviet Union.” This is a very narrow definition of the drill in question, and is probably intended to mislead. The 9/11 commission continues: “We investigated whether military preparedness for the large-scale exercise compromised the military’s response to the real-world terrorist attack on 9/11. According to General Eberhart, ‘it took about 30 seconds to make the adjustment to the real-world situation.’ (Ralph Eberhart testimony, June 17, 2004). We found that the response was, if anything, expedited by the increased number of staff at the sectors and at NORAD because of the scheduled exercise. See Robert Marr interview (Jan. 23, 2004)” (911 commission 458 n. 116) Eberhart’s braggadocio was transparent, and the commission’s verdict was a lie.

Here is one example of the profound confusion engendered by the simultaneous occurrence of drill and real emergency:

FAA: Hi. Boston Center TMU [Traffic Management Unit], we have a problem here. We have a hijacked aircraft headed towards New York, and we need you guys to, we need someone to scramble some F-16s or something up there, help us out.

NEADS: [Staff Sergeant Jeremy Powell, Air National Guard] Is this real-world
or exercise?

FAA: No, this is not an exercise, not a test. (9/11 commission report 20)
Here is the same scene of confusion as described from the standpoint of another participant:

On Sept. 11, as Americans watched horror rain upon New York and Washington, command teams at a little-known military outpost in Rome, N.Y., worked feverishly to restore safe skies and rouse a slumbering homeland defense.

At the Northeast Air Defense Sector, radar operators who constantly scan the continent’s boundaries suddenly faced a threat from within and a race they could not win.

Four months after the terrorist attacks, there are still untold stories. This is one.

6 A.M.: WAR GAMES

Lt. Col. Dawne Deskins figured it would be a long day.

Sept. 11 was Day II of “Vigilant Guardian,” an exercise that would pose an imaginary crisis to North American Air Defense outposts nationwide.

The simulation would run all week, and Deskins, starting her 12-hour shift in the Operations Center as the NORAD unit’s airborne control and warning officer, might find herself on the spot.

Day I of the simulation had moved slowly. She hoped the exercise gathered steam. It made a long day go faster.

8:40 A.M.: REAL WORLD

In the Ops Center, three rows of radar scopes face a high wall of wide-screen monitors. Supervisors pace behind technicians who peer at the instruments. Here it is always quiet, always dark, except for the green radar glow.

At 8:40, Deskins noticed senior technician Jeremy Powell waving his hand. Boston Center was on the line, he said. It had a hijacked airplane.

“It must be part of the exercise,” Deskins thought.

At first, everybody did. Then Deskins saw the glowing direct phone line to the Federal Aviation Administration.

On the phone she heard the voice of a military liaison for the FAA’s Boston Center.

“I have a hijacked aircraft,” he told her.

Three minutes later, the drill was still a factor of confusion for Lt. Deskins in the form of a simulated hijacked plane heading for JFK Airport in New York City:
Deskins ran to a nearby office and phoned 1st Air Force Chief Public Affairs Officer Major Don Arias in Florida. She said NEADS had a hijacked plane no, not the simulation likely heading for JFK.

“The entire floor sensed something wrong,” Chief of Operations Control Lt. Col. Ian Sanderson said. “The way this unfolded, everybody had a gut sense this wasn’t right.” (“Amid Crisis Simulation, ‘We Were Suddenly
No-Kidding Under Attack,”’ Newhouse News Service, January 25, 2002)

It is not clear from this account whether the “simulation” in question was an artificial radar blip inserted on the NEADS screens, or an actual aircraft (piloted or remote controlled) going towards the New York airport.

2. Vigilant Warrior
This drill was identified by Richard Clarke in his recently published memoir. Here is what he writes:

“I turned to the Pentagon screen. ‘JCS, JCS. I assume NORAD has scrambled fighters and AWACS. How many? Where?’

‘Not a pretty picture, Dick.’ Dick Meyers, himself a fighter pilot, knew that the days when we had scores of fighters on strip alert had ended with the Cold War. ‘We are in the middle of Vigilant Warrior, a NORAD exercise, but…Otis has launched two birds toward New York. Langley is trying to get two up now. The AWACS are at Tinker and not on alert’ Otis was an Air National Guard base on Cape Cod. Langley Air Force Base was outside Norfolk, Virginia. Tinker AFB, home to all of America’s
flying radar stations, was in Oklahoma.”

‘Okay, how long to CAP over DC?’ Combat Air Patrol, CAP, was something we were used to placing over Iraq, not over our nation’s capital.

‘Fast as we can. Fifteen minutes?’ Myers asked, looking at the generals and colonels around him. It was now 9:28.” (Clarke 5)

3. Northern Vigilance

Operation Northern Vigilance involved deploying fighter interceptors to air bases in northern Canada and Alaska. It undoubtedly reduced the number of interceptors available to defend the lower 48. Northern Vigilance was supposedly mounted by NORAD to counter a Russian maneuver going on at the same time. It could have been planned in advance provided the timing of the Russian drill had also been known in advance. It was announced publicly in a NORAD press release of September 9, 2001 under the headline “NORAD Maintains Northern Vigilance.” Here we read:

CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN AFS, Colo. – The North American Aerospace Defense Command shall deploy fighter aircraft as necessary to Forward Operating Locations (FOLS) in Alaska and Northern Canada to monitor a Russian air force exercise in the Russian arctic and North Pacific ocean.

“NORAD is the eyes and ears of North America and it is our mission to ensure that our air sovereignty is maintained,” said Lieutenant-General Ken Pennie, Deputy Commander-in-Chief of NORAD. “Although it is highly unlikely that Russian aircraft would purposely violate Canadian or American airspace, our mission of vigilance must be sustained.” NORAD-allocated forces will remain in place until the end of the Russian exercise.

NORAD conducted operation Northern Denial from December 1 to 14, 2000 in response to a similar, but smaller scale, Russian deployment of long-range bombers at northern Russian air bases. NORAD-allocated
forces were deployed to three FOLS, two in Alaska and one in Canada.

More than 350 American and Canadian military men and women were involved in the deployment.

The net effect of Northern Vigilance was drastically to reduce the number of fighter interceptors available at airports in the lower 48 states of the continental US. It is not known exactly how many planes moved north.

4. Northern Guardian

This drill is the least documented. It may have involved a complement to Northern Vigilance; one group of planes might have played the attackers, while another group played the defenders. A reference to this drill was found in the Toronto Star, December 9, 2001. At the very minimum, it appears to have been a northern Canada-Alaska-centered drill, which would have increased the presence of planes from the lower 48 moving to those areas.

5. National Reconnaissance Office Drill

This drill simulated an airplane crashing into the headquarters of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) in Chantilly, Virginia, near Dulles Airport. It meant that the employees of the NRO were evacuated from their buildings just as the 9/11 attacks were actually taking place. The AP ran a story about this drill under the headline “Top US Intelligence Agency was to simulate plane crash into government building on September 11, 2001.” The story stated that “a US intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash into one of its buildings.” (AP, August 21, 2002)

The NRO was a supersecret agency responsible for spy satellites and other eavesdropping from space. It was created in 1960, and its existence was not officially acknowledged for some 32 years. The NRO draws its personnel from the military and the Central Intelligence Agency and has a budget equal to the combined budgets of both the CIA and the National Security Agency. On 11 September 2001, the NRO director was Keith R. Hall, who had headed the agency since 1996. In his capacity as DNRO, Hall was responsible for the acquisition and operation of all United States space-based reconnaissance and intelligence systems. At the same time Hall also served as Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Space. As Nico Haupt has pointed out, Booz Allen Hamilton is a prominent subcontractor for the NRO.

The obvious effect of evacuating the NRO was at least temporarily to blind institutional US intelligence to events which could have been monitored from space. NRO could have provided a real time view of the air space over North America; as a result of the evacuation, this may not have been available. The advantages for the perpetrators are obvious.

5. Tripod II

Tripod II was a biological warfare exercise conducted jointly by the US Department of Justice and the City of New York; it was scheduled for September 12, 2001, and formally speaking never took place. Its obvious relevance was to provide a cover for various pre-9/ 11 activities in New York City.

It would seem that the code name “Tripod II” was revealed for the first time in testimony by former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani at the 9/11 commission; however, the basic facts about this exercise had been described by Giuliani in his self-serving memoir, Leadership, published in 2002. Here the former Mayor wrote:

For months, we had in place an exercise in which we’d drill on our response to a biochemical attack, specifically practicing for the distribution of medication. The
planned date: Wednesday, September 12. We had stored much of the materials for that drill at Pier 92. Pier 92 offered 125,000 square feet of open space and easy transportation to and from Ground Zero by way of boat and the West Side Highway. Moreover, because it was already in use by the military, the points of access were relatively easy to guard.” (Giuliani 355)

After Giuliani’s unusable command center in WTC 7 had been destroyed by the inexplicable collapse of that large building, he transferred his command post to Pier 92.

Bin Laden Working for CIA Proxy, Bush-Like Mascot Follows Orders Just the Same

PNAC

After the patriotic orgy following 9/11 subsided and it was no longer taboo to dare ask whether the events may have been allowed to occur not unlike Pearl Harbor, given the inconceivable failures - or so they initially seemed - in investigatory and aerospace defense procedures not to mention how convenient it was for the PNAC administration whose members described such an event as a "catalyst" for world domination in their own documents a year prior, the 9/11 Truth Movement was born.



9/11: Press for Truth

It was borne out of the "Jersey Girls" struggle to find the truth about what led to the deaths of their husbands and children since the official account of 9/11 varied from one individual to another, was largely incomplete and was contradicted almost on a daily basis, most often by government officials themselves. While the launch orders to strike Afghanistan circulating the White House in the days prior to 9/11 was being executed, the Jersey girls lobbied for a commission to look into the so-called government failures which led up to and occured on 9/11 and due to their large public support base, the feds reluctantly gave in to the Jersey Girls, or so we thought.




President Bush initially wanted to appoint Henry Kissinger but decided against it since a man with such a well known sordid history would not serve as the best public face for what would end up being the most important whitewash in American and maybe world history. He instead chose Thomas Kean, an oil man who stood much to gain from shining the turd that is the officials story. The laundry list of criminal individuals chosen to chair the rest of the commission would have made even Lyndon Johnson jealous and I'm certain their conclusions indeed made Arlen "Magic Bullet" Specter blush. The "Big Oil Keane - October Surprise Hamilton Commission" was touted over and over for it's bi-partisan nature. After all, it's a known fact that when you have a (D) in front of your name, you magically disregard your political and business connections and/or your involvement in the events.

Given the ridiculousness of the C-Span Circus, some Americans began shunning the talking heads on television and considered the allegations of alternative media - researchers, radio hosts and authors - concerning the events of 9/11, those which alleged that individuals in key positions of power did in fact pull strings to see to it that 9/11 would occur and perhaps even compounded the destructive nature of the attacks with unseen methods.


One such widely-held belief among those alleging 9/11 was an "inside job" is the notion that explosives were planted in the twin towers and building 7 prior to the plane impacts and detonated afterwards, causing them to collapse. Not long after 9/11, Donald Rumsfeld began spewing crazy conspiracy theories involving the Pentagon and Flight 93, which crash-landed in Pennsylvania.

Many thought they were verbal gaffes and others bought into such theories whole-heartedly. Though I'm reluctant to do so, I must admit that I still have some questions regarding the Pentagon attack which weren't satisfied by the official story, such as how a plane alleged to have vaporized upon impact, hitting the only wall reinforced to withstand a missile just days before 9/11 could have at the same time torn through so many of it's concentric rings as well as why the federal government is to this day withholding dozens of security cameras that caught more conclusive footage of whatever hit the Pentagon than we've since been given. However I tend to stay away from the fringe and stick to challenging that which is closest to the heart of the feds' arguement, the notion that a plot to strike the US was hatched by fanatical religious interests seeking to take down the United States and not those which sought to forge America in a "Reichstag Fire" event, like a nazi scepter's phoenix out of the ashes of 9/11.


As the years passed, growing frustration caused an already significant 9/11 Truth Movement - which appeared to have hit a brick wall lobbying for support from skeptics - to opt instead for pushing more radical theories, notions that even what little we know about the events, was also a fraud. It remains to be seen whether Alex Jones hit the nail on the head by suggesting that the federal government was using the pentagon as a "honey pot", that is to say, intentionally acting suspicious with regard the event in order to cause the movement to embrace alternative theories so it could consequently be dealt an embarassing blow when the feds reveal conclusive evidence proving the official story was indeed true, for instance video of Flight 77 striking the pentagon from a much closer vantage point. Such an event would certainly prevent some prospective recruits from joining the ranks of the 9/11 Truth Movement and cause others who had previously been sitting on the fence to embrace and exalt the media spin that would follow, declarations that "since a plane hit the pentagon, 9/11 was obviously not an "inside job".


In my years of research, I've found compelling evidence which points to various individuals and interests but none so little as religious extremists or their cause. Clearly, the US federal government and their imperial allies have been shaken by a recent suggesting that the federal government was using the pentagon as a "honey pot"Scripps Howard Poll which concluded that a third of Americans believe that elements of the US Government either orchestrated the attacks altogether or allowed them to happen since they have since alleged that the liquid bomb plot patsies in London watched "9/11 conspiracy documentaries" and the Pentagon has prepared documents alleging that "conspiracies" (WMDs in Iraq/Syria, Israeli soldiers in Syria) create an environment conducive to breeding resentment, anger and consequently terrorism. While such a notion sounds plausible since most all of us can agree that emotions are real regardless of whether they're rooted in fact, it doesn't necessarily translate into causing individuals to risk life and liberty by becoming suicide bombers or nuking entire cities.

Rather, it is the occupation of foreign lands, the support for dictatorial regimes that have killed an estimated 10 million people and the body parts of your so-called colaterally damaged loved ones strewn up and down the streets which are the root causes of Saudi youths fleeing into the arms of military-industrial complex agents claiming to share in their cause, agents employed by Pakistan's ISI whose leaders network with their parent organization, the CIA.




Since the PNAC administration and their Clean Break counterpart's transparent posturing to engage Iran - probably in the wake of unrealized "false-flag" events - Iranian officials have now stated the obvious and publicly claimed that 9/11 was the product of a US/Israeli conceived black-op, which has for the forseeable future, dealt the 9/11 Truth Movement a worse blow than the US Government ever could, since no self-described conservative supporting the Trotskeyite neocons would ever take a position that a so-called "Islamo-fascist" Iranian would. After all, the neocon cheerleaders are the fringe group who called Lou Dobbs liberal for wanting to enforce a border policy, something that George Bush, Vicente Fox and Paul Martin have since discreetly made a pact to dissolve much to the dismay of Ronald Reagan, who has since followed all former US presidents and turned over in his grave, if he hadn't already.

"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."

-- US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring and its connections to 9-11.


Fearing that Iran's statements might cause some in the left who realize the Iranians are not the fire-breathing monsters our mockingbird media and their administration have alleged, the feds have played one of their final aces before the the poker table gets thrown over and the guns come out, by releasing video of ISI agent and House of Saud family friend Osama Bin Laden meeting with 2 of the 15 Saudi hijackers but not their older handlers, who were seen on video sniffing coke and partying in strip clubs as well as on Jack Abramoff's casino cruiseline off the coast of Florida in 2001, according to the Associated Press.


In a move that is arguably just as brilliant, they played another ace by declaring that Pakistan is now cozying up to Al Qaida and the Taliban once again which will cause a rift in US/Pakistan relations. Why is this brilliant? Because it neutralizes the argument that Pakistan's ISI were already in bed with Al Qaida and the Taliban, having flown them to safety in Pakistan prior to Operation Enduring Freedom, leaving mostly innocent young goat-herders to get swept up and traded to US officials at $5,000 a head by Northern Alliance militants who are now running the ISI's exploding opium crops while the US oil pipeline lays across the barren Afghan wasteland. It seeks to neutralize the arguement that 9/11 was a product of the CIA's proxy organization, explaining why the Pentagon appears to have known the attacks were coming, taking steps to ensure the success of the attacks.

On December 11th 2002, chairman of the Senate intelligence committee Bob Graham was interviewed by Gwen Ifill on PBS News Hour. Below is an excerpt from their discussion:

GRAHAM: "I think there is very compelling evidence that at least some of the terrorists were assisted not just in financing – although that was part of it – by a sovereign foreign government and that we have been derelict in our duty to track that down, make the further case, or find the evidence that would indicate that that is not true and we can look for other reasons why the terrorists were able to function so effectively in the United States."

IFILL: "Do you think that will ever become public, which countries you're talking about?"

Now listen to Graham's bombshell...

GRAHAM: "It will become public at some point when it's turned over to the archives, but that's 20 or 30 years from now. And, we need to have this information now because it's relevant to the threat that the people of the United States are facing today." (24) (emphasis added)

Senator Graham is suggesting that US intelligence knows which foreign government helped the terrorists, but the government isn't going to tell us for another 30 years! Given the current state of anti-Muslim war hysteria being promoted by the media and government, common sense dictates that if an Arab government besides Saudi Arabia or Pakistan was ever discovered to have sponsored 9/11, we'd be seeing the evidence night and day on the controlled media, and hearing about it non-stop from all the President's warmongers as well as the Israeli-occupied US Congress and Senate.

I include Pakistan specifically because several of those who appear to have had more influence in the planning moved comfortably on the grid in Pakistan, were alleged to have been under orders by ISI officials who consequently resigned their positions or have since been arrested by ISI, yet not extradited to the United States, mysteriously enough.

Pakistani General Mahmoud Ahmed resigned from his position in the Pakistani government after it was alleged that he ordered Umar Saeed Sheikh to wire money to Mohammed Atta, the alleged ring-leader of the 9/11 attacks. Strangely enough, Ahmed was in the US a week before 9/11 and in Washington DC meeting with Pentagon and intelligence officials as the twin towers were struck, according to the Washington Post.

Bill Doyle, father of Joseph Doyle who died on the 104th floor of the World Trade Center represents one of the largest 9/11 victims' familes groups. He's been confided in by who he calls reputable people, that 9/11 was funded with American money through Saudi and Pakistani banksstruck. If that is accurate, it would certainly fit with what we know so far. It makes you wonder where 2.6 trillion (2.6 million millions) US tax payer dollars in the Pentagon went, whose pockets it's in, why nobody had been held accountable for it and why Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld thinks it's a laughing matter.




Ladies and gentlemen, the evidence is clear. While Osama Bin Laden is indeed your enemy, he has never been an enemy of the ISI and their parent organization, CIA. Not only can you bet your bottom dollar that the dominant interests in the Bin Laden Crime Family - making billions of dollars off the war on terror - have never really cast out so-called black sheep Osama, the House of Saud and the ISI are the Bushes and the CIA's link between Osama Bin Laden and company. They need not talk because they share mutual friends. Osama Bin Laden is NOT, I repeat.. IS NOT in it for what you think he is. He is an agent of the same multi-headed beast which certain elements - NOT ALL but certain individuals - including the executive branch of the US federal government, are a part of.

You must, I repeat.. MUST take a deep breath, look in the mirror and ask yourself whether you really want to preserve your lives and your liberty as we stand on the precipice of the most horrible suffering the world has ever seen. I ask you to swallow your pride and quietly step away from the chasm. It has been proven that drug-like opiates are released in the brain by reinforcing a position you believe in or denying one which challenges that which you've already come to believe. It takes faith, guts and patience to do this because you literally have to unwire those areas of your brian which have been plugged with mis and disinformation and rewire them with new concepts. It is a tedious and unnerving process.

I ask those 9/11 conspiracy theorists who've been thorougly convinced that it was ALL a product of the US government - feeling that anything less would give them the license to wage a 3rd World War - to do the same and converge where all of the hard evidence points. It points to the fact that our leaders have lied to us. They've all lied to all of us. The war is not between them. It is them in collusion, waging war on us and expanding it to other fronts they and their masters at the CFR seek to consolidate, as they did the EU and and the NAU.

They've had it in the cards since day one. I hope you'll join me in this fight for humanity. Disengage your physical and financial support for this system as soon as possible. Pay off your credit balances and chop up your cards. Turn off your televisions immediately. Accumulating useless goods is not patriotic, no matter what Bush said after 9/11. Buying domestic goods and investing in your own country's economic future, keeping the trade deficit as small as possible so as to minimize the urgency of foreign wars in light of a collapsing dollar while keeping your political leaders on a short leash, is the best chance for stability we have.

9/11 Insider Trading Linked to the CIA

October 12, 1999: General Musharraf Takes Control of Pakistan; Ousted ISI Leader Has Curious Finances

August 6, 2001: Suspicious Trading of Companies Affected by 9/11 May Begin by This Date

Early September 2001: Almost Irrefutable Proof of Insider Trading in Germany

Early September 2001: Suspicion of Insider Trading in Many Other Countries

October 16, 2001: Bin Laden Cleared of Insider Trading in Britain

June 3, 2002: The Results of 9/11 Related Insider Trading Inquiries Are Still Unknown

March 31, 2003: US Government Draws Harsh Criticism at First 9/11 Commission Hearing

September 10, 2003: SEC, Others Still Keep Mum About Insider Trading Investigations

September 19, 2003: FBI Claims No 9/11 Insider Trading

April 25, 2004: Academic Paper Determines 9/11 Insider Trading Not Due to Chance

July 22nd, 2004: Bush's Begrudgingly Appointed 9/11 Whitewash Commission Claims "No Insider Trading"

If 9/11 was an Inside Job

Below was my response to a person who asked the following question on a News & Politics Message Board:

"If 9/11 was an inside job and America is supposedly turning into a police state, how come my life hasn't changed since 9/11? I haven't seem to have lost any rights..", yada yada yada.

You build a prison one brick at a time. You don't put people in it until it's finished. I'm sure they love people like you. Hundreds of millions of lives have changed since 9/11. Your life will change. Give it time, Hessian slave.

Elements of the CIA, MI6 and NATO blew up trains, planes and buses for over 30 years in Operation Gladio among others, blaming communist subversives. Rumsfeld was ambassador to NATO when the program started. Then in Ford's administration, he tried to tie all international terrorism to the Soviets. The CIA officially stated that his claims were unfounded as well as his fear-mongering of Soviet submarines that allegedly didn't run on harmonics and thus couldn't be detected. The same unfounded claims he and his associates used then to amp up the arms race and egg on World War 3, they are again using to egg on World War 3, even the same false-flag events, just on a larger scale.

The FBI has as much on Bin Laden as authorities do on John Mark Karr, the self acclaimed murderer of Jon Benet Ramsey. FBI Chief of Investigative Publicity Rex Tomb has begrudgingly admitted so just recently. Bin Laden is not wanted for 9/11 because he didn't orchestrate 9/11. You make of his videotaped admission of guilt what you want. Some believe it's fake, that the voice-print doesn't fit, etc. I have no illusions about who he is, what his family are about and who they're involved with. They're a crime family who engage in various fraud for the military industrial complex. It's all about money, not Islamic extremism. People will believe Judas sold out Christ for a few pieces of silver but that you can't find a single person of similar character in the Islamic world. That's pretty funny. Money, which can buy anything sinful, cannot sway an Islamist apparently. Not a single, solitary one of them.

The CIA, the Pentagon and other arms of the US defense and intelligence establishment have a long history of not only engaging in false-flag terrorism but cooperating with groups like the mafia, anti-Castro Cubans and even their proxy ISI's make-believe "Al Qaida", a patsy operation fleshed out by Osama Bin Laden's former cabbie and given it's name by our own intelligence community after which Bin Laden only allegedly began referring to such an organization. Even this is suspect since the CIA has documentedly cooked up fake admissions of guilt by now allegedly vanquished Zarqawi in Iraq for events he had no hand in. Perhaps his status was a fraud altogether.

I couldn't help but laugh how every statement he made couldn't be more politically expedient for the military-industrial complex, giving them the license to stay in Iraq they themselves were lobbying for amid heightened debate about our presence there. You really have to be low-grade moron not to see how Ayman al-Zawhiri too follows the same White House talking points, saying they needed to be poised to move into Iraq and "fill in the gaps" as the Americans, who demonstrated their weak resolve in Viet Nam would inevitably pull out prematurely.

Now after the "catastrophic and catalyzing" "new Pearl Harbor" event which Rumfeld and the other 15 PNAC members who wound up in Bush's administration stated they needed as a pretext for world takeover, an event they referred to a year before the election in their "Rebuilding America's Defenses" document, an event which has since occured (9/11), the world is again plauged by train and bus bombings. Only instead of the Soviets (US, UK, NATO), it's Al Qaida (US, UK, Israel, Pakistan).

Do you understand that the 1993 World Trade Center bombings, 9/11, 3/11 (Madrid), 7/7 (London) and allegedly the Bali bombings (10/1) and the Heathrow plot though I'm unable to confirm those 2, were organized by agents of 4 intelligence agencies? These men were funded, protected and surveilled by the CIA, MI6, Mossad and ISI, not Iraq, Iran and Syria. Do you not even realize that this is in fact admitted by the Western intelligence establishment while they spin the involvement as a few bad apples, a few "double agents"? Certainly this was not sanctioned from the top, lol. I explain it all in this blog post (Part1, Part2)

The plan to invade Iraq was conceived long before 9/11 according to several White House staff members and Bush associates (1, 2, 3), the plan to invade Afghanistan was circulating the White House 2 days before 9/11, White House officials stopped flying commercial aircraft in the days before and told their friends to do the same and drills on the morning of 9/11 - which we can now confirm from NORAD audiotapes released just weeks ago - confused aerospace defense personnel, something "conspiracy theoriests" alleged for years. If the confusion the drills created weren't enough, the situation was only compounded by the fact that for the first time in history, fighter pilots were required to stay on the ground and wait for authorization by the Secretary of Defense before they even so much as engaged errant aircraft, flights which deviated from their pre-set flight plans. Why was this? Because on May 31 2001, former Enron executive Thomas White was appointed Secretary of the Army by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. On his first day on the job when you would think he would be getting settled into his new office, hite radically altered existing DOD protocols and issued a new directive placing all decision-making powers, specifically in the case of 'Derelict Airborne Objects' into the hands of his boss Donald Rumsfeld.

Not only did they have their plan to invade Afghanistan in mid-October ready, they had scheduled to arrive in New York on the morning of 9/11 to engage in a bio-warfare exercise so when the planes struck the towers, they would do the only thing government officials know how to, elicit the response they're trained to through their Pavlovian conditioning. FEMA went to work that morning, cleaning the military-industrial wound so the stock market could open once again, unleashing the floodgates of millions of dollars in short options placed on United Airlines and corporate tennants in the World Trade Center, trades which lead right to CIA officials.

This is not even the tip of the iceberg. The amount of hard evidence implicating the feds in these attacks - evidence which has nothing to do with bombs in the buildings, flight 93 being shot down or a missile hitting the pentagon - is mind-boggling and would take hours upon hours to address. They vet patsies or genuine Islamic extremists who don't know they're working for intelligence community and the operations are disguised internally as sting-ops in case things don't go as planned. If cover is blown, they say it was an accident (93 WTC bombing). Military or inteligence exercises occur in conjunction with the actual attacks to confuse inter-agency personnel. Not only were they running drills on the morning of 9/11, the 7/7 London bombings were coordinated with drills themed around simultaneously detonated explosives. In 1999, officials in Russia's FSB proved the real benefit of exercises themed around false-flag terrorist attacks.

The 10 Chapters I wrote in my most recent 2 part blog series addresses about 1/3 of the information if I may estimate and that's only a 1/3 of what I'm consciously aware of at the moment. I'm probably being too generous in my estimate.

Again.. Your life will change. America's noose is being waxed and oiled right now. Give it time. You're not going to take down the freest, most cautious nation with respect to government power over it's citizens in the history of the world overnight. They're building the prison around you, telling you the bricks are not bricks, putting a latch on the exit, telling you it's not a latch.

You think you're on the outside looking in when you're really on the inside looking out. Not only is there alot of wealth to be extracted from the Middle East if you can get an army obedient enough to do it, there's lots of wealth to extract from the "Homeland" too. Not only is it easier to get away with such a thing, it makes political and economic opposition to your long-term agenda less threatening and ensures a steady flow of down-trodden, misguided youth with no means to provide for themselves or their prospective familes than to do what? Join the military or a service oriented market, eg. government.

3rd World, here we come!

The Bin Laden Crime Family is CIA Connected

November 1979: Bin Laden Brother Tied to Terror Act

October 1980: Osama’s Oldest Brother Allegedly Involved in October Surprise

Mid-1980s: Osama’s Brother Is Allegedly Involved in the Iran-Contra Affair

1988: Bin Ladens Bail Out George W. Bush?

1988: 6 Bin Laden Family Members Linked to Bank with Terrorist Connections

1991: Bin Laden Brother-in-Law Linked to Islamic Militant Group

1991: Islamic Militant Brother-in-Law Held in the US and Let Go

June 4, 1992: FBI Investigates Ties Between Former CIA Directror and Bin Laden Associate

February-September 11, 1996: Investigation of bin Laden Family Members Is Opened; Then Closed

Shortly After April 1994: Bin Laden Family "PUBLICLY" Disowns Osama

2000-September 10, 2001: Hijackers Possibly Meet with Associates of Bin Laden's Brother-in-Law in Philippines

2000: $250 Million Bank Transfer Suggests Links Between Bin Laden, His Family, and Pakistani

February 26, 2001: Osama Attends Son’s Wedding with Other bin Laden Family Members

March 8, 2001: US Strangely Declines to Freeze al-Qaeda’s Assets Despite Call from UN and EU

September 11, 2001: Bin Laden Brother Attends Carlyle Group Conference with George Herbert Walker Bush

15, September 14-19, 2001: Bin Laden Family Members, Saudi Royals Quietly Leave US

March 29, 2002: Bin Laden Family Denies Terrorist Connections

November 22, 2002: Bin Laden Family Members Sued

On the Precipice of Unprecedented Human Suffering, Shocking Revalations on the Eve of Uncertainty

On the Precipice of Unprecedented Human Suffering, Shocking Revelations on the Eve of Uncertainty


Table of Contents


Part 1: The Enemy Within

Chapter (1)
Documented Collusion between the Intelligence Community and Terrorist Organizations

Chapter (2)
Short Summary of Documented Western Intelligence Involvement in False-Flag Terrorism

Chapter (3)
Documented Pakistani ISI Involvement in 9/11

Chapter (4)
The ISI Marionette's CIA Puppet-Masters

Chapter (5)
Documented British MI5/MI6 Involvement in the 7/7 London Bombings

Chapter (6)
Early Evidence Implicates ISI and MI5 in Heathrow Airport Plot to Blow up 10 Airliners


Part 2: What is the Endgame?

Chapter (7)
PNAC & 9/11, The Clean Break & World War 3

Chapter (8)
IDF in Lebanon, the Catalyst is Brewing

Chapter (9)
The Eve of Uncertainty

Chapter (10)
Conclusion





On the Precipice of Unprecedented Human Suffering, Shocking Revelations on the Eve of Uncertainty


Part 1: The Enemy Within


Chapter (1)
Documented Collusion between the Intelligence Community and Terrorist Organizations


It has long been established, though somewhat of a public secret, that state-run intelligence organizations are the biggest contributors to deliberate acts of terrorism against civilian populations in all of history. What is even less known than the extent of state sponsered terrorism, are the state networks' affinity for cooperating with various other criminal organizations not sanctioned by the state, organizations in the private sector. The boundaries of the black-op community are not departmental, nor are they national.




Money knows no boundaries and it's often been said that money is the root of all evil. Why wouldn't it be? If you can't buy a senator, you can buy his constitutents. If you can't buy his constituents, you can buy his enemies. You can buy their colleagues by creating financial incentives to uphold the status-quo of their departure, even if it's a manufactured paradigm on the scale of 9/11. Virtually every member of the Keane commission had every incentive not to get to the bottom of the US federal government's alleged incompetence on 9/11 2001, which can be demonstrated at the highest levels as a conspiracy among certain individuals - some in the US and their allies' defense and intelligence apparatuses - to commit mass murder of American citizens. Money is power and the consequences of 9/11 have been the most successful power-grab in world history, delivering trillions in the sale of chaos (defense), order (reconstruction), oil (sky-rocketing prices) and drugs (Afghan Opium).

The 1975 Church Committee addressed the CIA's willingness to cooperate with the mafia. It's interesting to note that among the CIA's various assassination plots, the September 11th, 1973 assassination of Chilean president Salvador Allende is among them. September 11th was also a date used by the US Government when they ceremonially broke ground for construction of the Pentagon in 1941. Though I myself don't believe in black magic or numerology, the various institutions who network at the highest levels of the international establishment strangely have a disproportionately larger concentration of people who engage in occult rituals and build architecture according to occult laws than the general population and the evidence of this is the fruit of their own admissions. Though this is only a very brief look at the phenomenon which cannot do justice to the entire body, I plan to expand upon it at a later juncture.




I think it's also interesting to note that the twin towers, lobbied for by the Rockefeller brothers whose CFR organization that PNAC grew out of - were essentially a giant 11 and composed of 110 (11) stories each. PNAC members Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Jeb Bush and William Krystol stated clearly in their own documents prior to 9/11 just like Jimmy Carter's national security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinkski, founder of the CFR's counterpart organization the Trilateral Commission previously did in his book "The Grand Chessboard: America and It's Geostrategic Imperatives", that a "new Pearl harbor" event would be an effective catalyst for sparking an imperialist agenda for US interests, interests which are largely shared by the top 2% of Americans, not the "dumb animals" they send off to war, as Henry Kissinger calls them. Bush referred to 9/11 as such - "the Pearl Harbor of the 21st century" - in his diary on the night of 9/11, according to the Washington Post.




Declassified documents have addressed the CIA's involvement with Italy's 1982 Bologna Massacre masterminds at the P2 Masonic Lodge and various other false-flag terrorist attacks against innocent civilians in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Asia and Latin America over the course of 30 years. Most of them were train and bus bombings strikingly similar to the alleged al Qaida attacks now plauging the world. The Gladio bombings however, were blamed on communist subversives. The current bombings appear in the least to have Islamic fundamentalists as willing participants but the extent of documented Western intelligence involvement as organizers demonstrates for any rational, thinking individual that they are in fact inside jobs, most likely without the knowledge of the bombers themselves, set up like entrapment stings allowed to be executed rather than thwarted.

Note that they all take place on the 11th or dates where the month/day relationship is a multiple of 11. Even ABC's Brian Ross recognized this much. 9/11, 3/11 (Madrid), 7/7 (London) [77 is a multiple of 11], 10/1 (Bali) [11] and 7/11 (Mumbai) all follow this pattern. Again though, this is only an hors' dourve. The main course, Western intelligence involvement, is already admitted in the 9/11, 3/11 and 7/7 attacks, unbeknowest to most people as we will establish later in chapters 3, 4 and 5.

First though, we will segway into the documented and admitted acts of false-flag terrorism by criminal elements of Western intelligence and their allies in Chapter 2 and more specifically their documented and admitted aid and orchestration of attacks within their own borders in Chapters 3, 4 and 5 by dispelling the notion that they would be involved at any level with what are perceived as Islamic fundamentalist sects (Al Qaida, etc.) in a couple of the many historical examples that demonstrate just that below.

One such example is the MI6 organized assassination attempt on Lybian president Colonel Mu 'ummar al-Qadhafi in 1996. MI6 used the Lybian al Qaida front group Al-Muqatila whose operations were not successful. Innocent people were killed as a result.

The following is an excerpt from cooperativeresearch.org, describing that plot:

Al-Muqatila, a cover for a Libyan al-Qaeda cell, tries to kill Libyan leader Colonel Muammar al-Qadhafi. Al-Qadhafi survives, but several militants and innocent bystanders are killed. [Dawn (Karachi), 10/30/2002] According to David Shayler, a member of the British intelligence agency MI5, and Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquié, authors of the controversial book The Forbidden Truth, the British intelligence agency MI6 pays al-Qaeda the equivalent of $160,000 to help fund this assassination attempt. Shayler later goes to prison for revealing this information and the British press is banned from discussing the case (see November 5, 2002). [New York Times, 8/5/1998; Observer, 11/10/2002 Sources: David Shayler, Jean-Charles Brisard, Guillaume Dasquie] Anas al-Liby, a member of the group, is given political asylum in Britain and lives there until May 2000 despite suspicions that he is an important al-Qaeda figure (see Late 1996-May 2000). He is later implicated in the al-Qaeda bombing of two US embassies in Africa in 1998 (see Late 1993-Late 1994; August 7, 1998). [Observer, 11/10/2002; Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2002]

Some might be inclined to believe that because of their larger Muslim population, British intelligence would be more likely than their US counterpart to use Islamic fundamentalist assets to advance their geostrategic goals and that like the CIA has claimed of itself in the past, they are bumbling fools in the world of Islamic fundamentalism, needing the extra authority and tax-payer money to counter such threats as they have been given with the Patriot Act and Reichland Security.

Such advancements in power were also awarded to them as a consequence of other so-called lapses in the security apparatus such as Pearl Harbor, the Oklahoma City bombing and the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, all events in which crucial details were either not initially reported to the public and those which were reported, assembled to fit an interpretation deemed safe for public consumption as you will later see.

The notion that the CIA is merely incompetent with regard to affairs in the Muslim world just doesn't jive with history though when you look at their documented and admitted involvement with Osama Bin Laden's Mujahideen and the evidence of their involvement with the Al Qaida organization alleged to have been borne out of that collusion, an organization MI6 never intended to share affiliation with and one their CIA ally still claims to share no affiliation.

Such affiliations would lend credence to the notion that their documented and admitted intelligence operatives' involvement with Al Qaida in the acts of 9/11 and the 7/7 London bombings were not a product of double agents but were in fact the product of state sponsered terrorism sanctioned from the very top of their bureaucracies.




Such CIA affiliations have in fact been alleged by various sources. If you disregard the allegations merely on the basis of those making the claims and feel that former Yugoslavian president Slobodan Milosevic's death during his war crimes tribunal was in fact a product of his ailing health alone and not an assassination plot by such interests as he was alleging prior to his death, you may want to bookmark this section and refer back to it later after we demonstrate irrefutably that Western intelligence and their allies, not the "Axis of Evil" they so bizarrely referred to in the wake of 9/11, were involved in the 9/11 attacks and an increasing amount of smaller events since then.


Chapter (2)
Short Summary of Documented Western Intelligence Involvement in False-Flag Terrorism


Are there good people within the CIA and FBI genuinely trying to keep Americans safe? Sure, the great majority of them are.

However, criminal elements of the intelligence agencies have in fact been called upon to engage in acts of false-flag terrorism against their own people and others in order to blame other parties and use the attacks as a pretext for tighter social control domestically or expansion of the financial empire (imperialism).




Elements of the CIA, MI6 and NATO had no problem blowing up childrens' school buses in Eastern Europe in Operation Gladio.

Elements of the Pentagon agreed unanimously to engage in terrorist acts on the American people in 1962 with Operation Northwoods but were turned down by then president John F Kennedy. Why did they bother asking? They should have taken a cue from the intelligence community and done it clandestinely using others in the private sector, people whose actions and locations are not scrutinized and recorded in goverment documentation. Only then will they be as successful as the CIA has!




Not only have elements of the Israeli government had no problem killing Americans in the Lavon affair and the USS Liberty, they're more than happy just like ours, to engage in diabolical, nazi-like experiments on their own citizens which are part of the public record unbeknowest to most people, not unlike our own governments' experiments, for which the list is a mile long.

Operation Gladio was not the only series of terrorist attacks that British Intelligence has engaged in. They've got an interesting track record with regard to false-flag terrorism.

The attacks I've listed are only some of the many terrorist attacks our government and their allies have committed and it's a safe bet we don't know about all of them.

While government crime in the Eastern world appears more overt and equally equally heinous, the crimes of empires are often covert. That is to say that empires often intentionally provoke smaller power blocs or engage in crimes clandestinely in order to blame the target they wish to occupy. Power blocs that are at a disadvantage don't have as much incentive to engage in such covert attacks against themselves because being at the disadvantage they are, they don't have the same incentive to go to war with their larger counterparts. It has been alleged by high-ranking CIA officials themselves that millions of deaths have resulted from the direct intervention of affairs in the 3rd world by thousands of operations, all of them illegal by their own definition.


Chapter (3)
Documented Pakistani ISI Involvement in 9/11




Remember Wall St. Journal Reporter Daniel Pearl?

Just what was he investigating in Pakistan when he got his head axed by Umar Saeed Sheikh? He was investigating various aspects of Pakistani Inter Services Intelligence (ISI), which is like our CIA's eastern counterpart. The CIA and ISI are quite close in the so-called war on terror.

It's suspicious though, why Osama Bin Laden would put out videotapes telling the world that Pakistan is a puppet for the USA. While that much is accurate, it misleads you into thinking Al Qaida and the ISI are two different creatures but if you're even a casual observor of international affairs, it's not hard to see that isn't the case. It's been said there are a few "bad apples" in Pakistan's ISI, some "Al Qaida sympathizers".




Take for instance Pakistani General Mahmoud Ahmed. Indian intelligence helped the FBI investigate a connection between General Ahmed and Umar Saeed Sheikh who wired 100 thousand dollars to Mohammed Atta prior to the 9/11 attacks. General Ahmed resigned his position shortly after this news was released. US news outlets claimed the reason for his departure were his sympathies with the Taliban. Only one Western outlet covered the alleged connection to 9/11 money man Umar Saeed Sheikh.

The Wall Street Journal wrote that the FBI sought General Ahmed's removal after they confirmed Sheikh ordered the 100 thousand dollar transfer at the behest of General Ahmed. The Pittsburgh Tribune however, notes that "There are many in Musharraf's government who believe that Saeed Sheikh's power comes not from the ISI, but from his connections with our own CIA."






There are many other instances where Pakistani ISI officials have aided or given refuge to Al Qaida operatives but let's focus a little bit closer on Mahmoud Ahmed. Some of you may not have realized that he was in Washington DC from September 4th to September 13th, 2001. What was he doing exactly? Just visiting with State Department and Pentagon officials among other things. What other things? How about meeting with CIA director George Tenet as well as eating breakfast with the heads of our House and Senate intelligence committee Porter Goss and Bob Graham on the morning of 9/11?




Porter Goss was later appointed head of the CIA after George Tenet resigned in tears. Bob Graham has since stated that he was surprised to find that there was a state sponser in the 9/11 attacks. Now if it was Iraq or Iran, they would have told us so, don't you think?

The 9/11 Commission claims the origin of the funding was never traced. I wonder if any of that information was on the 2.5 terabytes of data that pentagon officials were told to destroy prior to 9/11, information pertaining to Mohammed Atta. 2.5 terabytes is equivalent to 1/4 of the information in the US Library of Congress.


Chapter (4)
The ISI Marionette's CIA Puppet-Masters


9/11 was a joint operation between individuals, not entire organizations. Some of those individuals encompassed the US, Israeli and Pakistani intelligence apparatuses. Perhaps they'll release more details in 70 years or so when it's released from the national archives though some of us aren't so wilfully ignorant that we can't see what is going on right now. There is a very clear picture as realistic as a Da Vinci oil painting, albeit with a few cracks - missing pieces the conspirators have hidden and most likely destroyed - but nevertheless, we can make out the image just fine.




I'll give the coincidence theorists one thing though. Just because high-ranking US intelligence officials Goss and Graham met with General Ahmed on the morning of 9/11, doesn't mean that they had anything to do with it. I mean, if that were the case, why would Bush have appointed Porter Goss to head our foreign intelligence operations in the CIA? Besides. Goss has an honorable record in the CIA, what with his exploits in Operation 40 alongside such agents as Luis Posada Carriles who was extradited to Cuba last year for blowing up a commercial airliner full of American Olympic atheletes in 1977 and Barry Seal, who has been regarded as one of the most successful drug smugglers in US history. It's interesting to note that 9/11 Commission member Richard Ben-Veniste was Seal's attorney before he was killed in a hail of gunfire.

Though the following excerpt from a blog titled "The Coincidence Theorist's Guide to 9/11" at www.rigorousintuition.com is speculative at best, perhaps you can trace the information to more concrete details. If true, the connections to the dead seal's network are much closer to 9/11 than commission member Ben-Veniste.

"..That 43 lbs of heroin was found on board the Lear Jet owned by Wally Hilliard, the owner of Atta’s flight school, just three weeks after Atta enrolled – the biggest seizure ever in Central Florida – was just bad luck. That Hilliard was not charged shows how specious the claims for conspiracy truly are.

That Hilliard’s plane had made 30-round trips to Venezuela with the same passengers who always paid cash, that the plane had been supplied by a pair of drug smugglers who had also outfitted CIA drug runner Barry Seal, and that 9/11 commissioner Richard ben-Veniste had been Seal’s attorney before Seal’s murder, shows nothing but the lengths to which conspiracists will go to draw sinister conclusions.."

In addition to the ISI's connections to Umar Saeed Sheikh, they also protected 9/11 chief engineer Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and have a sordid history of involvement with Al Qaida in general. It's not a secret that elements of Pakistani intelligence are party to terrorism against US interests so why does our government not care?

'US ignored its own agency's reports on ISI backing Al Qaeda'

Pakistan spy service 'aiding Bin Laden'

More news about Pakistan and Saudi Arabia aiding Al Qaida

According to the FBI, they have no hard evidence linking Osama Bin Laden to 9/11. That's why 9/11 is not on his FBI website resume'.




Is it possible that allegations of the Clinton Crime Family's involvement in the cocaine trade as well as former DEA director Terry Reed, former marine and DEA agent Cele Castillo and Los Angeles narcotics detective Michael Ruppert's assertions that the Bush Crime Family are connected to the same international cabal true or is such a phenomenon only a product of third world banana republics, not the great United States where unchecked power only has a penchant for false-flag terrorism as we've so far documented?

Why entertain such notions when you can just smear the entire documented historical feasability of them as well as the messengers who have in fact written books? After all, retired government officials shouldn't be able to pursue justice and sell it to raise money for distribution of vital information to their fellow Americans. That can only demonstrate a skewed interpretation of history, a sensationalized attempt to make a profit. Only the Bushes, Bin Ladens, Cheneys, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleeza Rice and countless others in Washington regardless of political affiliation have the right to make money off of their exploits, combined billions in the Carlyle Group, Eli Lilly, Halliburton, Lockheed Martin, Bechtel Group and Chevron Texaco among others.




Is it possible that the Bin Laden crime family, whose connections to a wide array of fraud other than terrorism and allegations that their relationship with the Bush Crime Family encompasses more than innocent Carlyle Group business functions also true and that contrary to what we've been told by our intelligence community that the Bin Laden family has not cast out Osama? What reason do we have to take our intelligence community at their word?

Is it possible that Osama Bin Laden has never been anything more than a figurehead for Islamic fundamentalist recruits working for the military industrial complex unbeknowest to those martyrs who exalt him not unlike so many Americans and citizens of other countries who project their own intentions on their political leaders, feeling that the rhetoric is genuine or that even if it is, that they are not at some level owned or manipulated by interests with far more influence than the average citizen?

Nonsense, right? Let us press on but take into consideration that we may have been lied to for so long that the monstrous status quo we see before us is nothing more than a steaming pile of fraud we've allowed ourselves to believe out of sloth and partisanship. It certainly isn't leftist to embrace the notions I'm suggesting though. Most of the left does not but certainly a higher concentration of those who do are from that persuasion since they don't have the same emotional stake in the sense of nationalism the military industrial complex is manipulating, the very nationalism it seeks to destroy on the altar of globalism.

There are no shortage of other lies the left has married itself to which their neoconservative counterparts across the aisle have no problem seeing through. If only man could start acting as such and stop the madness of allowing himself to be baited with ideology and switched with fraud, following mis-leaders like children to the pied piper's song.


Chapter (5)
Documented British MI5/MI6 Involvement in the 7/7 London Bombings




The London bombing orchestrator Haroon Rashid Aswat was a British Intelligence agent.




The alleged ringleader of the attacks though, Mohammed Sadique Khan was an informant for Britain's home office, MI5.


Chapter (6)
Evidence Implicates ISI and MI5 in the Heathrow Airport Plot to blow up 10 Airliners


The following information is a product of excerpts from this article, available at www.prisonplanet.com interspersed with my own observations:

Revelations concerning the origins and connections of the alleged liquid bomb terror plot to Pakistan and the 7/7 bombings in London provide a strong indication that the operation, known for months yet deliberately timed for public release, was a synthetic ruse concocted by the Bush/Blair cabal to re-package the flagging war on terror.

Media reports in the days following the alert cite Pakistan's ISI as having identified Rashid Rauf as, "the link between the plot's planners and British-based Muslims who were allegedly preparing to carry out attacks on transatlantic flights."

According to former NSA official Wayne Madsen, the Lashkar-e-Toiba terror group, to which Rashid Rauf is affiliated, is wholly operated and funded by the Pakistani ISI.

The Pakistani ISI is a CIA front and controls terror cells at the discretion of the highest levels of the US military-industrial complex. This means that the potential mastermind of the liquid bomb plot, Rashid Rauf (pictured), was operating under the oversight and direction of Pakistani and by proxy American intelligence agencies.




In addition to Pakistani ISI's connections to 9/11 "hijacker" money-man Umar Saeed Sheikh and chief engineer of the patsy operation Khalid Sheikh Mohammed which I cited in Chapter 1, it is necessary to understand the the nexus that connects Pakistani intelligence, the CIA and terrorist organizations.

In October 2001, under the headline 'Pakistani Intelligence Had Links to Al Qaeda, U.S. Officials Say,' the New York Times reported, "The intelligence service of Pakistan, a crucial American ally in the war on terrorism, has had an indirect but longstanding relationship with Al Qaeda, turning a blind eye for years to the growing ties between Osama bin Laden and the Taliban, according to American officials."

The ISI has received CIA funds to create and control militant organizations, including the Taliban and Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan.

Defense Intelligence Agency documents dated from 2001 clearly indicate that the CIA is aware that Pakistan's ISI supports and bankrolls Al-Qaeda groups but they have deliberately chosen to ignore the connection.

This rich history of ISI creation and protection of terrorist cells, allied with the fact that the ISI is a known CIA front, and added to the revelation that the mastermind of the liquid bomb plot Rashid Rauf is under ISI control, it is therefore obvious to conclude that the entire charade was cooked and orchestrated by elements of the Bush/Blair cabal and sold as promotional propaganda for the increased surveillance and behavioral control of UK and US citizens.

Are we to believe that this latest alleged plot by Al Qaida which shares the same hallmarks of other set-ups by Western intelligence for the purpose of lending credence to the authenticity of genuine Islamic fundamentalist terror plots on civilian infrastructure in the West, was not orchestrated at the highest levels by the Western intelligence apparatus and their allies just like 9/11 and the 7/7 bombings?


Part 2: What is the Endgame?


Chapter (7)
PNAC & 9/11, The Clean Break & World War 3


For years, there has been much debate about the true motives and justification for the invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon and now discussion that Syria and Iran may also need to be "dealt with".

In light of the fact that virtually all of the true motives for these wars have been outlined long in advance by the occupiers themselves, I've found it dumb-founding that even those who are not so wilfully ignorant that they believe the rhetoric of the war-hawks, will spend hours upon hours in emotionally charged debate, arguing with the supporters of these conflicts about the true nature of what is behind them while ignoring the most revealing words and actions of the parties who conceived of them in the first place.




Take for instance the Project for a New American Century, also known as "P-NAC". It's a so-called neoconservative (neocon) think-tank assembeled in 1997, which promotes a more aggressive or "hawkish" approach to US foreign policy than was previously the case. It's roots are in the 1992 Pentagon where before it's inception, many of it's future members were referred to by CIA analyst Ray McGovern and others in the White House as "the crazies". PNAC has strong ties to the American Enterprise Institute as well as the Council on Foreign Relations, which is often referred to only by it's initials, the CFR.

To address all of the revealing issues raised by PNAC's various publications would be no small task so we'll just take a look at one document in particular, the often cited "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report. It was the synthesis of contributions by 27 PNAC members, 2 of them - Paul Wolfowitz and Dov Zakheim - who were appointed senior leadership positions at the Pentagon and another - Lewis Libby - who was appointed aide to vice-president Dick Cheney, all of them finding their way into power after George Walker Bush became president in November of 2000. At least 13 other PNAC members were appointed to the Bush administration as well, giving them a total of at least 16 members with direct influence in the US federal government.

It's important to note that Dick Cheney has been referred to as the most active vice-president on foreign policy matters in the history of the United States. He is also a member of the Project for a New American Century so in essence, several signatories of the "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report had not only unparalleled influence over matters of war but of the protection of the United States before 9/11. Don't lose sight of that when viewing these key points:

In PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report, the United States is referred to as "the Homeland", which became a label widely used by the Bush administration after the 9/11 attacks. Even the domestic intelligence network created in the wake of 9/11, Homeland Security, took advantage of the label which in it's context has xenophobic, "us against the world" connotations not unlike Adolf Hitler's propagandistic phrase "Faterland". The fact that the Patriot Act is practically a facsimile of nazi Germany's "Enabling Act" is all the more disturbing.

PNAC's report emphasizes preemption and addresses the need for America to aggressively increase it's military spending and engage in, and I quote: "multiple, simultaneous theater wars" of a "large-scale" but acknowledges that none of it would be possible without a "catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor", which would legitamize their agenda in the eyes of Americans. One year after their report was drafted, the 9/11 attacks occured, allowing the PNAC administration to execute their plan.

The question begs to be asked; What kind of enemy other than a group which could conceivably operate anywhere and everywhere ("Al Qaida"), would have given PNAC the broad authority they outlined in their report prior to 9/11? They've actually slated 66 nations for regime change in their publications.




Former US president Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinksi, who is the founder of the Trilateral Commission, counterpart to the CFR which PNAC grew out of, wrote a book in 1997 - the very same year PNAC was founded - titled "The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and It's Geostrategic Imperatives" in which he argued virtually the same case that PNAC would for years to come; that the US needed to secure complete control over the oil in the Middle East and Central Asia. Surprisingly, Brzezinski even alluded to the very same "helpful Pearl Harbor event" which would be the catalyst necessary to get the agenda moving. UK Prime Minister Tony Blair also acknowledged after the fact, that the wars borne out of 9/11 would have not been seen as socially acceptable otherwise. The Washington Post even reported that president Bush wrote in his diary before bed on 9/11: "America was attacked today. It was THE Pearl Harbor of the 21st Century."

All of these social engineering institutions which documentedly vet politicians on both sides of the political aisle for the US presidency and have influence in the press to get them there, argue that all of this is necessary to secure America's position as a unipolar military power. One of the mission objectives listed in PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report, is to "deter the rise of a new great-power competitor", basically to cut the legs off any fledgling power, the consequences of which are the kind of economic discontent you'd expect would breed anti-American sentiment in the eyes of the very people we're supposed to be winning the hearts and minds of. I guess it all boils down to whether you'd rather be loved or feared. There are consequences for both but at no point in history has America so openly embraced the option chosen by all doomed empires, the option of fear. The PNAC nazis traded such strong but subtle doctrines as "speak softly and carry a big stick" and "trust but verify" with "bomb now, ask questions later", Israel's failed model.

It should come as no surprise that the Israeli model - right down to the policies on the battlefield and the police state at home - has been adopted by the neocons, seeing as many of PNACs most fervent voices previously outlined a similar foreign policy plan for Israel, which we are also watching unfold.

Now if the absolute plethora of evidence indicating that specific arms of the military industrial complex - US, Israeli and Pakistani government and private interests in the least - were intimately involved in the events of 9/11 cannot make a believer out of you, perhaps the following information will.

President Bush had the signing orders for the invasion of Afghanistan on his desk 2 days before 9/11. This is A-D-M-I-T-T-E-D. For those who still don't believe that elements of the US federal government were in the very least aware of the attacks in advance and had every incentive to thwart the processes that would have prevented it, I must ask you.. Do you honestly believe that an administration which previously acknowledged that such an attack would be integral to executing the agenda which they lobbied for and is now unfolding, at least some of whom we know opted out of flying on commercial airliners for chartered jets in the days before 9/11 and warned others not to fly, had the launch orders for a mid-October attack on Afghanistan ready 2 days before 9/11 for reasons other than because they knew a terrorist attack was to occur in mere days?

PNAC also planned the invasion of Iraq long before 9/11. If the statements in their own body of literature aren't enough to convince you, I suppose you're just going to think that allegations from several former White House officials are merely sour grapes, people like Treasury Secretary Paul O' Neill and Anti-Terrorism Chief Richard Clarke, even Bush's former biographer Mickey Herskowitz.

Some of you are probably saying "Why would the Bush administration (PNAC) have cited the catalyzing pretext, the so-called 'New Pearl Harbor' in their own documents if they were behind the 9/11 attacks?"

First of all, the Bush administration per se' did not plan, nor did they execute the 9/11 attacks. Evidence does seem to indicate that key officials in the administration did have knowledge of a pending attack and took action to thwart investigative bodies and aerospace defense so that the attack could be successful, consequently angering and scaring Americans into accepting whichever measures the US federal government would deem necessary to bring the culprits to justice and prevent another attack but the evidence of planning and execution of the attacks themselves leads us elsewhere.

The body of evidence demonstrates that individuals spanning at least 3 nation states and just as many areas of financial interest (war, oil, drugs) did the actual dirty work and that Osama Bin Laden - heir to massive military industrial fortunes (Carlyle Group, etc.) - also played a role not only on 9/11 but during the decades previous, psychologically laying the groundwork for Americans to accept that naturally, he would be the prime suspect when the "new Pearl Harbor" event did occur.

The CIA's coup on an Iranian democracy and consequent support of a brutal dictator in 1953, their support for the rise of the Baathist party in Iraq, support for the perceived constituency of Al Qaida (Mujahedeen) in 1979 and Israel's involvement in the foundation of Hamas, were all integral in bringing this plan to fruition. All of these groups were strategically placed boogeymen that the intelligence community seeded, knowing there would be a good case for their harvest (removal) later on.

That's why NATOs fatigue colors were changed from dark greens to light browns in the early 70s. The entire infrastructure was shifted in advance of the fall of the Soviet Union - which was also a conflict staged by parties that had unparalleled influence in both the eastern and western world - so that we could move seamlessly into the next phase of the CFR hierarchy's plan for a world government, one that the US is playing a part in creating and will consequently be swallowed by, retaining none of the constitutional protections afforded by it's foundation in 1776. That is the plan, stated by CFR member Carroll Quigley himself, Bill Clinton's mentor at Georgetown University.

PNAC's plans, as we can now say confidently in hindsight, were not only genuine but were made public for the very same reason that so many other details of their agenda are made public. It is to create genuine resistance to the agenda by the parties which are a target of it, eg. Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Iran, North Korea and 60 others. That way, there is perceived justification for the invasion of those who resist the seemingly appropriate demands made in the public forum, demands which are based on fraudulent claims, not on the ones made in their own public documents to foment the very resistance that is desired, the resistance that is necessary to justify invasion and securement of resource and logistical control.

In a nutshell, PNAC wants to sell it's own public on the legitamacy of invasion and at the same time reveal their true motives to the enemy. Their enemy and their own concerned citizens' pleas about the PNAC documents are futile since so many people, as history has shown us, would rather remain wilfully ignorant and be hessian slaves than to see and ackowledge the truth. Adolf Hitler, whose nazi propaganda files the US and UK raided after world war 2, called this concept the "Big Lie". Do you really doubt that criminals in the US government would intentionally destablize the entire world to usher in the bloodiest conflict we've ever known? It can be proven incontrovertibly.




In 1942, US Naval Intelligence drafted the McCollum Memo, an 8 step plan to provoke Japan into attacking the United States, a plan which culminated in the attack on Pearl Harbor. The evidence is now clear that elements of the US government did know the Japanese were planning to attack and intentionally thwarted the procedures which would have prevented others from finding out and preventing it. Sadly, that wasn't the only dirty trick they used to stir up US support for World War 2.

The Viet Nam war, which was responsible for approximately 2 million dead Viet Namese and 60 thousand US troops was also launched or at least widened to the quagmire it became, because of a lie, the Gulf of Tonkin incident which never occured.

Unbeknowest to most, the first Gulf War did not unfold quite as we were told. Saddam Hussein, product of the baathist coup the CIA supported, a man who purchased deadly chemical and biological ingredients from the US government and used them on his own citizens with little more than a brow-beating from the US, sought consultancy on their border dispute with Kuwait in 1990.

Iraq was decimated due to their devestating war with Iran, a war in which the US funded both sides of interestingly. Iraq was in a tough economic position as a result. They claimed Kuwait was drilling their oil on the border. That isn't to say it was true or that they were in the right for targeting Kuwait. However, US ambassador April Gillespie has since stated that then Secretary of State James Baker told her to emphasize the "instruction" to Iraq that "we do not have an opinion on your border dispute with Kuwait" and that " we don't deal with arab to arab affairs."

Given the fact that genocidal campaigns have occured all over the planet for decades with no US intervention, it's not far-fetched to believe that the US would turn the other cheek while their old friend Hussein took care of business. However taking into account Iraq's oil capacity, Hussien's move was ill-advised.

It's already a foregone conclusion in light of not only the skewed and in some cases outright fabricated intelligence of WMDs but a host of other lies told by the Bush II administration, that no obstacle of truth was going to get in their way of invading Iraq in 2003.




Likewise, it is also clear that the Hizbollah/IDF border provocation that sparked Israel's invasion of Lebanon in late July of 2006 was also contrived by the interests that own the Israeli war machine. It should have come as no surprise though. The propaganda trail leading to Lebanon was a mile long; Bush telling Syrian forces to pull out of Lebanon a year prior, then going further by suggesting they should pull their intelligence network out as well, followed by the CIA publicizing what they allege were the beginnings (general shit talking) of a bomb plot on a New York subway tunnel by a Lebanese man, interestingly just days before the Hizbollah/IDF border provocation.

What else could would you expect from the parties that support arming their enemies, their allies in the war on terror and their allies' sworn enemies? The only conclusion you can come to is that the dominant interests of this world have used their influence in both the Eastern and Western worlds for you to take part in so they can make money, kill you as a consequence and control those leftover who have built their modern world, those 500 million they can more efficiently control in the absence of the "useless eaters".


Chapter (8)
IDF in Lebanon, the Catalyst is Brewing


It is now clear that Israel invaded Lebanon as a precursor for events that will lead us and/or them into invading Syria and consequently Iran.

Not only is their motive for such a venture outlined in their own foreign policy documents just like the Pentagon's motive for 9/11 was outlined in their own documents, all indictators demonstrate that their goal was not to destroy Hizbollah but to spark a series of events that would make it appear socially acceptable to extend the war on multiple other fronts.




There was such a blatent disregard or rather high regard for civilian life and infrastructure as prime targets by Israeli intelligence in Lebanon, that many of their own pilots resisted orders to attack alleged Hizbollah targets. We heard reports of direct hits on ambulances and civilian occupied hospitals and the IDF agreeing to a cease-fire only to blow up the bridges they told civilians to leave on following the reignition of conflict only hours later.

Not only by their own admissions was the superior Israeli war-machine's ratio of civilian to military casualties much higher than Hizbollah's, it has even been reported by US and Israeli military analysts that they intentionally allowed pockets of Hizbollah to survive in order to use Hizbollah's consequent missile attacks on Israeli cities as propaganda to incite their population.

Shockingly, while Israel's propaganda machine was busy telling their people that they were losing the war due to their attempts at political correctness - being "too soft" - their own dominance in the US media and oversight by AIPAC and the ADL over that which they don't control, sat back and watched as an unprecedented amount of media attention was given to Israel's heavy-handed tactics in Lebanon, a body of reporting that was so lock-step as a whole that you would swear they were all issued the same talking-points.

Thus we can conclude through joint US and Israeli intelligence in the field of physical battle (Lebanon) and more importantly in the field of psychological warfare (the press), that Israel intended for the world to see the atrocities they so strategically committed with discrimination. The question is why.

Why would the US/Israeli alliance want the world to witness Israel's atrocties while at the same time denying them and absurdly painting the large body of them as the product of a superior Hizbollah propaganda effort aided by liberal tendecies in our own press?

Because whether or not you believe Israel committed the level of atrocities in Lebanon that is alleged, it is in the interest of the US/Israeli alliance to make you think that an upcoming false-flag terrorist attack which will be blamed on Islamic extremists - possibly even Hizbollah - was at least in part the result of Israel's strike on Lebanon and the US military support of that strike.

You might suggest the notion that the US/Israeli alliance drawing attention to themselves as creating the conditions responsible for an attack on their own interests is absurd. However, in the same manner that appearing incompetent on 9/11 caused the majority of people to disregard notions that the US Government was directly involved in the attacks, Israel's perceived incompetence with regard to the Lebanon invasion will also lend credence to the authenticity of another attack, even with that 1/3 of the American population who now believe that 9/11 was either an inside job or intentionally allowed to happen as a pretext for war with the arab world.

As a result of Israel's invasion of Lebanon and the reporting which followed, many will say something to the effect of this after the next 9/11 scale attack:

"Not everything has to be a conspiracy. After all. Israel was harsh in their invasion of Lebanon or at least the arab world thought so due to Hizbollah's propaganda. Still.. that doesn't justify their deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure. It is now clear due to Syria/Iran/Hizbollah's attack on the US/Israel/UK that we must rid the world of Islamic extremism. Hence, the war in Syria/Iran is necessary."

As a result of the Western intelligence apparatus and their ally Pakistan appearing to thwart several of the very terrorist plots their own agencies seeded to begin with in the past weeks and months, the stage is now set for an attack on the scale of 9/11, one which will look to be the sole work of Islamic extremists in the eyes of the world since the West and their allies have appeared to be interested in thwarting such attacks.

The world has been inundated with incessant media coverage by the Mockingbirds, agents involved in at least several hundreds of millions of dollars in fake news annually in the US alone though it could conceivably encompass hundreds of billions of dollars on an international scale if the operation is being funded by the 2.6 trillion dollars that disappeared from the Pentagon prior to 9/11.




It was reported that Armstrong Williams was paid 250,000 dollars to sell Bush's "No Child Left Behind" education policy prior to the 2004 election. With 2.6 trillion dollars, over 9 million Armstrong Williams could be bought.


Chapter (9)
The Eve of Uncertainty


Since historically, the nature of every major terrorist attack by Al Qaida has been reported in advance by the Western intelligence apparatus as a warning or even in propagandized in entertainment to reinforce the plausibility of it as a consequence, we can assume that the intelligence community's recent stark warnings, even those given to their own first-responders will again be accurate indicators.

If the catalyst for World War 3 is not staged to coincide with the August 22nd date that CIA and Mossad press outlets are scare-mongering will result in an attack by Iran - an attack which will no doubt result in the invasion and destruction of their nation since there is not a snowball's chance in hell that the military might of Iran, Syria and the arab world combined can fend off an attack by even little Israel alone - then the attack will likely either fall shortly after the 2006 mid-term (s)elections in November, the following spring or sometime before the 2008 elections, possibly even resulting in their suspension.

SCENARIOS:



[1] We can assume that the attack might somehow encompass aerospace or train transit which would match the Western intelligence apparatus's historical penchant for striking such targets, lend credence to the notion that the attacks were authentic due to previous attacks on plane and train transit widely believed to have been orchestrated by Islamic fundamentalists and deliver Western interests the perceived authority to control travel everywhere in the same manner Adolf Hitler's terroristic regime used their own false-flag events to demand papers at various checkpoints, especially mass transit.




[2] A massive scale attack on US/UK or Israeli interests, allegedly by Hizbollah and taken credit for by men on videotape claiming to be affiliated with the organization which will be followed by an assault on Syria by the West and/or Israel, aiming to tighten the noose on Iran to the extent that they will consequently see attacking the Western world as their best immediate option in the same manner the US Government intentionally provocateured Japan into attacking Pearl Harbor prior to their involvement in World War 2, as the McCollum memo clearly shows.

The strike could encompass government interests on the scale that even the executive branch is severly decimated, if not altogether decapitated, lending credence to the arguement that the attack was the work of Islamic fundamentalists and not the the government itself since the government surely wouldn't attack itself. In this event, the parties in the line of presidential succession or even the military who survive and seize authority as a consequence should be seen as prime suspects.




[3] An assault on US/UK or Israeli military forces in the region, allegedly by Iran or Syria in the same manner that the US claimed to have been attacked by the Viet Namese in the Gulf of Tonkin, extending the war in Vietnam which was responsible for the deaths of over 58,000 Americans and over a million Viet Namese, sparked by an incident that never happened.

Though Western interests will level the first blow, it's citizenry will likely believe the Iran/Syria axis was responsible for sparking the incident if the military skirmish is simulcast with a synchronized attack on civilian infrastructure, allegedly by Hizbollah or affiliated interests, explained in the first scenario.


METHODS OF ATTACK:

[1] Conventional explosives or shoulder-fired missiles on the targets described in the [1]st scenario above.

[2] Conventional explosives or shoulder-fired missiles on the targets described in the [2]nd scenario above with the option or addition of nuclear devices, even conventional devices with nuclear fallout, AKA "dirty bombs" since the US Government has been constantly war-gaming that scenario in military exercises for the past couple years just as they were war-gaming scenarios of planes flying into buildings in the weeks and months prior to 9/11.

[3] An attack on naval vessels by weapons that are generally seen as used or sold by Iran on the targets described in the [3]rd scenario above.


Chapter (10)
Conclusion


We've so far demonstrated how US, British and Israeli intelligence have colluded with other organizations to execute assassinations and other terrorist acts in order to advance political and financial agendas.

We've demonstrated that US and Pakistani intelligence were involved in the 9/11 attacks, using such tactics.

We've demonstrated that British intelligence was involved in the 7/7 London Bombings, also using such tactics.

We've demonstrated that the recent Heathrow Airport bomb plot was the product of British and Pakistani intelligence, again using such tactics.

We've demonstrated how the US and Israeli foreign policy agendas were strategically designed to destablize the world and initiate World War 3.

What we have not addressed is the entire body of evidence implicating US, Israeli and Pakistani intelligence involvement in 9/11 nor the entire body of evidence implicating British involvement in the 7/7 London Bombings and Spanish involvement in the 3/11 Madrid Bombings.

I avoided the larger picture of the intelligence community's full orchestration and involvement in 9/11 and post-9/11 terrorist attacks to more easily demonstrate how key players in the Heathrow bomb plot were the same players that had integral roles in 9/11 and the 7/7 attacks and just what that means for us going forward.

If you want to see the larger body of evidence implicating US, Israeli, British and Pakistani involvement in 9/11 and various other terrorist attacks using either witting or unwitting Al Qaida front-men, watch the following 5 documentary films at the bottom of this page.

Though some have been compelled to embrace the notion that Israel is entirely behind 9/11 due to their almost dual control of the US pentagon and documented involvement in 9/11, I strongly caution against embracing this alternative for a number of reasons.

I for one believe that 9/11 was conceived almost exclusively by joint US and Israeli interests for the same reasons those who believe Israel had a predominate role do. However I am at odds with them, since I do not believe the US players are mere lapdogs but in fact only cater to Israel's interests because in doing so, they cater to their own. Alot of money is to be made off of "defending Israel", especially through the military and oil contractors. Only the US and Israeli citizenry as well as the targets of their imperialism lose out in the end.

Though I believe that 9/11 was conceived and orchestrated by joint US and Israeli interests through the aid of Pakistanin intelligence, I feel that at least some of the alleged involvement of Israel is disinformation, the product of black-ops and psy-ops orchestrated by Israel to draw attention to their own mysterious (false) connections to 9/11, causing the public to embrace what may ultimately be exposed as false-leads and consequently damaging the 9/11 truth movement since it will be called a tool of anti-semitism by the same US and Israeli propaganda masters that will paint it as such.



TerrorStorm




Masters of Terror




911: Stranger than Fiction Part 1

911: Stranger than Fiction Part 2

911: Stranger than Fiction Part 3

911: Stranger than Fiction Part 4

911: Stranger than Fiction Part 5




Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime




Who Killed John O' Neill?




Loose Change 2nd Edition




Disbelief